Protected from people trying to force their beliefs on whomever. Unpopular opinions and beliefs are actually more important in a democracy.
Advertisement

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:31 am

by Farnhamia » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:38 am
Text People wrote:Zottistan wrote:I don't really follow US news and I sure as fuck don't follow US sports. He was banned from the NBA for racist comments, right?
Yes, he lost his team because of a personal conversation with a woman who was setting him up to take a fall.
He may be a person that I oculdn't stand if I met him, but he was railroaded.
He was banned outright without even using a racial slur.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:43 am
Farnhamia wrote:Text People wrote:Yes, he lost his team because of a personal conversation with a woman who was setting him up to take a fall.
He may be a person that I oculdn't stand if I met him, but he was railroaded.
He was banned outright without even using a racial slur.
Well, railroading is as railroading does. One could argue that he set himself up, given that a month previously Sterling's wife embarked on a lawsuit to recover from his "friend," V. Stiviano, "$1.8-million Los Angeles duplex as well as a Ferrari, two Bentleys, and a Range Rover she said her husband bought for Stiviano." When one's private life is being bruited about in the courts, this kind of thing happens and Sterling acted foolishly by even talking to Stiviano while the suit was going on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ste ... fetime_ban
by Zottistan » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:43 am

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:45 am
by Zottistan » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:46 am

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:50 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:51 am
Text People wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Well, railroading is as railroading does. One could argue that he set himself up, given that a month previously Sterling's wife embarked on a lawsuit to recover from his "friend," V. Stiviano, "$1.8-million Los Angeles duplex as well as a Ferrari, two Bentleys, and a Range Rover she said her husband bought for Stiviano." When one's private life is being bruited about in the courts, this kind of thing happens and Sterling acted foolishly by even talking to Stiviano while the suit was going on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Ste ... fetime_ban
Oh god, now we are almost talking about man vs. women/ feminism out of control.
Any person deserves to keep a business or home, etc, that has meaning to him and is part of his financial security.
She went outside the law.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Farnhamia » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:51 am
Text People wrote:Zottistan wrote:Personally destroying them by kicking them out of your organization, i.e. not associating with them?
I'm talking of more than Sterling.
I mean people who have to live under a glaring spotlight and have people with a certain mentality harass and abuse them.
Their lives can be made hell and they lose a big chunk of their lives because of it. Noone has that right.
by Zottistan » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:52 am
Text People wrote:Zottistan wrote:Personally destroying them by kicking them out of your organization, i.e. not associating with them?
I'm talking of more than Sterling.
I mean people who have to live under a glaring spotlight and have people with a certain mentality harass and abuse them.
Their lives can be made hell and they lose a big chunk of their lives because of it. Noone has that right.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:54 am
Farnhamia wrote:Text People wrote:I'm talking of more than Sterling.
I mean people who have to live under a glaring spotlight and have people with a certain mentality harass and abuse them.
Their lives can be made hell and they lose a big chunk of their lives because of it. Noone has that right.
No one forced Mr. Sterling to say the things he said on the recording. When one lives in under a glaring spotlight, one ought to be a little circumspect.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:55 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:56 am
Zottistan wrote:Text People wrote:I'm talking of more than Sterling.
I mean people who have to live under a glaring spotlight and have people with a certain mentality harass and abuse them.
Their lives can be made hell and they lose a big chunk of their lives because of it. Noone has that right.
Actually, legally, you have as much right to criticism somebody as they have to criticize you, and you have a stronger right to not associate with them than they have to associate with you.
by Zottistan » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:56 am
by Zottistan » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:57 am
Text People wrote:Zottistan wrote:
Actually, legally, you have as much right to criticism somebody as they have to criticize you, and you have a stronger right to not associate with them than they have to associate with you.
Uh, no, I don't, neither do you.
There is little freedom of association any longer...

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:58 am

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:59 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:00 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:00 am

by Farnhamia » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:02 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:03 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:05 am
Farnhamia wrote:
In his home, talking (on the phone, I think) to a woman, his mistress, basically, who was being sued by his wife and who had told him she would get even with him. Just talking to her was stupid, let alone bitching at her about associating with black people.

by Text People » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:06 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:06 am
Text People wrote:Farnhamia wrote:In his home, talking (on the phone, I think) to a woman, his mistress, basically, who was being sued by his wife and who had told him she would get even with him. Just talking to her was stupid, let alone bitching at her about associating with black people.
In my state, it's illegal to record anyone on a phone.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:06 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Eurocom, Herador, Libertia-Columbia, Rary, Umeria, Valyxias, Wolfram and Hart, Xind
Advertisement