NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion: human right?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is abortion a right?

abortion is not a right any time.
218
19%
in case of rape and/or if the woman's life is threatened.
283
24%
yes, up until a certain point in the fetus's development.
356
30%
yes, any time while the fetus is still in her body.
257
22%
.
23
2%
I don't care, leave me alone. lol
40
3%
 
Total votes : 1177

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:00 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Holy Midas's gold scrotum. That's indeed insane. :blink:


Remember 4-sided Triangles? He went through a period of arguing that all sex was rape. Fortunately someone managed to talk him out of it.

I drink to forget.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:03 am

Sun Wukong wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Remember 4-sided Triangles? He went through a period of arguing that all sex was rape. Fortunately someone managed to talk him out of it.

I drink to forget.

NSG is going to be the reason I become a heroin addict in 4 years, give or take.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:04 am

Sun Wukong wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Remember 4-sided Triangles? He went through a period of arguing that all sex was rape. Fortunately someone managed to talk him out of it.

I drink to forget.


Yes, his gender issue threads could be traumatizing.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:05 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:I drink to forget.

NSG is going to be the reason I become a heroin addict in 4 years, give or take.


I'm sure some of the idiots are teenagers who will eventually outgrow the worst of their idiotic views.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:16 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Holy Midas's gold scrotum. That's indeed insane. :blink:


Remember 4-sided Triangles? He went through a period of arguing that all sex was rape. Fortunately someone managed to talk him out of it.


Yes, I do recall FST. Such craziness. For a time I thought he was just trolling, tbh.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:19 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Remember 4-sided Triangles? He went through a period of arguing that all sex was rape. Fortunately someone managed to talk him out of it.


Yes, I do recall FST. Such craziness. For a time I thought he was just trolling, tbh.


Nah, he was serious. He was very confused about everything to do with sexuality.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
T Roosevelt
Diplomat
 
Posts: 513
Founded: Oct 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby T Roosevelt » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:27 am

New Charleson wrote:Rape and incest only.
Other than that, no.

I don't think that's in whole fair to the child or the mother. The problems that come with abortion like complications and depression don't adequately make life good for either.
Economic Left/Right: 4.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 9.08

Click here and be a Rough Rider.

[My ideal wife]

[JOIN THE GOP]

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:37 am

T Roosevelt wrote:
New Charleson wrote:Rape and incest only.
Other than that, no.

I don't think that's in whole fair to the child or the mother. The problems that come with abortion like complications and depression don't adequately make life good for either.

Postpartum depression occurs whether you have an abortion or carry to term. Complications with abortion are fewer then complications associated with childbirth.

You make a wonderful argument for abortion.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:41 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Yes, I do recall FST. Such craziness. For a time I thought he was just trolling, tbh.


Nah, he was serious. He was very confused about everything to do with sexuality.


I was going to say that I tend not to take what some posters say at face value and then I remembered that yes, some people do hold very strange ideas out of confusion or plain ignorance. So you're right. It is perfectly possible that FST was just so confused he bought into some radical feminist ideas that, frankly, IMO, hurt the movement rather than help it.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nazi Flower Power
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21292
Founded: Jun 24, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Nazi Flower Power » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:45 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nah, he was serious. He was very confused about everything to do with sexuality.


I was going to say that I tend not to take what some posters say at face value and then I remembered that yes, some people do hold very strange ideas out of confusion or plain ignorance. So you're right. It is perfectly possible that FST was just so confused he bought into some radical feminist ideas that, frankly, IMO, hurt the movement rather than help it.


I don't think he would have let people talk him out of it if he was just trolling.
The Serene and Glorious Reich of Nazi Flower Power has existed for longer than Nazi Germany! Thank you to all the brave men and women of the Allied forces who made this possible!

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Oct 07, 2014 12:56 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
I was going to say that I tend not to take what some posters say at face value and then I remembered that yes, some people do hold very strange ideas out of confusion or plain ignorance. So you're right. It is perfectly possible that FST was just so confused he bought into some radical feminist ideas that, frankly, IMO, hurt the movement rather than help it.


I don't think he would have let people talk him out of it if he was just trolling.


Probably not. I stopped paying attention to the angst-full mass of what the fuck his posts became in the end. But yes, it's possible that he wasn't trolling and genuinely believed the manure about all sex being rape he was reading from those sites.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:44 am

Pragia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Yes, just like the female body during their period.

A gamete can't gain those properties, an embryo/zygote/fetus/blastocyst can.

It's a good thing that I'm talking about all of those things (except for fetus), then. You don't know much about reproduction, do you?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Republic of Coldwater
Senator
 
Posts: 4500
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Coldwater » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:49 am

Why is the termination of a human being's life ever a human right. Some may argue, using little technicalities that the child is not "alive". However, that is not the issue at hand, the issue is that an organism which would eventually develop into a human was intentionally stopped from such development by being aborted. That is just as bad as murder, as in murder, you are willingly ending an innocent life.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:54 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:Why is the termination of a human being's life ever a human right. Some may argue, using little technicalities that the child is not "alive". However, that is not the issue at hand, the issue is that an organism which would eventually develop into a human was intentionally stopped from such development by being aborted. That is just as bad as murder, as in murder, you are willingly ending an innocent life.

Murder is bad because you're killing an innocent person.

If abortion is as bad as murder, then I hope you don't get infected by a parasitic worm, or else killing it would be the same as murder.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:55 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:Why is the termination of a human being's life ever a human right. Some may argue, using little technicalities that the child is not "alive". However, that is not the issue at hand, the issue is that an organism which would eventually develop into a human was intentionally stopped from such development by being aborted. That is just as bad as murder, as in murder, you are willingly ending an innocent life.


It might eventually develop into a child, miscarriage is actually relatively common. More then that the future of said bundle of cells is irrelevant, as the woman's bodily sovereignty takes precedence. Also read the OP about the definition of murder. It is not as bad as murder, anymore then removing a tumor or parasite, engaging in plastic surgery, refusing to donate one's organs, etc.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
The Union of Tentacles and Grapes
Diplomat
 
Posts: 787
Founded: Sep 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Union of Tentacles and Grapes » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:57 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:Why is the termination of a human being's life ever a human right. Some may argue, using little technicalities that the child is not "alive". However, that is not the issue at hand, the issue is that an organism which would eventually develop into a human was intentionally stopped from such development by being aborted. That is just as bad as murder, as in murder, you are willingly ending an innocent life.

1. Individuals cannot be compelled to provide any part of their body for use by any others for any reason under any circumstances
2. Making abortion illegal places a compulsion upon women that renders their reproductive system public property and refuses all their rights as to its use
3. Such a compulsion is against the most basic of human rights, and is therefore immoral to the deepest and most extreme extent

If you reject this argument, you would also have to accept that everyone is required to be an organ donor, donate blood at least monthly, and that all citizens are required to provide for the fuffillment of all other's needs, regardless of any circumstances. If anyone in your nation dies of cold, thirst, hunger, or exposure, you should think yourself a murderer for failing to provide for their needs. You are not being logical.
Last edited by The Union of Tentacles and Grapes on Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:58 am

T Roosevelt wrote:Artificially keeping families small inevitably involves prenatal infanticide and abortion- with all its pandering to self-indulgence, its shrinking of duties, and its enervation of character. Abortion is plain wrong.

Casual, thoughtless, uncaring abortion practices are dead wrong. Having an abortion because pregnancy is "oh such an inconveniece" and "I can't be bothered with a child because of my career" is an attitude that's going around these days.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:00 am

Text People wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:Artificially keeping families small inevitably involves prenatal infanticide and abortion- with all its pandering to self-indulgence, its shrinking of duties, and its enervation of character. Abortion is plain wrong.

Casual, thoughtless, uncaring abortion practices are dead wrong. Having an abortion because pregnancy is "oh such an inconveniece" and "I can't be bothered with a child because of my career" is an attitude that's going around these days.


So? A woman's reason for having an abortion is none of your business. You are aware how important a career is, right? I mean it's not like personal economics matter, right?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:02 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:NSG is going to be the reason I become a heroin addict in 4 years, give or take.


I'm sure some of the idiots are teenagers who will eventually outgrow the worst of their idiotic views.

4-sided triangle wasn't a teenager though...
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Text People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 610
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Text People » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:04 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Text People wrote:Casual, thoughtless, uncaring abortion practices are dead wrong. Having an abortion because pregnancy is "oh such an inconveniece" and "I can't be bothered with a child because of my career" is an attitude that's going around these days.


So? A woman's reason for having an abortion is none of your business. You are aware how important a career is, right? I mean it's not like personal economics matter, right?

If they can't handle the possibility of becoming pregnant and they don't seem to understand birth control, or, better yet, getting 'fixed' permanently, they have no right to use abortion as a severe form of birth control.

They can keep their legs crossed until they are mature enough to handle unpredictability and unintended consequences.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:04 am

Text People wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:Artificially keeping families small inevitably involves prenatal infanticide and abortion- with all its pandering to self-indulgence, its shrinking of duties, and its enervation of character. Abortion is plain wrong.

Casual, thoughtless, uncaring abortion practices are dead wrong. Having an abortion because pregnancy is "oh such an inconveniece" and "I can't be bothered with a child because of my career" is an attitude that's going around these days.

No it's not. Just because you THINK women are all dirty evil sluts doesn't mean they actually are.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72174
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:05 am

T Roosevelt wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Potential does not equate actually being a person. An acorn is a potential tree, but not an actual tree.

And why is potential suddenly more important than the actual person, in this case, the woman and what she desires? Why is the fetus more important than the person gestating it?



Galloism wrote:Tell you what bugs me about the "potential" argument.

All of you are mortal. From my perspective, as something close to immortal, you are all one foot in the grave and potentially dead. You don't see me walking around with a shovel burying mortals still alive because of being potentially dead do you?

What matters is the here and now. I've been joking on it, but my sperm is potentially a person - it just has to find an egg at the right time. Hell, if you get right down to it, some part of that chicken I had earlier is potentially a person, because it will likely be used as a building block to produce sperm. That makes the chicken potentially a person when we kill it. Which makes chicken feed potentially people.

Potential means jack shit. Every atom on the surface of the earth has potential to become part of a person.


Personhood is the merest reference for a human being. The fetus is not more important than the woman. The renewal of life is more important than whims of the moment. Living forever isn't how we're intended to survive. Children arrange for us to survive in another way. You see, life is a torch that is passed on through every person. A torch that you're not supposed to carry forever. It's pleasing to God to carry on the process of life through different individuals than the same because life is renewed through every child. That is why forever is more important than the here and now.

I could repeat this, verbatim, in a "should we force women to remain perpetually pregnant" thread.

There's nothing differentiating this argument and one that every unfertilized egg is a potential human life wasted. They're both equally bankrupt from a legal and societal standpoint.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:05 am

Text People wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
So? A woman's reason for having an abortion is none of your business. You are aware how important a career is, right? I mean it's not like personal economics matter, right?

If they can't handle the possibility of becoming pregnant and they don't seem to understand birth control, or, better yet, getting 'fixed' permanently, they have no right to use abortion as a severe form of birth control.

They can keep their legs crossed until they are mature enough to handle unpredictability and unintended consequences.

Abortion is not nor can it be birth control. Birth control is used to prevent pregnancies. Abortion terminates them.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:05 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:Why is the termination of a human being's life ever a human right. Some may argue, using little technicalities that the child is not "alive". However, that is not the issue at hand, the issue is that an organism which would eventually develop into a human was intentionally stopped from such development by being aborted. That is just as bad as murder, as in murder, you are willingly ending an innocent life.

Wrong.
A Cell that will eventually make it a human does not protect it, nor is that the definition of what abortion is meant for at times, or the process of a cell. This has been discussed before where future developers do not prevent it from being aborted.
The process discussed here why it isn't a person until Week 12:

Furry Alairia and Algeria wrote:
Wanderjar wrote:
I see, so force a woman to carry the results of someone who forced themselves on her, forcing her to know everyday she was raped and must now deal with the medical issues all pregnancies bring...brilliant. You just made pregnancy worse then a punishment.

No:

Sperm-/->Baby

Sperms are the cells that are the double in creating a baby, so actually, it is required to have sperm or a reproductive cell.

Sperm+Ovum-->Zygote-->Fetus (What you're killing)-->Baby

Wrong:
Sperm + Ovum = Zygote{The beginning cell, Not a human, it is still in cell form, lasts up to week 8} = Embryo{Starts at week 8, Ends at Week 12} = Fetus{The baby}

Zygote is the cell, Embryo is the formed body of many cells reproducing, and neither can be considered human due to the fact that a embryo is till developing into the stage of growth, and Zygotes are simple cells.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

User avatar
Furry Alairia and Algeria
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21009
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Furry Alairia and Algeria » Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:07 am

Text People wrote:
T Roosevelt wrote:Artificially keeping families small inevitably involves prenatal infanticide and abortion- with all its pandering to self-indulgence, its shrinking of duties, and its enervation of character. Abortion is plain wrong.

Casual, thoughtless, uncaring abortion practices are dead wrong. Having an abortion because pregnancy is "oh such an inconveniece" and "I can't be bothered with a child because of my career" is an attitude that's going around these days.

Are you ignoring every point that was ever made. If it is a abortion, it is most likely for a good reason of death threatening the mother or rape. We've been over this. WE'VE BEEN THROUGH IT.
In memory of Dyakovo - may he never be forgotten - Дьяковожс ученик


I do not reply to telegrams, unless you are someone I know.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Neo-American States, Vassenor, Vyahrapura

Advertisement

Remove ads