NATION

PASSWORD

Old Man Kills Intruder

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:03 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
People just love Grand Theft Auto wet dreams where they can shoot anyone they want and not face consequences for it.


I call Strawman

It's Gauth. Does this even surprise you?
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:03 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
People just love Grand Theft Auto wet dreams where they can shoot anyone they want and not face consequences for it.


I call Strawman


I call not being a lawyer in any sense of the word. But, hey, who's counting?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:03 pm

Viritica wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:Self-defense requires imminence. There must be a clear and present danger to your life. And it must be reasonable. In California, an objective reasonable person standard is employed for self-defense.

When the assailants flee, the imminent danger is over and your right to use deadly force ends. And when you leave your home, the place of safety, and give chase and kill someone, that's murder.

Stop defending murderers. Quit being pro-criminal.

This is Castle Doctrine we're talking about here. They were on his property and he'd been robbed four times before. They'd just got done beating him and who's to say they wouldn't return? It's reasonable to say he would think they'd harm him again the future.

Stop trying to re-victimize this man.


I agree.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:04 pm

Viritica wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:Self-defense requires imminence. There must be a clear and present danger to your life. And it must be reasonable. In California, an objective reasonable person standard is employed for self-defense.

When the assailants flee, the imminent danger is over and your right to use deadly force ends. And when you leave your home, the place of safety, and give chase and kill someone, that's murder.

Stop defending murderers. Quit being pro-criminal.

This is Castle Doctrine we're talking about here. They were on his property and he'd been robbed four times before. They'd just got done beating him and who's to say they wouldn't return? It's reasonable to say he would think they'd harm him again the future.

Stop trying to re-victimize this man.


Was the shot woman on his property?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:05 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Viritica wrote:This is Castle Doctrine we're talking about here. They were on his property and he'd been robbed four times before. They'd just got done beating him and who's to say they wouldn't return? It's reasonable to say he would think they'd harm him again the future.

Stop trying to re-victimize this man.


Was the shot woman on his property?


Property extends to line of sight, silly.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:06 pm

Trotskylvania wrote:
Viritica wrote:They'd just got done beating him. And he'd been robbed four times before. I think it's safe to say he felt threatened.

Self-defense requires imminence. There must be a clear and present danger to your life. And it must be reasonable. In California, an objective reasonable person standard is employed for self-defense.

When the assailants flee, the imminent danger is over and your right to use deadly force ends. And when you leave your home, the place of safety, and give chase and kill someone, that's murder.

Stop defending murderers. Quit being pro-criminal.


Ultimately you're right, but I wouldn't call it being pro-criminal. Right and wrong isn't that cut and dry. The old guy's position is regrettable but sympathetic. Heat of the moment and all that. We're splitting the hairs of his actions well after the fact. 80 years of being an upstanding citizen, he deserves leniency.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:06 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Was the shot woman on his property?


Property extends to line of sight, silly.

Pretty sure you mean line of fire.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:06 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Viritica wrote:This is Castle Doctrine we're talking about here. They were on his property and he'd been robbed four times before. They'd just got done beating him and who's to say they wouldn't return? It's reasonable to say he would think they'd harm him again the future.

Stop trying to re-victimize this man.


Was the shot woman on his property?

Her dead body wasn't, but the shot was fired while she was running towards the garage.
Despite his injuries, Greer managed to grab his gun and fire at the suspects, causing them to flee through the garage and into the alley, police said.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:07 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Was the shot woman on his property?

Her dead body wasn't, but the shot was fired while she was running towards the garage.
Despite his injuries, Greer managed to grab his gun and fire at the suspects, causing them to flee through the garage and into the alley, police said.

No. That was the first shot. Two more were fired in the alley.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:08 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Was the shot woman on his property?

Her dead body wasn't, but the shot was fired while she was running towards the garage.
Despite his injuries, Greer managed to grab his gun and fire at the suspects, causing them to flee through the garage and into the alley, police said.


You might want to read that again....

User avatar
Tarsonis Survivors
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15693
Founded: Feb 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Tarsonis Survivors » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:08 pm

Trotskylvania wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Actually, considering the unlikelihood/absence of premeditation (getting beaten and robbed from likely to result in a good deal of passion, not inviting planning of much of anything) and mens rea beyond 'they were just beating me!', first degree is pretty much out the window.

No. Having the presence of mind to retrieve a pistol, and then give chase when they flee is proof of malice aforethought. The act of leaving the place of safety and giving chase is proof of premeditation.

This not a matter of heat of passion. Heat of passion is an affirmative, impartial defense. It'll bring you down to involuntary manslaughter at best, and it's very difficult to prove, and this man shows none of the signs. Heat of passion means the defendant can at best hazily recollect what actually happened. They're scattered, and usually horrified by what they did. This person in the interview showed himself to be completely lucid during the events, and incriminated himself. He acknowledged her pleas for her life and openly stated that he consciously disregarded them.

This is a textbook case, and the poor devil wasn't smart enough to lawyer up before he shot his mouth off to the media.



Negative, premeditation does not include decisions made during the act, requires prior planning before the act. Him retrieving his weapon and chasing those who just assaulted him doesn't fit the definition of premeditation.

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:09 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Viritica wrote:This is Castle Doctrine we're talking about here. They were on his property and he'd been robbed four times before. They'd just got done beating him and who's to say they wouldn't return? It's reasonable to say he would think they'd harm him again the future.

Stop trying to re-victimize this man.


Was the shot woman on his property?

Pretty sure she was.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Ratateague
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1577
Founded: Dec 25, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Ratateague » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:09 pm

New acardia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Do you get paid a dollar or something every-time you call a woman a bitch?

I call then as I see them and her actions say thug bitch .

That's really not a good habit to get into. By continually addressing someone in a demeaning way, you legitimize the same form of honorific to be returned to yourself. Plus, people might think less of you. Also not very sporty to speak ill of the dead. Y'know.
Last edited by Ratateague on Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Society prepares the crime, the criminal commits it. -Henry Thomas Buckle
When money speaks, the truth is silent. -Russian Proverb
'|

User avatar
New Acardia
Minister
 
Posts: 3275
Founded: Aug 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Acardia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:09 pm

Scomagia wrote:
New acardia wrote:They beat him .
In fact there should be a law any one who is killed while commenting a violent crime that's your tough luck .
Also the thug bitch would still be alive if she did not break in to Mr. Geer's house and beat him .

Do you get paid a dollar or something every-time you call a woman a bitch?

I call then as I see them and her actions say thug bitch .
Quotes
Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.
Faith with out works is a dead faith
Evil wins when Good does nothing
My Factbook
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian
I am a Tea Party Conservative
I am a American National Unionist
I am a Liberal Conservative

User avatar
New Acardia
Minister
 
Posts: 3275
Founded: Aug 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Acardia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:10 pm

Scomagia wrote:
New acardia wrote:Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.

Defending himself by shooting people who posed no immediate danger?

They beat him .
In fact there should be a law any one who is killed while commenting a violent crime that's your tough luck .
Also the thug bitch would still be alive if she did not break in to Mr. Geer's house and beat him .
Quotes
Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.
Faith with out works is a dead faith
Evil wins when Good does nothing
My Factbook
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian
I am a Tea Party Conservative
I am a American National Unionist
I am a Liberal Conservative

User avatar
New Acardia
Minister
 
Posts: 3275
Founded: Aug 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Acardia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:10 pm

Scomagia wrote:
New acardia wrote:Any DA who brings this to trial should be labeled pro criminal.

Pro criminal because they're prosecuting someone for committing a crime?

Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.
Quotes
Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.
Faith with out works is a dead faith
Evil wins when Good does nothing
My Factbook
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian
I am a Tea Party Conservative
I am a American National Unionist
I am a Liberal Conservative

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:10 pm

Viritica wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Was the shot woman on his property?

Pretty sure she was.


Based on what? Did he own the alley?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:11 pm

New acardia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Pro criminal because they're prosecuting someone for committing a crime?

Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.


Don't forget to give an award to George Zimmerman while you're at it.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:11 pm

New acardia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Pro criminal because they're prosecuting someone for committing a crime?

Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.

The law doesn't work that way.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
New Acardia
Minister
 
Posts: 3275
Founded: Aug 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Acardia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:12 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
New acardia wrote:If the thug bitch did not break in to Mr. Greer's house.
The thug bitch would not got her thug ass killed in the first plac.


Andrea Miller. That's the name of the dead person.

And you're right, if she hadn't broken into the place then she would probably be alive. But the question is whether Mr. Greer killed her legally. I don't believe that he did.

To me she is just a thug bitch . That prayed on the wrong person and got her thug ass taken out .
Quotes
Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.
Faith with out works is a dead faith
Evil wins when Good does nothing
My Factbook
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian
I am a Tea Party Conservative
I am a American National Unionist
I am a Liberal Conservative

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:12 pm

Gauthier wrote:
New acardia wrote:Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.


Don't forget to give an award to George Zimmerman while you're at it.

He was already acquitted.

So...
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:12 pm

New acardia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Pro criminal because they're prosecuting someone for committing a crime?

Pro criminal for prosecuting some one who defending himself . If anything Mr Greer should get a .award for community service.


It's an award. AN AWARD.

You're welcome.

User avatar
New Acardia
Minister
 
Posts: 3275
Founded: Aug 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Acardia » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:12 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
New acardia wrote:Let's not make this thug bitch in to a victim .
In case people forgot she broke in to a 80 year old man's house and withl the other thug she was with gave him a beating . So the bitch got her thug ass killed .to that I say DSAF .

Andrea Miller is dead. Ton Greer is not. Seems to me like he came out of the altercation better off.

If the thug bitch did not break in to Mr. Greer's house.
The thug bitch would not got her thug ass killed in the first plac.
Quotes
Those who stand for nothing fall for everything.
Faith with out works is a dead faith
Evil wins when Good does nothing
My Factbook
I am an Eastern Orthodox Christian
I am a Tea Party Conservative
I am a American National Unionist
I am a Liberal Conservative

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:13 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Viritica wrote:Pretty sure she was.


Based on what? Did he own the alley?

It might have been inside his property.
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41256
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:13 pm

New acardia wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Andrea Miller. That's the name of the dead person.

And you're right, if she hadn't broken into the place then she would probably be alive. But the question is whether Mr. Greer killed her legally. I don't believe that he did.

To me she is just a thug bitch . That prayed on the wrong person and got her thug ass taken out .


Preyed. Preyed on the wrong person.

You're welcome.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Astoria-, Abserdia, Alvecia, Amenson, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Grand matrix of Dues ex machina, Incelastan, Southeast Iraq, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads