Canada Should Get Nuclear Weapons

[Imperializt Russia]

Almost everyone should, with the exception of North Korea.

Too late.

[Rephesus]

NO! NEVER THERE IS NO WAY CANADA IS GETTING NUKES!!!! IT"S NEVER HAPPENING!!! THE USA WOULD NEVER ALLOW IT!!!! EVER!!!

Instead of Canada I think South Korea or Japan should get some nukes

Still NO.

NO.

How about instead of all-Caps posting "NO!!!1!1!11" you add something constructive to the discussion? Like a reason?

[Rhine-East Berlin]

Canada already has nuclear weapons.

[Ifreann]

Canada already has nuclear weapons.

Do they?

[The 93rd Coalition]

No, we can do without more missiles filled with pure, unrefined evil. Although Canada should build up its conventional forces, at least a little.

[Ifreann]

No, we can do without more missiles filled with pure, unrefined evil. Although Canada should build up its conventional forces, at least a little.

I don't think you understand how nuclear weapons work.

[The 93rd Coalition]

No, we can do without more missiles filled with pure, unrefined evil. Although Canada should build up its conventional forces, at least a little.

I don't think you understand how nuclear weapons work.

I was using a metaphor.

[The Predator Federation]

Canada has a no nuclear policy

[Antarticaria]

Why would we invade Canada there's absolutely NO logical reasoning behind it. They are so close in the same proximity that they do not have any resources that we dont.

[Antarticaria]

Canada already has nuclear weapons.

Do they?

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

[The 93rd Coalition]

Why would we invade Canada there's absolutely NO logical reasoning behind it. They are so close in the same proximity that they do not have any resources that we dont.

But Canada has more. So by the logic of some, to get more of what we have, we invade others who have more of what we have to get more of what we have.

Wrap your head around that.

[Wind in the Willows]

Do they?

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

Good.

[Ifreann]

I don't think you understand how nuclear weapons work.

I was using a metaphor.

It's a bad metaphor.

[The 93rd Coalition]

I was using a metaphor.

It's a bad metaphor.

It served its purpose, didn't it?

[The Pacifican Islands]

As a Canadian, Canada actually has technology to make nukes since 1966!

[Great Hyruke]

Do they?

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

No he is right. Canada has nukes. In their own country.

[Ifreann]

Do they?

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

Being on good terms with a country that has nuclear weapons isn't really the same as having nuclear weapons yourself.

---

It's a bad metaphor.

It served its purpose, didn't it?

No, because nukes aren't evil.

[Zachsland]

http://nwp.ilpi.org/wp-content/uploads/ ... embers.png

They have already agreed to never building any and claim to not own any

[The 93rd Coalition]

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

Being on good terms with a country that has nuclear weapons isn't really the same as having nuclear weapons yourself.

---

It served its purpose, didn't it?

No, because nukes aren't evil.

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

[Ifreann]

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

No he is right. Canada has nukes. In their own country.

As funny as it would be for the OP to be saying that Canada needs to get something it already has, something being funny doesn't mean it's true.

---

Being on good terms with a country that has nuclear weapons isn't really the same as having nuclear weapons yourself.

---

No, because nukes aren't evil.

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

"Can be"? That's rather different from "Is".

[Imperializt Russia]

Yes they are all south of their border and ready to go at their command should they need help.

No he is right. Canada has nukes. In their own country.

Not since 1984.

[Antarticaria]

Being on good terms with a country that has nuclear weapons isn't really the same as having nuclear weapons yourself.

---

No, because nukes aren't evil.

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."

[The Pacifican Islands]

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

"I am become death, the destroyer of worlds."

"YOU YOU ARE THE DESTROYER OF WORLDS!!!!! YOU!!!!!"

-Davros

[The 93rd Coalition]

No he is right. Canada has nukes. In their own country.

As funny as it would be for the OP to be saying that Canada needs to get something it already has, something being funny doesn't mean it's true.

---

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

"Can be"? That's rather different from "Is".

But they almost always are.

[Imperializt Russia]

Being on good terms with a country that has nuclear weapons isn't really the same as having nuclear weapons yourself.

---

No, because nukes aren't evil.

A device that kills thousands of people in the blink of an eye and millions, painfully over the course of a few years can, in the wrong hands, be evil indeed.

It's literally just a bigger bomb.

Nuclear weapons deserve and require respect and safeguarding.
But they are not deserving of a lot of the boogeymanning they receive.

This is not to say that I wish nuclear assault upon anyone - in broadly the same reasoning I do not wish conventional or chemical shelling upon anyone.
These systems hold their place as tools of warfare, however.