Khorsun wrote:Sea Shepard should be harpooned. The Japanese can say they mistook them for a whale.
A noisy, smelly whale with lasers for eyes. Which obviously, would demand urgent scientific investigation.
Advertisement
by Mean Feat » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:26 pm
Khorsun wrote:Sea Shepard should be harpooned. The Japanese can say they mistook them for a whale.
Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.
Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.
by New Ziedrich » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:27 pm
by Mean Feat » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:35 pm
Mean Feat wrote:The Latham of the Liberals. Tony Abbott.
Tanya Plibersek Mon 22 Feb 2010 wrote:"Tony is the 'Mark Latham' of the Liberal Party.
by Khorsun » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:29 am
by NERVUN » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:19 am
by New Ziedrich » Thu Dec 31, 2009 1:20 am
by The Scandinvans » Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:43 am
It is an offensive term because of the fact of the connotations that it has with World War 2 propaganda.Jap, is it an offensive term?
by Greed and Death » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:47 am
The Scandinvans wrote:It is an offensive term because of the fact of the connotations that it has with World War 2 propaganda.Jap, is it an offensive term?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_p ... rld_War_II
by Traxa » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:32 am
by Ifreann » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:34 am
by Traxa » Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:38 am
by Fartsniffage » Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:30 am
Ifreann wrote:If whales had laser eyes the Japanese would stop hunting them in short order.
by Yootopia » Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:03 am
The Scandinvans wrote:Jap, is it an offensive term?
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:31 pm
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by James_xenoland » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:19 pm
Greens senator Bob Brown yesterday lashed out at the Federal Government for not doing more to protect the Sea Shepherd crews.
"I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it."
Rikese wrote:From a 14 year old saying that children should vote, to a wankfest about whether or not God exists. Good job, you have all achieved new benchmarks in stupidity.
by F1-Insanity » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:26 pm
James_xenoland wrote:I hope the SS ships sink... : |Greens senator Bob Brown yesterday lashed out at the Federal Government for not doing more to protect the Sea Shepherd crews.
ROFLMAO! x100
...........sad.
by New Manvir » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:46 pm
Lord-General Drache wrote:While I do agree with the antiwhaling lads, I disagree with their methods. Though I doubt I'd be too torn up if the whaling ship sank.
On another note, Batman is gonna be PISSED to find some animal loving treehuggers stole his boat. Goddamn, that thing looks cool.
by Traxa » Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:50 pm
by Linker Niederrhein » Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:19 pm
Tahar Joblis wrote:Two things. One, whale-hunting techniques are cruel. Two, whales are smart as fuck.
by Andaluciae » Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:30 pm
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by Greed and Death » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:01 pm
Andaluciae wrote:If said ship is actually stealthy, then it is a genuine menace to oceangoing traffic. Added to the fact that it's painted black, and has a broken profile, I would say it's a hazard to navigation. It ought to be impounded by a signatory maritime force in order to reduce the navigation hazard, and should be held until the "Sea Shepherd" organization rectifies this problem.
by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:06 pm
greed and death wrote:Andaluciae wrote:If said ship is actually stealthy, then it is a genuine menace to oceangoing traffic. Added to the fact that it's painted black, and has a broken profile, I would say it's a hazard to navigation. It ought to be impounded by a signatory maritime force in order to reduce the navigation hazard, and should be held until the "Sea Shepherd" organization rectifies this problem.
Using your 2 million dollar stealth vessel to block harpoons sounds like it is a good way to get your vessel harpooned.
After all the Japanese can always say they didn't see the boat between the whale and their harpoon gun.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.
by Greed and Death » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:08 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:greed and death wrote:Andaluciae wrote:If said ship is actually stealthy, then it is a genuine menace to oceangoing traffic. Added to the fact that it's painted black, and has a broken profile, I would say it's a hazard to navigation. It ought to be impounded by a signatory maritime force in order to reduce the navigation hazard, and should be held until the "Sea Shepherd" organization rectifies this problem.
Using your 2 million dollar stealth vessel to block harpoons sounds like it is a good way to get your vessel harpooned.
After all the Japanese can always say they didn't see the boat between the whale and their harpoon gun.
Why say anything at all?
I mean, freak accidents do happen...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bogestan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Hirota, Likhinia, Singaporen Empire, Terra Magnifica Gloria, Tiami
Advertisement