Slavija Slovenska wrote:
Still considered shit beer compared to what Germany, Belgium, and England produce. Oh and can't forget Ireland. Irelands hard liquor same as Scotland's
280 people died and you are talking about beer.
Americans
Advertisement

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:01 pm
Slavija Slovenska wrote:
Still considered shit beer compared to what Germany, Belgium, and England produce. Oh and can't forget Ireland. Irelands hard liquor same as Scotland's

by Slavija Slovenska » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:01 pm
Napkiraly wrote:Slavija Slovenska wrote:See thats okay…but if you specifically made a joke about the person or persons being hung then its not okay.
"Murderer James French has been attributed with famous last words before his death by electric chair: "How's this for a headline? 'French Fries'."
See, once again, depends.

by Slavija Slovenska » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:02 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:02 pm
The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:American football terminology. A "hail mary" pass is a long-distance throw down the field with a low chance of success. The idea here being that the rebels (in my personal speculation on the matter,) want to force Putin to support them.
There were Americans on that plane too. So cut the appeal to emotion, because I'm angry over it too. I just don't think that jumping to conclusions before being in possession of all the facts in a situation like this is a terribly brilliant idea.
At the end of the day, whoever shot down this plane, was an ill experienced force with an advanced air defence system, now there are only two options as a result of the geopolitical landscape of the area, either the Russians shot it down or PRO-RUSSIAN, RUSSIAN SPEAKING TERRORISTS shot it down. Now, no international independent investigation team can enter the area because the last time an international team went inside a Pro-Russian held territory of Ukraine, it didn't go well...

by Napkiraly » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:02 pm

by Empire of Symphonia » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:03 pm


by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:03 pm

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:04 pm

by Slavija Slovenska » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:05 pm
Piggywas for you. So you want to get back on topic porkins? We can start by shutting up about what was 2 minutes ago. You think the Russians did it?

by The Republic of Pantalleria » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:05 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:At the end of the day, whoever shot down this plane, was an ill experienced force with an advanced air defence system, now there are only two options as a result of the geopolitical landscape of the area, either the Russians shot it down or PRO-RUSSIAN, RUSSIAN SPEAKING TERRORISTS shot it down. Now, no international independent investigation team can enter the area because the last time an international team went inside a Pro-Russian held territory of Ukraine, it didn't go well...
Once more, Russia has been distancing itself from Donetsk and the "pro-Russian" movement in Eastern Ukraine. It seems to me that Putin is eager to bring that whole thing to an end, and was probably quite happy that media attention was moving on.
Evidence as it stands would seem to indicate that the separatists are responsible for shooting the plane down, but they did so with equipment they took from a Ukrainian source. IE: Not provided by Russia.

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:07 pm

by Slavija Slovenska » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:07 pm
The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Once more, Russia has been distancing itself from Donetsk and the "pro-Russian" movement in Eastern Ukraine. It seems to me that Putin is eager to bring that whole thing to an end, and was probably quite happy that media attention was moving on.
Evidence as it stands would seem to indicate that the separatists are responsible for shooting the plane down, but they did so with equipment they took from a Ukrainian source. IE: Not provided by Russia.
And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.

by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:07 pm

by Costa Fierro » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:08 pm


by The Republic of Pantalleria » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:08 pm
Slavija Slovenska wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.
EXACTLY! and the question is…who used the equipment? Have the separatists been supplied by the Ruskies?

by The BranRiech » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:08 pm

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:09 pm

by Costa Fierro » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:10 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:10 pm
The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Once more, Russia has been distancing itself from Donetsk and the "pro-Russian" movement in Eastern Ukraine. It seems to me that Putin is eager to bring that whole thing to an end, and was probably quite happy that media attention was moving on.
Evidence as it stands would seem to indicate that the separatists are responsible for shooting the plane down, but they did so with equipment they took from a Ukrainian source. IE: Not provided by Russia.
And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.

by The Republic of Pantalleria » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:11 pm

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:12 pm
The BranRiech wrote:Besides CNN postponing The Sixties to cover the same thing for at least 6 hours straight, which has pissed me off beyond belief as I was looking forward to that episode, I've been interested in the news. Of course, those people didn't deserve to be caught in the crossfire, but it will certainly be interesting to see what this does to the conflict.

by The Republic of Pantalleria » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:12 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.
My point is the separatists are not Russia, no matter how "pro-Russian" they may be. Their actions do not reflect Russia's foreign policy or intent. Hell, it even seems that the separatists didn't shoot the plane down on purpose. Some untrained militiaman probably saw a blip on the radar and shot the thing off without bothering to think what he might be targeting.
It's a tragic, insane accident. It's not cause to start WWIII because "the West" decides to rush in and beat up Russia over a group of Russian fanboys being dumbasses and playing with toys they don't know how to use.

by Costa Fierro » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:14 pm
Roski wrote:The BranRiech wrote:Besides CNN postponing The Sixties to cover the same thing for at least 6 hours straight, which has pissed me off beyond belief as I was looking forward to that episode, I've been interested in the news. Of course, those people didn't deserve to be caught in the crossfire, but it will certainly be interesting to see what this does to the conflict.
They were warned to stay out of that particular spot of airspace.
Nobody listened of course.
They are now, because the jet was shot down.
Fucking people man.
"Oh, that warning is bullshit"
"OH FUCK SOMEONE GOT SHOT DOWN BECAUSE WE DIDN'T LISTEN TO THE WARNING CRY CRY CRY"
That actually legitimately pisses me off, that airliners will risk their passengers safety just for a couple bucks.

by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:14 pm
The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Once more, Russia has been distancing itself from Donetsk and the "pro-Russian" movement in Eastern Ukraine. It seems to me that Putin is eager to bring that whole thing to an end, and was probably quite happy that media attention was moving on.
Evidence as it stands would seem to indicate that the separatists are responsible for shooting the plane down, but they did so with equipment they took from a Ukrainian source. IE: Not provided by Russia.
And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.

by Roski » Thu Jul 17, 2014 6:15 pm
greed and death wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:And so? If ISIS took over Chinese nukes and launched it at America, is it the Chinese's fault? What's the point you're trying to make? It doesn't matter whose equipment they used, it's who used the equipment, period.
Lets fix this analogy.
1st We are dealing with a separatist faction domestic to the country. So instead of ISIS nuking the US, lets say the New Confederate states of America Nuked the US.
2nd The weapons were not taken from Russia they were given. So instead of the Confederate states of America invading China to get nukes to nuke the US, China gives the nuclear weapons to the confederate state of the US.
So yes if China gives nuclear weapons to the confederate states of the US, China would have a degree of moral responsibility for the use of those nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Andsed, Arikea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Galloism, Google [Bot], Hirota, Ifreann, Immoren, La Xinga, Lord Dominator, Narland, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Riviere Renard, Saiwana, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Trollgaard, Valyxias
Advertisement