Advertisement
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:08 am
Oaledonia wrote:Limborg wrote:Shame that it happend, but that's what you can expect if you fly over a warzone. I would hold those resposible that made this flight plan, even though they state it was "safe" they knew it wasn't. Besides them i blame Ukraine aswell for chosing war over peace. Only after that i will concern myself with the ones who fired the missile.
I blame the missile crew above anyone, for negligence of equipment and not being able to clear identify the plane. As with any international flight, the nations in which the flight will be flying is notified before hand of what path they are taking.
So bullshit.
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:09 am
Limborg wrote:Shame that it happend, but that's what you can expect if you fly over a warzone. I would hold those resposible that made this flight plan, even though they state it was "safe" they knew it wasn't. Besides them i blame Ukraine aswell for chosing war over peace. Only after that i will concern myself with the ones who fired the missile.
by Beta Test » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:09 am
Calimera II wrote:173 Dutch on that flight.
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:10 am
Great Confederacy Of Commonwealth States wrote:Limborg wrote:Shame that it happend, but that's what you can expect if you fly over a warzone. I would hold those resposible that made this flight plan, even though they state it was "safe" they knew it wasn't. Besides them i blame Ukraine aswell for chosing war over peace. Only after that i will concern myself with the ones who fired the missile.
No, no, no, that's not how it works. The people firing missiles at civilian aircraft are those responsible. They shot the weapon. Neither the Ukrainians nor the KLM or MA could have known it would have led to this.
by Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:11 am
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:11 am
Limborg wrote:Oaledonia wrote:I blame the missile crew above anyone, for negligence of equipment and not being able to clear identify the plane. As with any international flight, the nations in which the flight will be flying is notified before hand of what path they are taking.
So bullshit.
Are then? Did they informed the Donetsk Republic aswell? I don't think so. What you're saying is pretty much impossible. Its a warzone, not a peacefull nation. You're clearly the one with the bullshit here.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Calimera II » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:12 am
by Calimera II » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:13 am
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:15 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Limborg wrote:Shame that it happend, but that's what you can expect if you fly over a warzone. I would hold those resposible that made this flight plan, even though they state it was "safe" they knew it wasn't. Besides them i blame Ukraine aswell for chosing war over peace. Only after that i will concern myself with the ones who fired the missile.
The airplane was flying at 10km, which is usually considered a safe distance. You can't blame the people who made the flight plan - if you blame anyone, blame the people who made the safety regulations (even though I think 10km is reasonable, since usually weapons that reach so far aren't manned by complete idiots).
And Ukraine; what did you expect them to do? Allow all of Eastern-Ukraine to leave - even against the wishes of a significant part of the population there? Should countries always listen to an armed minority?
by Beta Test » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:15 am
by Arkinesia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:16 am
Limborg wrote:Oaledonia wrote:I blame the missile crew above anyone, for negligence of equipment and not being able to clear identify the plane. As with any international flight, the nations in which the flight will be flying is notified before hand of what path they are taking.
So bullshit.
Are then? Did they informed the Donetsk Republic aswell? I don't think so. What you're saying is pretty much impossible. Its a warzone, not a peacefull nation. You're clearly the one with the bullshit here.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:16 am
by Calimera II » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:18 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Calimera II wrote:I can tell you that people are really angered here now.
I'd say shock and sadness. Especially when compared to international standards, we're not quickly angered. The Russians would have been out on the streets burning Dutch flags by now and threatening our embassy (like they did after the arrest of a Russian diplomat who abused his children in the Netherlands) if a group of separatists from Ameland would have brought down a Russian carrier. Maybe that's an idea for the next Russian bomber that shows up unannounced in our airspace, by the way. We could always arm those crazy Frisians and call them "separatists".
by Oaledonia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:19 am
Limborg wrote:Are then? Did they informed the Donetsk Republic aswell? I don't think so. What you're saying is pretty much impossible. Its a warzone, not a peacefull nation. You're clearly the one with the bullshit here.
The lovable PMT nation of hugs and chibi! Now with 75% more Hanyū!
Oaledonian wiki | Decoli Defense | Embassy | OAF Military InfoUnder construction
*POLITICALLY CONTENTIOUS STATEMENTS INTENSIFY*
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:21 am
Limborg wrote:Kahlenberg wrote:
The airplane was flying at 10km, which is usually considered a safe distance. You can't blame the people who made the flight plan - if you blame anyone, blame the people who made the safety regulations (even though I think 10km is reasonable, since usually weapons that reach so far aren't manned by complete idiots).
And Ukraine; what did you expect them to do? Allow all of Eastern-Ukraine to leave - even against the wishes of a significant part of the population there? Should countries always listen to an armed minority?
Idiots are present in every army, and they tend to operate such stuff. Planes had been shot down before in that region, so ofcourse the blame lies on those that made the flight plan, or at least for a big part.
Ukraine had plenty of time to enter into dialog with the East, instead of that they went to the east and arrested them for protesting. After that the fight began. Even then Ukraine had time to call for a dialog, but still they rather wanted to kill their own citzens then to create a peacefull and stable nation. There was no reason for letting the East leave, a federalization was all they asked, wich is completely understandable since those area's hold large Russian populations.
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:21 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Calimera II wrote:I can tell you that people are really angered here now.
I'd say shock and sadness. Especially when compared to international standards, we're not quickly angered. The Russians would have been out on the streets burning Dutch flags by now and threatening our embassy (like they did after the arrest of a Russian diplomat who abused his children in the Netherlands) if a group of separatists from Ameland would have brought down a Russian carrier. Maybe that's an idea for the next Russian bomber that shows up unannounced in our airspace, by the way. We could always arm those crazy Frisians and call them "separatists".
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:21 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Limborg wrote:
Are then? Did they informed the Donetsk Republic aswell? I don't think so. What you're saying is pretty much impossible. Its a warzone, not a peacefull nation. You're clearly the one with the bullshit here.
Do what how what? The Donetsk People's Republic is not a recognised state and has no recognised airspace. The Ukrainian military (or whoever) had declared a restriction on civil aviation flying below ~6500m, about the altitude at which an An-26 had previously been shot down.
Aircraft regularly fly over warzones because typically, SAM batteries aren't lighting them up.
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:22 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Limborg wrote:
Idiots are present in every army, and they tend to operate such stuff. Planes had been shot down before in that region, so ofcourse the blame lies on those that made the flight plan, or at least for a big part.
Ukraine had plenty of time to enter into dialog with the East, instead of that they went to the east and arrested them for protesting. After that the fight began. Even then Ukraine had time to call for a dialog, but still they rather wanted to kill their own citzens then to create a peacefull and stable nation. There was no reason for letting the East leave, a federalization was all they asked, wich is completely understandable since those area's hold large Russian populations.
You clearly did not follow the news. A federalization has been proposed on multiple occasions. On the 11th of April the first proposal was made for a more federalized Ukraine. And no, regular armies do not tend to have amateurs operating high-end ground-to-air missiles.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:22 am
Calimera II wrote:I cannot recall the Anti-Russian sentiments were ever as high as now in The Netherlands.
by Limborg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:24 am
Arkinesia wrote:Limborg wrote:
Are then? Did they informed the Donetsk Republic aswell? I don't think so. What you're saying is pretty much impossible. Its a warzone, not a peacefull nation. You're clearly the one with the bullshit here.
Fuck the “Donetsk People's Republic.” You don't get to be treated like a real nation when you have no actual recognized holdings and basically exist to try to prove that special snowflakes can have pretend countries too. They are a bunch of idealistic assclowns, not a functioning government.
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:24 am
Limborg wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Do what how what? The Donetsk People's Republic is not a recognised state and has no recognised airspace. The Ukrainian military (or whoever) had declared a restriction on civil aviation flying below ~6500m, about the altitude at which an An-26 had previously been shot down.
Aircraft regularly fly over warzones because typically, SAM batteries aren't lighting them up.
That isn't part of the debate wich i had with him. Besides that, again, airplanes have been shot down, wich is in my eyes reason enough to stay away from that area.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Kahlenberg » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:25 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Kahlenberg wrote:
I'd say shock and sadness. Especially when compared to international standards, we're not quickly angered. The Russians would have been out on the streets burning Dutch flags by now and threatening our embassy (like they did after the arrest of a Russian diplomat who abused his children in the Netherlands) if a group of separatists from Ameland would have brought down a Russian carrier. Maybe that's an idea for the next Russian bomber that shows up unannounced in our airspace, by the way. We could always arm those crazy Frisians and call them "separatists".
Unless the navigator's being a tit, Russian reconnaissance flights do not penetrate airspace.
They're probing and testing reaction times, which they can, and do, do in international airspace.
Because obviously if they do stray into your airspace, the aircraft sent to intercept them have rights to force them out and/or engage.
Which clearly hasn't happened.
Reconnaissance probing interceptions are traditionally quite a friendly experience, actually, even during the Cold War.
Crew of both aircraft usually just start waving at each other and taking pictures.
by Organized States » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:26 am
Limborg wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Do what how what? The Donetsk People's Republic is not a recognised state and has no recognised airspace. The Ukrainian military (or whoever) had declared a restriction on civil aviation flying below ~6500m, about the altitude at which an An-26 had previously been shot down.
Aircraft regularly fly over warzones because typically, SAM batteries aren't lighting them up.
That isn't part of the debate wich i had with him. Besides that, again, airplanes have been shot down, wich is in my eyes reason enough to stay away from that area.
by Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:26 am
Kahlenberg wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Unless the navigator's being a tit, Russian reconnaissance flights do not penetrate airspace.
They're probing and testing reaction times, which they can, and do, do in international airspace.
Because obviously if they do stray into your airspace, the aircraft sent to intercept them have rights to force them out and/or engage.
Which clearly hasn't happened.
Reconnaissance probing interceptions are traditionally quite a friendly experience, actually, even during the Cold War.
Crew of both aircraft usually just start waving at each other and taking pictures.
I wasn't completely serious (it would be ludicrous to actually shoot down a Russian Bear over this), but Dutch fighters regularly need to escort the Russians out of our "zone of responsibility".
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], New Temecula, Shrillland, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement