Why did she join the Blue Dog Coalition if she wasn't a Blue Dog? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand#Tenure
Advertisement

by Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 4:49 pm


by George Smiley II » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:22 pm
Geilinor wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Kirsten Gillibrand was never a pro-gun Blue Dog.
Why did she join the Blue Dog Coalition if she wasn't a Blue Dog? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand#Tenure

by Liriena » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:38 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Dyakovo » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:43 pm
George Smiley II wrote:Geilinor wrote:Why did she join the Blue Dog Coalition if she wasn't a Blue Dog? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand#Tenure
It's also why Bloomberg hates her.... He was ready to argue his point for gun control and she came in and was all suddenly for it. I agree Gillibrand is overrated. Much ado about nothing. I have far more respect for people like Warren and Sanders, who have conviction, who have souls.
I would have even respected Gillibrand, regardless of her politics, if she was consistent about it.

by Dyakovo » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:44 pm
George Smiley II wrote:Geilinor wrote:Why did she join the Blue Dog Coalition if she wasn't a Blue Dog? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirsten_Gillibrand#Tenure
It's also why Bloomberg hates her.... He was ready to argue his point for gun control and she came in and was all suddenly for it. I agree Gillibrand is overrated. Much ado about nothing. I have far more respect for people like Warren and Sanders, who have conviction, who have souls.
I would have even respected Gillibrand, regardless of her politics, if she was consistent about it.

by Murkwood » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:45 pm
Merizoc wrote:Murkwood wrote:How so? Is it because you disagree with him?
Well, for a start, there's this: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/01/chris-christie-bullying-videos
And then there was that whole bridge thing. What happened there again? Oh yeah…..
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Dyakovo » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:46 pm
Murkwood wrote:Merizoc wrote:Well, for a start, there's this: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/01/chris-christie-bullying-videos
And then there was that whole bridge thing. What happened there again? Oh yeah…..
He's not bullying. That's called "straight talk".

by Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 5:58 pm
Murkwood wrote:Merizoc wrote:Well, for a start, there's this: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/01/chris-christie-bullying-videos
And then there was that whole bridge thing. What happened there again? Oh yeah…..
He's not bullying. That's called "straight talk".


by Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:01 pm
Newanderthals wrote:Ben Carson 2016.

by Vitius » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:01 pm


by The Re-Frisivisiaing » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:03 pm

by Neutraligon » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:03 pm
Vitius wrote:I doubt Sanders would get far at all. Warren would have a chance, though.
Too bad Clinton is in the way:/
But just because I want the Republicans to lose, I'd say Bush/Palin. Bush is a tarnished name and Palin, well, I don't have to explain that one.

by District XIV » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:06 pm
The Re-Frisivisiaing wrote:Ron Paul 2008
Ron Paul 2012


by Newanderthals » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:06 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:11 pm
Newanderthals wrote:Geilinor wrote:He called the Affordable Care Act the worst thing since slavery. I can't take him seriously.
I disagree with him there. I don't support the Affordable Care Act at all, but I don't see how it is worse than slavery. I don't agree with his stance on education though.
All the other issues I agree with him on.

by District XIV » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:12 pm

by Geilinor » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:12 pm
Dyakovo wrote:George Smiley II wrote:
It's also why Bloomberg hates her.... He was ready to argue his point for gun control and she came in and was all suddenly for it. I agree Gillibrand is overrated. Much ado about nothing. I have far more respect for people like Warren and Sanders, who have conviction, who have souls.
I would have even respected Gillibrand, regardless of her politics, if she was consistent about it.
Listening to her constituents and voting according to their wishes is hardly a bad thing.

by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:21 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:22 pm
Toronina wrote:Blaatschapen/Lunatic Goofballs 2016.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Greco-Prussia, Kitsuva, Majestic-12 [Bot], Necroghastia, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement