NationStates

Gauthier wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
Maybe not them. But Hamas probably is and if the Israeli neighbors won the war in 1948 well... There would be a lot less Arab Jews today.

Attempting Genocide with rockets that have to have most of its explosive warhead removed to be even able to reach Israeli territory and might kill a handful of people on a really, really lucky day. Good one.

When Israeli casualties even begin to reach half the amount of Palestinian casualties, then using the term "genocide" won't come off as pure bullshit.

Jamzmania wrote:

Gauthier wrote:
Attempting Genocide with rockets that have to have most of its explosive warhead removed to be even able to reach Israeli territory and might kill a handful of people on a really, really lucky day. Good one.

When Israeli casualties even begin to reach half the amount of Palestinian casualties, then using the term "genocide" won't come off as pure bullshit.

Doesn't change the fact that Hamas is dedicated to the destruction of Israel.

Uxupox wrote:

Gauthier wrote:
Attempting Genocide with rockets that have to have most of its explosive warhead removed to be even able to reach Israeli territory and might kill a handful of people on a really, really lucky day. Good one.

When Israeli casualties even begin to reach half the amount of Palestinian casualties, then using the term "genocide" won't come off as pure bullshit.

So what exactly do you propose then? When the rockets drop just "take" it and act like nothing happens?

"Oh it's a rocket attack go ahead on your business folks nothing to see here."

Uxupox wrote:

Gauthier wrote:
Attempting Genocide with rockets that have to have most of its explosive warhead removed to be even able to reach Israeli territory and might kill a handful of people on a really, really lucky day. Good one.

When Israeli casualties even begin to reach half the amount of Palestinian casualties, then using the term "genocide" won't come off as pure bullshit.

So what exactly do you propose then? When the rockets drop just "take" it and act like nothing happens?

"Oh it's a rocket attack go ahead on your business folks nothing to see here."

Gauthier wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
So what exactly do you propose then? When the rockets drop just "take" it and act like nothing happens?

"Oh it's a rocket attack go ahead on your business folks nothing to see here."

Crack down on the settlements. That would take a lot of wind out of Hamas's justifications for sending bottle rockets over. Then again without Hamas, Israel wouldn't have a justification to bomb the shit out of Palestinians and grab their lands either.

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
So what exactly do you propose then? When the rockets drop just "take" it and act like nothing happens?

"Oh it's a rocket attack go ahead on your business folks nothing to see here."

they could if they really wanted

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
So what exactly do you propose then? When the rockets drop just "take" it and act like nothing happens?

"Oh it's a rocket attack go ahead on your business folks nothing to see here."

they could if they really wanted

Alyakia wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
they could if they really wanted

No.

Alyakia wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
they could if they really wanted

No.

Uxupox wrote:Let's say that Hamas get's "lucky" and kill 1 or a few? What do you suggest then? Ignore it as well? A few lives don't matter right?

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:Let's say that Hamas get's "lucky" and kill 1 or a few? What do you suggest then? Ignore it as well? A few lives don't matter right?

well in that case the obvious answer is to ban chocolate, invade, kill thousands and displace hundreds of thousands of peole

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:Let's say that Hamas get's "lucky" and kill 1 or a few? What do you suggest then? Ignore it as well? A few lives don't matter right?

well in that case the obvious answer is to ban chocolate, invade, kill thousands and displace hundreds of thousands of peole

Uxupox wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
well in that case the obvious answer is to ban chocolate, invade, kill thousands and displace hundreds of thousands of peole

Violence will only beget violence.

Uxupox wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
well in that case the obvious answer is to ban chocolate, invade, kill thousands and displace hundreds of thousands of peole

Violence will only beget violence.

Gauthier wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
Violence will only beget violence.

Because the Palestinians bending over with their pants down while Israeli settlers sodomize them out of land will result in peace. For the Israeli settlers.

Uxupox wrote:

Gauthier wrote:
Because the Palestinians bending over with their pants down while Israeli settlers sodomize them out of land will result in peace. For the Israeli settlers.

Have you seen me supporting expanding the settlements? No. In fact I agree with you that's wrong and disgusting. But Hamas using continued rocket attacks and expect the Israelis to just wither it is insane and unreasonable.

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
So answer violence with violence? Yea that's gonna work out great.

there is a reason that "peaceful resistance? more settlements. violent resistance? more settlements. go to UN? more settlements. don't go to UN? more settlements." became a meme

Jamzmania wrote:

Alyakia wrote:>hamas is to blame because they respond to israeli violence with anything but absolute submission

Hamas is to blame because they constantly commit to violence instead of peace.

Uxupox wrote:So answer violence with violence? Yea that's gonna work out great.

Aelex wrote:For refusing to be slaughtered and responding to violence with violence? Excuse me but their behavior is quite excusable.

DBJ wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
there is a reason that "peaceful resistance? more settlements. violent resistance? more settlements. go to UN? more settlements. don't go to UN? more settlements." became a meme

stupid people?

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:

Jamzmania wrote:Hamas is to blame because they constantly commit to violence instead of peace.

Maybe because peace and diplomacy not only got them nowhere, but earned them further Israeli settlements in their territory.

Merizoc wrote:

Aelex wrote:For refusing to be slaughtered and responding to violence with violence? Excuse me but their behavior is quite excusable.

Now, the wronger are the Palestinians. If they used diplomacy rather than strait-up tried to genocide the Israeli, nor tried to do it again repetitively during the course of the year, they wouldn't be in such deep shit nowadays.

The Palestinians have never attempted genocide. Stop lying.

Alyakia wrote:

Uxupox wrote:
Have you seen me supporting expanding the settlements? No. In fact I agree with you that's wrong and disgusting. But Hamas using continued rocket attacks and expect the Israelis to just wither it is insane and unreasonable.

even when hamas stops rocket attacks for months and years on end shit still happens. hmm.

Tmutarakhan wrote:

Alyakia wrote:
even when hamas stops rocket attacks for months and years on end shit still happens. hmm.

Since the Israeli evacuation of Gaza there has never been a year without rocket attacks from there; there has seldom even been a month without attacks.