NATION

PASSWORD

Israel / Gaza / Hamas Mega-Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:23 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Tmutarakhan wrote:Since the Israeli evacuation of Gaza there has never been a year without rocket attacks from there; there has seldom even been a month without attacks.


there is a difference between rocket attacks and hamas rocket attacks.

i would consider a month with literally 1 rocket to be splitting hairs. and when the number of rockets fired a month goes from 4 to 2,874 you know that something has gone pretty badly.

When someone fires almost 3,000 rockets at you in a month, it's their fault.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:25 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
there is a difference between rocket attacks and hamas rocket attacks.

i would consider a month with literally 1 rocket to be splitting hairs. and when the number of rockets fired a month goes from 4 to 2,874 you know that something has gone pretty badly.

When someone fires almost 3,000 rockets at you in a month, it's their fault.


the problem with this kind of thinking is that it completely ignores israel's actions in every case
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Fri Oct 09, 2015 6:26 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Geilinor wrote:When someone fires almost 3,000 rockets at you in a month, it's their fault.


the problem with this kind of thinking is that it completely ignores israel's actions in every case

I'm not saying Israel is perfect.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Fri Oct 09, 2015 7:35 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
the problem with this kind of thinking is that it completely ignores israel's actions in every case

I'm not saying Israel is perfect.

And nobody is saying Hamas is perfect, or good. Israel is certainly far from perfect, and should be criticized for their immoral actions.

User avatar
TomKirk
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1432
Founded: May 08, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby TomKirk » Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:56 pm

Merizoc wrote:
Geilinor wrote:I'm not saying Israel is perfect.

And nobody is saying Hamas is perfect, or good. Israel is certainly far from perfect, and should be criticized for their immoral actions.

I was responding to a poster who claimed that whole months and years had gone by without attacks, which was simply untrue.
[puppet of Tmutarakhan]
YoLandII: " How is mutation natural? Just because it occurs in nature doesn't mean it's natural. It is not supposed to happen. It is accidental."
Salamanstrom: "Saying it is wrong since it calls it something that was used then is stupid. It's like saying a guy from the 1800s is stupid since he calls an ipod a radio."
Lunatic Goofballs: "The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards."

User avatar
Great Israel
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 129
Founded: Sep 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Israel » Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:47 am

I dot know if you know, but the situation in Israel is bad, real bad. I have no clue why its not covered on the news but, for a week now, there have benn stabbing terror attacks, Palestinians are in an intifada, there are 4 to 5 stabbing attacks a day, and throwing rocks with no stop. its that bad that i personally, am afraid to go out of my house.
Dear Arabs,
I think we are Semitic brothers so lets end the violence. I want you to live, peacefully and quietly in one of your 22 states, and please let me live peacefully and quietly in MY one and only Jewish state, the one that goes from the Mediterranean all way the Jordan river, that's all I ask, cant us Semites just co-exist and practice our religions separately?

User avatar
Seraven
Senator
 
Posts: 3570
Founded: Jun 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Seraven » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:42 pm

Great Israel wrote:I dot know if you know, but the situation in Israel is bad, real bad. I have no clue why its not covered on the news but, for a week now, there have benn stabbing terror attacks, Palestinians are in an intifada, there are 4 to 5 stabbing attacks a day, and throwing rocks with no stop. its that bad that i personally, am afraid to go out of my house.


Situation in Palestine is worse.
Copper can change as its quality went down.
Gold can't change, for its quality never went down.
The Alma Mater wrote:
Seraven wrote:I know right! Whites enslaved the natives, they killed them, they converted them forcibly, they acted like a better human beings than the Muslims.

An excellent example of why allowing unrestricted immigration of people with a very different culture might not be the best idea ever :P

User avatar
Equestria and Griffon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1185
Founded: Dec 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Equestria and Griffon » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:42 pm

The locking is soon...
I'm a living shitpost.

PONIES UNITE!!!

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 5:47 pm

TomKirk wrote:
Merizoc wrote:And nobody is saying Hamas is perfect, or good. Israel is certainly far from perfect, and should be criticized for their immoral actions.

I was responding to a poster who claimed that whole months and years had gone by without attacks, which was simply untrue.


i said months had gone by without hamas attacks not months had gone by with no attacks. the problem lies with you not me.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:03 pm

Alyakia wrote:
TomKirk wrote:I was responding to a poster who claimed that whole months and years had gone by without attacks, which was simply untrue.


i said months had gone by without hamas attacks not months had gone by with no attacks. the problem lies with you not me.

Hamas is actually attacking right now. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/09/hamas-leader-gaza-declares-intifada-deadly-attacks-continue

It's a semi-war. http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-jets-reportedly-strike-hamas-targets-in-gaza/
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Oct 10, 2015 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
West Aurelia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5793
Founded: Sep 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby West Aurelia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:53 pm

_REPUBLIC OF WEST AURELIA_
Official factbook
#Valaransofab

User avatar
Kraylandia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5523
Founded: Sep 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kraylandia » Sat Oct 10, 2015 9:55 pm

You can call me Luci
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent..
Jello is my bored buddy!
Lito's NS wife

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Oct 10, 2015 10:15 pm


"Israel isn't perfect, but they're still better than those Palestinian terrorist dogs!"
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Sat Oct 10, 2015 11:33 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Tmutarakhan wrote:Since the Israeli evacuation of Gaza there has never been a year without rocket attacks from there; there has seldom even been a month without attacks.


there is a difference between rocket attacks and hamas rocket attacks.

i would consider a month with literally 1 rocket to be splitting hairs. and when the number of rockets fired a month goes from 4 to 2,874 you know that something has gone pretty badly.


You may consider it splitting hairs, but when that alarm goes off with that kind of frequency for cities to hear and about a 30 second time to bunker down? The populace ain't gonna have the same notion of it.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:10 am

Herskerstad wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
there is a difference between rocket attacks and hamas rocket attacks.

i would consider a month with literally 1 rocket to be splitting hairs. and when the number of rockets fired a month goes from 4 to 2,874 you know that something has gone pretty badly.


You may consider it splitting hairs, but when that alarm goes off with that kind of frequency for cities to hear and about a 30 second time to bunker down? The populace ain't gonna have the same notion of it.


i'd prefer 30 seconds to hide from a glorified pipe than 0 seconds to hide from a bomb or 0 seconds to hide from a jet (the bombing is a warning that there's an even bigger bombing coming! hope you don't die also p.s. no saying you're going to be hitting things in half the country does not count as a warning when israel does it anymore than when hamas does it)

it is splitting hairs. if you're so scared of the attacks then 1 rocket a month is great.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:37 am

Alyakia wrote:
Herskerstad wrote:
You may consider it splitting hairs, but when that alarm goes off with that kind of frequency for cities to hear and about a 30 second time to bunker down? The populace ain't gonna have the same notion of it.


i'd prefer 30 seconds to hide from a glorified pipe than 0 seconds to hide from a bomb or 0 seconds to hide from a jet (the bombing is a warning that there's an even bigger bombing coming! hope you don't die also p.s. no saying you're going to be hitting things in half the country does not count as a warning when israel does it anymore than when hamas does it)

it is splitting hairs. if you're so scared of the attacks then 1 rocket a month is great.


It's still unreasonable to expect ANY country to ignore/tolerate rocket attacks against them. Heck the rocket attacks don't even try to damage governmental building they just try and "maximize" the kill ratio they get (If they get any because luckily the Israeli Iron Dome is so good that it stops the majority of these attacks) against the civilians.

Let's say your neighbor is throwing rocks at you once per month or twice per month and sometimes he hits you but sometimes he does not. You just gonna ignore that or are you gonna take action against it?
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Brickistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1529
Founded: Apr 10, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Brickistan » Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:54 am

Uxupox wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
i'd prefer 30 seconds to hide from a glorified pipe than 0 seconds to hide from a bomb or 0 seconds to hide from a jet (the bombing is a warning that there's an even bigger bombing coming! hope you don't die also p.s. no saying you're going to be hitting things in half the country does not count as a warning when israel does it anymore than when hamas does it)

it is splitting hairs. if you're so scared of the attacks then 1 rocket a month is great.


It's still unreasonable to expect ANY country to ignore/tolerate rocket attacks against them. Heck the rocket attacks don't even try to damage governmental building they just try and "maximize" the kill ratio they get (If they get any because luckily the Israeli Iron Dome is so good that it stops the majority of these attacks) against the civilians.

Let's say your neighbor is throwing rocks at you once per month or twice per month and sometimes he hits you but sometimes he does not. You just gonna ignore that or are you gonna take action against it?


Let's say that your neighbor invades your country, takes control of all infrastructure, sets up roadblocks everywhere, and let ultra-nationalists settle in the occupied areas... Are you just going to ignore that or are you going to take action?

From the Palestinian point of view, they're simply fighting to expel an invader.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sun Oct 11, 2015 5:58 am

Brickistan wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
It's still unreasonable to expect ANY country to ignore/tolerate rocket attacks against them. Heck the rocket attacks don't even try to damage governmental building they just try and "maximize" the kill ratio they get (If they get any because luckily the Israeli Iron Dome is so good that it stops the majority of these attacks) against the civilians.

Let's say your neighbor is throwing rocks at you once per month or twice per month and sometimes he hits you but sometimes he does not. You just gonna ignore that or are you gonna take action against it?


Let's say that your neighbor invades your country, takes control of all infrastructure, sets up roadblocks everywhere, and let ultra-nationalists settle in the occupied areas... Are you just going to ignore that or are you going to take action?

From the Palestinian point of view, they're simply fighting to expel an invader.


To expel the invader you don't kill civilians. You target specific institutions such as government buildings, military barracks and so on and so forth. Here Hamas just props up a rocket and hopes it hit something and if it hits something most of the time it's a civilian that had nothing to do with current conflict between Hamas and the Israeli government.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:03 am

Uxupox wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
i'd prefer 30 seconds to hide from a glorified pipe than 0 seconds to hide from a bomb or 0 seconds to hide from a jet (the bombing is a warning that there's an even bigger bombing coming! hope you don't die also p.s. no saying you're going to be hitting things in half the country does not count as a warning when israel does it anymore than when hamas does it)

it is splitting hairs. if you're so scared of the attacks then 1 rocket a month is great.


It's still unreasonable to expect ANY country to ignore/tolerate rocket attacks against them. Heck the rocket attacks don't even try to damage governmental building they just try and "maximize" the kill ratio they get (If they get any because luckily the Israeli Iron Dome is so good that it stops the majority of these attacks) against the civilians.

Let's say your neighbor is throwing rocks at you once per month or twice per month and sometimes he hits you but sometimes he does not. You just gonna ignore that or are you gonna take action against it?


the figures for casualties and deaths are actually higher in the year iron dome was put up then the years before even though there were less rockets fired in comparative years. the reality is that iron dome had no real effect on the rockets because they are so shit they are unlikely to actually do anything in the first place. the rockets are a purely psychological threat and israel is very safe, by their governments own admission. and in a world where 1 bomb can and has killed 5x more people than 12,000 rockets and 6,500 mortars ever did you have to try really really really hard to convince me that i should care when israel goes on about how they in super danger (until it damages their tourism and they change their tune)

honestly, now i think about it, that might be the real problem. other countries don't have the luxury of invading and wrecking shit with impunity every time sometimes goes wrong and handwrining and declaring the peace process over because 1 attack from some random minor group (in this case, not hamas) happened. which is why getting to that point is viewed as a great thing not some intolerable apocalypse.

that's a stupid comparison but sure. if he threw 2,000 rocks one month and then he didn't throw any one month but his friends kid threw 1 i'd be fucking delighted. if the guy a few streets over was getting hammered with a goddamn catapult i'd be thanking my lucky stars im getting rocks. i mean, i have a catapult and half the country on my side so i could fucking destroy rock man whenever i wanted. but catapult guy? he's fucked. he has a catapult as well but there's no way he can just go and beat the shit out of the other guy without starting a huge fucking war that will leave millions dead. he'd be 100% justified in telling me to shut the fuck up if i went on a big spiel about how my house is the most dangerous house in the world.

and jesus christ this is why analogies are useless.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:04 am

Uxupox wrote:
Brickistan wrote:
Let's say that your neighbor invades your country, takes control of all infrastructure, sets up roadblocks everywhere, and let ultra-nationalists settle in the occupied areas... Are you just going to ignore that or are you going to take action?

From the Palestinian point of view, they're simply fighting to expel an invader.


To expel the invader you don't kill civilians. You target specific institutions such as government buildings, military barracks and so on and so forth. Here Hamas just props up a rocket and hopes it hit something and if it hits something most of the time it's a civilian that had nothing to do with current conflict between Hamas and the Israeli government.


why has the IDF placed their HQ beside a mall and a hospital? cowards! human shields!
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Brickistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1529
Founded: Apr 10, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Brickistan » Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:07 am

Uxupox wrote:
Brickistan wrote:
Let's say that your neighbor invades your country, takes control of all infrastructure, sets up roadblocks everywhere, and let ultra-nationalists settle in the occupied areas... Are you just going to ignore that or are you going to take action?

From the Palestinian point of view, they're simply fighting to expel an invader.


To expel the invader you don't kill civilians. You target specific institutions such as government buildings, military barracks and so on and so forth. Here Hamas just props up a rocket and hopes it hit something and if it hits something most of the time it's a civilian that had nothing to do with current conflict between Hamas and the Israeli government.


Civilians have been a target during war since the dawn of time. For a particular egregious example, look at the Allied bombing campaigns during WW2.

There's also the question of what else Hamas is supposed to do? They're not exactly in control of a fully functioning country with a formal army. Taking on the Israeli army directly would be suicide. So instead they revert to guerrilla attacks aimed at softer targets.

It's not really something I condone, but I do have an understanding for why it's happening.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Sun Oct 11, 2015 6:08 am

in the sake of fairness hamas should do only what jewish paramilitaries (which later became the IDF) did back in the day
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:51 am

Uxupox wrote:
Brickistan wrote:
Let's say that your neighbor invades your country, takes control of all infrastructure, sets up roadblocks everywhere, and let ultra-nationalists settle in the occupied areas... Are you just going to ignore that or are you going to take action?

From the Palestinian point of view, they're simply fighting to expel an invader.


To expel the invader you don't kill civilians. You target specific institutions such as government buildings, military barracks and so on and so forth. Here Hamas just props up a rocket and hopes it hit something and if it hits something most of the time it's a civilian that had nothing to do with current conflict between Hamas and the Israeli government.


Hamas don't have any-other weapons, Gaza is under a blockade, where do you think they will get them from?

well, if you want to limit the three (?) civilian casualties caused by Hamas rocket attacks maybe Israel should them guided misslies and F-16s
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Grunberg-Ludbach
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 159
Founded: Sep 24, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Grunberg-Ludbach » Sun Oct 11, 2015 7:55 am

Israel is complicated. Originally, the Jewish settlers in the region did little wrong, and bought land from Palestinians to form a nation state. Later, they faced legitimate threats from Palestinians and other Islamic groups in the region. The Jews in Israel had their peace and sovereignty violated extensively in the 6 Days War and the subsequent Yom Kippur War, wherein the Israelites gained some land legitimately, before returning the majority of it. Around this same period of time, Israeli Jews faced bus bombs, offensives, and other terrorist acts from radical Islamists. Israel fought back.

This would make Israel sound like the good guys. While I am a zionist to an extent, they have commited some atrocities since the 1990s that I cannot excuse. The last few Israeli governments have been under the impression that they are morally righteous, and that they can get away with anything, even if it is condemned internationally.

Palestine, on the other hand, still has a population that harbours largely genocidal opinions against the Jews.

In scenarios like these, taking sides is really the silly thing to do.
The King's Empire of Grünberg-Ludbach | Politics | " Il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux"


I am: British-German, Non-Denominational Christian, Right Winger, Racialist, Nationalist, Economic Liberal

Languages: German, English, Passable French. | Location: SE England | Hobbies: Piano, Swimming, Gardening | Call me Werner

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, General TN, The H Corporation, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads