Alyakia wrote:
it's not pathetic.
you can't actually prove the people were being used as human shields in that case. you just blurt out "human shield!!!" every time sometimes dies, even though you can't prove it in probably half of the cases. accept it, and only make claims you can actually prove.
you also don't seem to understand that "but they did it some other time!" is not actual evidence either and is not not enough to make up for your lack of evidence.Doitsu-san wrote:Like I said, it's up to Hamas to prove that they did not have their mortar positions in civilian areas, and were not operating in civilian areas. It's automatically human shields if Israel has to bomb civilian areas because they see mortar rounds flying out of them.
it's up to israel to prove that their targets were legitimate. considering israel still has about 3,000 homes they've destroyed that they've yet to provide any evidence were being used for terrorism i am doubtful they will prove mortars were being fired from the places they hit.
"No evident." This really is pathetic. You cannot accept any evidence that is against Hamas, and you seem pretty heated about the fact that you are wrong in this case. That's why I am not going to debate with you anymore on this topic for a little time.
