Doitsu-san wrote:Farnhamia wrote:The only flaw in your cost argument is that insurance policies already cover contraception. This case isn't about inventing a new kind of insurance policy, it's about making employers pay for existing ones.
I never claimed that there would be a "new insurance policy invented", I claimed that making companies upgrade their policies would end up with the companies paying more. Which, again, is basic logic.
And again. How much?
And again. This case was not about costs.




How much broccoli?

wow That's dedication right there my friend.
We have no right to complain about paying for birth control, etc! I'll gladly pay a slightly higher insurance premium as compensation for the fact that I never have to give birth.