NATION

PASSWORD

Non-Americans: Could you live in the United States?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would/could you live in the US?

Yes! Where's my green card!
71
25%
No! *clings to native passport*
134
47%
Eh, maybe. (Explain.)
53
18%
One ticket to Vulcan, please.
30
10%
 
Total votes : 288

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:53 am

Cymrea wrote:
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
You seem to be a thoroughly pleasant person who is going to have a long and fruitful stay here.


And a rather clear example of precisely why there are so many negative views about Americans in general. Good job perpetuating the stereotype.


Looking past the tone of his post he does have a point (albeit one for another thread)
Last edited by Frazers on Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:58 am

Germanic Imperium wrote:>Sees you use 2nd Ammendment and completely blow it down....You must be a Liberal.

I like your logic.

In most of the Western world, gun control isn't an explicit left-right divide like in the US.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:59 am

1). Guns in the constitution. Ah yes. The beloved 2nd Amendment. The gun loving culture many Americans espouse is something I just utterly revile, and cannot reconcile myself to accept, by living in a country where people are guaranteed the right to be able to easily kill each other in the name of self defense, due to the pervasive availability of guns. I know many Americans too revile US gun culture, but until the 2nd Amendment was itself amended or ideally removed (no chance in hell), I'd find this one of my biggest stumbling blocks.
2). Two party system. Two parties, different, yet the same. Both have been bought out by corporate interests and have done an equally terrible job in governing the state, which is trillions in debt and is often mired in political gridlock. One of my favoured sayings is the US is so free, they have one whole other party more than North Korea! (I know there are independents and other smaller parties, so take my "joke" with a grain of salt.)
3). "Backward views." Again, I know this applies to only some, but when a large percentage of Americans deny climate change (about 25%), wish to have Evolution discredited in schools in favour of Creationism (and I say this as a Christian myself) and oppose equal marriage opportunities for homosexuals, again, these are things that just make me cringe.
4). Health care. I am pleased to live in a country where healthcare is available for all, and I'm happy to pay the taxes for it, even if it does at times mean longer waiting periods.
5). Natural disasters. Pretty much every corner of the USA is affected or vulnerable to natural disasters, which happen on a fairly regular basis. The west has drought and earthquakes, the central states can be hammered by tornadoes, and the south and east are vulnerable to hurricanes and severe snow storms (the latter which we Canadians are very used to as well).
6). Death penalty. I am vehemently opposed to its use and implementation.
7). US reality TV programming blows.


1. Really? Well, don't try Iceland.
2. I don't see much wrong with this. If you are a right-winger, join the Republicans. If you aren't, join the Democrats. It makes things much easier than having a trillion different parties.
3. You must be talking about places like Texas. Sure, gay marriage isn't legal. But Texans make up for it by being the nicest God-dammed people you will ever meet! 99% don't care who the fuck you are, as long as you don't flaunt it.
4. Meh. Don't know how to respond to this.
5. Natural disasters strike all over the world, buddy.
6. I bet you oppose some of the U.Ks policies too, right? I bet you would disagree with some of the ones Harper implemented. Just because a country has laws you don't agree with, but won't affect you, doesn't mean you shouldn't consider moving here.
7. I agree with you on that. But we have more sports than you!

The US can be a pretty good place, actually. Most of the facts you here are baloney. We have a great healthcare, education, and internet compared to other parts of the world. We have hordes of immigrants clamoring to get in, and no one clamoring to get out. We also donate the most, privately and publicly. In short, USA! USA! USA!
Last edited by Murkwood on Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:00 am

Cill Airne wrote:Non-American here, and I do live in the US; have for nearly 5 years. Even (attempted) to serve in the army here. You lot are welcome.

God bless.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Doomwood
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 424
Founded: Jun 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Doomwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:09 am

I hate the U.S, so I will never live in it.

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:12 am

Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world


Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html

User avatar
Doomwood
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 424
Founded: Jun 20, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Doomwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:13 am

Frazers wrote:
Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world


Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html

Don't worry, I also hate the UK.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:15 am

Frazers wrote:
Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world


Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html

Most of those polls are skewed.

http://www.nationalreview.com/critical- ... mas-p-mill
http://www.creators.com/opinion/john-st ... study.html
Last edited by Murkwood on Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:16 am

Murkwood wrote:
Frazers wrote:
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html

Most of those polls are skewed.

http://www.nationalreview.com/critical- ... mas-p-mill
http://www.creators.com/opinion/john-st ... study.html


Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:19 am

Frazers wrote:


Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?

I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.
Last edited by Murkwood on Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:20 am

Murkwood wrote:
Frazers wrote:
Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?

I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.

"Probably" is little more than guessing.

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:22 am

Murkwood wrote:
Frazers wrote:
Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?

I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.


Soooooo you don't really know what you're talking about. Great. We can all ignore any further posts on the matter from yourself.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:22 am

Merizoc wrote:
Murkwood wrote:I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.

"Probably" is little more than guessing.

It's an educated guess. From what I've seen of others, this looks to be rather similar.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:23 am

Murkwood wrote:
Merizoc wrote:"Probably" is little more than guessing.

It's an educated guess. From what I've seen of others, this looks to be rather similar.


You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:23 am

Frazers wrote:
Murkwood wrote:I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.


Soooooo you don't really know what you're talking about. Great. We can all ignore any further posts on the matter from yourself.

How are you getting that? Major report A and B come to a conclusion, and they used bad methodology. Then, Major Report C comes around, with the same conclusion and a lot of the same methodology.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:26 am

Frazers wrote:
Murkwood wrote:It's an educated guess. From what I've seen of others, this looks to be rather similar.


You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.

It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.

I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:29 am

Merizoc wrote:
Murkwood wrote:I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.

"Probably" is little more than guessing.


It also makes you wonder on what grounds he makes the "America has great healthcare compared to others" statement when he casts aside all reports on the matter as probably falling into the same credibility pitfalls.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:30 am

Murkwood wrote:
Frazers wrote:
You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.

It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.

I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.

Why wouldn't cost be used? A good healthcare system not only has to have good healthcare, it has to be cost efficient. If that supports Socialized medicine, then maybe you're on the wrong side of that argument.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:31 am

Murkwood wrote:3. You must be talking about places like Texas. Sure, gay marriage isn't legal. But Texans make up for it by being the nicest God-dammed people you will ever meet! 99% don't care who the fuck you are, as long as you don't flaunt it.

Wrong... 110 % wrong. South Carolina/Georgia* FTW
We have hordes of immigrants clamoring to get in, and no one clamoring to get out. We also donate the most, privately and publicly. In short, USA! USA! USA!


:lol2:
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:33 am

Kiruri wrote:
Murkwood wrote:3. You must be talking about places like Texas. Sure, gay marriage isn't legal. But Texans make up for it by being the nicest God-dammed people you will ever meet! 99% don't care who the fuck you are, as long as you don't flaunt it.

Wrong... 110 % wrong. South Carolina/Georgia* FTW
We have hordes of immigrants clamoring to get in, and no one clamoring to get out. We also donate the most, privately and publicly. In short, USA! USA! USA!


:lol2:

I'll admit, Georgians and South Carolinians are pretty damn nice.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:35 am

Murkwood wrote:
Frazers wrote:
You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.

It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.

I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.

Debunked by unsourced editorials in obscure publications. Do you have a peer-reviewed paper with the same conclusions?

And cost is an important factor of healthcare, since it makes the difference in whether it's affordable for a large segment of the population or not. Also, using the McCarthyist term "socialised medicine" to refer to universal healthcare is really hurting your credibility.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:38 am

Ainin wrote:
Murkwood wrote:It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.

I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.

Debunked by unsourced editorials in obscure publications. Do you have a peer-reviewed paper with the same conclusions?

And cost is an important factor of healthcare, since it makes the difference in whether it's affordable for a large segment of the population or not. Also, using the McCarthyist term "socialised medicine" to refer to universal healthcare is really hurting your credibility.

It's a legitimate term.

Socialized medicine is a term used to describe and discuss systems of universal health care—that is, medical and hospital care for all at a nominal cost by means of government regulation of health care and subsidies derived from taxation


I don't see why you are calling it "McCarthyist". It was invented during the Truman presidency.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159037
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:39 am

I imagine I could make do.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:40 am

I could do it yes. However its not high on the list of places I'd like to live, probably my least favorite place in the Anglosphere.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Frazers
Minister
 
Posts: 2028
Founded: Mar 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:41 am

Ifreann wrote:I imagine I could make do.


You're Irish. You could just live off the gifts bestowed upon you by the 30 million 'Irish' folk out there in exchange for a quick jig and a tall tale.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Arval Va, Galloism, Giovanniland, Haganham, Ifreann, Imperiul romanum, Oceasia, The Sherpa Empire, Trolleborg, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads