Looking past the tone of his post he does have a point (albeit one for another thread)
Advertisement
by Ainin » Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:58 am
Germanic Imperium wrote:>Sees you use 2nd Ammendment and completely blow it down....You must be a Liberal.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 5:59 am
1). Guns in the constitution. Ah yes. The beloved 2nd Amendment. The gun loving culture many Americans espouse is something I just utterly revile, and cannot reconcile myself to accept, by living in a country where people are guaranteed the right to be able to easily kill each other in the name of self defense, due to the pervasive availability of guns. I know many Americans too revile US gun culture, but until the 2nd Amendment was itself amended or ideally removed (no chance in hell), I'd find this one of my biggest stumbling blocks.
2). Two party system. Two parties, different, yet the same. Both have been bought out by corporate interests and have done an equally terrible job in governing the state, which is trillions in debt and is often mired in political gridlock. One of my favoured sayings is the US is so free, they have one whole other party more than North Korea! (I know there are independents and other smaller parties, so take my "joke" with a grain of salt.)
3). "Backward views." Again, I know this applies to only some, but when a large percentage of Americans deny climate change (about 25%), wish to have Evolution discredited in schools in favour of Creationism (and I say this as a Christian myself) and oppose equal marriage opportunities for homosexuals, again, these are things that just make me cringe.
4). Health care. I am pleased to live in a country where healthcare is available for all, and I'm happy to pay the taxes for it, even if it does at times mean longer waiting periods.
5). Natural disasters. Pretty much every corner of the USA is affected or vulnerable to natural disasters, which happen on a fairly regular basis. The west has drought and earthquakes, the central states can be hammered by tornadoes, and the south and east are vulnerable to hurricanes and severe snow storms (the latter which we Canadians are very used to as well).
6). Death penalty. I am vehemently opposed to its use and implementation.
7). US reality TV programming blows.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:00 am
Cill Airne wrote:Non-American here, and I do live in the US; have for nearly 5 years. Even (attempted) to serve in the army here. You lot are welcome.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:12 am
Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world

by Doomwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:13 am
Frazers wrote:Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:15 am
Frazers wrote:Murkwood wrote:We have a great healthcare ...... compared to other parts of the world
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:16 am
Murkwood wrote:Frazers wrote:
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but it seems Mr Shapiro should be sourcing his opinions :
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/uk ... 42833.html
Most of those polls are skewed.
http://www.nationalreview.com/critical- ... mas-p-mill
http://www.creators.com/opinion/john-st ... study.html

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:19 am
Frazers wrote:Murkwood wrote:Most of those polls are skewed.
http://www.nationalreview.com/critical- ... mas-p-mill
http://www.creators.com/opinion/john-st ... study.html
Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by MERIZoC » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:20 am
Murkwood wrote:Frazers wrote:
Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?
I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.

by Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:22 am
Murkwood wrote:Frazers wrote:
Neither of those are able to dispute the recent report. Did you read them or just post the first two results from a google search?
I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:22 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:23 am
Frazers wrote:Murkwood wrote:I'm using the two reports as examples. I've never heard of this Mirror, Mirror thing, but it probably falls into the same credibility pitfalls as the others.
Soooooo you don't really know what you're talking about. Great. We can all ignore any further posts on the matter from yourself.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:26 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Frazers » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:29 am

by MERIZoC » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:30 am
Murkwood wrote:Frazers wrote:
You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.
It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.
I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.
by Kiruri » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:31 am
Murkwood wrote:3. You must be talking about places like Texas. Sure, gay marriage isn't legal. But Texans make up for it by being the nicest God-dammed people you will ever meet! 99% don't care who the fuck you are, as long as you don't flaunt it.
We have hordes of immigrants clamoring to get in, and no one clamoring to get out. We also donate the most, privately and publicly. In short, USA! USA! USA!

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:33 am
Kiruri wrote:Murkwood wrote:3. You must be talking about places like Texas. Sure, gay marriage isn't legal. But Texans make up for it by being the nicest God-dammed people you will ever meet! 99% don't care who the fuck you are, as long as you don't flaunt it.
Wrong... 110 % wrong. South Carolina/Georgia* FTWWe have hordes of immigrants clamoring to get in, and no one clamoring to get out. We also donate the most, privately and publicly. In short, USA! USA! USA!
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.
by Ainin » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:35 am
Murkwood wrote:Frazers wrote:
You're not fooling anyone. If you want to do a critical appraisal of the report go for it. Until then we can all agree you're guessing and praying no-one asks too much.
It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.
I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.

by Murkwood » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:38 am
Ainin wrote:Murkwood wrote:It says "cost" as one of it's measurements. This is much more likely to support Socialized medicine.
I could do more of this, but guess what? For sources, it uses the WHO survey and the Commonwealth Fund one. The ones that were debunked.
Debunked by unsourced editorials in obscure publications. Do you have a peer-reviewed paper with the same conclusions?
And cost is an important factor of healthcare, since it makes the difference in whether it's affordable for a large segment of the population or not. Also, using the McCarthyist term "socialised medicine" to refer to universal healthcare is really hurting your credibility.
Socialized medicine is a term used to describe and discuss systems of universal health care—that is, medical and hospital care for all at a nominal cost by means of government regulation of health care and subsidies derived from taxation
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Greater-London » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Arval Va, Galloism, Giovanniland, Haganham, Ifreann, Imperiul romanum, Oceasia, The Sherpa Empire, Trolleborg, Zurkerx
Advertisement