NATION

PASSWORD

It's called rubberneckin', baby.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:41 am

Trollzilla wrote:-snip-

I should probably have mentioned I'm not a native English speaker and Portuguese has no similar insult.

Also, it's not opposite sex. To say opposite sex is to imply that the sexes are mutually exclusive instead of extremes on a rather wide and complex continuum.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Carbon based lifeforms
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 463
Founded: Apr 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Carbon based lifeforms » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:41 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Carbon based lifeforms wrote:You're being obnoxious.

Are being? The correct is plain "are". :p

There is a clear distinction in meaning between those two. If you're going to try being a smartass, make sure you're right. More importantly: does saying this make you less obnoxious?

No. It doesn't.
______________________ FREE UKRAINE ______________________
_________________. STOP RUSSIAN FASCISM ._________________

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:42 am

Viritica wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, only in the South of Texas.

Here in Texas we have a curious demographic: towns like Brownsville and other small towns which are not metro areas are pretty conservative (or "red" counties). Dallas, Austin, Houston, El Paso and other metro areas/college towns are liberal by various degrees (they're "blue" counties predominantly). Dallas is certainly a bit more liberal than Austin, but not by a lot.

Liberals? They exist in Texas? Huh, who knew. :p


Ja. All the refugees from the northeast, no doubt. :D
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Trollzilla
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Trollzilla » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:42 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Viritica wrote:Yes.

Good that you gave up, then.

Yay, cisgender heterosexual men need to fear less for their bodily integrity when walking alone in public and you admit it! See? Feminism doesn't hurt. :p


When I thought I was cisgender hetero, I was never comfortable walking home. Not necessarily becase of women, but because the men would throw verbal abuse in my direction because I looked and walked like a girl. It was something I could not help.

Hearing someone walking behind me would always cause me to walk faster or brace myself for confrontation which I always went out of the way to avoid because I felt intimidated.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:43 am

Trollzilla wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Good that you gave up, then.

Yay, cisgender heterosexual men need to fear less for their bodily integrity when walking alone in public and you admit it! See? Feminism doesn't hurt. :p


When I thought I was cisgender hetero, I was never comfortable walking home. Not necessarily becase of women, but because the men would throw verbal abuse in my direction because I looked and walked like a girl. It was something I could not help.

Hearing someone walking behind me would always cause me to walk faster or brace myself for confrontation which I always went out of the way to avoid because I felt intimidated.


Should have carried a weapon.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:44 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Viritica wrote:Liberals? They exist in Texas? Huh, who knew. :p


Ja. All the refugees from the northeast, no doubt. :D


Poor Jim, you've missed quite a decade of stuff around here *pats shoulder* :p
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Trollzilla
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Trollzilla » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:44 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Trollzilla wrote:
But have you ever heard such women referred to as creeps or have you only heard men being referred as creeps?


Does it make a difference?


Actually... yes it does. For it to not be a slur then it has to used in reference to both men and women who leer equally. But it is not.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:44 am

Viritica wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:I didn't. I implied (and later said) I didn't found indication of your claims, and thus asked you where exactly was the evidence pertinent to the debate.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/09/living/chris-brown-female-on-male-rape/

"I want people to understand that it's not about how physically strong you are," he says. "We [men] are conditioned to believe that we cannot be victimized in such a way."

That's interesting because this happens to be a debate about feeling threatened from the potential violent actions of complete strangers before you ever really meet them and allow them to be intimate to you in your life.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:45 am

Carbon based lifeforms wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Are being? The correct is plain "are". :p

There is a clear distinction in meaning between those two. If you're going to try being a smartass, make sure you're right. More importantly: does saying this make you less obnoxious?

No. It doesn't.

I'm saying I am always obnoxious. I am obnoxious by definition. So obnoxious, I'm almost really indeed actually noxious!
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:45 am

Trollzilla wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Does it make a difference?


Actually... yes it does. For it to not be a slur then it has to used in reference to both men and women who leer equally. But it is not.


No, I mean, using the slur or not. Does it make a difference that the behavior is stupid and uncomfortable?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:47 am

Trollzilla wrote:When I thought I was cisgender hetero

By men I mean physically average males above by their 20s or over.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Trollzilla
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Trollzilla » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:47 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Trollzilla wrote:-snip-

I should probably have mentioned I'm not a native English speaker and Portuguese has no similar insult.

Also, it's not opposite sex. To say opposite sex is to imply that the sexes are mutually exclusive instead of extremes on a rather wide and complex continuum.


I do not speak Portuguese either. I am not sure how to explain it. But as you say, it does not refer to opposite sex.


Since I am not sure which post you were referring to I can only hope I responding to the right one.

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:48 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:

"I want people to understand that it's not about how physically strong you are," he says. "We [men] are conditioned to believe that we cannot be victimized in such a way."

That's interesting because this happens to be a debate about feeling threatened from the potential violent actions of complete strangers before you ever really meet them and allow them to be intimate to you in your life.

Okay?
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Viritica
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7790
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Viritica » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:48 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Viritica wrote:Liberals? They exist in Texas? Huh, who knew. :p


Ja. All the refugees from the northeast, no doubt. :D

:lol2:
Empire of Viritica (PMT) · Factbook (Incomplete)
Hamas started this after all
NSG's Resident KKKoch Rethuglican Shill
Watch Mark Levin shred Jon Stewart
The Jewish Reich is upon us

Conservative Atheist, Pro-Choice, Pro-LGBT rights, Pro-Israel, Zionist, Anti-UN

User avatar
Trollzilla
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Trollzilla » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:48 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Trollzilla wrote:
When I thought I was cisgender hetero, I was never comfortable walking home. Not necessarily becase of women, but because the men would throw verbal abuse in my direction because I looked and walked like a girl. It was something I could not help.

Hearing someone walking behind me would always cause me to walk faster or brace myself for confrontation which I always went out of the way to avoid because I felt intimidated.


Should have carried a weapon.


As much as I support the second amendment and your right to carry one should you feel the need, I myself choose not to.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:50 am

Trollzilla wrote:I do not speak Portuguese either. I am not sure how to explain it. But as you say, it does not refer to opposite sex.


Since I am not sure which post you were referring to I can only hope I responding to the right one.

The one where you explain about a friend of yours who wanted to become a woman in order to understand them.

And Portuguese got no insult like 'creep'. It is generally translated to terms that really convey as their true notions 'pervert', 'asshole', 'moron' or similar ones depending on context.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:51 am

Viritica wrote:Okay?

:palm:

You had no point to dispute because you just misinterpreted me.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Trollzilla
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 449
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Trollzilla » Sat Jun 21, 2014 12:52 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Trollzilla wrote:
Actually... yes it does. For it to not be a slur then it has to used in reference to both men and women who leer equally. But it is not.


No, I mean, using the slur or not. Does it make a difference that the behavior is stupid and uncomfortable?


No. If you feel uncomfortable to the point of feeling threatened then the person you feel threatened by could be referred to by the term. My objection was to it being used exclusively toward men.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:26 am

Trollzilla wrote:
Norstal wrote:My hyperbole meter went off-charts from this and crashed itself.


We never ever hear the word "creep" used to refer to women who stare. It is only used for guys who stare. That is what makes it a slur.

...I've heard it used against women. But that's besides the point. Women haven't paraded through their neighborhood wearing ghost costumes lynching men yet. It's disingenuous to compare it with the word "nigger."
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57858
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:31 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:

"I want people to understand that it's not about how physically strong you are," he says. "We [men] are conditioned to believe that we cannot be victimized in such a way."

That's interesting because this happens to be a debate about feeling threatened from the potential violent actions of complete strangers before you ever really meet them and allow them to be intimate to you in your life.



see, this is the problem with fucking feminists.
What do you want exactly.
He just showed you that the reason men don't feel the same way is that they are typically conditioned out of it. They get raped and don't even think it's rape.
BUT
Women get raped and know it is, so they get to be acknowledged as victims.
It's the same with this staring nonsense. The reason women are visibly "victims" of this is because they havn't had it beaten out of them to shut up about it.
If every time women brought this up, we ruthlessly mocked them, maybe assaulted them kicked the shit into them, told them to stop being such babies when they complained about the beating, etc. Eventually they'd shut up, and then they'd be in exactly the same situation the males are.
That's what they want, right? Equality? You think the men are privileged, right? Because they don't complain about it?
They make me absolutely sick.

Oh the poor women who have to live in fear of being raped when someone looks at them funny.
Those dastardly men don't know what thats like, having been socially conditioned NOT TO FEAR being raped and to just accept it, but who instead have to fear their own fucking thoughts and feelings because if they show the slightest weakness they might be assaulted or mocked or something.
Such privilege.

And like I keep pointing out to them, the studies show that the majority of gender based shaming of males comes from females. So we're left with this situation.


Feminist: "Ok, so who's a rape victim!"
Female 1: "Me."
Female 2: "Me."
Male 1: "Me."
Female 3: "LOL FAGGOT! FAG! LOLOL! MAN UP YOU PUSSY! OMG!"
Male 2: "..."
Male 3: "..."
Female 4: "Me."

Feminist "See! We're obviously the bigger victim in all this! Wahhhhhh!"

It's absolutely disgusting. When people identify as a feminist to me, it's like a damn fucking trigger word.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:34 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:And like I keep pointing out to them, the studies show that the majority of gender based shaming of males comes from females.

Feel free to drop this in a radfem space yourself.

I would love to watch the shitstorm and counterbalance both your arguments and theirs.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57858
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:36 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:And like I keep pointing out to them, the studies show that the majority of gender based shaming of males comes from females.

Feel free to drop this in a radfem space yourself.

I would love to watch the shitstorm and counterbalance both your arguments and theirs.



Do it yourself.
http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archiv ... er/275322/
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:37 am


...being an MRA isn't in my interests?

Defending an anti-feminist friend would be, but surely not saying people do feminism wrong when I don't really understand their message.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57858
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:42 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:

...being an MRA isn't in my interests?

Defending an anti-feminist friend would be, but surely not saying people do feminism wrong when I don't really understand their message.


I'm not an MRA. I'm an anti-feminist gender abolitionist. Trust me, I give the MRA a load of shit too. Albeit more politely. I've yet to see any kind of acknowledgement that women are the source of modern gender problems from the feminist movement. Which makes their entire shenanigan just one long, drawn out, harrassment of males.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:43 am

With the kind of stuff like this, I believe the oppression of male persons will happen in the next 20 years and will be treated like second-class citizens. Don't let the Matriarchy take over.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Applebania, Duvniask, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Galloism, North Cromch, North Korea Choson, Urzikstaniya, Waria, Zahrif

Advertisement

Remove ads