NATION

PASSWORD

Labour Party UK: No welfare for you!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:56 am

*bursts into song*

"The people's flag is palest pink
It's not the colour you might think
White collar workers stand and cheer
The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit
So nobody will notice it
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

The cloth cap and the wollen scarf
Are images outdated
For we're the party's avant garde
And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high
The college scarf, the old school tie
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

New Labour's flag is palest pink
It's not as red as you might think
And Tony's added shades of blue
He does not care for me and you
The people's flag is palest pink
Best drop it now before we stink
I rather like the Tory Blue
And Cam'ron's policies - I'll have them too

Now ditch we all that old red flower
Anything to cling to power
The working class can kiss my ass
It's gold I worship, first and last."
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:05 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Making it so that if you work, you dont lose ALL your benefits, but are instead weened off them.

3 really fucking good ideas that the labour party could campaign on.

The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.

User avatar
Herrebrugh
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15206
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Herrebrugh » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:07 am

4years wrote:*bursts into song*

"The people's flag is palest pink
It's not the colour you might think
White collar workers stand and cheer
The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit
So nobody will notice it
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

The cloth cap and the wollen scarf
Are images outdated
For we're the party's avant garde
And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high
The college scarf, the old school tie
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

New Labour's flag is palest pink
It's not as red as you might think
And Tony's added shades of blue
He does not care for me and you
The people's flag is palest pink
Best drop it now before we stink
I rather like the Tory Blue
And Cam'ron's policies - I'll have them too

Now ditch we all that old red flower
Anything to cling to power
The working class can kiss my ass
It's gold I worship, first and last."


Bravo :clap:

Now all we need is a Dutch version for the PvdA.
Uyt naem Zijner Majeſteyt Jozef III, bij de gratie Godts, Koningh der Herrebrugheylanden, Prins van Rheda, Heer van Jozefslandt, enz. enz. enz.
Im Namen Seiner Majeſtät Joſeph III., von Gottes Gnaden König der Herrenbrückinſeln, Prinz von Rheda, Herr von Josephsland etc. etc. etc.


The Factbook of the Kingdom of the Herrebrugh Islands
Where the Website-Style Factbook Originated!

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:11 am

Nierr wrote:The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.

I find it hard to see a way to raise living standards without a strong economy. The short term living standards sacrifice was made so that the economy can get going. Once it does, living standards will come back up again.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Caverna
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Caverna » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:12 am

Nierr wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Making it so that if you work, you dont lose ALL your benefits, but are instead weened off them.

3 really fucking good ideas that the labour party could campaign on.

The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.


Maybe you can say what could be done if you're such an expert?
Last edited by Caverna on Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:13 am, edited 5 times in total.

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5791
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:13 am

4years wrote:*bursts into song*

"The people's flag is palest pink
It's not the colour you might think
White collar workers stand and cheer
The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit
So nobody will notice it
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

The cloth cap and the wollen scarf
Are images outdated
For we're the party's avant garde
And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high
The college scarf, the old school tie
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

New Labour's flag is palest pink
It's not as red as you might think
And Tony's added shades of blue
He does not care for me and you
The people's flag is palest pink
Best drop it now before we stink
I rather like the Tory Blue
And Cam'ron's policies - I'll have them too

Now ditch we all that old red flower
Anything to cling to power
The working class can kiss my ass
It's gold I worship, first and last."


Glorious.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:14 am

Britanno wrote:
Nierr wrote:The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.

I find it hard to see a way to raise living standards without a strong economy. The short term living standards sacrifice was made so that the economy can get going. Once it does, living standards will come back up again.

Except in the 80s, where the economy was doing just as bad, this figure was just 14%.

User avatar
Multifarity
Envoy
 
Posts: 226
Founded: Oct 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Multifarity » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:16 am

Britanno wrote:
Nierr wrote:The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.

I find it hard to see a way to raise living standards without a strong economy. The short term living standards sacrifice was made so that the economy can get going. Once it does, living standards will come back up again.
You don't get an economy going by reducing demand and damaging confidence.

Economies recover in spite of austerity.
British Genderqueer Intactivist Pokémon Trainer
Economic Left/Right: -5.12 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.67
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Time Magazine Person Of The Year
I hate Tories. If I see a Tory, I eat a Tory.
A small and relatively wealthy parliamentary republic with a population of 1.2 million, covering most of northern Yorkshire in Britain, which became independent from the UK in 1987 in the desire to create a state which prioritises civil rights, social mobility, individuality and heterogeneity above all else. It's noted for it's absence of a gender-binary, it's highly progressive taxation and very well funded welfare state.
Map

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:18 am

Caverna wrote:
Maybe you can say what could be done if you're such an expert?


No expert but perhaps...

- Raise the minimum wage
- A cut in VAT
- Raise the threshold in which you start paying income tax to a years salary on the minimum wage
- Abolish NI contribution's and raise the top rate of income tax to make up the loses
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:18 am

Britanno wrote:
Nierr wrote:The problem with that is that it hasn't worked. The cost of living crisis isn't just Labour buzz - there actually is one. The economy may be recovering but more people than ever live below minimum living standards - 18 million - or 1 in 3.

Much more needs to be done, but this government just isn't interested in doing it.

I find it hard to see a way to raise living standards without a strong economy. The short term living standards sacrifice was made so that the economy can get going. Once it does, living standards will come back up again.



Actually I agree with that, and the Tories have done well in that regard (despite what others say). Now they need to start transforming the recovery into higher wages.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:20 am

Why is there such opposition here? Letting people at age of 18 claim benefits because they don't have education/ skills for job market (which AS level or equivalent essentially is) is condemning those people to lifelong dependency in welfare. If they are unemployed, they most certainly can take on a course, either academic or otherwise, to ensure they have required qualifications.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:20 am

Valaran wrote:
Britanno wrote:I find it hard to see a way to raise living standards without a strong economy. The short term living standards sacrifice was made so that the economy can get going. Once it does, living standards will come back up again.



Actually I agree with that, and the Tories have done well in that regard (despite what others say). Now they need to start transforming the recovery into higher wages.

That 1 in 3 figure has been rising since the '80s. Even when the economy was good for most of the past 20 years, the figure rose.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Caverna
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Caverna » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:22 am

Greater-London wrote:
Caverna wrote:
Maybe you can say what could be done if you're such an expert?


No expert but perhaps...

- Raise the minimum wage
- A cut in VAT
- Raise the threshold in which you start paying income tax to a years salary on the minimum wage
- Abolish NI contribution's and raise the top rate of income tax to make up the loses


Income tax for top is almost 50%. There is no room to raise.

I think UK huge debt is one of the problems. Currently UK must pay 1 billion pounds interests per week and this sum is rising.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:23 am

Great Nepal wrote:Why is there such opposition here? Letting people at age of 18 claim benefits because they don't have education/ skills for job market (which AS level or equivalent essentially is) is condemning those people to lifelong dependency in welfare. If they are unemployed, they most certainly can take on a course, either academic or otherwise, to ensure they have required qualifications.


It's actually quite a good idea from the Labour party. Especially now that the school leaving age has risen to 18; everyone in that age bracket will have left education before 18 and thus will REALLY struggle in the future.

I also disagree that this will alienate core Labour voters, they aren't demonizing people on welfare this will GENUINELY benefit them in the long run and a way of getting them into the job market.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:23 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:My friend thinks Milibands policy advisors hate his fucking guts because he stole the election and want him gone as leader, hence why they keep handing him these insane policies, so they can generate enough hatred and discontent to shove him before the election and get the person we actually voted for, the other Miliband.

...
It's a possibility.

Jesus Christ, it's The Thick of It series 4 in RL
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:31 am

Caverna wrote:
Income tax for top is almost 50%. There is no room to raise.

I think UK huge debt is one of the problems. Currently UK must pay 1 billion pounds interests per week and this sum is rising.


Well its 45% so not really almost 50%. There is room for a raise you just have a SuperTax for the mega rich thats 50%. You can then avoid clobbering the middle classes who are sitting in the current highest rate of tax.

The debt is huge, however that doesn't mean that you can't raise taxes. In fact a tax rise in order for us to do away with national insurance contributions would mean that those on lower incomes would have more money to spend creating growth. Also less to pay for employers which would encourage them to hire new staff and expand their businesses. This means in the long term the debt would be going down.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Multifarity
Envoy
 
Posts: 226
Founded: Oct 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Multifarity » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:32 am

4years wrote:*bursts into song*

"The people's flag is palest pink
It's not the colour you might think
White collar workers stand and cheer
The Labour government is here
We'll change the country bit by bit
So nobody will notice it
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

The cloth cap and the wollen scarf
Are images outdated
For we're the party's avant garde
And we are educated
So raise the rolled umbrella high
The college scarf, the old school tie
And just to show that we're sincere
We'll sing The Red Flag once a year

New Labour's flag is palest pink
It's not as red as you might think
And Tony's added shades of blue
He does not care for me and you
The people's flag is palest pink
Best drop it now before we stink
I rather like the Tory Blue
And Cam'ron's policies - I'll have them too

Now ditch we all that old red flower
Anything to cling to power
The working class can kiss my ass
It's gold I worship, first and last."
"He's telling us to hug a hoodie! He's ring-fenced education, healthcare and police spending! He applauded Tony Blair when he left Parliament for the last time, David Cameron is a compromising, leftist disgrace, what's happened to The Conservative Party! What's happened to the right in Britain?!"

-Tory in 2008
British Genderqueer Intactivist Pokémon Trainer
Economic Left/Right: -5.12 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.67
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate
Time Magazine Person Of The Year
I hate Tories. If I see a Tory, I eat a Tory.
A small and relatively wealthy parliamentary republic with a population of 1.2 million, covering most of northern Yorkshire in Britain, which became independent from the UK in 1987 in the desire to create a state which prioritises civil rights, social mobility, individuality and heterogeneity above all else. It's noted for it's absence of a gender-binary, it's highly progressive taxation and very well funded welfare state.
Map

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:33 am

Greater-London wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:Why is there such opposition here? Letting people at age of 18 claim benefits because they don't have education/ skills for job market (which AS level or equivalent essentially is) is condemning those people to lifelong dependency in welfare. If they are unemployed, they most certainly can take on a course, either academic or otherwise, to ensure they have required qualifications.


It's actually quite a good idea from the Labour party. Especially now that the school leaving age has risen to 18; everyone in that age bracket will have left education before 18 and thus will REALLY struggle in the future.

I also disagree that this will alienate core Labour voters, they aren't demonizing people on welfare this will GENUINELY benefit them in the long run and a way of getting them into the job market.

But how will this actually get those people the same education as those who graduated in the years to follow?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Caverna
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jun 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Caverna » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:34 am

Greater-London wrote:
Caverna wrote:
Income tax for top is almost 50%. There is no room to raise.

I think UK huge debt is one of the problems. Currently UK must pay 1 billion pounds interests per week and this sum is rising.


Well its 45% so not really almost 50%. There is room for a raise you just have a SuperTax for the mega rich thats 50%. You can then avoid clobbering the middle classes who are sitting in the current highest rate of tax.

The debt is huge, however that doesn't mean that you can't raise taxes. In fact a tax rise in order for us to do away with national insurance contributions would mean that those on lower incomes would have more money to spend creating growth. Also less to pay for employers which would encourage them to hire new staff and expand their businesses. This means in the long term the debt would be going down.


Well if debt or budget deficit isn't reduced then all this added tax will eventually be useless. You can't always increase tax to fix problems. It will just buy some time but won't matter in the long run.

User avatar
Great Franconia and Verana
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5543
Founded: Apr 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Franconia and Verana » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:36 am

That's why I would vote for the Conservatives in 2015, Labour is in a tailspin just trying anything to get seats. The Tories are actually making sense and have really out maneuvered Labour for the Centrist voters and issues

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:39 am

Geilinor wrote:But how will this actually get those people the same education as those who graduated in the years to follow?


Because they will have to take A levels or equivalent qualifications, which from now all school leavers will have. If your unemployed, in this age group and and haven't continued on with at least some form of education/training post GCSE then the system has failed you.

You may be unaware of how in a few years time you'll be far less qualified than anyone else your competing with or not have the confidence in yourself to go back to college and get some skills. As such you may actually need to be forced to do it, regardless it will help in the long run.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:42 am

Great Franconia and Verana wrote:That's why I would vote for the Conservatives in 2015, Labour is in a tailspin just trying anything to get seats. The Tories are actually making sense and have really out maneuvered Labour for the Centrist voters and issues



I might also vote Tory but there sure aren't moving towards the center. Instead, many are pandering to the Ukip voters, which is deeply troubling. The party is also divided over several key issues, namely Europe and foreign policy. The conservatives have a more clear vision for Britain but it isn't exactly the best one.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:42 am

Caverna wrote:
Well if debt or budget deficit isn't reduced then all this added tax will eventually be useless. You can't always increase tax to fix problems. It will just buy some time but won't matter in the long run.


Well not really, not if higher rates of taxes means that your books become balanced. I'm also not suggesting a tax raise to fix our problems what I suggest is that you can solve the cost of living crisis by changing where the tax burden falls. You cut taxes on low and middle income earners and THEN pay for that by raising taxes on the very rich. You could also cut public expenditure in some areas at the same time.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:44 am

Greater-London wrote:
Geilinor wrote:But how will this actually get those people the same education as those who graduated in the years to follow?


Because they will have to take A levels or equivalent qualifications, which from now all school leavers will have. If your unemployed, in this age group and and haven't continued on with at least some form of education/training post GCSE then the system has failed you.

So why not change the failed system?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6760
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:45 am

Y'know its funny, this kind of policy is actually likely to probably win him a load of votes from the working class.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cerespasia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Gorutimania, Ifreann, Infected Mushroom, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Sarolandia, The Scandoslavic Empire, Tungstan, United Iraq Republic, W3C [Validator]

Advertisement

Remove ads