NATION

PASSWORD

Is ''Hooters'' Degrading To Women?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is ''Hooters'' Degrading To Women?

Poll ended at Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:05 pm

Yes
90
25%
No
213
58%
Both
62
17%
 
Total votes : 365

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:06 am

Vozt Yurkova wrote:
Upper America wrote:But do they sexualize them as much as hooter's does? Sure, they'll hire attractive staff, but not all restaraunts who hire attractive go out of their way to show it.


Besides, is Hooters even that sexualised? I'll admit I've never been to one, but someone I knew at university worked there. From what she used to say/put up on Facebook it looked fairly tame in the grand scheme of things (and this was a girl who would happily post her topless holiday pictures). Shorts and a tank top might reveal more than trousers and a waistcoat, but go to the beach this summer and you'll see even more skin.

This^. They aren't showing any genitals, they're just showing skin.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Upper America
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1862
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Upper America » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:12 am

Geilinor wrote:
Vozt Yurkova wrote:
Besides, is Hooters even that sexualised? I'll admit I've never been to one, but someone I knew at university worked there. From what she used to say/put up on Facebook it looked fairly tame in the grand scheme of things (and this was a girl who would happily post her topless holiday pictures). Shorts and a tank top might reveal more than trousers and a waistcoat, but go to the beach this summer and you'll see even more skin.

This^. They aren't showing any genitals, they're just showing skin.

They can't show genitals. If they did, someone would shut them down immediately.
Pro: LGBT, Evolution, Obama, United States, capitalism, United Nations, South Korea, Israel, EU, Gun Control, Pro-Choice, Women's Rights, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech
Neutral: Creationism
Anti: Homophobia, Discrimination, Racism, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Communism, Socialism, Chinese censorship

I am a Christian male who supports gay equality, abortion, and believes in evolution. Got a problem? Bring it up to the complaints department, that paper shredder to your right

Wars:
Operation Yaramaqui Liberation- Cancelled
Invasion of Vekalse (Operation Contagion)- Ongoing

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:15 am

Upper America wrote:
Geilinor wrote:This^. They aren't showing any genitals, they're just showing skin.

They can't show genitals. If they did, someone would shut them down immediately.

Is showing more skin than one would usually in a restaurant degrading?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:16 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I'm sure the ~90% male population of NSG will have valuable insight to offer on this topic, and I look forward to an enlightening thread.

So, just because your a man means you can't have an opinion?

I wonder what you must think about free speech and expression that you take mocking the value of people's opinions for suggesting that they can't have an opinion.
Last edited by Ifreann on Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:17 am

Ifreann wrote:
Murkwood wrote:So, just because your a man means you can't have an opinion?

I wonder what kind you must think about free speech and expression that you take mocking the value of people's opinions for suggesting that they can't have an opinion.

It sounded like you were dismissing all the opinions of men in this forum. Because they were men.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Getrektistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 453
Founded: May 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Getrektistan » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:20 am

Geilinor wrote:
Upper America wrote:They can't show genitals. If they did, someone would shut them down immediately.

Is showing more skin than one would usually in a restaurant degrading?


When the restaurant is designed around showcasing women showing more skin than usual in a society where women are often objectified, I think it's degrading.
Mushet wrote:That's just a disingenuous equivalance you can't just point a crucifix at somebody and blast their brains out, that's a big difference.


-Arabiyyah- wrote:I don't even understand the insult you are just calling me a spear with meat and onions?


Alyakia wrote:i think you're giving her too much credit for turning a racist extremist party into a racist extremist party except we sorta hide it now


Dakini wrote:
Aurora Novus wrote:
I understand it perfectly. I'm sorry you apparently can't handle reality.

I'm sorry that you can't handle the English language.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:27 am

Murkwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I wonder what kind you must think about free speech and expression that you take mocking the value of people's opinions for suggesting that they can't have an opinion.

It sounded like you were dismissing all the opinions of men in this forum. Because they were men.

And it sounds like you think that dismissing an opinion is the same as thinking that that person cannot have an opinion.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:45 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
Norstal wrote:[Insert Hitler joke here]


Arbeit macht frei! :lol:

How did Hitler get in here?


Now I have an idea for a theme restaurant. The servers can be male and female, but they all have to be blonde haired and blue eyed.

And it will be called.... HITLERS.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:47 am

Ifreann wrote:
Murkwood wrote:It sounded like you were dismissing all the opinions of men in this forum. Because they were men.

And it sounds like you think that dismissing an opinion is the same as thinking that that person cannot have an opinion.

You're dismissing the opinion of men because they're men. On the Internet, how do you know if people are really who they say they are?
Last edited by Geilinor on Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Jumalariik
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5733
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jumalariik » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:49 am

I don't have an opinion, but I will say this: Since I live in a college town/city, in the summer, if you walk in the streets, all the girls are basically dressed as scantily as what I understand of hooters.
Varemeist tõuseb kättemaks! Eesti on Hiiumaast Petserini!
Pray for a new spiritual crusade against the left!-Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium
For: A Christian West, Tradition, Pepe, Catholicism, St. Thomas Aquinas, the rosary, warm cider, ramen noodles, kbac, Latin, Gavin McInnes, Pro-Life, kebabs, stability, Opus Dei
Against: the left wing, the Englightenment, Black Lives Matter, Islam, homosexual/transgender agenda, cultural marxism

Boycott Coke, drink Fanta

User avatar
Upper America
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1862
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Upper America » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:54 am

Geilinor wrote:
Upper America wrote:They can't show genitals. If they did, someone would shut them down immediately.

Is showing more skin than one would usually in a restaurant degrading?

The degrading part of Hooter's is how they judge you based on breast size. It's not the short shorts and tank tops that are degrading. I heard of a test in which you stand against a wall, and if your breasts and nose both touch the wall, you can work there.
Pro: LGBT, Evolution, Obama, United States, capitalism, United Nations, South Korea, Israel, EU, Gun Control, Pro-Choice, Women's Rights, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech
Neutral: Creationism
Anti: Homophobia, Discrimination, Racism, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, Hamas, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, Islamic State, Communism, Socialism, Chinese censorship

I am a Christian male who supports gay equality, abortion, and believes in evolution. Got a problem? Bring it up to the complaints department, that paper shredder to your right

Wars:
Operation Yaramaqui Liberation- Cancelled
Invasion of Vekalse (Operation Contagion)- Ongoing

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:55 am

Jumalariik wrote:I don't have an opinion, but I will say this: Since I live in a college town/city, in the summer, if you walk in the streets, all the girls are basically dressed as scantily as what I understand of hooters.

Out of their own free will. If you're an attractive girl who got rejected by Hooters, of all places, I will guarantee that it will destroy your self-esteem. So it's different.
Last edited by Norstal on Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Jumalariik
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5733
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jumalariik » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:57 am

Norstal wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:I don't have an opinion, but I will say this: Since I live in a college town/city, in the summer, if you walk in the streets, all the girls are basically dressed as scantily as what I understand of hooters.

Out of their own free will. If you're an attractive girl who got rejected by Hooters, of all places, I will guarantee that it will destroy your self-esteem. So it's different.

All I said was that they are dressed similar.
Does that make me a po-Hooters person?
No.
Does that make me an anti-Hooters person?
No.
Varemeist tõuseb kättemaks! Eesti on Hiiumaast Petserini!
Pray for a new spiritual crusade against the left!-Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium
For: A Christian West, Tradition, Pepe, Catholicism, St. Thomas Aquinas, the rosary, warm cider, ramen noodles, kbac, Latin, Gavin McInnes, Pro-Life, kebabs, stability, Opus Dei
Against: the left wing, the Englightenment, Black Lives Matter, Islam, homosexual/transgender agenda, cultural marxism

Boycott Coke, drink Fanta

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Thu Jun 19, 2014 9:59 am

Ifreann wrote:
Murkwood wrote:It sounded like you were dismissing all the opinions of men in this forum. Because they were men.

And it sounds like you think that dismissing an opinion is the same as thinking that that person cannot have an opinion.

Well, Murky is known for his general opinion about women. As an MRA he considers those to be not really people, and only real people are entitled to have opinions. Of course it doesn't stop there. Freedom of speech should only be enjoyed by white male neocons, of course. Other people just can't handle such intense levels of freedom.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8304
Founded: May 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Is ''Hooters'' Degrading To Women?

Postby Parhe » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:00 am

Before I said I found Hooters degrading. I still stand by that but really Hooters just seem degrading for everyone. Reasons I don't go to Hooters, besides the oily food that wouldn't be good for my face, is that I find it degrading, or at least demeaning, having my sexuality taken advantage of so blatantly, though I really don't find any sexual interest in most female bodies. Not that I think it is more degrading for men then it is for women, and of course I am okay with degrading myself as I did in the past if I feel the ends outweigh the negatives. I just don't feel it is like that for going to Hooters.

Also how often is it that Hooters is the only place hiring in a region? At least here there are plenty of restaurants and stores that are hiring. Even In-N-Out which pays about ten dollars an hour.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:11 am

No, Hooters isn't 'degrading'. It's women's business what they want to do, and they're the ones who judge whether it's degrading or not to do something. If they think it is they will not work at Hooter's. If they have no problems with it or might, god forbid, enjoy such a job, they will work there. No real issue here.

I've only ever been to one once. The food was pretty good, if a bit expensive to me for what it was. *shrug* Much like strip clubs it's not my scene but if other people enjoy it I see nothing to condemn.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:52 am

As a women, I find Hooters necessary part of our society. Sometimes I have the desire to both eat and check out lovely women and sometimes don't have the time to do both. This is where hooters comes in. It takes two great things, puts them together, cue symphony of angels, and creates a wonderful thing which would make an old guru cry with joy.

On a more serious note, I do think there is a problem with objectification outside of Hooters. Hooters girls clearly don't have a problem with showing off their bodies and with the sexual objectification. But there is a problem outside of there. People, not everyone like being objectified like that. And just because they work somewhere that objectifies them does not mean they like being objectified out of work. People need to learn this most basic concept.
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

User avatar
Distruzio
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23841
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Distruzio » Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:56 am

What? No. Beautiful women need to earn a living too. Why not do so in the way they choose?
Eastern Orthodox Christian

Anti-Progressive
Conservative

Anti-Feminist
Right leaning Distributist

Anti-Equity
Western Chauvanist

Anti-Globalism
Nationalist

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:06 am

Hurdegaryp wrote:
Ifreann wrote:And it sounds like you think that dismissing an opinion is the same as thinking that that person cannot have an opinion.

Well, Murky is known for his general opinion about women. As an MRA he considers those to be not really people, and only real people are entitled to have opinions. Of course it doesn't stop there. Freedom of speech should only be enjoyed by white male neocons, of course. Other people just can't handle such intense levels of freedom.

Hurd, for the least time. MRAs believe women are people, and don't hate them. I don't know how many ways I can say this. Can you get that through your thick skull?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Trotskylvania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17217
Founded: Jul 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Trotskylvania » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:08 am

Distruzio wrote:What? No. Beautiful women need to earn a living too. Why not do so in the way they choose?

Many people, including Hooters employees, earn a living through self-degradation.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in Posadism


"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:08 am

Geilinor wrote:
Vozt Yurkova wrote:
Besides, is Hooters even that sexualised? I'll admit I've never been to one, but someone I knew at university worked there. From what she used to say/put up on Facebook it looked fairly tame in the grand scheme of things (and this was a girl who would happily post her topless holiday pictures). Shorts and a tank top might reveal more than trousers and a waistcoat, but go to the beach this summer and you'll see even more skin.

This^. They aren't showing any genitals, they're just showing skin.

The employees also sign a contract stating that they understand that the business is based on female sexuality and that they won't sue over sexual harassment.

Also, the fucking place discriminates against potential employees based on cup size, ffs.
Last edited by Dakini on Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:09 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Elgomeria v2
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elgomeria v2 » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:09 am

nope
Guess Who's back ?

User avatar
Murkwood
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7806
Founded: Apr 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Murkwood » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:11 am

Dakini wrote:
Geilinor wrote:This^. They aren't showing any genitals, they're just showing skin.

The employees also sign a contract stating that they understand that the business is based on female sexuality and that they won't sue over sexual harassment.

Also, the fucking place discriminates against potential employees based on cup size, ffs.

And? If you run a business based on hotness, why not?
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o

Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.

Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

Catholicism has the fullness of the splendor of truth: The Bible and the Church Fathers agree!

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:12 am

Murkwood wrote:
Dakini wrote:The employees also sign a contract stating that they understand that the business is based on female sexuality and that they won't sue over sexual harassment.

Also, the fucking place discriminates against potential employees based on cup size, ffs.

And? If you run a business based on hotness, why not?

Because it's technically not legal to create a hostile work environment for your employees where sexual harassment is to be expected?

User avatar
Parhe
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8304
Founded: May 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Is ''Hooters'' Degrading To Women?

Postby Parhe » Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:17 am

Dakini wrote:
Murkwood wrote:And? If you run a business based on hotness, why not?

Because it's technically not legal to create a hostile work environment for your employees where sexual harassment is to be expected?

Never been to Hooters but do the worked get sexually harassed often? Besides oogling I suppose, though I do consider that a form of harassment in most cases.
Hey, it is Parhe :D I am always open to telegrams.
I know it is a Work-In-Progress, but I would love it if y'all looked at my new factbook and gave me some feedback!

BRING BACK THE ICE CLIMBERS

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Ecalpa, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Jilia, La Xinga, Neu California, New Gonch, Port Caverton, San Lumen, Solaryia, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, The Lund, Uiiop, Valrifall, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads