Master Shake wrote:Man he never answered my question...
Damn I'm bummed since he tricked me into some stupid debate on capitalism and communism in Nigeria...I must be a fool...
What was your question again?
Advertisement

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:45 am
Master Shake wrote:Man he never answered my question...
Damn I'm bummed since he tricked me into some stupid debate on capitalism and communism in Nigeria...I must be a fool...

by Master Shake » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:47 am

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:47 am

by Big Jim P » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:48 am
Ardoki wrote:Master Shake wrote:
How is it possible to rape a girl inside of a Hooter's with 20 guests and other workers present?
I mean the other people wouldn't allow such things to happen.So provide me with an answer please...
The man would wait until she left, he would then stalk her, and rape her at some point.

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:49 am

by Cadonica » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:49 am

by Camelza » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:49 am
Ardoki wrote:Camelza wrote:Directly is the only correct answer, cudos for you for having at least some sense on a subject other than sexual egalitarianism.
Ah, I almost forgot, it's the workers, not the public.
In my opinion, the disabled and the sick etc should also be included in having control and ownership. They shall belong to all, not just the workers.

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:52 am
Camelza wrote:Ardoki wrote:In my opinion, the disabled and the sick etc should also be included in having control and ownership. They shall belong to all, not just the workers.
"To each according to his ability to each according to his needs", it is practically meant that sick and disabled people would be treated fairly and would have as much power in political decisions as the rest, plus "workers" refers to the working class in general. Have you even read Marx's works?

by Copenhagen Metropolis » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:52 am
Keyboard Warriors wrote:Of course it's degrading. Whether or not the waitresses were willingly employed doesn't alter the fact that they are there to provide a set of tits.

by Master Shake » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:56 am

by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:56 am
Ardoki wrote:Camelza wrote:Rape? Really? You know we're talking about Hooters, eh? Get your things strait, if consent is given and the person is emotionaly fine and has control over her/his actions, then you're degrading their intelligence by saying they're being raped.
Good gracious...
Hooter's also offers a prostitution service I thought?
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

by Master Shake » Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:59 am

by Hardrina » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:00 am
Hooters: Yo, we have mediocre food.
Person: And? Am I supposed to be impressed? What makes your restaurants special?
Hooters: We have boobs, too.
Person: ... A Buffalo Chicken Burger please.

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:00 am

by Nazi Flower Power » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:01 am

by Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:02 am
Hardrina wrote:I don't think it is degrading. Just primitive. You know, like thier business policy is likeHooters: Yo, we have mediocre food.
Person: And? Am I supposed to be impressed? What makes your restaurants special?
Hooters: We have boobs, too.
Person: ... A Buffalo Chicken Burger please.
And it seems like it's working.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it
Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

by Master Shake » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:02 am

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:03 am

by Big Jim P » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:03 am
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Big Jim P wrote:
No, just the one insufficiently attractive to do it themselves.
When women oppose the sex industry or the sexualization of women in general, it is not always about being too unattractive to do it themselves. Some people are just naturally uncomfortable with sexuality.

by Ardoki » Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:03 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Canarsia, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Habsburg Mexico, Hirota, Juansonia, Kaskalma, Kitsuva, New Ciencia, Philjia, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement