True. But what else could they do ? Keep turning the other cheek ?
At some point one has to come to the conclusion that does not work. And be fair - one offensive sign vs thousand does not really make you the bad guy

Advertisement

by The Alma Mater » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:14 am


by Lelouche » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:19 am
The Alma Mater wrote:
True. But what else could they do ? Keep turning the other cheek ?
At some point one has to come to the conclusion that does not work. And be fair - one offensive sign vs thousand does not really make you the bad guy

by Hitchensland » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:23 am

by Milks Empire » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:29 am
Hitchensland wrote:This idiot says that its wrong to put up a sign that mocks anything, when in reality putting a nativity scene is mocking the constitution...
Katganistan, in the One Stop Rules Shop, wrote:Flame: Expressing anger at someone in uncouth ways with OOC (out-of-character) comments (i.e. swearing, being obnoxious, threatening etc). It does to watch what you post IC (in-character) as well unless the other posters know you're not serious. You do not need to curse to be a flamer. Erudite slams while maintaining a veneer of politeness can also be considered flaming. Flaming in the forums should be reported in the Moderation forum, in the game itself, through Getting Help Page.

by TheRightWay » Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:58 am
The Alma Mater wrote:TheRightWay wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Missed the point, huh?
The other post (or puppet, I'm undecided) said "I would say the same of any religion" - and yet, menorahs and nativity scenes in the same public building at the same time are not being described in those same terms, even by that poster....
Also - of course - placing signs about religion, at Christmas, is not an attack on Christmas. That's the big flaw in the whole Christian propoganda war. It's an 'attack' on religion (if anything is being 'attacked') - focused on Christmas because that's when the most attention is focused on religion.
The difference is really intent ... this sign was intended as an attack, the other religious symbols that were up in the building at the same time as the nativity scene were not
I am still unsure why you are equating the two
You are assuming that the response was to the other symbols that were there at the same time, instead of a response to the general behaviour of christians throughout the year. To respond to the repeated insults of a whole year/decade/century/millenia with a single sign, the date of Christmas could merely be chosen because it would get attention.

by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:01 am
Hitchensland wrote:This idiot says that its wrong to put up a sign that mocks anything, when in reality putting a nativity scene is mocking the constitution...

by Grave_n_idle » Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:16 pm
TheRightWay wrote:What do holidays of other religions that happen to co-inside in time with Christmas have to do with a sign put in place to attack it?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Cho ba que, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dreria, Drew Durrnil, Eternal Algerstonia, Irish Hungarian Union, Kavanos, Necroghastia, Onceluria, Pasong Tirad, Port Caverton, Rary, Ryemarch, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Acolyte Confederacy, Tlaceceyaya
Advertisement