Socialist Czechia wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Source away, if you want. I still don't see how these problems - and they are problems - are serious enough that the NHS should be scrapped. What would you replace it with? The US system of private health care that's tied to your job, with government-provided care only after you reach 65? And you haven't said anything about the millions of people who've been treated by the NHS since the 1940s with no problems at all.
I didn't say NHS should be scrapped. I am saying, that NHS in Britain today is completely f*cked up and whole system needs massive purge from both useless surgeons and too bureaucrats.
I am from ex-socialist country with still massive public health care, so I know a thing or two how universal health care looks.
Too many 'Muricans around, I understand
I used British NHS simply as an example, that universal health care can end in horrific, inefficient and corrupted form.
Please do not say "Muricans" when addressing me. I find it offensive. So you think single-payer (universal) health care is okay, just that the British version has gotten bloated and inefficient? You could have said that to begin with. Inefficiency is a danger with any large government program. Still, the point was that the NHS has not caused the British economy to implode or explode or disintegrate, which is what we Americans are told all the time by the opponents of Obamacare and universal health care.