NATION

PASSWORD

Iraqi PM declares "State of Emergency" as ISIS occupy Mosul

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:16 pm

Valaran wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:So target those other things then, starting with Saudi Arabia. Those assholes had it too good for too long.



Right, just targeting nations doesn't exactly solve things.... (2003 anyone?)

AS then you would also have to target Turkey, Iran, and US itself as well to really solve the interests. Oh and don't forget the Syrian war, the helped cause instability, and Israel. This isn't realistic to do, and selective targeting only makes things worse.

So would partitioning Iraq. The only you're gonna solve this bullshit once and for all is fixing the whole Middle East.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:18 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
Valaran wrote:

Right, just targeting nations doesn't exactly solve things.... (2003 anyone?)

AS then you would also have to target Turkey, Iran, and US itself as well to really solve the interests. Oh and don't forget the Syrian war, the helped cause instability, and Israel. This isn't realistic to do, and selective targeting only makes things worse.

So would partitioning Iraq. The only you're gonna solve this bullshit once and for all is fixing the whole Middle East.



Partitioning Iraq isn't perfect but will ease ethnic tensions, as the groups don't have to compete for government (and their isn't a tyranny by majority). And solving the Middle East? That is practically impossible in the short term, from any standpoint. Where would one begin, and how?
Last edited by Valaran on Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Aushanit
Diplomat
 
Posts: 684
Founded: May 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Aushanit » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:28 pm

Post-Keynesian Economics wrote:So, fortune tellers of NSG, do you all think the ISIS will succeed in establishing a new state?

Probably not, while it can definetly hold the land for a long time I think after awhile they will start to loss ground. Of the Iraqi's can get competent leadership they will be a force to be reckoned with, the Revolutionary Guard are a powerful and well trained not to mention combat experienced. Same with the Kurdish Peshmerga who from what I can tell are fairing pretty well against ISIS. And I'm sure if there power grows nations like America, Turkey, and Israel would get involved although in varying capacities.

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:32 pm

Valaran wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:So would partitioning Iraq. The only you're gonna solve this bullshit once and for all is fixing the whole Middle East.



Partitioning Iraq isn't perfect but will ease ethnic tensions, as the groups don't have to compete for government (and their isn't a tyranny by majority)

There are many places of interest that won't be that easily divisible, like Baghdad and the oil reserves. Plus, they will still continue pulling Middle East bullshit, which won't end until the Middle East stops being so conducive to bullshit.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:34 pm

Blakk Metal wrote:
Valaran wrote:

Partitioning Iraq isn't perfect but will ease ethnic tensions, as the groups don't have to compete for government (and their isn't a tyranny by majority)

There are many places of interest that won't be that easily divisible, like Baghdad and the oil reserves. Plus, they will still continue pulling Middle East bullshit, which won't end until the Middle East stops being so conducive to bullshit.



Yes, but that won't happen anytime soon. We can divide Baghdad like Berlin, using the Germany example. Oil reserves are either Kurdish or in the Shia south, so they don't case too many problems.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:36 pm

Mmm. Turkey is well armed. So is Jordan and other countries in the region. Let them sort it out. It's their part of the world after all.

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:37 pm

Valaran wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:There are many places of interest that won't be that easily divisible, like Baghdad and the oil reserves. Plus, they will still continue pulling Middle East bullshit, which won't end until the Middle East stops being so conducive to bullshit.



Yes, but that won't happen anytime soon. We can divide Baghdad like Berlin, using the Germany example. Oil reserves are either Kurdish or in the Shia south, so they don't case too many problems.

Until the Sunnis use religion as an excuse to steal it.

User avatar
Scholmeria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1354
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholmeria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:38 pm

Distruzio wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:This talk of partition is a waste of time. Germany has a traditionally Catholic area and a traditionally Protestant area yet don't see them continuously fighting each other over religion.


Because Iraq is Germany, Sunnis are Protestants, and Shi'ites are Catholics?

Germany has been a nation-state for a lot longer than Iraq has been. Germany has been through some pretty rough transitions that united the people - can Iraqis say the same? Etc etc etc.

Germany existed prior as the Holy Roman Empire so the German nation exist at least 500 years.

What are the Kurds in the German case?

The Kurds are pro-western and religious tolerant, in case they have freedom they could serve as a base from which freedom and democracy woul be spread in the region.
GAZA 2014
For the brave Israeli soldiers <3

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:38 pm

Densaner wrote:Mmm. Turkey is well armed. So is Jordan and other countries in the region. Let them sort it out. It's their part of the world after all.

You could said nearly anything else and it would've sounded less stupid than what you said here.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Estado Paulista
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5791
Founded: Sep 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Estado Paulista » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:38 pm

Valaran wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:This talk of partition is a waste of time. Germany has a traditionally Catholic area and a traditionally Protestant area yet don't see them continuously fighting each other over religion.



But Germany is not torn apart by competing regional interests.


Even if it were, Germany is a federation. That helps alleviate those conflicts.
Last edited by Estado Paulista on Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Your nation is like a son. What it does right is your merit, as well as what it does wrong is your fault. When you praise it, be lucid and avoid exaggeration. Praising it too much can make it indolent. On the other hand, when you criticize it, be harsh, but do not ridicule it. Do your best to improve it, not through derision or disdain, but through good examples and dedication.

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:39 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Densaner wrote:Mmm. Turkey is well armed. So is Jordan and other countries in the region. Let them sort it out. It's their part of the world after all.

You could said nearly anything else and it would've sounded less stupid than what you said here.


Really? So Turkey and Jordan are pacifists are they? :lol:

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:40 pm

Densaner wrote:
Blasveck wrote:You could said nearly anything else and it would've sounded less stupid than what you said here.


Really? So Turkey and Jordan are pacifists are they? :lol:

No, the fact that you think that Jordan and Turkey should be the only ones to sort it out.

If that's not what you meant, then I rescind my previous comment and apologize for the hostility.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:42 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Densaner wrote:
Really? So Turkey and Jordan are pacifists are they? :lol:

No, the fact that you think that Jordan and Turkey should be the only ones to sort it out.

If that's not what you meant, then I rescind my previous comment and apologize for the hostility.


It is what I meant. Not just Turkey and Jordan. Iran is weighing in. No doubt Russia will have a view. Why should the West intervene when near neighbours won't lift a finger?

User avatar
Scholmeria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1354
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholmeria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Estado Paulista wrote:
Valaran wrote:

But Germany is not torn apart by competing regional interests.


Even if it were, Germany is a federation. That helps alleviate those conflicts.

It is a federation for different reason, also not to alleviate the religious conflict.

Germany was unite from smaller independent Kingdoms and Dukeships in 1871. The first German government decided to spare thoose structures within the new Empire (the new state was federative monarchy with subkingdoms as federative subjects).

You have had Kingdom of Bavaria, Kingdom of Prussia, Dukeship of Oldenburg with their ruling royal dynasties that recongnised the primacy of the German Emperor. The Federal nature of the German state is preserved until theese days.

Also, this all does have nothing to do with Iraq, so it is not good to compare it to Iraq. "Iraqis" are a social and colonial construct. They do not exist. It is the destiny of Iraq to be partitioned.
Last edited by Scholmeria on Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
GAZA 2014
For the brave Israeli soldiers <3

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:43 pm

Estado Paulista wrote:
Valaran wrote:

But Germany is not torn apart by competing regional interests.


Even if it were, Germany is a federation. That helps alleviate those conflicts.



Well there are many, many reasons why Iraq is not like Germany.
Last edited by Valaran on Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:46 pm

Densaner wrote:
Blasveck wrote:No, the fact that you think that Jordan and Turkey should be the only ones to sort it out.

If that's not what you meant, then I rescind my previous comment and apologize for the hostility.


It is what I meant. Not just Turkey and Jordan. Iran is weighing in. No doubt Russia will have a view. Why should the West intervene when near neighbours won't lift a finger?

Because if the US wants to have more non-monarchial allies in the Middle East besides Israel, it would be a good idea to assist them. And letting a terror group run around doing whatever the hell it wants isn't exactly a good thing either.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:50 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Densaner wrote:
It is what I meant. Not just Turkey and Jordan. Iran is weighing in. No doubt Russia will have a view. Why should the West intervene when near neighbours won't lift a finger?

Because if the US wants to have more non-monarchial allies in the Middle East besides Israel, it would be a good idea to assist them. And letting a terror group run around doing whatever the hell it wants isn't exactly a good thing either.



Yeah, terrorists ruin everyones' day.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Gezi Park
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1542
Founded: Apr 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gezi Park » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:09 pm

Scholmeria wrote:
Gezi Park wrote:
We speak the same language and other cultural stuff.

Ok, so they are basically etnic Turks living in Iraq. It is just weird why are they called "Turkmens" instead of Turks.


Anyway, Iraq is an artifical nation, it is nothing that a post-colonial creation which was created without the consulting of its people. So, the best would be a partition of Iraq.


They're not from Turkey. They're just Turkic, Turkmens are a Turkic group.

Yea, I agree with that.
Last edited by Gezi Park on Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
19-year old agnostic university student living in Izmir, Turkey. I consider myself a centre-left Kemalist, social liberal and civic nationalist/patriotic. I like drinking beer (Beck's, Carlsberg, Efes Pilsen), watching Anime and soccer (Fenerbahce fan here). I'm now a proud member of the newly founded Anatolia Party.

PRO: Enviromentalism, State feminism, Anti-clericalism, Individualism, EU (including Turkey), PES, LGBT rights, abortion, Legalize It movement, Laïcité, Westernization, Gezi youth, Tamarod, Greek-Turkish sisterhood, Ataturk's ideals

ANTI: Religious conservatism, Ethnic nationalism, Islamism, Religious zionism, Neo-Ottomanism, Imperialism, Irredentism, Prejudices, Stereotypes, Turcophobia, PKK, Free Syrian Army, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Qatar

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:32 pm

Scholmeria wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
Because Iraq is Germany, Sunnis are Protestants, and Shi'ites are Catholics?

Germany has been a nation-state for a lot longer than Iraq has been. Germany has been through some pretty rough transitions that united the people - can Iraqis say the same? Etc etc etc.

Germany existed prior as the Holy Roman Empire so the German nation exist at least 500 years.

What are the Kurds in the German case?

The Kurds are pro-western and religious tolerant, in case they have freedom they could serve as a base from which freedom and democracy woul be spread in the region.



Yeah this comment sums up my views pretty much on the issue.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:35 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Densaner wrote:
It is what I meant. Not just Turkey and Jordan. Iran is weighing in. No doubt Russia will have a view. Why should the West intervene when near neighbours won't lift a finger?

Because if the US wants to have more non-monarchial allies in the Middle East besides Israel, it would be a good idea to assist them. And letting a terror group run around doing whatever the hell it wants isn't exactly a good thing either.

Improving security for one state improves security for all in the region.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:39 pm

Scholmeria wrote:
Estado Paulista wrote:
Even if it were, Germany is a federation. That helps alleviate those conflicts.

It is a federation for different reason, also not to alleviate the religious conflict.

Germany was unite from smaller independent Kingdoms and Dukeships in 1871. The first German government decided to spare thoose structures within the new Empire (the new state was federative monarchy with subkingdoms as federative subjects).

You have had Kingdom of Bavaria, Kingdom of Prussia, Dukeship of Oldenburg with their ruling royal dynasties that recongnised the primacy of the German Emperor. The Federal nature of the German state is preserved until theese days.

Also, this all does have nothing to do with Iraq, so it is not good to compare it to Iraq. "Iraqis" are a social and colonial construct. They do not exist. It is the destiny of Iraq to be partitioned.

You're not the only one who thinks so apparently.
From the Kurds pov.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-06-16/i ... -partition
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:47 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Scholmeria wrote:It is a federation for different reason, also not to alleviate the religious conflict.

Germany was unite from smaller independent Kingdoms and Dukeships in 1871. The first German government decided to spare thoose structures within the new Empire (the new state was federative monarchy with subkingdoms as federative subjects).

You have had Kingdom of Bavaria, Kingdom of Prussia, Dukeship of Oldenburg with their ruling royal dynasties that recongnised the primacy of the German Emperor. The Federal nature of the German state is preserved until theese days.

Also, this all does have nothing to do with Iraq, so it is not good to compare it to Iraq. "Iraqis" are a social and colonial construct. They do not exist. It is the destiny of Iraq to be partitioned.

You're not the only one who thinks so apparently.
From the Kurds pov.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-06-16/i ... -partition



Well they have been arguing for a proper Kurdistan for some time now, and of course they should get it.
Last edited by Valaran on Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69785
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:51 pm

Valaran wrote:
Genivaria wrote:You're not the only one who thinks so apparently.
From the Kurds pov.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-06-16/i ... -partition



Well they have been arguing for a proper Kurdistan for some time now, and of course they should get it.

If a democratic Kurdish nation were formed from the region know as Kurdistan in Iraq, Iran, and Syria then the US might have itself a real ally other then Israel.
Frankly I think the US and the West in general NEED a muslim majority ally.
Last edited by Genivaria on Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anarcho-Communist, Democratic Confederalist
"The Earth isn't dying, it's being killed. And those killing it have names and addresses." -Utah Phillips

User avatar
-The Unified Earth Governments-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12215
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby -The Unified Earth Governments- » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:54 pm

Stabkon wrote:
Purpelia wrote:That's the propaganda they are pitching sure. But given that their methods seem to be simply conventional warfare we know full well they know full well that it's an impossible goal. Maybe we should just give them some land to play in and satisfy their lust for blood and than bomb them back to those borders if they try and expand further.


Great bombing them would cause even more civilian casualties causing the friends and relatives of the dead to seek to avenge the dead and join the Islamists even more!

A grave option, good for the short term, not for the long term, and given the reluctance of the Obama administration to do such things.

Why would it always be

America!

Why not the fucks that instigated America to fight in the hypothetical?

You're acting the the total population of the country are unwashed dumbasses who can't think critically enough to realize that poking the dangerous animal gets you and your friends hurt.

Sure some might join, they're idiots everywhere in the world, but I highly doubt the entire population will support the terrorist who hypothetically conquered their nation and instigated a war again with America.

Anyways I'd personally say that we should just get away...far far away.

Just leave the Middle East to itself and work on our own problems, a little bit of Isolationism won't hurt for a while.

If they try shit, bomb them, if Israel is under threat, just move the population to Texas, hey...maybe it will handle the Cartel too!

Just please...lets stay the fuck away from that place, the whole region is fucked imo.
FactbookHistoryColoniesEmbassy Program V.IIUNSC Navy (WIP)InfantryAmmo Mods
/// A.N.N. \\\
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

The Most Important Issue Result - "Robosexual marriages are increasingly common."

User avatar
Scholmeria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1354
Founded: Mar 14, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholmeria » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:55 pm

Genivaria wrote:You're not the only one who thinks so apparently.
From the Kurds pov.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-06-16/i ... -partition

Well, there are a distinct nationality so it is understandable if they want to have an own state and let the Arabs to fight in their religious wars.

Now it is the best chance to declare independence and to use Kirkur as part of Kurdistan as their have a majority their. An independent Kurdistan would economically prosper due to oil and since they are secular they might be the next democratic country in the Middle East.
GAZA 2014
For the brave Israeli soldiers <3

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dimetrodon Empire, Hyponichtmallieturam, Kandfaroi, Norse Inuit Union, Shrillland, Valyxias, Vassenor, Vistulange

Advertisement

Remove ads