NATION

PASSWORD

What are the limits of "Slut shaming?"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:17 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:What when they start telling lies about you behind your back which cost you your job, your relationship and your public image ;) ?

Their lies are false. Therefore I deny them. If anyone believes such lies, then they do not deserve to associate with me. Besides, I don't keep many friends. Not many people who would talk, and even then, I know how to smoke out a rat.

Words are meaningless, and forgettable.

Nonsense. Two hundred years from now, words are all that will have remained of you. While bruises would be long gone.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:25 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:What when they start telling lies about you behind your back which cost you your job, your relationship and your public image ;) ?

Their lies are false. Therefore I deny them. If anyone believes such lies, then they do not deserve to associate with me. Besides, I don't keep many friends. Not many people who would talk, and even then, I know how to smoke out a rat.

Words are meaningless, and forgettable.

Maybe the reason you aren't keeping friends is cause you're calling everyone inferior...?
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Conglomerate of Iron
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conglomerate of Iron » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:25 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Conglomerate of Iron wrote:Their lies are false. Therefore I deny them. If anyone believes such lies, then they do not deserve to associate with me. Besides, I don't keep many friends. Not many people who would talk, and even then, I know how to smoke out a rat.

Words are meaningless, and forgettable.

Nonsense. Two hundred years from now, words are all that will have remained of you. While bruises would be long gone.

My words will have not done anything.

My ACTIONS will be my lasting legacy. All else is dust in the wind.
Alignment: Chaotic Good
Pro: Liberty, Anti-Statism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchy, Libertarianism, Capitalism, etc.
Neutral: Anarcho-Communism, Syndicalism, Democracy.
Con: Communism, Socialism, Statism, Fascism, Crony Capitalism, Corporatism, Consumerism.

User avatar
Conglomerate of Iron
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conglomerate of Iron » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:29 am

Vettrera wrote:
Conglomerate of Iron wrote:Their lies are false. Therefore I deny them. If anyone believes such lies, then they do not deserve to associate with me. Besides, I don't keep many friends. Not many people who would talk, and even then, I know how to smoke out a rat.

Words are meaningless, and forgettable.

Maybe the reason you aren't keeping friends is cause you're calling everyone inferior...?

1) I do not consider most people to be inferior, simply those who prey upon the vulnerable.
2) are you just trying to personally attack me now? Maybe you should reconsider your own stand point if you must resort to ad hominem and attacks on my character.
3) I have many acquaintances, but few friends. Only a handful are people I truly trust.
Alignment: Chaotic Good
Pro: Liberty, Anti-Statism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchy, Libertarianism, Capitalism, etc.
Neutral: Anarcho-Communism, Syndicalism, Democracy.
Con: Communism, Socialism, Statism, Fascism, Crony Capitalism, Corporatism, Consumerism.

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:34 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
Vettrera wrote:Maybe the reason you aren't keeping friends is cause you're calling everyone inferior...?

1) I do not consider most people to be inferior, simply those who prey upon the vulnerable.
2) are you just trying to personally attack me now? Maybe you should reconsider your own stand point if you must resort to ad hominem and attacks on my character.
3) I have many acquaintances, but few friends. Only a handful are people I truly trust.

Nope. I don't need to rethink anything. And that wasn't an Ad Hominem. I was simply trying to see if your opinion on "words don't matter" had something to do with whether or not you've been the victim of harsh words or have dealt them out :)

I was simply saying that when you call people "inferior" (lesser beings) it doesn't give the impression that you're a welcoming person I suppose. And at that point, that may be where your whole "words don't matter" line of thinking comes from because when people throw harsh words at you, you feel the need to throw them back or vice versa.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:35 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:Nonsense. Two hundred years from now, words are all that will have remained of you. While bruises would be long gone.

My words will have not done anything.

My ACTIONS will be my lasting legacy. All else is dust in the wind.

kinda depends on how impactful those actions are as well though.
And in certain circumstances, it is possible that your words actually do last.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Conglomerate of Iron
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conglomerate of Iron » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:38 am

Vettrera wrote:
Conglomerate of Iron wrote:1) I do not consider most people to be inferior, simply those who prey upon the vulnerable.
2) are you just trying to personally attack me now? Maybe you should reconsider your own stand point if you must resort to ad hominem and attacks on my character.
3) I have many acquaintances, but few friends. Only a handful are people I truly trust.

Nope. I don't need to rethink anything. And that wasn't an Ad Hominem. I was simply trying to see if your opinion on "words don't matter" had something to do with whether or not you've been the victim of harsh words or have dealt them out :)

I was simply saying that when you call people "inferior" (lesser beings) it doesn't give the impression that you're a welcoming person I suppose. And at that point, that may be where your whole "words don't matter" line of thinking comes from because when people throw harsh words at you, you feel the need to throw them back or vice versa.

The thing is, I do not go out of my way to insult people, I simply insult them back. People should simply remain strong and believe in themselvesand not be subject to the opinions of others.
Alignment: Chaotic Good
Pro: Liberty, Anti-Statism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchy, Libertarianism, Capitalism, etc.
Neutral: Anarcho-Communism, Syndicalism, Democracy.
Con: Communism, Socialism, Statism, Fascism, Crony Capitalism, Corporatism, Consumerism.

User avatar
Juggalo land
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Jun 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Juggalo land » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:40 am

The only limits on "slut shaming" is whatever the feminst and liberals say it is to further their goals. So basically anything they disagree with.
WHOOP WHOOP MMFWCL!!!

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:41 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:Nonsense. Two hundred years from now, words are all that will have remained of you. While bruises would be long gone.

My words will have not done anything.

My ACTIONS will be my lasting legacy. All else is dust in the wind.


Your actions will be described by words. And those words are all that shall remain - no matter if they are truthful or not.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Conglomerate of Iron
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: May 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Conglomerate of Iron » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:42 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Conglomerate of Iron wrote:My words will have not done anything.

My ACTIONS will be my lasting legacy. All else is dust in the wind.


Your actions will be described by words. And those words are all that shall remain - no matter if they are truthful or not.

The impact of my actions will be permanent. That will be more important than what people say...
Alignment: Chaotic Good
Pro: Liberty, Anti-Statism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchy, Libertarianism, Capitalism, etc.
Neutral: Anarcho-Communism, Syndicalism, Democracy.
Con: Communism, Socialism, Statism, Fascism, Crony Capitalism, Corporatism, Consumerism.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:43 am

There should be absolutely no shaming of promiscuity. If it affects a person's career and life with friends, and health, then an intervention of sorts is necessary. Otherwise, it is completely unwarranted and wrong.

User avatar
Juggalo land
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Jun 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Juggalo land » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:46 am

Kelinfort wrote:There should be absolutely no shaming of promiscuity. If it affects a person's career and life with friends, and health, then an intervention of sorts is necessary. Otherwise, it is completely unwarranted and wrong.

Now see I agree to a point, just because someones promiscuous doesnt mean they should be treated like shit or anything. But on the other hand people should be taught to limit themselves or show a bit of self control, I mean women should go out the house and screw 20+ guys and guys shouldnt chase after every girl they see.
WHOOP WHOOP MMFWCL!!!

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:46 am

Juggalo land wrote:The only limits on "slut shaming" is whatever the feminst and liberals say it is to further their goals. So basically anything they disagree with.
...well do you want to give your interpretation or do you just want to say "uhh liberals"?
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Juggalo land
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Jun 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Juggalo land » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:47 am

Vettrera wrote:
Juggalo land wrote:The only limits on "slut shaming" is whatever the feminst and liberals say it is to further their goals. So basically anything they disagree with.
...well do you want to give your interpretation or do you just want to say "uhh liberals"?

What do you mean? Im not saying every liberal no of course not but it seems on many issues they are quick to use it.
WHOOP WHOOP MMFWCL!!!

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:48 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:There should be absolutely no shaming of promiscuity. If it affects a person's career and life with friends, and health, then an intervention of sorts is necessary. Otherwise, it is completely unwarranted and wrong.

Now see I agree to a point, just because someones promiscuous doesnt mean they should be treated like shit or anything. But on the other hand people should be taught to limit themselves or show a bit of self control, I mean women should go out the house and screw 20+ guys and guys shouldnt chase after every girl they see.

People should build lasting relationships with a partner they connect with, but if they enjoy being promiscuous, I don't give a damn. There is self control as promiscuity doesn't involve multiple partners every hour or day.

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:48 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:There should be absolutely no shaming of promiscuity. If it affects a person's career and life with friends, and health, then an intervention of sorts is necessary. Otherwise, it is completely unwarranted and wrong.

Now see I agree to a point, just because someones promiscuous doesnt mean they should be treated like shit or anything. But on the other hand people should be taught to limit themselves or show a bit of self control, I mean women should go out the house and screw 20+ guys and guys shouldnt chase after every girl they see.

what
password scrambled

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:49 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Vettrera wrote:...well do you want to give your interpretation or do you just want to say "uhh liberals"?

What do you mean? Im not saying every liberal no of course not but it seems on many issues they are quick to use it.

And obviously the correct response to them using it is "DURN LIBRUL" and not looking to see of they have a point.
password scrambled

User avatar
Juggalo land
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Jun 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Juggalo land » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:50 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Juggalo land wrote:Now see I agree to a point, just because someones promiscuous doesnt mean they should be treated like shit or anything. But on the other hand people should be taught to limit themselves or show a bit of self control, I mean women should go out the house and screw 20+ guys and guys shouldnt chase after every girl they see.

People should build lasting relationships with a partner they connect with, but if they enjoy being promiscuous, I don't give a damn. There is self control as promiscuity doesn't involve multiple partners every hour or day.

Certain people who are very promiscuous do tho its not like its hard for a girl to find a guy willing to have sex with her.
WHOOP WHOOP MMFWCL!!!

User avatar
Juggalo land
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Jun 04, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Juggalo land » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:51 am

Condunum wrote:
Juggalo land wrote:What do you mean? Im not saying every liberal no of course not but it seems on many issues they are quick to use it.

And obviously the correct response to them using it is "DURN LIBRUL" and not looking to see of they have a point.

Because liberals rely on it as well as other buss words and terms to get their points across.
WHOOP WHOOP MMFWCL!!!

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:51 am

Conglomerate of Iron wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Your actions will be described by words. And those words are all that shall remain - no matter if they are truthful or not.

The impact of my actions will be permanent. That will be more important than what people say...


Not if noone will acknowledge they were your actions because the words say otherwise.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:52 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Vettrera wrote:...well do you want to give your interpretation or do you just want to say "uhh liberals"?

What do you mean? Im not saying every liberal no of course not but it seems on many issues they are quick to use it.

Issues where people are bullying and calling them sluts for having sex, yes.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Alexanda
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1640
Founded: May 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Alexanda » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:52 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Alexanda wrote:Because the Lord created sex to be an experience between a married couple.

Prove "the Lord" exists.
Prove "the Lord" created sex.
Prove "the Lord" only wanted married people to engage in it.

Prove 'the Lord' does not exist.
Prove 'the Lord' did not create sex.
Prove 'the Lord' did not want only married people to engage in it.
Last edited by Alexanda on Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
I do not use N.S Tracker.
PRO: Conservative Party, Christianity, Thatcherism, Margaret Thatcher, Privatisation, Capitalism, Monarchy, Democracy, British Commonwealth
ANTI: Socialism, Communism, Homosexual Marriage, Homophobia, E.U dominance of the U.K, State-owned industries, Terrorism
My condolences to those who were killed in the recent terror attacks, and may God help us defeat the twisted ideology which prompted such evil!

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:53 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Condunum wrote:And obviously the correct response to them using it is "DURN LIBRUL" and not looking to see of they have a point.

Because liberals rely on it as well as other buss words and terms to get their points across.

So you object to using a catchy phrase to define an action or.....?
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Vettrera
Senator
 
Posts: 4272
Founded: Dec 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vettrera » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:53 am

Alexanda wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Prove "the Lord" exists.
Prove "the Lord" created sex.
Prove "the Lord" only wanted married people to engage in it.

Prove 'the Lord' does not exist.
Prove 'the Lord' did not create sex.
Prove 'the Lord' only wanted married people to engage in it.

You have the burden of proof.
||International Achievements||
"In Search of That Which Cannot Be Seen"

User avatar
Condunum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26273
Founded: Apr 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Condunum » Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:53 am

Juggalo land wrote:
Condunum wrote:And obviously the correct response to them using it is "DURN LIBRUL" and not looking to see of they have a point.

Because liberals rely on it as well as other buss words and terms to get their points across.

I'm sure you know this to be truth and not just a knee jerk reaction to someone using words you don't agree with.

Protip: Buzz words is a buzz phrase.
password scrambled

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arrhidaeus, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Czechoslovakia and Zakarpatia, East Aneurin, Enormous Gentiles, Floofybit, Galloism, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Grinning Dragon, Hirota, Narland, Saiwana, Socialist Ancomistan, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Rio Grande River Basin, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads