What are the limits of "Slut shaming?"

[Liriena]

Well, your first mistake is believing that one date means anything in the dating world. Second, one night stands happen. Take it on the chin and move on.

I personally don't think I could ever have a one-night stand. I'm too romantic for my own good. But that doesn't mean I get to chastise people who like one-night stands.

[Cupola]

So, now were to tell sexually active teens you shouldn't wear protection because its immoral? Its immoral to be safe?

Nope, they're to be told that having sex as a teen is stupid, irresponsible, and gravely immoral, and that they should not do so until marriage.

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

[Dyakovo]

"Being married" isn't a requirement for "having sex".

Morally it is.

Nope, I have no moral objection to sex outside of marriage.

[Camelza]

Nope, they're to be told that having sex as a teen is stupid, irresponsible, and gravely immoral, and that they should not do so until marriage.

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

In general and not only to teenagers.

[Dyakovo]

No, you don't, or you wouldn't be saying what you're saying.
Also, nice job ignoring everything else I've said, as if I never said them.

So you would claim that all faithful Christians don't know what they are talking about?

Gren is a faithful christian.

[Cupola]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

In general and not only to teenagers.

Of course.

[ALMF]

Engaging in physical expression of love is immoral? How so? For more credibility, try and answer without citing one religions dogmatic beleifs.

And what do you describe as casual? Sex out of marriage? Or sex for pleasure? How is engaging in sexual activity with a consenting partner for enjoyment in anyway negative or detrimental? Also, why should you care what one does in the bedroom so long as it does not directly impact you?

I'm tired of people expressing this "why should you care if it doesn't affect you?" attitude. It's the most selfish bloody conceited thing I've ever heard. Why the hell should I only care about myself? Why the hell do you encourage that? People SHOULD care what others do, for the good of all humanity, people should care for their brothers and sisters, and not simply concern themselves with their own person only.

By that reason, we should hospitalize and treat for delusions all monotheists.

[Grenartia]

No, you don't, or you wouldn't be saying what you're saying.
Also, nice job ignoring everything else I've said, as if I never said them.

So you would claim that all faithful Christians don't know what they are talking about?

If they all claimed that sex without marriage is inherently immoral, then yes.

[The Flood]

Nope, they're to be told that having sex as a teen is stupid, irresponsible, and gravely immoral, and that they should not do so until marriage.

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

[New Lexington]

Morally it is.

Nope, I have no moral objection to sex outside of marriage.

But he does that means his objection must be implemented by all humanity.

[The Flood]

So you would claim that all faithful Christians don't know what they are talking about?

Gren is a faithful christian.

Actually, I believe Gren keeps the Old Gods, that or possibly the Faith of the Seven

[Grenartia]

So you would claim that all faithful Christians don't know what they are talking about?

Gren is a faithful christian.

You must be the only person who looks at sigs.

[New Lexington]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

You truly DONT have any idea what you're talking about.

Learn what delinquency means. Because it aure as hell doesn't mean teens who engage in sex.

[Grenartia]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

Except, its hardly "acting like an animal". And I'm not a delinquent.

Gren is a faithful christian.

Actually, I believe Gren keeps the Old Gods, that or possibly the Faith of the Seven

I actually don't get that reference...

[Cupola]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

On the contrary.

[ALMF]

Of course not. It comes from God.

Which one? Shiva? Quetzalcoatl?

nyarlathotep

[Camelza]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

"What I say is law and all who oppose it are delinquents"

[The Flood]

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

You truly DONT have any idea what you're talking about.
Learn what delinquency means. Because it aure as hell doesn't mean teens who engage in sex.

A delinquent is a minor who commits crimes or immoral actions, so yes, teens who engage in sex are delinquents.

[Cannot think of a name]

Because you are selfishly using another person for personal gratification, in an unloving fashion.

I advise you learn what consent is.

Rape is not casual sex.

Consider: The poster in question is in a repetitive loop and is stating his position in the broadest and most absolute manner possible. When challenged, for several pages, he simply restates the broader terms of his stance.

Someone truly vested in such an argument would have at the very least considered it slightly if only to justify a dogged adherence to it and would have, at some point, created at the very least some nuance to the way they express it.

Further, in the absolute closest he is able to come to what could be considered a support or defense for his position is to apply a bizarre caricature of the logic to arguments about evolution and young earth creationism, suggesting not only a familiarity with them but an acceptance to them. While it is entirely possible for a Christian super-moralist to also accept science as science and does not in and of itself denote someone who is having a laugh, the fact that such detail in one area while lacking in another, plus the increasing ridiculousness of various statements does lead one to a particular conclusion.

Taking that all into account: How much sincerity do you want to assume the poster has?

[ALMF]

*Sigh* I'll hate myself later for doing this, but; Why is casual sex degrading?

Because it is an unloving abuse of the human person.

Historically, it's usually a caring mutule pleasure. It's no good for me, but thouse it makes happy --more power to them.

[Gaelic Celtia]

That is really counter-intuitive. Not only would you lose the respect of the teenagers but also you are promoting an unhealthy practice of self-denial.

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

So now im a juvenile criminal for engaging in sexual activity?

[Cupola]

You truly DONT have any idea what you're talking about.
Learn what delinquency means. Because it aure as hell doesn't mean teens who engage in sex.

A delinquent is a minor who commits crimes or immoral actions, so yes, teens who engage in sex are delinquents.

No, it isn't. You have a nasty habit with intentionally skewed definitions and I can see that.

[Gaelic Celtia]

You truly DONT have any idea what you're talking about.
Learn what delinquency means. Because it aure as hell doesn't mean teens who engage in sex.

A delinquent is a minor who commits crimes or immoral actions, so yes, teens who engage in sex are delinquents.

Mutual sex isn't a cRime. Try again.

So are we to make casual sex a cRime now and hear cases on the matter? I thought compensation cases were frivolous.

[The Flood]

It is completely healthy, to tell them anything else but what I said is unhealthy. The only teenagers who's respect you would lose for telling them to not act like an animal are delinquents.

Except, its hardly "acting like an animal". And I'm not a delinquent.

Actually, I believe Gren keeps the Old Gods, that or possibly the Faith of the Seven

I actually don't get that reference...

A Song of Ice and Fire / Game of Thrones reference, there is a character called Gren

But I must ask, how can you reconcile Christianity with the fact that you reject Christian morality? Surely any Christian must at least acknowledge their sins, rather then pretending they don't exist, or trying to justify any un-Christian action they partake in to absolve themselves of feeling guilt.

[ALMF]

No, you don't, or you wouldn't be saying what you're saying.
Also, nice job ignoring everything else I've said, as if I never said them.

So you would claim that all faithful Christians don't know what they are talking about?

Faith: regardless of in what, it a moral incapacitant, so yes.