Advertisement

by The Batorys » Sun Jun 08, 2014 2:26 am
The Flood wrote:Casual sex and promiscuity are immoral, and should be condemned as such. They should be stigmatized by society at large, enough to discourage these actions, but not so much that it becomes hatred. This stigma should apply to both sexes evenly.
I also don't think words like 'slut' and 'whore' should be used in a derogatory sense. Only that promiscuity should not be considered acceptable behaviour.

by New Lexington » Sun Jun 08, 2014 2:43 am
The Flood wrote:Casual sex and promiscuity are immoral, and should be condemned as such. They should be stigmatized by society at large, enough to discourage these actions, but not so much that it becomes hatred. This stigma should apply to both sexes evenly.
I also don't think words like 'slut' and 'whore' should be used in a derogatory sense. Only that promiscuity should not be considered acceptable behaviour.
Ernest Hemingway wrote:I love sleep. My life has the tendency to fall apart when I'm awake, you know?

by Dyakovo » Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:16 am
Jumalariik wrote:Threlizdun wrote:Engaging in consensual sexual activty with people that want to experience minor degrees of pain while ensuring the safety of all parties involved and never pushing anyone outside what they are okay with doing makes me a terrible person? And then letting them do the same thing to me makes me...what, complacent in them being a terrible person?
It's literally called sadism, have we come to the point in this world where it's perfectly fine to be labeling oneself a sadist?

by Dyakovo » Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:19 am
The Flood wrote:Casual sex and promiscuity are immoral, and should be condemned as such. They should be stigmatized by society at large, enough to discourage these actions, but not so much that it becomes hatred. This stigma should apply to both sexes evenly.
I also don't think words like 'slut' and 'whore' should be used in a derogatory sense. Only that promiscuity should not be considered acceptable behaviour.
Jumalariik wrote:Threlizdun wrote:All of us are misguided at some point. I can't see how that's worse than being a Nazi.
And I would expect it to be offensive. I would take offense to such a statement as well if you used it against my beliefs, though it is the best comparison I can make to truly describe my utter contempt for the book.
I feel quite condescended being thought as a "misguided monster follower" for obvious reasons, I'd rather be called a nazi, they can at least think for themselves.

by Alexanda » Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:34 am

by Seaxeland » Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:34 am

by Dyakovo » Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:35 am
Seaxeland wrote:Slut shaming wouldn't even exist if people weren't sluts.
Not that there is anything wrong with slut shaming, as there isn't. Immorality is always wrong and should be stopped at the source, lest the immoral be damned to Hell.

by Alexanda » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:10 am
Camelza wrote:Why having sex with many people is a good thing that doesn't deserve to be condemned in my head?

by Greed and Death » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:34 am

by Dyakovo » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:41 am

by The Alma Mater » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:45 am


by Greed and Death » Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:51 am
For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. And likewise did he for all his foreign wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods. And the LORD was angry with Solomon

by Camelza » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:00 am
greed and death wrote:
I would direct your attention to 1 Kings 11:4-9For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. And likewise did he for all his foreign wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods. And the LORD was angry with Solomon

by The Alma Mater » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:03 am
greed and death wrote:
I would direct your attention to 1 Kings 11:4-9For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods: and his heart was not perfect with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father. For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites. And Solomon did evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father. Then Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon. And likewise did he for all his foreign wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods. And the LORD was angry with Solomon


by Grenartia » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:10 am
Seaxeland wrote:1. Slut shaming wouldn't even exist if people weren't sluts.
2. Not that there is anything wrong with slut shaming, as there isn't. 3. Immorality is always wrong and should be stopped at the source, 4. lest the immoral be damned to Hell.

by Llamalandia » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:13 am

by Greater-London » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:15 am

by Grenartia » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:19 am
Llamalandia wrote:Well in a physical mechanical sense, yes. I mean, they have tightening suregeries for down there to restore it to umm...factory condition so to speak.

by Greater-London » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:21 am
Llamalandia wrote:
Well in a physical mechanical sense, yes. I mean, they have tightening suregeries for down there to restore it to umm...factory condition so to speak.

by Greater-London » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:23 am
Camelza wrote:Why having sex with many people is a good thing that doesn't deserve to be condemned in my head?

by Cupola » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:23 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Arrhidaeus, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Czechoslovakia and Zakarpatia, East Aneurin, Enormous Gentiles, Floofybit, Galloism, Great Britain eke Northern Ireland, Grinning Dragon, Hirota, Narland, Saiwana, Socialist Ancomistan, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Rio Grande River Basin, Umeria
Advertisement