Conkerials wrote:Is it sexist to only want to date women?
Are you really comparing sex and race?
Really?
Are we going there? Of all the dark alleys to go down?
Advertisement

by Conserative Morality » Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:02 am
Conkerials wrote:Is it sexist to only want to date women?

by MERIZoC » Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:07 am
Kiruri wrote:Norstal wrote:No because it's not sexist to exclude sexes because of your sexual orientation?
On the other hand, if you meet the perfect girl/man and you can't date him/her because they're black or they're not the race you want them to be...that's racist.
If you're not attracted to a certain race then there's no problem. Same as if you're not attracted to a certain gender.

by Mavorpen » Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:00 am
Mavorpen wrote:Len Hyet wrote:Is it sexist for gay guys to only want to date guys?
No?
Same basic principle. You don't exactly get to pick and chose who you're sexually attracted to. You just don't.
The principles aren't the same. Not even remotely. See, it's true you can't pick and choose who you're sexually attracted to, but this doesn't in any way shape or form automatically rule out racism. After all, it's not like racists choose to be that way. It typically happens because they were brought up to be that way.
And the same is largely true for people who ONLY date people of a certain race. We know that in many places there is a cultural perception of beauty that is ground in racism. Lighter skin=prettier being one of them. It's reached the point where even a lot of blacks have subscribed to this belief. It's gotten to the point where in Nigeria, 77% of black women use bleaching products.
This kind of shit doesn't influence your sexual orientation. You don't become gay by looking at gay porn all day. You can, however, be coaxed into the belief that certain characteristics that are perceived to belong to certain races are inherently better than others.

by Kiruri » Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:18 am
Mavorpen wrote:Merizoc wrote:Exactly. Unless your reason for not dating someone of a different race is "purity of bloodline" or some shit like that, you're fine.
No.Mavorpen wrote:The principles aren't the same. Not even remotely. See, it's true you can't pick and choose who you're sexually attracted to, but this doesn't in any way shape or form automatically rule out racism. After all, it's not like racists choose to be that way. It typically happens because they were brought up to be that way.
And the same is largely true for people who ONLY date people of a certain race. We know that in many places there is a cultural perception of beauty that is ground in racism. Lighter skin=prettier being one of them. It's reached the point where even a lot of blacks have subscribed to this belief. It's gotten to the point where in Nigeria, 77% of black women use bleaching products.
This kind of shit doesn't influence your sexual orientation. You don't become gay by looking at gay porn all day. You can, however, be coaxed into the belief that certain characteristics that are perceived to belong to certain races are inherently better than others.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:32 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Kiruri » Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:27 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Kiruri wrote:
Okay, sure.. it technically is racist. Not that it matters. If I don't feel attraction toward certain characteristics (whatever they may be), then so be it. It's not wrong or anything. It shouldn't be condemned.
Well, it's not so much about THAT though.
See, I agree with you on not being attracted. However, if you want to date someone, AND THE ONLY REASON YOU HAVE is "she's black, I can't date her" then there's some racism behind your thoughts.
Notice how it's phrased. One thing is "I don't feel attracted to her" and another is "I will never touch a woman of X skin color"

by Mavorpen » Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:50 am

by Esternial » Wed Jun 18, 2014 10:51 am

by Kiruri » Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:32 am
Mavorpen wrote:Kiruri wrote:
Okay, sure.. it technically is racist. Not that it matters. If I don't feel attraction toward certain characteristics (whatever they may be), then so be it. It's not wrong or anything. It shouldn't be condemned.
I don't care about what you, on a personal level, find attractive. I care about the general perception of beauty that has roots in racist beliefs that trace back to slavery and periods of mass colonialism.

by Dakini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 11:46 am
Kiruri wrote:Norstal wrote:No because it's not sexist to exclude sexes because of your sexual orientation?
On the other hand, if you meet the perfect girl/man and you can't date him/her because they're black or they're not the race you want them to be...that's racist.
If you're not attracted to a certain race then there's no problem. Same as if you're not attracted to a certain gender.

by Norstal » Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:23 pm
Kiruri wrote:Norstal wrote:No because it's not sexist to exclude sexes because of your sexual orientation?
On the other hand, if you meet the perfect girl/man and you can't date him/her because they're black or they're not the race you want them to be...that's racist.
If you're not attracted to a certain race then there's no problem. Same as if you're not attracted to a certain gender.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:51 pm
Norstal wrote:Kiruri wrote:If you're not attracted to a certain race then there's no problem. Same as if you're not attracted to a certain gender.
Non-attraction != never ever date. I know the majority of NSG don't go outside, but shit, people do go on dates with people they don't find attractive at first glance. Because that's the point of dates. To get to know more about them.
I'm not attracted to black girls. But if there's a black girl out there who has the same interests as I do and matches me perfectly, why would my non-attraction to her skin stop me? There's a lot of other things that makes a person attractive.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:54 pm

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:57 pm

by Geilinor » Wed Jun 18, 2014 4:59 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Dakini wrote:No it's not. Race is a social construct and gender is an inherent part of a person.
And skin colour/body structure is an inherent part of a person to. And under these circumstances, that's what people mean when discussing race. They're discussing physical qualities of people that they do or do not find attractive.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's extremely petty to complain that someone not being attracted to you because of your "race" is racist.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:02 pm
Geilinor wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
And skin colour/body structure is an inherent part of a person to. And under these circumstances, that's what people mean when discussing race. They're discussing physical qualities of people that they do or do not find attractive.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's extremely petty to complain that someone not being attracted to you because of your "race" is racist.
"I prefer to date X race" is very different from "I'll never date a member of X race".

by Geilinor » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:07 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Geilinor wrote:"I prefer to date X race" is very different from "I'll never date a member of X race".
I see no problem with either. The latter you could say is naive and inane, but it's no worse than saying "I'll never date someone who doesn't meet X criteria." Which people do...all the time, especially with physical appearance.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:12 pm
Geilinor wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
I see no problem with either. The latter you could say is naive and inane, but it's no worse than saying "I'll never date someone who doesn't meet X criteria." Which people do...all the time, especially with physical appearance.
People doing it all the time doesn't make it less racist.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:20 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:It's only racist in the most inane, nonsensical "It's discriminatory" sense. No different than only being attracted to people of a certain sex, or people of a certain age range. By any realistic sense, by any sense that actually maters, no, it's not racist.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:23 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Geilinor wrote:People doing it all the time doesn't make it less racist.
It's only racist, as I said, by the most inane definitions. In the same way that "I'll never date someone of the same sex" is sexist. Complaining about that is an indictment of yourself, not of those making such statements. It makes you seem petty and, honestly, that you have a distorted sense of entitlement that people ought to be willing to date you, regardless of your phsyical appearance. Get real.
By any reasonable definition of racism, no, it's not racist.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:30 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, let's analyze this with you, given you have a penchant to say the most inane things (not sure if it is because you're a teenager or because you're immature).
Not liking someone isn't the same as saying you will never date someone of X categories that have nothing to do with livability such as skin color. WHen you say you will NEVER date someone of X color you are excluding every other skin color in existence except for that one; why? It's not a preference, and if it is is grounded in racism because you think all X women are Y.
To have a preference isn't racist, it's simply a preference, it doesn't exclude anyone. To exclude a particular group of women out of your dating options can be discriminatory, but it doesn't need to be if you just happen to chase more those who attract you. To actively exclude a pool of women however is discriminatory, and if it is by skin color is racist.

by Aurora Novus » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:39 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Difference: sexual orientation determines who you fuck universally (men or women). It doesn't determine who you find attractive.
As a heterosexual who doesn't give a fuck about race I only care about two things when looking/chasing for a woman to have sex with:
- Are they female?
- Can they fuck?
Their race, background, and so on is irrelevant. I am looking to have sex, not to have my preferences catered to. Now, if it was for a relationship I'd see more things like background, family, and so forth, but even then race is irrelevant in my opinion, and if someone says "I can't date you because you're X" then that's racist, is not "I don't like you" is "I can't date you".

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:42 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, let's analyze this with you, given you have a penchant to say the most inane things (not sure if it is because you're a teenager or because you're immature).
Not liking someone isn't the same as saying you will never date someone of X categories that have nothing to do with livability such as skin color. WHen you say you will NEVER date someone of X color you are excluding every other skin color in existence except for that one; why? It's not a preference, and if it is is grounded in racism because you think all X women are Y.
1. No, it's literally preference, and nothing to do with racism. It's saying "I'm not attracted to X features, therefore, I will never date someone with X features, because I only want to date people I find attractive." I don't like large breasts. In fact, I find them very unnatractive. They are distinctly a turn off to me. Now as a matter of habit I don't like to say "never", as I don't know what the future will hold, but for all intents and purposes, I will never date a woman with large breats. Skin colour is no different in this regard. It's a matter of identifying your attractions, and choosing to not date outside of those attractions.To have a preference isn't racist, it's simply a preference, it doesn't exclude anyone. To exclude a particular group of women out of your dating options can be discriminatory, but it doesn't need to be if you just happen to chase more those who attract you. To actively exclude a pool of women however is discriminatory, and if it is by skin color is racist.
2. Again, only by the most inane definitions of racism. "It's discriminatory" is a ridiculous way to define racism, and this context is an exact reason for why that is. You are not entitled to be dated by me. I am free to choose whom I will and will not date, and you are only deserving of dating me if I so choose. What you're doing is complaining that certain people exclude certain other people from their potential dating pool. It is the most childish and self-absorbed complaint you could make, good lord.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jun 18, 2014 5:47 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:No, it's "I refuse to date you, because I don't like X." Which there is, again, nothing wrong with that (outside of it perhaps being a petty reason). It's nice that you have certain standards you look for when wanting to date someone, or sleep with them, but not everyone shares your desires and standards. And there's nothing wrong with that. To complain about that is a sign of an entitlement complex. It's ridiculous. It's like the equivalent of "nice guys" complaining about women not wanting to date them. "What? You don't find certain qualities I possess attractive, and don't want to date me as a result? Fuck you, you're scum for not wanting to date me! There's something wrong with you!" Grow up.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Ralkovian Grand Island » Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:06 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:You've never met Ralk before, have you? Ralk doesn't have friends.
He only respects the strong, and preys on the weak.
He might act polite and smile all the time, but always remember...
The day will come when you'll wake up to find him looming over your bed,
knife in hand, and he'll still be smiling.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Benuty, Bienenhalde, Czechoslovakia and Zakarpatia, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Galloism, Ifreann, Kitsuva, Marimaia, Northern Seleucia, Nothreen, Rhodevus, Rusozak, The Snazzylands, Valyxias
Advertisement