by EvilDarkMagicians » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:00 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Gun control is hitting your target?
by Krazniastan » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:08 pm
by F1-Insanity » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:10 pm
by Third Spanish States » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:14 pm
Izistan wrote:Third Spanish States is a well known far-right activist so his attempts at humor can only be expected.
Umbagar wrote:%*$#! I put a crack in my screen thanks to the awesome "place fist here" sign. >:(
Lhazastan wrote:if all you want to do is run around being the big badass of a community, not only are you pathetic, but you are a bad RPer
Saxon Germany wrote:[...]you're practically a professional troll, TSS.[...]
by Neu California » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:15 pm
Krazniastan wrote:I am against most forms of gun control. A lot of it is unnecessary, unenforceable, or so screwed up its not even funny. . .
I do think you should have safety and basic marksmanship training before purchasing one however. (And I do sell guns, a lot of people don't have the basics. . .)
by Marinetus » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:16 pm
by New BladeSlayer Land » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:16 pm
by Brogavia » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:17 pm
by Roten » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:17 pm
by Neu California » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:18 pm
New BladeSlayer Land wrote:Looser gun control leads to less crime. Strong gun control increases violent crime, and it leaves the playing field unbalanced with no way to make it fair.
by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:20 pm
Neu California wrote:Why not background checks, or psychological evaluations?
Surely you don't want violent/sexual criminals or people who are mentally unstable to have guns?
The above as well as strict limitations on automatic/sniper rifles pretty much sums up my views. There is no real reason why anyone needs those. Not for hunting (unless you're ging for utter overkill) or self defense.
by Brogavia » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:20 pm
Neu California wrote:The above as well as strict limitations on automatic/sniper rifles pretty much sums up my views. There is no real reason why anyone needs those. Not for hunting (unless you're ging for utter overkill) or self defense.
by Neu California » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:21 pm
Brogavia wrote:Gun control is putting two bullets through the same hole at 25 meters.
However, I assume that's not what you mean. What you mean is victim disarmament.
Look at Chicago, Detroit, and Washington DC. Some of the toughest gun control laws in the country. Yet they have some of the highest murder rates in the country.
by New BladeSlayer Land » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:21 pm
[citation needed]
by New World Liberty » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:21 pm
Marinetus wrote:My uncle owns a gun store, I work there, so my opinion might be a little biased.
I believe anyone 18 years or older should be allowed to buy a gun, and get a permit. Even felons should be able to, as long as their crimes didn't previously involve firearms or violence.
by Marinetus » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:21 pm
by F1-Insanity » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:21 pm
Brogavia wrote:Neu California wrote:The above as well as strict limitations on automatic/sniper rifles pretty much sums up my views. There is no real reason why anyone needs those. Not for hunting (unless you're ging for utter overkill) or self defense.
Please define what you consider automatic and sniper rifles.
The basic definition of a sniper rifle is pretty much a rifle with a scope. By that definition, you just out lawwed almost every single hunting rifle.
by Marinetus » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:23 pm
New World Liberty wrote:[...]
i agree 18, a permit and even felons of non-violent crimes. but i think you should also have to take some kind of course or class or an evaluation to make sure your competent.
by EvilDarkMagicians » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:23 pm
Roten wrote:
Usually, gun-control activists want to reduce crime. In this venue, Gun control is doomed to failure. Just because someone has a gun does not mean that they can't hurt other people. A gas station could be robbed just as easily if the thief holds up a machete to the attendant's neck instead of pointing a gun at his face (which is why the UK is looking at banning those too). Ban swords, then it's knives. Ban Knives, then it's rocks. Ban rocks, then it's hands. A human can kill another human without any guns or tools.
by Neu California » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:23 pm
New BladeSlayer Land wrote:[citation needed]
You have the internet, bro. Read up. The amount of information out there on this is astounding, and me trying to summarize it will just be a waste of everyones time.
by Brogavia » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:24 pm
Neu California wrote:Brogavia wrote:Gun control is putting two bullets through the same hole at 25 meters.
However, I assume that's not what you mean. What you mean is victim disarmament.
Look at Chicago, Detroit, and Washington DC. Some of the toughest gun control laws in the country. Yet they have some of the highest murder rates in the country.
Yeah, blame a single factor on everything without even thinking of the possibility that other factors may exist.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aggicificicerous, Bovad, Cannonio, Cyptopir, El Lazaro, La Xinga, Nationlized Mississippi, Port Carverton, Senkaku, Skiva, The Web Citadel, Umeria, USS Monitor, Valrifall, Washington Resistance Army, Wisteria and Surrounding Territories
Advertisement