Your hypothetical depends on the ability to see into the future and alter the timeline...can you?
Advertisement

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 7:44 am

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed May 28, 2014 7:45 am
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Roski » Wed May 28, 2014 7:46 am
Neutraligon wrote:Benuty wrote:Firing squads are inefficient and psychologically traumatic for all involved. Hell the suicide of those involved in firing squads was so high they had to put blanks in some of the guns [swapping them each time so no one knows who fired the killing shot] to stop getting bad press.
And even then you have the cost of all the trials, so it would still be much more expensive.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed May 28, 2014 7:46 am
Thafoo wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Money that more often than not is paid from the pocket of the one seeking the abortion, not by the government. Your point is unfounded.
He appears to think that money, once spent, disappears into the void of no return and causes the national economy to collapse not unlike an elderly woman standing on a water slide.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 7:47 am

by Britanno » Wed May 28, 2014 7:49 am

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 7:50 am
Britanno wrote:I don't agree with the OP, but the point is made very well.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed May 28, 2014 7:51 am
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria


by Mavorpen » Wed May 28, 2014 7:53 am

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 7:54 am
Mavorpen wrote:Abortion made me hit my toe on a door. It's the root of all evil.

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 7:54 am
Wind in the Willows wrote:Oh yeah, let's blame abortion for everything!

by Chemaki » Wed May 28, 2014 7:56 am
Roski wrote:Or not. I don't know. It might be fucking aliens. What do you guys think?
Am I right?
Or not?

by Neutraligon » Wed May 28, 2014 7:57 am

by The Scientific States » Wed May 28, 2014 7:57 am

by Trezchoix » Wed May 28, 2014 7:59 am
Roski wrote:We all know the story. We killed Hitler, then everyone went home and had (lots of) babies.
The Baby Boomer Period, or, to better explain
The term "baby boom" most often refers to the post–World War II baby boom (1946–1964) when the number of annual births exceeded 2 per 100 women (or approximately 2% of the total population size). There are an estimated 78.3 million Americans who were born during this demographic boom in births.
So what does that have to do with the economy?
Well, we all believe that the President rules the economy with an iron fist. I have seen many people think that on the forums. That, is horseshit.
Those 78.3 million Americans are now retiring (or dead already, but they really don't effect the economy anymore), and no longer in the workforce. For better or for worse, Social Security now pays them. So why does that matter?
Well, 78.3 million workers is a lot, almost the entire population of Germany. But still, abortion doesn't seem to play in.
Well, the Abortion movement started in 1973 (Hey Roski, stfu, you don't know what you are talking about, some random ass movement nine years after your damn point), meaning that instead of making babies, they were terminating pregnancies more.
This also means that there would be no baby boom after Vietnam as well. So now, you don't have enough people to replace the workforce of 78 MILLION people. That is why the economy is collapsing.
Or not. I don't know. It might be fucking aliens. What do you guys think?
Am I right?
Or not?

by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 8:00 am
Trezchoix wrote:Roski wrote:We all know the story. We killed Hitler, then everyone went home and had (lots of) babies.
The Baby Boomer Period, or, to better explain
The term "baby boom" most often refers to the post–World War II baby boom (1946–1964) when the number of annual births exceeded 2 per 100 women (or approximately 2% of the total population size). There are an estimated 78.3 million Americans who were born during this demographic boom in births.
So what does that have to do with the economy?
Well, we all believe that the President rules the economy with an iron fist. I have seen many people think that on the forums. That, is horseshit.
Those 78.3 million Americans are now retiring (or dead already, but they really don't effect the economy anymore), and no longer in the workforce. For better or for worse, Social Security now pays them. So why does that matter?
Well, 78.3 million workers is a lot, almost the entire population of Germany. But still, abortion doesn't seem to play in.
Well, the Abortion movement started in 1973 (Hey Roski, stfu, you don't know what you are talking about, some random ass movement nine years after your damn point), meaning that instead of making babies, they were terminating pregnancies more.
This also means that there would be no baby boom after Vietnam as well. So now, you don't have enough people to replace the workforce of 78 MILLION people. That is why the economy is collapsing.
Or not. I don't know. It might be fucking aliens. What do you guys think?
Am I right?
Or not?
well mixed with terminating 50 million babies, poor economic polices, pseudo empire of democracy giving, and a expanding federal government. not to forget the FED

by Mavorpen » Wed May 28, 2014 8:00 am
Trezchoix wrote:Roski wrote:We all know the story. We killed Hitler, then everyone went home and had (lots of) babies.
The Baby Boomer Period, or, to better explain
The term "baby boom" most often refers to the post–World War II baby boom (1946–1964) when the number of annual births exceeded 2 per 100 women (or approximately 2% of the total population size). There are an estimated 78.3 million Americans who were born during this demographic boom in births.
So what does that have to do with the economy?
Well, we all believe that the President rules the economy with an iron fist. I have seen many people think that on the forums. That, is horseshit.
Those 78.3 million Americans are now retiring (or dead already, but they really don't effect the economy anymore), and no longer in the workforce. For better or for worse, Social Security now pays them. So why does that matter?
Well, 78.3 million workers is a lot, almost the entire population of Germany. But still, abortion doesn't seem to play in.
Well, the Abortion movement started in 1973 (Hey Roski, stfu, you don't know what you are talking about, some random ass movement nine years after your damn point), meaning that instead of making babies, they were terminating pregnancies more.
This also means that there would be no baby boom after Vietnam as well. So now, you don't have enough people to replace the workforce of 78 MILLION people. That is why the economy is collapsing.
Or not. I don't know. It might be fucking aliens. What do you guys think?
Am I right?
Or not?
well mixed with terminating 50 million babies, poor economic polices, pseudo empire of democracy giving, and a expanding federal government. not to forget the FED

by Mavorpen » Wed May 28, 2014 8:00 am
Kelinfort wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Irrelevant, really. What if you're driving and kill someone who potentially could've cured cancer. Should we now ban cars?
I, for one, think we should ban everything. Go back to our natural habitats.
But seriously, that's the Beethoven argument. What if the mother had given birth to a serial killer?

by Kelinfort » Wed May 28, 2014 8:01 am
Trezchoix wrote:Roski wrote:We all know the story. We killed Hitler, then everyone went home and had (lots of) babies.
The Baby Boomer Period, or, to better explain
The term "baby boom" most often refers to the post–World War II baby boom (1946–1964) when the number of annual births exceeded 2 per 100 women (or approximately 2% of the total population size). There are an estimated 78.3 million Americans who were born during this demographic boom in births.
So what does that have to do with the economy?
Well, we all believe that the President rules the economy with an iron fist. I have seen many people think that on the forums. That, is horseshit.
Those 78.3 million Americans are now retiring (or dead already, but they really don't effect the economy anymore), and no longer in the workforce. For better or for worse, Social Security now pays them. So why does that matter?
Well, 78.3 million workers is a lot, almost the entire population of Germany. But still, abortion doesn't seem to play in.
Well, the Abortion movement started in 1973 (Hey Roski, stfu, you don't know what you are talking about, some random ass movement nine years after your damn point), meaning that instead of making babies, they were terminating pregnancies more.
This also means that there would be no baby boom after Vietnam as well. So now, you don't have enough people to replace the workforce of 78 MILLION people. That is why the economy is collapsing.
Or not. I don't know. It might be fucking aliens. What do you guys think?
Am I right?
Or not?
well mixed with terminating 50 million babies, poor economic polices, pseudo empire of democracy giving, and a expanding federal government. not to forget the FED

by Chemaki » Wed May 28, 2014 8:03 am
Kelinfort wrote:How's does the fed have anything to do with it? Also, the Federal government adds to economic growth.
And if we didn't have those abortions, we'd be paying for them in...another 30 years.

by Kelinfort » Wed May 28, 2014 8:04 am
Chemaki wrote:Kelinfort wrote:How's does the fed have anything to do with it? Also, the Federal government adds to economic growth.
And if we didn't have those abortions, we'd be paying for them in...another 30 years.
Bingo. Anti-abortion policies are one of the root causes of the Romanian revolution; working-class families became larger, people were poorer, there were more unemployed people and a huge underclass formed. I don't see how anyone could argue that abortion harms economies, when in reality the opposite is true.

by Chemaki » Wed May 28, 2014 8:04 am
Kelinfort wrote:Hell, this is all spelled out in Freakanomics. Why does this thread exist?


by Benuty » Wed May 28, 2014 8:07 am
Chemaki wrote:Kelinfort wrote:Hell, this is all spelled out in Freakanomics. Why does this thread exist?
Because people don't learn enough about the world around them, and don't have to time to read good literature about these issues.
Remember, NationStates users: if you're a young, white, middle-class teenager on the internet, actually sourcing some evidence isn't actually required for any argument you make!
I think abortion is unpatriotic because the fewer babies we have, the fewer potential soldiers we can send overseas! If you exercise your rights over your body, you are ruining this nation, women of 'Mericuh!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, Grinning Dragon, Hispida, Infected Mushroom, Kerwa, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Washington-Columbia, Wingdings, Xind
Advertisement