by Trezchoix » Tue May 27, 2014 8:44 am
by Farnhamia » Tue May 27, 2014 8:46 am
by Trezchoix » Tue May 27, 2014 8:49 am
Farnhamia wrote:Better. How about telling us what Mrs. Obama actually said? And not with a link to a video, some of us can't or won't sit through a video.
by Ifreann » Tue May 27, 2014 8:50 am
by Trezchoix » Tue May 27, 2014 8:51 am
Ifreann wrote:I would wager a big wad of cash that not one of these people has read anything by George Orwell.
by Farnhamia » Tue May 27, 2014 8:51 am
Trezchoix wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Better. How about telling us what Mrs. Obama actually said? And not with a link to a video, some of us can't or won't sit through a video.
Then if you don't have time for a 2 minute vid how do you have time to moderate? its a article to insight thought and as the OP I have no opinion on the matter I want to see NS speak about it. And how people react to a article like this as the LAST post I was editing it and then it was blocked.
by The Time Alliance » Tue May 27, 2014 8:52 am
Ifreann wrote:I would wager a big wad of cash that not one of these people has read anything by George Orwell.
by Ifreann » Tue May 27, 2014 8:52 am
Trezchoix wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Better. How about telling us what Mrs. Obama actually said? And not with a link to a video, some of us can't or won't sit through a video.
Then if you don't have time for a 2 minute vid how do you have time to moderate? its a article to insight thought and as the OP I have no opinion on the matter I want to see NS speak about it. And how people react to a article like this as the LAST post I was editing it and then it was blocked.
by Liberaxia » Tue May 27, 2014 8:53 am
by Tel » Tue May 27, 2014 8:53 am
by Trezchoix » Tue May 27, 2014 8:54 am
Farnhamia wrote:Trezchoix wrote:
Then if you don't have time for a 2 minute vid how do you have time to moderate? its a article to insight thought and as the OP I have no opinion on the matter I want to see NS speak about it. And how people react to a article like this as the LAST post I was editing it and then it was blocked.
As I say, some people here can't or won't sit through a video, two minutes or two seconds long. I don't see how it's an imposition on you to provide some context for the opinion piece you posted as the OP.
by Trezchoix » Tue May 27, 2014 8:57 am
Ifreann wrote:Trezchoix wrote:
Then if you don't have time for a 2 minute vid how do you have time to moderate? its a article to insight thought and as the OP I have no opinion on the matter I want to see NS speak about it. And how people react to a article like this as the LAST post I was editing it and then it was blocked.
If you're not going to debate or discuss then what are you doing posting on a debate and discussion forum?
I wasn't referring to you.
by Ifreann » Tue May 27, 2014 9:04 am
Trezchoix wrote:Ifreann wrote:If you're not going to debate or discuss then what are you doing posting on a debate and discussion forum?
I wasn't referring to you.
my stance is well since I have read 1984, Brave New World etc what do you think it is? I believe we are heading for this faster than we think.
by Galloism » Tue May 27, 2014 9:08 am
by Tel » Tue May 27, 2014 9:08 am
Ifreann wrote:Trezchoix wrote:
my stance is well since I have read 1984, Brave New World etc what do you think it is? I believe we are heading for this faster than we think.
And why do you think that? Because a woman with no political power at all has called on some teenagers not to accept casual racism?
by L Ron Cupboard » Tue May 27, 2014 9:14 am
by Ifreann » Tue May 27, 2014 9:16 am
by Slovenian socialist federative republic » Tue May 27, 2014 9:18 am
by Andarro » Tue May 27, 2014 9:19 am
Ifreann wrote:Trezchoix wrote:
my stance is well since I have read 1984, Brave New World etc what do you think it is? I believe we are heading for this faster than we think.
And why do you think that? Because a woman with no political power at all has called on some teenagers not to accept casual racism?
by Farnhamia » Tue May 27, 2014 9:22 am
Andarro wrote:Ifreann wrote:And why do you think that? Because a woman with no political power at all has called on some teenagers not to accept casual racism?
This no ordinary woman, she is wife of the POTUS and that gives her a degree of influence over the decisions that he makes.
That is what makes her remarks a little bit disturbing.
by Murbleflip » Tue May 27, 2014 9:23 am
Andarro wrote:Ifreann wrote:And why do you think that? Because a woman with no political power at all has called on some teenagers not to accept casual racism?
This no ordinary woman, she if wife of the POTUS and that gives her a degree of influence over the decisions that he makes.
That is what makes her remarks a little bit disturbing.
Greater Istanistan wrote:the Eldar, an ancient race, had too much sex and woke a dark god.
The UK in Exile wrote: It's perfectly logical if you hit yourself several times round the head with the daily mail.
United British Union wrote:Never talk to me again
by Paixao » Tue May 27, 2014 9:24 am
by The Time Alliance » Tue May 27, 2014 9:24 am
Murbleflip wrote:Andarro wrote:
This no ordinary woman, she if wife of the POTUS and that gives her a degree of influence over the decisions that he makes.
That is what makes her remarks a little bit disturbing.
Though the OP doesn't actually say what she actually said, the impression I'm getting is that she was saying to not accept casual racism, and to speak up against it even or especially if it's your own family speaking such views. I fail to see anything disturbing here.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Jubiloso, Kostane, Likhinia, New Temecula
Advertisement