NATION

PASSWORD

No dates? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:15 am

Aethrys wrote:
Avenio wrote:
He was conducting the attack whilst driving around in a car - it seems more likely that he was firing randomly into crowds and hit who he did by chance alone. It doesn't seem as though he had any formal gun training (AFAIK), so it's not as though he could have easily hit who he wanted anyway.



IIRC he spent a few days going to a range and renting a pistol while he waited to receive his firearms.

My take on this is that he was evidently motivated at least in part by hatred of women, perhaps slightly more than his hatred for all the other people he had a hard on for. As his last video was primarily about women, it's clear they were at least on his mind as he planned his attack. However, the way the event is being co-opted by members of the feminist crowd as an exclusively anti-women event is both disgusting and dishonest.


B/U added.
Pretty much this.
It's an excercise in propaganda, nothing more.

If people want to say he was motivated partially by a hatred of women, i'd have no argument. That's true.
That isn't what they are saying.

They are arguing that his hatred of women caused him to go out and shoot people (When combined with his mental status.)
There is absolutely no evidence of that claim.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 26, 2014 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:18 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Aethrys wrote:

IIRC he spent a few days going to a range and renting a pistol while he waited to receive his firearms.

My take on this is that he was evidently motivated at least in part by hatred of women, perhaps slightly more than his hatred for all the other people he had a hard on for. As his last video was primarily about women, it's clear they were at least on his mind as he planned his attack. However, the way the event is being co-opted by members of the feminist crowd as an exclusively anti-women event is both disgusting and dishonest.


B/U added.
Pretty much this.
It's an excercise in propaganda, nothing more.

If people want to say he was motivated partially by a hatred of women, i'd have no argument. That's true.
That isn't what they are saying.

They are arguing that his hatred of women caused him to go out and shoot people (When combined with his mental status.)
There is absolutely no evidence of that claim.

Hey dicks I am also a feminist and I am in your side.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:18 am

CTALNH wrote:This does not revolve around him and hating women.

He was a dick simply put and a deranged dick in detail him saying he hated women means nothing.


The fact he was a deranged dick has been noted several times throughout.

The ideological reasons why he did it have been pretty much summarized in his last video.

He goes on and on about other things in other videos, but it never escalated to death threats he was planning to carry through; nor did he execute up until this.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:19 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
B/U added.
Pretty much this.
It's an excercise in propaganda, nothing more.

If people want to say he was motivated partially by a hatred of women, i'd have no argument. That's true.
That isn't what they are saying.

They are arguing that his hatred of women caused him to go out and shoot people (When combined with his mental status.)
There is absolutely no evidence of that claim.

Hey dicks I am also a feminist and I am in your side.


Sorry. Some feminists.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:20 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Hey dicks I am also a feminist and I am in your side.


Sorry. Some feminists.


I'm not even a feminist, when you put it that way.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:21 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
CTALNH wrote:This does not revolve around him and hating women.

He was a dick simply put and a deranged dick in detail him saying he hated women means nothing.


The fact he was a deranged dick has been noted several times throughout.

The ideological reasons why he did it have been pretty much summarized in his last video.

He goes on and on about other things in other videos, but it never escalated to death threats he was planning to carry through; nor did he execute up until this.


His ideological reasons for hating women are summarized in his last video. He does not summarize his entire manifesto, nor does he summarize all of the people he has threatened in his other videos.
He makes death threats in them.
How do you know he wasn't planning to, and how do you know that he didn't just decide to go out and shoot a bunch of random people because everyone is guilty of offending him somehow.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Aethrys
Minister
 
Posts: 2714
Founded: Apr 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethrys » Mon May 26, 2014 8:22 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
B/U added.
Pretty much this.
It's an excercise in propaganda, nothing more.

If people want to say he was motivated partially by a hatred of women, i'd have no argument. That's true.
That isn't what they are saying.

They are arguing that his hatred of women caused him to go out and shoot people (When combined with his mental status.)
There is absolutely no evidence of that claim.

Hey dicks I am also a feminist and I am in your side.


Aethrys wrote:... However, the way the event is being co-opted by members of the feminist crowd as an exclusively anti-women event is both disgusting and dishonest.


Back off the personal attacks, tone down the anger, and kindly check again, please.
"Concentration of power in a political machine is bad; and an Established Church is only a political machine; it was invented for that; it is nursed, cradled, preserved for that; it is an enemy to human liberty, and does no good which it could not better do in a split-up and scattered condition." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:22 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Sorry. Some feminists.


I'm not even a feminist, when you put it that way.


And i'm not a Welshman, i'm British. Yet, I live in wales and was born here, and fit all of the criteria, I simply don't identify as one. so I understand when someone calls me Welsh, and i'd understand if they insisted it.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:24 am

Secondly, the information that he was subscribed to MRA's seems absolutely false.
He was subscribed to PUA's.

If you check his channel, you will not find him subscribed to an MRA or MRM channel.
So why is it that people are pushing the idea that he was?

What has happened here is one huge excercise in ideological bias and blindness coming from some of the feminist crowd, and a lot of you just swallow it up because it fits with your ideology.
How many of you actually fact checked the articles.

Several of them claim he was white.
That's somewhat misleading. He's Eurasian.
But again, it fits in with the ideological bias, so they don't check.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon May 26, 2014 8:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:25 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
The fact he was a deranged dick has been noted several times throughout.

The ideological reasons why he did it have been pretty much summarized in his last video.

He goes on and on about other things in other videos, but it never escalated to death threats he was planning to carry through; nor did he execute up until this.


His ideological reasons for hating women are summarized in his last video. He does not summarize his entire manifesto, nor does he summarize all of the people he has threatened in his other videos.
He makes death threats in them.
How do you know he wasn't planning to, and how do you know that he didn't just decide to go out and shoot a bunch of random people because everyone is guilty of offending him somehow.


How do we know other than the videos, indeed.

The main issue I have is that the entire thing revolves around he being a psycho. The main question when profiling someone is "why did he lose his shit?". Now my question for you is: if it wasn't because of the reasons in his last video, then what is it that triggered him? Do you have something people can go by and discuss a more underlying issue?

He was a fucknut, no question about that, so let's get that out of the way. The main reason is that there was a trigger. You never have no reason whatsoever to go out and just shoot a bunch of people.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:26 am

Aethrys wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Hey dicks I am also a feminist and I am in your side.


Aethrys wrote:... However, the way the event is being co-opted by members of the feminist crowd as an exclusively anti-women event is both disgusting and dishonest.


Back off the personal attacks, tone down the anger, and kindly check again, please.

Well you started it.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:27 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
His ideological reasons for hating women are summarized in his last video. He does not summarize his entire manifesto, nor does he summarize all of the people he has threatened in his other videos.
He makes death threats in them.
How do you know he wasn't planning to, and how do you know that he didn't just decide to go out and shoot a bunch of random people because everyone is guilty of offending him somehow.


How do we know other than the videos, indeed.

The main issue I have is that the entire thing revolves around he being a psycho. The main question when profiling someone is "why did he lose his shit?". Now my question for you is: if it wasn't because of the reasons in his last video, then what is it that triggered him? Do you have something people can go by and discuss a more underlying issue?

He was a fucknut, no question about that, so let's get that out of the way. The main reason is that there was a trigger. You never have no reason whatsoever to go out and just shoot a bunch of people.


I'm betting his reason was that he reached the conclusion that society as a whole was fucked and everyone was guilty.
That's why it was an indiscriminate shooting.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:28 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Secondly, the information that he was subscribed to MRA's seems absolutely false.
He was subscribed to PUA's.

If you check his channel, you will not find him subscribed to an MRA or MRM channel.
So why is it that people are pushing the idea that he was?

What has happened here is one huge excercise in ideological bias and blindness coming from some of the feminist crowd, and a lot of you just swallow it up because it fits with your ideology.
How many of you actually fact checked the articles.

Several of them claim he was white.
That's somewhat misleading. He's Eurasian.
But again, it fits in with the ideological bias, so they don't check.


Eurasian really fits just about everything from white to dark-skinned if you are going to go over race.

And what does race really have to do with any of this. Is it now less relevant because he's not white? I'd have come to the same conclusions if he was a black man or an asian person.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:28 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
His ideological reasons for hating women are summarized in his last video. He does not summarize his entire manifesto, nor does he summarize all of the people he has threatened in his other videos.
He makes death threats in them.
How do you know he wasn't planning to, and how do you know that he didn't just decide to go out and shoot a bunch of random people because everyone is guilty of offending him somehow.


How do we know other than the videos, indeed.

The main issue I have is that the entire thing revolves around he being a psycho. The main question when profiling someone is "why did he lose his shit?". Now my question for you is: if it wasn't because of the reasons in his last video, then what is it that triggered him? Do you have something people can go by and discuss a more underlying issue?

He was a fucknut, no question about that, so let's get that out of the way. The main reason is that there was a trigger. You never have no reason whatsoever to go out and just shoot a bunch of people.

For the lols?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32067
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon May 26, 2014 8:29 am

I'm a little confused as to why we've decided his motivations matter.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Mon May 26, 2014 8:29 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Avenio wrote:
We can't conclude anything about his motives purely from who his victims were, no. That much was down to chance. But we can conclude who he wanted to target had he got the opportunity - and he singles women out first and foremost in that video.


Bold/Underlined shows why your argument is shakey.
If he had one video and a much shorter manifesto?
Sure. I'd be comfortable saying we know his motives.
He doesn't, and we don't.


The manifesto represents months of thought poured out onto a page. Parts of it are even a recounting of his life story as he saw it. He lists every slight that's ever been committed against him, and goes on and on about little things like his envy about others' cars or his treatment by his mother. He's not giving his motives for carrying out the attack, he's venting 20 years worth of grievances. The video was created within the context of him being less than 24 hours ahead of his planned attack, and he likely knew that it would have been found first, before the manifesto he sent to friends and family became public. That video represents him giving his 'summarized' (such as they were) motives and convictions ahead of what he had planned. It's a much better gauge of his mental state than a document carefully crafted over many weeks.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:29 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Secondly, the information that he was subscribed to MRA's seems absolutely false.
He was subscribed to PUA's.

If you check his channel, you will not find him subscribed to an MRA or MRM channel.
So why is it that people are pushing the idea that he was?

What has happened here is one huge excercise in ideological bias and blindness coming from some of the feminist crowd, and a lot of you just swallow it up because it fits with your ideology.
How many of you actually fact checked the articles.

Several of them claim he was white.
That's somewhat misleading. He's Eurasian.
But again, it fits in with the ideological bias, so they don't check.


Eurasian really fits just about everything from white to dark-skinned if you are going to go over race.

And what does race really have to do with any of this. Is it now less relevant because he's not white? I'd have come to the same conclusions if he was a black man or an asian person.


I'm sure you would have. But the point is, they are trying to make him a poster child for anti-feminism for propoganda purposes, or because they subconsciously want to do so, and many of you are eating it up.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:29 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
How do we know other than the videos, indeed.

The main issue I have is that the entire thing revolves around he being a psycho. The main question when profiling someone is "why did he lose his shit?". Now my question for you is: if it wasn't because of the reasons in his last video, then what is it that triggered him? Do you have something people can go by and discuss a more underlying issue?

He was a fucknut, no question about that, so let's get that out of the way. The main reason is that there was a trigger. You never have no reason whatsoever to go out and just shoot a bunch of people.


I'm betting his reason was that he reached the conclusion that society as a whole was fucked and everyone was guilty.
That's why it was an indiscriminate shooting.


Society is always fucked. We always find flaws in our society that we acknowledge.

Why did he perceive society as fucked though?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:30 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'm betting his reason was that he reached the conclusion that society as a whole was fucked and everyone was guilty.
That's why it was an indiscriminate shooting.


Society is always fucked. We always find flaws in our society that we acknowledge.

Why did he perceive society as fucked though?

Apparently every thing that didn't revolve around him.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:31 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'm betting his reason was that he reached the conclusion that society as a whole was fucked and everyone was guilty.
That's why it was an indiscriminate shooting.


Society is always fucked. We always find flaws in our society that we acknowledge.

Why did he perceive society as fucked though?


Because he was an unmedicated psychotic.
If you mean, which parts of society did he see as fucked?
It's a wide range of issues.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:32 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Eurasian really fits just about everything from white to dark-skinned if you are going to go over race.

And what does race really have to do with any of this. Is it now less relevant because he's not white? I'd have come to the same conclusions if he was a black man or an asian person.


I'm sure you would have. But the point is, they are trying to make him a poster child for anti-feminism for propoganda purposes, or because they subconsciously want to do so, and many of you are eating it up.


If there were any other indicators that this was about something else entirely, and that his conflicts with society and humanity in general were more zeroed in on a specific issue [other than getting laid] I would veer my target towards that.

However, so far there's not much other reason to say the least. Unless I'm missing something on his videos.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Mon May 26, 2014 8:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:33 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Bold/Underlined shows why your argument is shakey.
If he had one video and a much shorter manifesto?
Sure. I'd be comfortable saying we know his motives.
He doesn't, and we don't.


The manifesto represents months of thought poured out onto a page. Parts of it are even a recounting of his life story as he saw it. He lists every slight that's ever been committed against him, and goes on and on about little things like his envy about others' cars or his treatment by his mother. He's not giving his motives for carrying out the attack, he's venting 20 years worth of grievances. The video was created within the context of him being less than 24 hours ahead of his planned attack, and he likely knew that it would have been found first, before the manifesto he sent to friends and family became public. That video represents him giving his 'summarized' (such as they were) motives and convictions ahead of what he had planned. It's a much better gauge of his mental state than a document carefully crafted over many weeks.


And if he went to Mcdonalds immediately beforehand would you feel comfortable saying Mcdonalds was the reason?
This kind of episode DOES take months of stewing and such.
I'm way more inclined to take his manifesto as the reasoning, rather than one video.

You know, like we would for basically any other psycho.
"Why did he do this? Oh look, a manifesto."
But I guess to be consistent here would be inconvinient for the narrative.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Babylonia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11870
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Babylonia » Mon May 26, 2014 8:34 am

Des-Bal wrote:I'm a little confused as to why we've decided his motivations matter.

Cause and effect. Motive is everything in life. There must be a cause for everything which happens. To understand something which happened, you must understand what made it possible for it to occur in the first place.
The power of self is unlimited and ultimate, an unending wave of pure energy and being that could never be stopped, apart from time and forever ingrained into the fabrics of all being, this is the truth of Korrelian Existentialism.

⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing ⚧
Pronouns? Just use whatever, it's all the same to me :P
You will always have your friends, with your friends, you will never be alone. There will always be a light. Friendship is Magic, its the magic that brings the most glimmering lights of hope to the darkest of worlds. And as long as you have it, you will never have to be afraid of the dark. - Me, New Babylonia ^^

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:34 am

CTALNH wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Society is always fucked. We always find flaws in our society that we acknowledge.

Why did he perceive society as fucked though?

Apparently every thing that didn't revolve around him.


Pretty much. And I admit that I'm not making it - at least - an anti-feminist issue.

I've said it clear from the onset I think the kid was a self-centered douche.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:35 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Apparently every thing that didn't revolve around him.


Pretty much. And I admit that I'm not making it - at least - an anti-feminist issue.

I've said it clear from the onset I think the kid was a self-centered douche.


So have I.
I'm just pointing out that the people who are using this to attack the MRA are missing a lot of important information.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Ameriganastan, Bavarno, Bornada, Cannot think of a name, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Dakran, Fartsniffage, Greater Miami Shores 3, Juansonia, Lativs, New Ciencia, Ryemarch, Shidei, Shrillland, The Orson Empire, The Rio Grande River Basin, Torrocca, Uiiop, Wallenburg

Advertisement

Remove ads