NATION

PASSWORD

No dates? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Eura
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1342
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eura » Mon May 26, 2014 7:56 am

Hey wait, I'm a sexually frustrated late teen, does this mean I can shoot people? /s
United Federation of Eura - Sporting achievements
Champions: WC66, WC73, CR23, CR27, CR34, CoH 85, Market Cup I, Next Generation Trophy, Gold Medal (Mens Football) Olympics IX
Runner up: WC60, WC72, WC78, CR16, CR20, CR32, CoH51, COH79
Host: CR24, CR37, BoF60, CR Under 21's and Under 17's



User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 7:57 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:You may as well have written

"They have a nicer car? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By."

Yeh. He has a video threatening women because they won't date him. You should note that in that video he threatens to go into a soroity house and shoot it up, not do a drive by.
He has plenty of videos threatening lots of sections of society.

We can't know why he did what he did.
I've already explained why his hatred for women on that basis is irrational and self-centred. Now i'm pointing out why the feminists (And yeh, I know you're going to roll your eyes) are jumping the gun and assuming everything revolves around vaginas.
We can't know that.
Especially given the 5/7ths of victims being male, I simply don't think it's the case. He was probably motivated by a whole range of issues to go out and just start killing random people.
If it makes you feel all butthurt that you aren't allowed to claim he did this because of his hatred of women despite having no real basis for that claim, that's your problem.
I don't see why the feminists should be allowed to claim that women are being victimized by this shooting.

Email the amazing atheist,MrRepzion and Thunderf00t we have a feminist war on our hands!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 7:57 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Kelinfort wrote:I'm denying he was a sack of hate and vitriol, but we have to investigate his views as well. Therapy alone wouldn't have helped, I'm willing to wager.


Yeh, therapy alone wouldn't have helped, because he wasn't taking his medication. I find it someone infuriating that the state did not institutionalize him after his threats given his situation and refusal to medicate.

I'm not denying he was a misogynist.
I'm saying people are jumping the gun and saying that that view motivated the shooting. They don't know that.


No, his misogynistic views were the trigger for it all. The video, if you would have watched it, makes it clear enough. Like, it's right fucking there why he did it. But since you don't want to watch it, it's your loss.

Basically, his hate was aimed at "women who always rejected him and never gave him a chance to get laid" (cry me a river) and also towards men who "got more pussy than I" (paraphrased: again, cry me a river). He also made it specifically clear he was out to shoot "blonde bimbos" at UC Santa Barbara.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 7:59 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:You may as well have written

"They have a nicer car? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By."

Yeh. He has a video threatening women because they won't date him. You should note that in that video he threatens to go into a soroity house and shoot it up, not do a drive by.
He has plenty of videos threatening lots of sections of society.

We can't know why he did what he did.
I've already explained why his hatred for women on that basis is irrational and self-centred. Now i'm pointing out why the feminists (And yeh, I know you're going to roll your eyes) are jumping the gun and assuming everything revolves around vaginas.
We can't know that.
Especially given the 5/7ths of victims being male, I simply don't think it's the case. He was probably motivated by a whole range of issues to go out and just start killing random people.
If it makes you feel all butthurt that you aren't allowed to claim he did this because of his hatred of women despite having no real basis for that claim, that's your problem.
I don't see why the feminists should be allowed to claim that women are being victimized by this shooting. (Other than the two who are dead.)


Uhmm... I'm not a feminist and even I can see from his video history that this was all about he not getting laid.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:00 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:You may as well have written

"They have a nicer car? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By."

Yeh. He has a video threatening women because they won't date him. You should note that in that video he threatens to go into a soroity house and shoot it up, not do a drive by.
He has plenty of videos threatening lots of sections of society.

We can't know why he did what he did.
I've already explained why his hatred for women on that basis is irrational and self-centred. Now i'm pointing out why the feminists (And yeh, I know you're going to roll your eyes) are jumping the gun and assuming everything revolves around vaginas.
We can't know that.
Especially given the 5/7ths of victims being male, I simply don't think it's the case. He was probably motivated by a whole range of issues to go out and just start killing random people.
If it makes you feel all butthurt that you aren't allowed to claim he did this because of his hatred of women despite having no real basis for that claim, that's your problem.
I don't see why the feminists should be allowed to claim that women are being victimized by this shooting. (Other than the two who are dead.)


Uhmm... I'm not a feminist and even I can see from his video history that this was all about he not getting laid.

No it was about his self centered ego and him being an asshole.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:00 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Yeh, therapy alone wouldn't have helped, because he wasn't taking his medication. I find it someone infuriating that the state did not institutionalize him after his threats given his situation and refusal to medicate.

I'm not denying he was a misogynist.
I'm saying people are jumping the gun and saying that that view motivated the shooting. They don't know that.


No, his misogynistic views were the trigger for it all. The video, if you would have watched it, makes it clear enough. Like, it's right fucking there why he did it. But since you don't want to watch it, it's your loss.

Basically, his hate was aimed at "women who always rejected him and never gave him a chance to get laid" (cry me a river) and also towards men who "got more pussy than I" (paraphrased: again, cry me a river). He also made it specifically clear he was out to shoot "blonde bimbos" at UC Santa Barbara.


Yeh. He has a video and a section of his manifesto about how much women suck.
Have you watched all of his videos, and read his whole manifesto?
Do you think that maybe if this kind of shit is par for the course for him and he threatens all kinds of people that that may somewhat undermine the notion that THAT video is the reason he did it?

He hated women who rejected him and such. Not denying it. He's an asshole and his reasons for the hate are stupid and not based in reality.
But to say his hate was AIMED at women?
No basis for that. None. This dude hated pretty much everyone who wasn't him.
But nevermind, the fact he said something bad about women means we can ignore all the other sections of society he threatened and assume
"This is why he did it."
Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Mon May 26, 2014 8:01 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm not denying he was a misogynist.
I'm saying people are jumping the gun and saying that that view motivated the shooting. They don't know that.


Have you read the transcript of the video he posted? It's really quite clear that women were his first targets and his perceived treatment by them were impetus for the attack;

Hi, Elliot Rodger here.

Well… this is my last video. It all has to come to this.

Tomorrow is the day of retribution. The day in which I will have my revenge against humanity.

Against all of you.

For the last 8 years of my life, ever since I’ve hit puberty, I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires. All because girls have never been attracted to me.

Girls gave their affection, and sex, and love, to other men but never to me.
I’m 22 years old and I’m still a virgin. I’ve never even kissed a girl.
I’ve been through college for two and a half years, more than that actually, and I’m still a virgin.

It has been very torturous.

College is the time when everyone experiences those things such as sex, and fun, and pleasure.

But in those years I’ve had to rot in loneliness.
It’s not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me.

I don’t know why you girls aren’t attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it.

It’s an injustice, a crime, because I don’t know what you don’t see in me. I’m the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentlemen.

I will punish all of you for it. (laughs)

On the day of retribution I am going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB… and I will slaughter every single spoiled, stuck-up, blonde slut I see inside there.

All those girls that I’ve desired so much, they would’ve all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them while they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes.

I will take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you.

You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true alpha male. (laughs)

Yes, after I’ve annihilated every single girl in the sorority house, I’ll take to the streets of Isla Vista, and slay every single person I see there.
Last edited by Avenio on Mon May 26, 2014 8:01 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:01 am

CTALNH wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Uhmm... I'm not a feminist and even I can see from his video history that this was all about he not getting laid.

No it was about his self centered ego and him being an asshole.


Yea, but I'm self-centered and an asshole at times.

Doesn't mean that automatically makes me think it's right to kill everyone in sight.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:02 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
CTALNH wrote:No it was about his self centered ego and him being an asshole.


Yea, but I'm self-centered and an asshole at times.

Doesn't mean that automatically makes me think it's right to kill everyone in sight.

Your also not deranged and out of medication so yeah.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:03 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
No, his misogynistic views were the trigger for it all. The video, if you would have watched it, makes it clear enough. Like, it's right fucking there why he did it. But since you don't want to watch it, it's your loss.

Basically, his hate was aimed at "women who always rejected him and never gave him a chance to get laid" (cry me a river) and also towards men who "got more pussy than I" (paraphrased: again, cry me a river). He also made it specifically clear he was out to shoot "blonde bimbos" at UC Santa Barbara.


Yeh. He has a video and a section of his manifesto about how much women suck.
Have you watched all of his videos, and read his whole manifesto?
Do you think that maybe if this kind of shit is par for the course for him and he threatens all kinds of people that that may somewhat undermine the notion that THAT video is the reason he did it?

He hated women who rejected him and such. Not denying it. He's an asshole and his reasons for the hate are stupid and not based in reality.
But to say his hate was AIMED at women?
No basis for that. None. This dude hated pretty much everyone who wasn't him.
But nevermind, the fact he said something bad about women means we can ignore all the other sections of society he threatened and assume
"This is why he did it."
Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


The motivations of a murder isn't the same as the victims.

If you want to argue over "5 out of 7 victims were male!" is the same as "2 our of 7 victims were female!". The factual evidence is irrelevant because he went on a mass shooting spree, it wasn't a concerted attempt. The big question is: why did he lose his shit like he did?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:04 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm not denying he was a misogynist.
I'm saying people are jumping the gun and saying that that view motivated the shooting. They don't know that.


Have you read the transcript of the video he posted? It's really quite clear that women were his first targets and his perceived treatment by them were impetus for the attack;



He has plenty of videos threatening plenty of people. Have you read the transcript where he threatens to kill people who have a nicer car than him because of the car hierarchy?
Why do you think that the video where he specifically threatens to enter a soroity house, is the video where he's telling us about his plan to do a drive by.
Why are you singling out this video as the reason, when it could be any of his other crazy views.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:04 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Yeh. He has a video and a section of his manifesto about how much women suck.
Have you watched all of his videos, and read his whole manifesto?
Do you think that maybe if this kind of shit is par for the course for him and he threatens all kinds of people that that may somewhat undermine the notion that THAT video is the reason he did it?

He hated women who rejected him and such. Not denying it. He's an asshole and his reasons for the hate are stupid and not based in reality.
But to say his hate was AIMED at women?
No basis for that. None. This dude hated pretty much everyone who wasn't him.
But nevermind, the fact he said something bad about women means we can ignore all the other sections of society he threatened and assume
"This is why he did it."
Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


The motivations of a murder isn't the same as the victims.

If you want to argue over "5 out of 7 victims were male!" is the same as "2 our of 7 victims were female!". The factual evidence is irrelevant because he went on a mass shooting spree, it wasn't a concerted attempt. The big question is: why did he lose his shit like he did?

That happens when your a deranged asshole and don't take your medication!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:05 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Yeh. He has a video and a section of his manifesto about how much women suck.
Have you watched all of his videos, and read his whole manifesto?
Do you think that maybe if this kind of shit is par for the course for him and he threatens all kinds of people that that may somewhat undermine the notion that THAT video is the reason he did it?

He hated women who rejected him and such. Not denying it. He's an asshole and his reasons for the hate are stupid and not based in reality.
But to say his hate was AIMED at women?
No basis for that. None. This dude hated pretty much everyone who wasn't him.
But nevermind, the fact he said something bad about women means we can ignore all the other sections of society he threatened and assume
"This is why he did it."
Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


The motivations of a murder isn't the same as the victims.

If you want to argue over "5 out of 7 victims were male!" is the same as "2 our of 7 victims were female!". The factual evidence is irrelevant because he went on a mass shooting spree, it wasn't a concerted attempt. The big question is: why did he lose his shit like he did?


Ok, i can agree with that. That makes sense.
But you can't know he lost his shit over hating women. He certainly hated women, and he was certainly full of shit in his reasoning, but why are you claiming that that hatred of women was the reason?
What link do you have from that particular subset of his views, to the shooting?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Mon May 26, 2014 8:05 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


He was conducting the attack whilst driving around in a car - it seems more likely that he was firing randomly into crowds and hit who he did by chance alone. It doesn't seem as though he had any formal gun training (AFAIK), so it's not as though he could have easily hit who he wanted anyway.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:06 am

CTALNH wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
The motivations of a murder isn't the same as the victims.

If you want to argue over "5 out of 7 victims were male!" is the same as "2 our of 7 victims were female!". The factual evidence is irrelevant because he went on a mass shooting spree, it wasn't a concerted attempt. The big question is: why did he lose his shit like he did?

That happens when your a deranged asshole and don't take your medication!


When you're a deranged asshole and don't take your meds you can do all kinds of shit for all kinds of reasons. You don't need to tell me that. It's crystal clear.

My point is, his idea that women "owed" him something was the trigger.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:07 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


He was conducting the attack whilst driving around in a car - it seems more likely that he was firing randomly into crowds and hit who he did by chance alone. It doesn't seem as though he had any formal gun training (AFAIK), so it's not as though he could have easily hit who he wanted anyway.


Sure.
I agree. We can't know he was targetting the males.
But we can't know he was targetting the females either, so why are you acting as though you know?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:07 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
CTALNH wrote:That happens when your a deranged asshole and don't take your medication!


When you're a deranged asshole and don't take your meds you can do all kinds of shit for all kinds of reasons. You don't need to tell me that. It's crystal clear.

My point is, his idea that women "owed" him something was the trigger.


What evidence do you have for that being the trigger, as opposed to his other crazy views where he threatened people.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Mon May 26, 2014 8:09 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Avenio wrote:
Have you read the transcript of the video he posted? It's really quite clear that women were his first targets and his perceived treatment by them were impetus for the attack;



He has plenty of videos threatening plenty of people. Have you read the transcript where he threatens to kill people who have a nicer car than him because of the car hierarchy?
Why do you think that the video where he specifically threatens to enter a soroity house, is the video where he's telling us about his plan to do a drive by.
Why are you singling out this video as the reason, when it could be any of his other crazy views.


Because he posted this one knowing it'd be the last video he ever posted, one way or another. You can see it in the fact that he's summarizing all of his other screeds and boiling the down to basics one last time. And the fact that he chose to centre it around women, and by extent his sexual status, tells us that he thinks that's the single most important reason in his mind for what he was about to do.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:10 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
When you're a deranged asshole and don't take your meds you can do all kinds of shit for all kinds of reasons. You don't need to tell me that. It's crystal clear.

My point is, his idea that women "owed" him something was the trigger.


What evidence do you have for that being the trigger, as opposed to his other crazy views where he threatened people.

I approve of this question.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:11 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
He has plenty of videos threatening plenty of people. Have you read the transcript where he threatens to kill people who have a nicer car than him because of the car hierarchy?
Why do you think that the video where he specifically threatens to enter a soroity house, is the video where he's telling us about his plan to do a drive by.
Why are you singling out this video as the reason, when it could be any of his other crazy views.


Because he posted this one knowing it'd be the last video he ever posted, one way or another. You can see it in the fact that he's summarizing all of his other screeds and boiling the down to basics one last time. And the fact that he chose to centre it around women, and by extent his sexual status, tells us that he thinks that's the single most important reason in his mind for what he was about to do.


That's a good answer.
It's not proof, but it's a good answer.
And if people had said he was likely motivated by his hatred of women, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
That's not what people are saying, and you know it.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Mon May 26, 2014 8:12 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Avenio wrote:
He was conducting the attack whilst driving around in a car - it seems more likely that he was firing randomly into crowds and hit who he did by chance alone. It doesn't seem as though he had any formal gun training (AFAIK), so it's not as though he could have easily hit who he wanted anyway.


Sure.
I agree. We can't know he was targetting the males.
But we can't know he was targetting the females either, so why are you acting as though you know?


We can't conclude anything about his motives purely from who his victims were, no. That much was down to chance. But we can conclude who he wanted to target had he got the opportunity - and he singles women out first and foremost in that video.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon May 26, 2014 8:13 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Sure.
I agree. We can't know he was targetting the males.
But we can't know he was targetting the females either, so why are you acting as though you know?


We can't conclude anything about his motives purely from who his victims were, no. That much was down to chance. But we can conclude who he wanted to target had he got the opportunity - and he singles women out first and foremost in that video.


Bold/Underlined shows why your argument is shakey.
If he had one video and a much shorter manifesto?
Sure. I'd be comfortable saying we know his motives.
He doesn't, and we don't.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Aethrys
Minister
 
Posts: 2714
Founded: Apr 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethrys » Mon May 26, 2014 8:14 am

Avenio wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Even though 5/7 of the victims were male.
Sure.
That's not stupid ideological bias at all.


He was conducting the attack whilst driving around in a car - it seems more likely that he was firing randomly into crowds and hit who he did by chance alone. It doesn't seem as though he had any formal gun training (AFAIK), so it's not as though he could have easily hit who he wanted anyway.



IIRC he spent a few days going to a range and renting a pistol while he waited to receive his firearms.

My take on this is that he was evidently motivated at least in part by hatred of women, perhaps slightly more than his hatred for all the other people he had a hard on for. As his last video was primarily about women, it's clear they were at least on his mind as he planned his attack. However, the way the event is being co-opted by members of the feminist crowd as an exclusively anti-women event is both disgusting and dishonest.
"Concentration of power in a political machine is bad; and an Established Church is only a political machine; it was invented for that; it is nursed, cradled, preserved for that; it is an enemy to human liberty, and does no good which it could not better do in a split-up and scattered condition." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon May 26, 2014 8:15 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:Ok, i can agree with that. That makes sense.
But you can't know he lost his shit over hating women. He certainly hated women, and he was certainly full of shit in his reasoning, but why are you claiming that that hatred of women was the reason?
What link do you have from that particular subset of his views, to the shooting?


I can pinpoint what I see in the transcript, because it's much easier to do that from just telling you.

Hi, Elliot Rodger here.

Well… this is my last video. It all has to come to this.

Tomorrow is the day of retribution. The day in which I will have my revenge against humanity.

Against all of you.

For the last 8 years of my life, ever since I’ve hit puberty, I’ve been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires. All because girls have never been attracted to me.

Girls gave their affection, and sex, and love, to other men but never to me.
I’m 22 years old and I’m still a virgin. I’ve never even kissed a girl.
I’ve been through college for two and a half years, more than that actually, and I’m still a virgin.

It has been very torturous.

College is the time when everyone experiences those things such as sex, and fun, and pleasure.

But in those years I’ve had to rot in loneliness.
It’s not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me.

I don’t know why you girls aren’t attracted to me
, but I will punish you all for it.

It’s an injustice, a crime, because I don’t know what you don’t see in me. I’m the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentlemen.

I will punish all of you for it. (laughs)

On the day of retribution I am going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB… and I will slaughter every single spoiled, stuck-up, blonde slut I see inside there.

All those girls that I’ve desired so much, they would’ve all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them while they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes.

I will take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you.


You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true alpha male. (laughs)

Yes, after I’ve annihilated every single girl in the sorority house, I’ll take to the streets of Isla Vista, and slay every single person I see there.


Most of the rant was about women and how he was going to kill women. Also, almost all his other videos are addressed at women, they are not addressed at us males (except for one or two where he goes on about guys in fraternities). Clearly there's a profile that his views triggered the incident. His manifesto isn't coincidential of "oh let's just dismiss it" when his youtube videos have a clear profile of someone who is desperate to get laid, and is at the same time mentally unstable.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Mon May 26, 2014 8:15 am

This does not revolve around him and hating women.

He was a dick simply put and a deranged dick in detail him saying he hated women means nothing.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bavarno, Bornada, Cannot think of a name, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Dakran, Fartsniffage, Greater Miami Shores 3, Lativs, New Ciencia, Ryemarch, Shidei, Shrillland, The Orson Empire, The Rio Grande River Basin, Torrocca, Uiiop, Wallenburg

Advertisement

Remove ads