NATION

PASSWORD

No dates? Shoot a bunch of people. Santa Barbara Drive By.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 4:41 pm

Shie wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Guess I'm not a "real" man or woman, and happy about it.

This isn't about you.


You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun May 25, 2014 4:42 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
It still doesn't excuse his behavior.

Say what you will to defend him. Truth is I was there. I was at the point where he was at 22 fucking years of age, where I felt unattractive and women rejected me. I didn't go and kill anyone; in fact I just fucking improved my game. I got laid when I was 24, it wasn't that big a deal. I did complain "why do women don't look at me?" you know what my father said "Get over it."

I didn't get it at first; but now I do, and yes, I should have gotten the fuck over it and gotten out there. I may have had way more sex than what I did.

Also, the video is this kid who goes about saying that, because he didn't get laid and because women did not pay attention to him he was going to kill everyone. If that isn't fucked up I don't know what it is. His other videos make him across as a douche.



Where the hell do you get the idea i'm defending him.


I should have probably read better. I thought you were.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 25, 2014 4:42 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Shie wrote:This isn't about you.


You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.


Neut.
A guy you meet in a bar says
"I realize this is a little direct, but i'll cut to the chase. You're pretty good looking, if I hit on you do you think it's got a chance to get anywhere?"

Is that a bad thing?
Are you going to flip your shit and go around telling everyone he hit on you and try to ruin his reputation?

Because that's what these people don't seem to get. Women have grown up since school.
Yeh. They used to be childish, hurtful, and mean spirited.
We all did. We were kids for fucks sake.
And yes. It's understandable that school can leave psychological scars.

But to let those scars cause you to go completely crazy is ridiculous.


Further, guys.
A woman comes up infuriated that a guy said that to her.
Do you give one single solitary fuck?
Would you tell her to get over herself?
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun May 25, 2014 4:46 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun May 25, 2014 4:45 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.


Neut.
A guy you meet in a bar says
"I realize this is a little direct, but i'll cut to the chase. You're pretty good looking, if I hit on you do you think it's got a chance to get anywhere?"

Is that a bad thing?
Are you going to flip your shit and go around telling everyone he hit on you?

No! Be direct and don't state the obvious, tell her how you feel and take her somewhere romantic.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun May 25, 2014 4:45 pm

Shie wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Are you having a lot of sex? If no, not you.

That's horrible, they're missing out if they're not "going steady".

The lives of Cads, Players, Rakehells, and Casanovas have no meaning.


You're definitely part of the problem and why these ideas exist.

Also, I am single and I am okay being single. If I was to go stready with someone I will make sure they are the person I want. Again, just because I'm single doesn't mean I'm miserable.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 4:45 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.


Neut.
A guy you meet in a bar says
"I realize this is a little direct, but i'll cut to the chase. You're pretty good looking, if I hit on you do you think it's got a chance to get anywhere?"

Is that a bad thing?
Are you going to flip your shit and go around telling everyone he hit on you?


No, but then, that is neither acting with chivalry nor telling me to act as a maiden.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 25, 2014 4:47 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neut.
A guy you meet in a bar says
"I realize this is a little direct, but i'll cut to the chase. You're pretty good looking, if I hit on you do you think it's got a chance to get anywhere?"

Is that a bad thing?
Are you going to flip your shit and go around telling everyone he hit on you?


No, but then, that is neither acting with chivalry nor telling me to act as a maiden.


I know, I'm just asking because you revealed you were female.
It's cutting to the core of the matter, which is that the reason a lot of this involuntary celibacy nonsense exists is that people are terrified of being publically shamed for being sexual creatures, when in reality that simply doesn't happen outside of school.

That shame often leaves them emotionally disturbed and such. It compounds the situation when they consider themselves undesirable, when in reality they simply aren't asking anymore because they are scared to.
Apparently, this guy was enough of a psycho already that that disturbance made him flip his shit.

Added in an edit:
Because that's what these people don't seem to get. Women have grown up since school.
Yeh. They used to be childish, hurtful, and mean spirited.
We all did. We were kids for fucks sake.
And yes. It's understandable that school can leave psychological scars.

But to let those scars cause you to go completely crazy is ridiculous.


Further, guys.
A woman comes up infuriated that a guy said that to her.
Do you give one single solitary fuck?
Would you tell her to get over herself?
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun May 25, 2014 4:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun May 25, 2014 4:48 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Shie wrote:This isn't about you.


You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.

Dear, if you're going to express your taste in candor, it's not sensible to be half hearted.

I'm not telling you how to act; I'm just stating a preference.
Last edited by Shie on Sun May 25, 2014 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 4:50 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
No, but then, that is neither acting with chivalry nor telling me to act as a maiden.


I know, I'm just asking because you revealed you were female.
It's cutting to the core of the matter, which is that the reason a lot of this involuntary celibacy nonsense exists is that people are terrified of being publically shamed for being sexual creatures, when in reality that simply doesn't happen outside of school.


The only time I would publicly shame someone for hitting on me is if the person wouldn't leave me alone after my telling him no. A person coming up to talk to me, why would I shame them?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
The Rhomaion
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 440
Founded: May 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rhomaion » Sun May 25, 2014 4:51 pm

Shie wrote:No! Be direct and don't state the obvious, tell her how you feel and take her somewhere romantic.


How precisely did a thread about a shooting rampage turn into a Billy Joel-esque romantic advice column?
Last edited by The Rhomaion on Sun May 25, 2014 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-- FreeSoc --
The Grand Empire of Rhomas and its Dominions/The Rhomish Empire

Officially a Respectable and Upstanding Role Model Nation

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 4:52 pm

Shie wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
You made a claim about how a real man and real woman should act. Considering the fact that I am female, that means you are telling me how I should act, so while this is not about me specifically your ideas affect me, and thus I have a very good reason to want to respond.

Dear, if you're going to express your taste in candor, it's not sensible to be half hearted.

I'm not telling you how to act; I'm just stating a preference.


First don't call me dear it's condescending. Second your preference is a preference for how I should act. I do not like the preference and stated so.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun May 25, 2014 4:52 pm

The Rhomaion wrote:
Shie wrote:No! Be direct and don't state the obvious, tell her how you feel and take her somewhere romantic.


How precisely did a thread about a shooting rampage turn into a Billy Joel-esque romantic advice column?


The core of the matter in this case has been the fact of the kid's logic.

His logic was "I can't get any pussy so I will shoot everyone"; hence, that's the topic at the moment.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 25, 2014 4:53 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I know, I'm just asking because you revealed you were female.
It's cutting to the core of the matter, which is that the reason a lot of this involuntary celibacy nonsense exists is that people are terrified of being publically shamed for being sexual creatures, when in reality that simply doesn't happen outside of school.


The only time I would publicly shame someone for hitting on me is if the person wouldn't leave me alone after my telling him no. A person coming up to talk to me, why would I shame them?


Exactly.
But for a lot of people the fear still exists, because that's exactly the type of thing that used to happen in schools.
It warps their method of courting and leaves them thinking they must be undesirable and stuff.

Yeh, that really sucks for them, I feel bad for them. They need to grow out of it, and be helped to grow out of it.

But this guy was in that situation, and despite this situation being EXTREMELY common in males around 18-25ish, decided he was being singled out somehow and decided to flip his shit.
He's an egotist.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun May 25, 2014 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 4:56 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
The only time I would publicly shame someone for hitting on me is if the person wouldn't leave me alone after my telling him no. A person coming up to talk to me, why would I shame them?


Exactly.
But for a lot of people the fear still exists, because that's exactly the type of thing that used to happen in schools.
It warps their method of courting and leaves them thinking they must be undesirable and stuff.

Yeh, that really sucks for them, I feel bad for them. They need to grow out of it, and be helped to grow out of it.

But this guy was in that situation, and despite this situation being EXTREMELY common in males around 18-25ish, decided he was being singled out somehow and decided to flip his shit.
He's an egotist.


That's what I got from everything, that his ego was somehow so big (and self-esteem so low, if that makes sense) that he felt he somehow deserved to get what he wanted, including women. He was in a situation that many other men and women find themselves, but instead of looking at himself and saying how can I make myself more attractive (and I don't mean just physically), he instead blamed everyone else. It seems to me this person never grew up.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 pm

Shie wrote:
Indira wrote:
True, so I shall amend my post. He must have had very poor social/dating skills.


Dating isn't a skill, some guys are born more attractive than others. These sexually attractive guys do better with girls than those who are less sexually attractive. This shooter who failed with women because he had nothing going for him like being rich, handsome, or famous committed this crime because he was probably too lazy to get therapy, get cosmetic surgery, or start lifting weights, and likely didn't make any improvements to his wardrobe.

You know, you really have to be trolling at this point to get so close to describing the exact opposite situation the shooter was in. The shooter was driving a BMW. His father is a movie producer. He was also pretty okay looking. I've definitely seen uglier, poorer and less-famous guys get into relationships before. If he had a reasonable personality to go with all of that, he would have been set, but as we can see from his video tirades, he did not have a reasonable personality.

edit: I should really read past the post I reply to before replying.
Last edited by Dakini on Sun May 25, 2014 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun May 25, 2014 4:57 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Shie wrote:Dear, if you're going to express your taste in candor, it's not sensible to be half hearted.

I'm not telling you how to act; I'm just stating a preference.


First don't call me dear it's condescending. Second your preference is a preference for how I should act. I do not like the preference and stated so.
Firstly, my referring to you as "dear" was out of respect. In the same way how I refer to males who are my senior as "sir" women who I consider my seniors as "ma'am", and young males who are equal to me in worth as "buddy" or "mate". I hold women who I consider my equals in terms of respect as "dear".

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun May 25, 2014 4:59 pm

Dakini wrote:
Shie wrote:
Dating isn't a skill, some guys are born more attractive than others. These sexually attractive guys do better with girls than those who are less sexually attractive. This shooter who failed with women because he had nothing going for him like being rich, handsome, or famous committed this crime because he was probably too lazy to get therapy, get cosmetic surgery, or start lifting weights, and likely didn't make any improvements to his wardrobe.

You know, you really have to be trolling at this point to get so close to describing the exact opposite situation the shooter was in. The shooter was driving a BMW. His father is a movie producer. He was also pretty okay looking. I've definitely seen uglier, poorer and less-famous guys get into relationships before. If he had a reasonable personality to go with all of that, he would have been set, but as we can see from his video tirades, he did not have a reasonable personality.

If you read my further responses, I went on to explain his precise issues with scientific fact that explain why he's unsuccessful with the ladies and I'm not going to repeat myself.
Last edited by Shie on Sun May 25, 2014 5:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 5:00 pm

Shie wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
First don't call me dear it's condescending. Second your preference is a preference for how I should act. I do not like the preference and stated so.
Firstly, my referring to you as "dear" was out of respect. In the same way how I refer to males who are my senior as "sir" women who I consider my seniors as "ma'am", and young males who are equal to me in worth as "buddy" or "mate". I hold women who I consider my equals in terms of respect as "dear".


Please do not. Dear tends to be a very condescending way of referring to people. I have had people call me that outside the internet and always ask them not to.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun May 25, 2014 5:01 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Shie wrote:Firstly, my referring to you as "dear" was out of respect. In the same way how I refer to males who are my senior as "sir" women who I consider my seniors as "ma'am", and young males who are equal to me in worth as "buddy" or "mate". I hold women who I consider my equals in terms of respect as "dear".


Please do not. Dear tends to be a very condescending way of referring to people. I have had people call me that outside the internet and always ask them not to.

I'll just call you Gon like your signature says. :)
Last edited by Shie on Sun May 25, 2014 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sun May 25, 2014 5:01 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Exactly.
But for a lot of people the fear still exists, because that's exactly the type of thing that used to happen in schools.
It warps their method of courting and leaves them thinking they must be undesirable and stuff.

Yeh, that really sucks for them, I feel bad for them. They need to grow out of it, and be helped to grow out of it.

But this guy was in that situation, and despite this situation being EXTREMELY common in males around 18-25ish, decided he was being singled out somehow and decided to flip his shit.
He's an egotist.


That's what I got from everything, that his ego was somehow so big (and self-esteem so low, if that makes sense) that he felt he somehow deserved to get what he wanted, including women. He was in a situation that many other men and women find themselves, but instead of looking at himself and saying how can I make myself more attractive (and I don't mean just physically), he instead blamed everyone else. It seems to me this person never grew up.


People with low-self esteem often act supremely arrogant because they don't want to be hurt. They are very susceptible to shame and insults, which is why they flip their shit so hard when they feel insulted.
They start bigging themselves up in their own mind in order to cope, and when you challenge that view of themselves they are terrified of going back to being considered the weird kid with no friends who smells funny, lets laugh at him.
They fail to recognize that people have grown up.

There isn't much else to say.
He's a guy with probably some mental disorders who was probably treated like shit by kids when he was a kid, because that's just how kids act. (And yeh, we ARE trying to fix this problem.)
He failed to take a step back and realize that everyone grew up and his fears are baseless, and he let the emotional turmoil brew up until he went out and shot a bunch of people.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sun May 25, 2014 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40513
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 25, 2014 5:02 pm

Shie wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Please do not. Dear tends to be a very condescending way of referring to people. I have had people call me that outside the internet and always ask them not to.

I'll just call you Gon like your signature says.


Thanks.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun May 25, 2014 5:03 pm

Shie wrote:
Dakini wrote:You know, you really have to be trolling at this point to get so close to describing the exact opposite situation the shooter was in. The shooter was driving a BMW. His father is a movie producer. He was also pretty okay looking. I've definitely seen uglier, poorer and less-famous guys get into relationships before. If he had a reasonable personality to go with all of that, he would have been set, but as we can see from his video tirades, he did not have a reasonable personality.

If you read my further responses, I went on to explain his precise issues with scientific fact that explain why he's unsuccessful with the ladies and I'm not going to repeat myself.


It's not like your scientism has anything to do with dating, though.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun May 25, 2014 5:03 pm

Shie wrote:
Dakini wrote:You know, you really have to be trolling at this point to get so close to describing the exact opposite situation the shooter was in. The shooter was driving a BMW. His father is a movie producer. He was also pretty okay looking. I've definitely seen uglier, poorer and less-famous guys get into relationships before. If he had a reasonable personality to go with all of that, he would have been set, but as we can see from his video tirades, he did not have a reasonable personality.

If you read my further responses, I went on to explain his precise issues with scientific fact that explain why he's unsuccessful with the ladies and I'm not going to repeat myself.


As I stated before, it's about as scientific as phrenology.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sun May 25, 2014 5:06 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Shie wrote:If you read my further responses, I went on to explain his precise issues with scientific fact that explain why he's unsuccessful with the ladies and I'm not going to repeat myself.


As I stated before, it's about as scientific as phrenology.


Phrenology at least had some basis of reasoning even though it was a wacko science.

His doesn't.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun May 25, 2014 5:11 pm

Shie wrote:Attractiveness is very much objective and is not completely arbitrary.

Our standards are actually very similar and have hardly changed for the past 10,000 years.

This paleolithic era fertility goddess(sex-symbol) statue has a waist that is smaller than her hips.

I'm not sure what definition of "waist" and "hips" you're using, but the statue's waist is clearly much larger than its hips.


edit: Also, in present-day societies the "optimal" waist to hip ratio in women varies considerably, being as high as 1.1:1 in some places.
Last edited by Dakini on Sun May 25, 2014 5:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Atrito, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Cyber Duotona, El Lazaro, Elwher, Google [Bot], Hapilopper, Immoren, Jilia, Juansonia, Junemeau, Moltian, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Temecula, Old Temecula, Shrillland, Socialistic Britain, Tinhampton, Utquiagvik, Valoptia, Valyxias, Verkhoyanska, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads