NATION

PASSWORD

UKIP 'Diversity Carnival' Croydon - A total disaster?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57856
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue May 20, 2014 12:46 pm

Britcan wrote:
Greater-London wrote:I actually find this all a bit pathetic. Not that I would stop anyone going to a UKIP event and kicking up a fuss your perfectly entitled to do so. However your efforts would be better spent offering a better alternative rather than going to UKIP events and kicking up a fuss.

All together I find the obsession with UKIP rather tedious. Nigel Farage and his party are not social pariahs nor are they geniuses and they should stop being treated as such.

There are already many better alternatives to UKIP.


The greens are one I see thrown about a lot.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Tue May 20, 2014 12:47 pm

The Serbian Empire wrote:
European Socialist Republic wrote:I think we can leave the P out of the PIGS now.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/ ... GY20140502

I guess that's a relief until one notices that Portugal is the smallest of them.

Which reminds me, didn't Ireland also complete the EU-IMF plan? Can we now remove the I too? The GS doesn't exactly have the same ring...
Last edited by European Socialist Republic on Tue May 20, 2014 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Britcan
Senator
 
Posts: 3955
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Britcan » Tue May 20, 2014 12:48 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Britcan wrote:There are already many better alternatives to UKIP.


The greens are one I see thrown about a lot.

They're certainly better than UKIP, though some of their policies are a little ridiculous.

This nation should not be taken to be representative of my real-life views, nor should any of the nonsense I posted on here as a teenager.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Tue May 20, 2014 12:48 pm

European Socialist Republic wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:I guess that's a relief until one notices that Portugal is the smallest of them.

Which reminds me, didn't Ireland also complete the EU-IMF plan? Can we now remove the I too?

Did you forget Italy... the big one that still seems to be sinking lower.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 12:48 pm

Britcan wrote:There are already many better alternatives to UKIP.


I completely agree.

However if you don't like them you should be promoting the alternative rather than going out with no other intention but to sabotage them.

I saw a Green Party placard outside my student union today it said. "May 22nd National Don't vote UKIP day". How about you put a sign up saying Vote Green?
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Tue May 20, 2014 12:49 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Olde Engelond wrote:
I am certainly no Ukipper but which liberties do you think would be threatened by a UKIP victory?


Right to travel within the EU.
Right to settle within the EU.
Universal healthcare access within the EU and possibly inside the UK.
The human rights act would be repealed, etc.

As well as that, UKIP opposed the right to free assembly and the right to free speech, going by their recent actions.

User avatar
Allet Klar Chefs
Minister
 
Posts: 2095
Founded: Apr 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Allet Klar Chefs » Tue May 20, 2014 12:49 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Allet Klar Chefs wrote:Is there anything you can think of which you couldn't express in a 'politically correct' way?


Yes. Say I'm a radical preacher, I think that gay people should be hung and are an abomination to society. I couldn't express that in a politically correct way

You just did, congratulations.

You can say awful things in a way where the words you choose aren't deliberately offensive of and in themselves. That's all political correctness really amounts to.
Even if you could hypothetically say everything you wanted but in a "politically correct way" that's not the point. It is a limit on free speech because your restricting the words and ways people can express themselves.

What is the specific advantage to our society of calling someone a poofter?

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Tue May 20, 2014 12:49 pm

The Serbian Empire wrote:
European Socialist Republic wrote:Which reminds me, didn't Ireland also complete the EU-IMF plan? Can we now remove the I too?

Did you forget Italy... the big one that still seems to be sinking lower.

Last time I checked we weren't bailing them out. Did I miss something?
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 12:50 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The greens are one I see thrown about a lot.


NO 2 EU I feel should be put out their to, as a Eurosceptic alternative.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue May 20, 2014 12:50 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:A statement from farage on the political correctness issue, and in support of reform section 5. and it's one I entirely agree with.


“In a robust democracy people must be free to insult and be insulted. We have laws that protect against incitement to violence and hatred, that should be enough. To protect my feelings from those who wish to laugh at me or hold me in contempt is a freedom I never wanted, nor hoped for. So three cheers for this campaign, three cheers for those like Peter Tatchell, The Christian Institute, David Davis, The National Secular Society, the Freedom Association, Big Brother Watch and all the others standing up for the liberty of people to throw verbal brickbats around.’


He had a rather different view when Anna Soubry suggested he resembled a man who'd had finger stuck up his bottom and was quite enjoying it. Wasn't quite so forgive and forget then. Nor for that matter, where the Kippers who called the cambridgeshire police on a man who had the temerity to suggest UKIP policy was UKIP policy.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue May 20, 2014 12:51 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Allet Klar Chefs wrote:Is there anything you can think of which you couldn't express in a 'politically correct' way?


Yes. Say I'm a radical preacher, I think that gay people should be hung and are an abomination to society. I couldn't express that in a politically correct way .


You'd be pretty hypocritical to complain when they suggested you be hung for saying it.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Lordieth
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31603
Founded: Jun 18, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Lordieth » Tue May 20, 2014 12:55 pm

What irritates me most is the constant actions of the try-hards trying to portray the entire party as racist. It's extremely irritating. No other political party has its members' opinions and comments scrutinised so heavily. Only because you aren't hearing about racist comments coming from their members doesn't mean their aren't any.

The media loves a hate figure, and UKIP make themselves a prime target for it with their views on immigration. Quite frankly I'm bored of it now. I don't particularly think UKIP has much to offer beyond a protest vote, but the froth-at-the-mouth leftism they're barraged with is far more irritating.

Don't like their policies, fine. Name calling is for children.
There was a signature here. It's gone now.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 12:55 pm

Allet Klar Chefs wrote:You just did, congratulations.
You can say awful things in a way where the words you choose aren't deliberately offensive of and in themselves. That's all
political correctness really amounts to.


Okay say I go out and stand in the middle of town tomorrow and do that? are you telling me that won't attract interest from the police and I won't be moved on.


Allet Klar Chefs wrote:What is the specific advantage to our society of calling someone a poofter?


None whatsoever, why does their need to be? theirs no specific advantage to society of me drinking a can of Coke. In fact the only support I have for it is "I like the taste"; does that mean my right to drink a Coke could legitimately stopped?
Last edited by Greater-London on Tue May 20, 2014 12:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue May 20, 2014 12:56 pm

Lordieth wrote:What irritates me most is the constant actions of the try-hards trying to portray the entire party as racist. It's extremely irritating. No other political party has its members' opinions and comments scrutinised so heavily. Only because you aren't hearing about racist comments coming from their members doesn't mean their aren't any.

The media loves a hate figure, and UKIP make themselves a prime target for it with their views on immigration. Quite frankly I'm bored of it now. I don't particularly think UKIP has much to offer beyond a protest vote, but the froth-at-the-mouth leftism they're barraged with is far more irritating.

Don't like their policies, fine. Name calling is for children.


labour or tory MP candidate denying the holocaust. you have 24 hours. go. go now.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue May 20, 2014 12:57 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Lordieth wrote:What irritates me most is the constant actions of the try-hards trying to portray the entire party as racist. It's extremely irritating. No other political party has its members' opinions and comments scrutinised so heavily. Only because you aren't hearing about racist comments coming from their members doesn't mean their aren't any.

The media loves a hate figure, and UKIP make themselves a prime target for it with their views on immigration. Quite frankly I'm bored of it now. I don't particularly think UKIP has much to offer beyond a protest vote, but the froth-at-the-mouth leftism they're barraged with is far more irritating.

Don't like their policies, fine. Name calling is for children.


labour or tory MP candidate denying the holocaust. you have 24 hours. go. go now.


Bonus points if they dressed in an SS uniform.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Britcan
Senator
 
Posts: 3955
Founded: Jun 27, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Britcan » Tue May 20, 2014 12:57 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Britcan wrote:There are already many better alternatives to UKIP.


I completely agree.

However if you don't like them you should be promoting the alternative rather than going out with no other intention but to sabotage them.

I saw a Green Party placard outside my student union today it said. "May 22nd National Don't vote UKIP day". How about you put a sign up saying Vote Green?

It's perfectly possible to both protest UKIP and support another party simultaneously. Doing one doesn't prevent you from doing the other.

I'd imagine that's because the Greens are pretty much opposed to everything on UKIP's platform and would prefer that people vote for just about anyone else. I believe they have been trying to position themselves as the anti-UKIP recently, so doing that makes sense.

This nation should not be taken to be representative of my real-life views, nor should any of the nonsense I posted on here as a teenager.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 12:58 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
You'd be pretty hypocritical to complain when they suggested you be hung for saying it.


Exactly. But radical religion and hypocrisy tend to partner.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Tue May 20, 2014 1:00 pm

Lordieth wrote:What irritates me most is the constant actions of the try-hards trying to portray the entire party as racist. It's extremely irritating. No other political party has its members' opinions and comments scrutinised so heavily.

This is actually not true in the slightest.

UKIP is under as much scrutiny as any other party. It looks like more because UKIP have gone from almost zero scrutiny to some scrutiny. There is more to come out about UKIP, there is more that needs publicising. Farage's expensives, UKIPs allies in the European Parliament and plenty of other stuff.

Supporters of UKIP decry political correctness and try to hide behind the banner of free speech. They should learn that there is a difference between free speech and consequence free speech. UKIP is now learning that difference.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Tue May 20, 2014 1:01 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Britcan wrote:There are already many better alternatives to UKIP.


I completely agree.

However if you don't like them you should be promoting the alternative rather than going out with no other intention but to sabotage them.

I saw a Green Party placard outside my student union today it said. "May 22nd National Don't vote UKIP day". How about you put a sign up saying Vote Green?

They think of UKIP as far worse than the Tories. That's what the Greens are after. They don't care who wins as long as it's not UKIP.

European Socialist Republic wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:Did you forget Italy... the big one that still seems to be sinking lower.

Last time I checked we weren't bailing them out. Did I miss something?

I think the Italians are having economic growth issues that lead to future bailouts as looking at fact Italy has seen zero economic growth overall since 2000 while debt grows at a far faster rate. The recent budget surplus is also deceptive as it was created by such austerity measures as to strangle economic growth in hopes of preserving the Euro and avoiding bailouts in the present. Worse yet, there was a time with Italy having interest rates on 10 year treasuries at 7% only a few years ago. How can they keep a surplus or even stay above the debt target when the economy is growing far too slow to pay off debt.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Tue May 20, 2014 1:03 pm

I live one borough away from Croydon. Knowing the area, why the fuck did UKIP pick Croydon, of all the boroughs in London? Of course it was going to get hijacked.
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 1:03 pm

Britcan wrote:It's perfectly possible to both protest UKIP and support another party simultaneously. Doing one doesn't prevent you from doing the other.

I'd imagine that's because the Greens are pretty much opposed to everything on UKIP's platform and would prefer that people vote for just about anyone else. I believe they have been trying to position themselves as the anti-UKIP recently, so doing that makes sense.


I know, however time would be better spent spreading that parties message rather than just criticizing another. Negative campaigning is lazy and worst of all tends not to work - notice how UKIPs poll rating remain ever high despite the fact were told every single time someone says something riduclous (no matter how minor)

Except its incredibly hypocritical of the Greens, they repeatedly accuse UKIP of being the "nasty party" or "negative" and they are putting a positive message forward. Yet part of their campaign (admittedly a tiny one) is just saying "do anything but vote UKIP". It's also quite a poor strategy if they want to grow as a party if part of their message is just "dont vote for those guys"
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Nierr
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1211
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nierr » Tue May 20, 2014 1:03 pm

Wolfmanne wrote:I live one borough away from Croydon. Knowing the area, why the fuck did UKIP pick Croydon, of all the boroughs in London? Of course it was going to get hijacked.

Which is exactly what they wanted.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue May 20, 2014 1:05 pm

Greater-London wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
You'd be pretty hypocritical to complain when they suggested you be hung for saying it.


Exactly. But radical religion and hypocrisy tend to partner.


Well we can stand to hear less from them then.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Tue May 20, 2014 1:05 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:Bonus points if they dressed in an SS uniform.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26059862 how about that ? that's certainly involves dressing up as Nazi's.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Allet Klar Chefs
Minister
 
Posts: 2095
Founded: Apr 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Allet Klar Chefs » Tue May 20, 2014 1:06 pm

Greater-London wrote:Okay say I go out and stand in the middle of town tomorrow and do that? are you telling me that won't attract interest from the police and I won't be moved on.

Depends on the member of the police, doesn't it.
Allet Klar Chefs wrote:What is the specific advantage to our society of calling someone a poofter?

None whatsoever, why does their need to be?

Because we all have to get along, that's why. And being politically incorrect on purpose (ie rude to people who're already put-upon for the sake of it) doesn't help with that.
theirs no specific advantage to society of me drinking a can of Coke. In fact the only support I have for it is "I like the taste"

Reason enough.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Best Mexico, Bradfordville, Elwher, Equai, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, La Xinga, Mtwara, Necroghastia, Perchan, Phage, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads