So by native Brits you meant white Brits, ignoring the fact that most black British people are at least second or third generation.
Racist much?

Advertisement
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 2:00 am
Wind in the Willows wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:So basically a bunch of social justice warriors ruin an event. I'm no fan of UKIP, but the constant braying that they are racist simply doesn't hold water.
This. I am fed up with lefties constantly using the same old excuse that they are racist. I wish they would come up with something new to say about UKIP.
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 2:24 am
Densaner wrote:The Vekta-Helghast Empire wrote:
That's a tad exaggerated, your point about the stone-age. All I'm saying is, it'll lead to expenses that the people of Great-Britain could do without at the moment, if you hadn't noticed - we're just at the back-end of a recession, I don't think now's the best time to take spending-power from the people and restricting labour for the Corporate bodies that rely heavily upon foreign workers.
Also, I fail to see your point about demographic alteration. In Scotland, minorities only make up 4% of the population and 12.9% of the population in the UK as a whole, so even if you leave immigration unrestricted, it would take decades to see a significant change in the percentages. Even if there was a significant change, chances are - by the time the balance had change, a majority of the ethnic minorities would've have been assimilated into the culture of Great Britain and adapted to it's norms, as I've seen with Eastern Europeans, Koreans and Africans.
12.9%. What was it before WWII? Negligible. According to demographers native Brits will be in a minority by the middle of this century. I would call that a massive demographic alteration.
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 2:26 am
The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:Yes, because interrupting a peaceful gathering with violent rhetoric and obnoxious shouting is completely a progressive, tolerant thing to do. I'm so glad that a victory was accomplish for such progressive and tolerant people such as yourself.

by The UK in Exile » Sat May 24, 2014 3:22 am
New Connorstantinople wrote:Allet Klar Chefs wrote:I got their manifesto through my letterbox today. On social issues, they wrote, unselfconsciously, I think:
"Political correctness is killing free speech".
Does that sound like Not-Racism to you?
The " political correctness" being addressed is the concept of suppressing opinions because the do not fit a set ideology, which from a person who is not even that politically incorrect, I find disgusting.

by Wind in the Willows » Sat May 24, 2014 6:48 am

by Wind in the Willows » Sat May 24, 2014 6:54 am
Alyakia wrote:Wind in the Willows wrote:
This. I am fed up with lefties constantly using the same old excuse that they are racist. I wish they would come up with something new to say about UKIP.
well shit maybe UKIP should come up with some policies that aren't fuck immigrants (and maybe the gays as well) then people would have other things to say
e: oh and stop talking about how weird it makes you feel when people talk foreign on the train, how lots of kids in school speak english as their second language (including your own children, but you "know" the difference between good germans and romanians, right?) yeah stop doing that farage.
Nierr wrote:
So by native Brits you meant white Brits, ignoring the fact that most black British people are at least second or third generation.
Racist much?
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:08 am
Wind in the Willows wrote:Well shit maybe you should actually read their fucking policies first, you imbecile. They want to restrict Immigration to the ones that are coming here to contribute to the country instead of leeching off it. I welcome Immigrants that are coming to help the country, and can speak their own language if they wish, but should be expected to speak English for most things.
And before you start saying that Native Brits are leeching too, well you surely can guess that UKIP will bring in policies to stop that from happening, if they get power.
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:11 am

by Nierr » Sat May 24, 2014 7:36 am
Wind in the Willows wrote:Did you see the "in part" bit? No, you didn't, you just couldn't wait to use the race card, could you?

by Densaner » Sat May 24, 2014 7:46 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:
The article is called "white Britons to become minority by 2066". That doesn't bode well.
I'm a little wary of any set of statistics that divides the UK into 'native', 'white immigrant' and 'ethnic', to be honest - I'm not sure that 'white' skin is an important qualifier. I'm also not sure that 'Britons' have to be 'white' - which is one of the assumptions that the article seems to take as axiomatic.
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:48 am
Densaner wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
The article is called "white Britons to become minority by 2066". That doesn't bode well.
I'm a little wary of any set of statistics that divides the UK into 'native', 'white immigrant' and 'ethnic', to be honest - I'm not sure that 'white' skin is an important qualifier. I'm also not sure that 'Britons' have to be 'white' - which is one of the assumptions that the article seems to take as axiomatic.
So does that work for the Japanese for example? Another island country. Can people of African or European descent be as easily described as Japanese as someone from Tokyo or Yokohama who can trace their ancestry back into Japanese history? Note the foreign resident population of Japan is less than 2%. Japanese people are really racist it seems...

by Densaner » Sat May 24, 2014 7:53 am
Alyakia wrote:Densaner wrote:
So does that work for the Japanese for example? Another island country. Can people of African or European descent be as easily described as Japanese as someone from Tokyo or Yokohama who can trace their ancestry back into Japanese history? Note the foreign resident population of Japan is less than 2%. Japanese people are really racist it seems...
yes. japanese people are really racist. they'll declare that a person that has lived in japan their entire lives and has no other language or culture than japanese is not japanese is not really japanese if they ever find out they have korean parents/grandparents. please don't be the racist xenophobic island country that is slowly declining in power whose neighbours hate it.
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:00 am
Densaner wrote:Alyakia wrote:
yes. japanese people are really racist. they'll declare that a person that has lived in japan their entire lives and has no other language or culture than japanese is not japanese is not really japanese if they ever find out they have korean parents/grandparents. please don't be the racist xenophobic island country that is slowly declining in power whose neighbours hate it.
So Israel is racist as well? Bibi wanting to declare Israel as a state for Jews only? So you think Japan is racist. So if a country stands up for its people and culture then they're automatically racist. Noted...

by Densaner » Sat May 24, 2014 8:05 am
Alyakia wrote:Densaner wrote:
So Israel is racist as well? Bibi wanting to declare Israel as a state for Jews only? So you think Japan is racist. So if a country stands up for its people and culture then they're automatically racist. Noted...
yes. israels jewish state policy is extremely racist. and yes japan is racist. it's literally world famous for how incredibly racist it is. i'm sorry that this appears to be news for you.
if a country declares that one race is supreme over the others in governance, then yes that is racist. it's literally based on race. it's nearly impossible to get any more racist than that.

by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:12 am
Densaner wrote:Alyakia wrote:
yes. israels jewish state policy is extremely racist. and yes japan is racist. it's literally world famous for how incredibly racist it is. i'm sorry that this appears to be news for you.
if a country declares that one race is supreme over the others in governance, then yes that is racist. it's literally based on race. it's nearly impossible to get any more racist than that.
And the French language in Quebec and France? Both governments have laws supporting the primacy of the French language. Is that racist? Do you believe people/countries have no right whatsoever to maintain their cultural distinctiveness in language, culture or history?

by New Connorstantinople » Sat May 24, 2014 8:17 am

by Densaner » Sat May 24, 2014 8:17 am
Alyakia wrote:Densaner wrote:
And the French language in Quebec and France? Both governments have laws supporting the primacy of the French language. Is that racist? Do you believe people/countries have no right whatsoever to maintain their cultural distinctiveness in language, culture or history?
woah, hold on there. there's a difference between protecting a minority culture from being destroyed by a majority culture and a majority culture suppressing a minority culture. france, in its quest for french supremacy, virtually destroyed the basque, breton, occitan, etc. speaking populations. as in, they literally beat children for daring to speak their own language. this is entirely different from the people who they just tried to exterminate trying to pass laws to prevent further linguistic atrophy. (it also means i don't give a shit if people write computer instead of ordinatuer or whatever, because really)


by Grave_n_idle » Sat May 24, 2014 8:20 am
Densaner wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
The article is called "white Britons to become minority by 2066". That doesn't bode well.
I'm a little wary of any set of statistics that divides the UK into 'native', 'white immigrant' and 'ethnic', to be honest - I'm not sure that 'white' skin is an important qualifier. I'm also not sure that 'Britons' have to be 'white' - which is one of the assumptions that the article seems to take as axiomatic.
So does that work for the Japanese for example? Another island country. Can people of African or European descent be as easily described as Japanese as someone from Tokyo or Yokohama who can trace their ancestry back into Japanese history? Note the foreign resident population of Japan is less than 2%. Japanese people are really racist it seems...

by Densaner » Sat May 24, 2014 8:21 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Densaner wrote:
So does that work for the Japanese for example? Another island country. Can people of African or European descent be as easily described as Japanese as someone from Tokyo or Yokohama who can trace their ancestry back into Japanese history? Note the foreign resident population of Japan is less than 2%. Japanese people are really racist it seems...
I had no idea we were actually discussing Japan. Oh, wait... we're not.


by Kelinfort » Sat May 24, 2014 8:22 am
Densaner wrote:Alyakia wrote:
woah, hold on there. there's a difference between protecting a minority culture from being destroyed by a majority culture and a majority culture suppressing a minority culture. france, in its quest for french supremacy, virtually destroyed the basque, breton, occitan, etc. speaking populations. as in, they literally beat children for daring to speak their own language. this is entirely different from the people who they just tried to exterminate trying to pass laws to prevent further linguistic atrophy. (it also means i don't give a shit if people write computer instead of ordinatuer or whatever, because really)
So if any country wishes to protect their language from foreign incursion. In the case of French by English then that's racist. Is there anything that's not racist to you?
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:23 am
Densaner wrote:Alyakia wrote:
woah, hold on there. there's a difference between protecting a minority culture from being destroyed by a majority culture and a majority culture suppressing a minority culture. france, in its quest for french supremacy, virtually destroyed the basque, breton, occitan, etc. speaking populations. as in, they literally beat children for daring to speak their own language. this is entirely different from the people who they just tried to exterminate trying to pass laws to prevent further linguistic atrophy. (it also means i don't give a shit if people write computer instead of ordinatuer or whatever, because really)
So if any country wishes to protect their language from foreign incursion. In the case of French by English then that's racist. Is there anything that's not racist to you?

by Grave_n_idle » Sat May 24, 2014 8:23 am
by Alyakia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:24 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Densaner wrote:
So does that work for the Japanese for example? Another island country. Can people of African or European descent be as easily described as Japanese as someone from Tokyo or Yokohama who can trace their ancestry back into Japanese history? Note the foreign resident population of Japan is less than 2%. Japanese people are really racist it seems...
I had no idea we were actually discussing Japan. Oh, wait... we're not.

by The Grim Reaper » Sat May 24, 2014 8:25 am
Densaner wrote:Alyakia wrote:
woah, hold on there. there's a difference between protecting a minority culture from being destroyed by a majority culture and a majority culture suppressing a minority culture. france, in its quest for french supremacy, virtually destroyed the basque, breton, occitan, etc. speaking populations. as in, they literally beat children for daring to speak their own language. this is entirely different from the people who they just tried to exterminate trying to pass laws to prevent further linguistic atrophy. (it also means i don't give a shit if people write computer instead of ordinatuer or whatever, because really)
So if any country wishes to protect their language from foreign incursion. In the case of French by English then that's racist. Is there anything that's not racist to you?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Cannot think of a name, Cetaros, Divided Free Land, Eternal Algerstonia, Eurocom, Forsher, Fractalnavel, Gun Manufacturers, Necroghastia, Neo-American States, Port Caverton, Quessia, Senkaku, Shrillland, Snake Worship Football Club, Tarsonis, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia, Umeria
Advertisement