Yea I was honestly not suprised.
Though that does bring up the question of how it is that they claim they are in harmony with nature when the don't even attempt to control population growth.
Advertisement
by United Dependencies » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:26 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by The_pantless_hero » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:27 pm
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!
by EvilDarkMagicians » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:29 pm
The_pantless_hero wrote:They don't show how they reproduce. I keep feeling like I don't want to know.
by United Dependencies » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:29 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Playing In The Water » Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:25 pm
United Dependencies wrote:
Yea I was honestly not suprised.
Though that does bring up the question of how it is that they claim they are in harmony with nature when the don't even attempt to control population growth.
Terraliberty wrote:What do you call an abortion in Prague? A cancelled Czech!
by RhynoD » Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:50 pm
The Snake Brotherhood wrote:So, Avatar is the new hit on the box. The movie was long in the making (actually 10 years, it seems), and a lot of money has been spent for making and promoting it. I watched it. Truly an orgasm for the eye. While the plot is rather flat and full of cliches (not surprisingly), it is also true that the movie is a pioneer of a new age of cinematography. Much has been said about it, from both praisers and critics...but generally it is enjoying high marks http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/. Mainly for its special animation effects, and the 3D adventure it brings us into. A nice way to spend 3 hours, by any means.
So far, so good...
But here is where we go political.
While Cameron's cinematographic achievement has earned deserved ovations, there are voices that turn the attention to the political side of the movie. Basically, the accusations are as follows...
Accusation 1. Avatar is branded as an obvious leftist, anti-war, anti-industrial, pro-environmentalist propaganda. It is animation, and many children are going to watch it. And they will get brainwashed into the New Age, hippie naturalist agenda of the author(s). Just one more proof that Hollywood is Liberal, etc. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2009/12/14/today-james-cameron-reveals-liberal-propaganda-avatar
Accusation 2. Avatar is unpatriotic, un-American and many more "un" things, and above all, un-humanist, because it puts mankind in the position of the bad guys, the oppressor, who is colonising the poor lovely aliens. It is also seen as an allusion to the Iraq War. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100019656/is-avatar-an-attack-on-the-iraq-war/
Accusation 3. Avatar is racist, because, when drawing the above parallel between the human invasion and colonialism, it creates an impression that only the white man (i.e. the humans) possess the ability/capacity to destroy worlds, and respectively to save worlds. The native aliens are obviously not able to save themselves on their own, and they need a white/human to do it for them.
Accusation 4. In the meantime, Avatar promotes reverse racism, because it implants white guilt - humans are the bad guys, they are destroying a beautiful planet and a native civilisation that lives in harmony with nature. "And then there’s his underlying purpose: Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man's need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt." http://www.nypress.com/article-20710-blue-in-the-face.html
Sarkhaan wrote:This. And just about everything else RhynoD said.
by The Snake Brotherhood » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:59 pm
The_pantless_hero wrote:They don't show how they reproduce. I keep feeling like I don't want to know.
by The_pantless_hero » Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:36 pm
The Snake Brotherhood wrote:The_pantless_hero wrote:They don't show how they reproduce. I keep feeling like I don't want to know.
I am fairly certain that there were gravid female Na'vi in some of the crowd scenes. They have navels in the same place as humans, so I'm assuming some analogue of placental mammal reproduction.
The Snake Brotherhood wrote:The females have breasts (similar range of sizes to free range humans who are well fed but not "well fed"). I suspect Neytiri was less well endowed than most of the adult females. I've been wondering how old she is. She's a fully qualified warrior, but I would guess she is in late adolescence (H. sapiens equivalent 18 +/- a couple of years). Also from how bratty she is to her parents at a couple of points.
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!
by The great Seal » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:01 pm
by Callisdrun » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:27 pm
Ifreann wrote:Maybe I'm crazy, but somehow I get the feeling that the only people who think this(or indeed, most blockbusters) is propaganda are just looking for a reason to disparage some group they disagree with.
by Brogavia » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:32 pm
by Callisdrun » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:57 pm
The_pantless_hero wrote:The only ones with noticeable breasts were the human DNA Na'vi - ie, the avatars.
by Denny Crania » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:32 pm
by The_pantless_hero » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:42 pm
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!
by Callisdrun » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:45 pm
by Tauntoga » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:51 pm
by Arumdaum » Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:53 pm
Chrobalta wrote:I had no intentions of seeing it until I read this. Makes me want to see it
by Tauntoga » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:01 pm
Denny Crania wrote:Avatar has exactly the same plot as Dances with Wolves, The Last Samurai, Ecotopia, and so many other things.
by Andaluciae » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:34 pm
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...
by United Dependencies » Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:35 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Callisdrun » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:07 pm
Tauntoga wrote:Humans by nature are violent. We can't hardly live amoungst ourselves happily let alone others. So it wouldn't come as a surprise we'll jump to a war with something else when you nagotiate mining under the Home Tree to get, without blowing it up as they did in the movie. That would have worked as a usefull plan B that wouldn't destroy the land but allow them to get the ore. But, as it's a movie and needs a decent plot with stuff going to hell I don't think it was ever considered.
by United Dependencies » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:08 pm
Callisdrun wrote:Tauntoga wrote:Humans by nature are violent. We can't hardly live amoungst ourselves happily let alone others. So it wouldn't come as a surprise we'll jump to a war with something else when you nagotiate mining under the Home Tree to get, without blowing it up as they did in the movie. That would have worked as a usefull plan B that wouldn't destroy the land but allow them to get the ore. But, as it's a movie and needs a decent plot with stuff going to hell I don't think it was ever considered.
Humans are Bastards: The Movie
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.
by Urgolon » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:17 pm
Young Children should not watch a PG13 movie. And there are hundreds of childrens movies that teach those same things.Accusation 1. Avatar is branded as an obvious leftist, anti-war, anti-industrial, pro-environmentalist propaganda. It is animation, and many children are going to watch it. And they will get brainwashed into the New Age, hippie naturalist agenda of the author(s). Just one more proof that Hollywood is Liberal, etc. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2009/12/14/today-james-cameron-reveals-liberal-propaganda-avatar
There are some good humans.Accusation 2. Avatar is unpatriotic, un-American and many more "un" things, and above all, un-humanist, because it puts mankind in the position of the bad guys, the oppressor, who is colonising the poor lovely aliens. It is also seen as an allusion to the Iraq War. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100019656/is-avatar-an-attack-on-the-iraq-war/
Not all the humans are white. I saw several black guys and maybe an Asian guy?Accusation 3. Avatar is racist, because, when drawing the above parallel between the human invasion and colonialism, it creates an impression that only the white man (i.e. the humans) possess the ability/capacity to destroy worlds, and respectively to save worlds. The native aliens are obviously not able to save themselves on their own, and they need a white/human to do it for them.
Again, not the first movie.Accusation 4. In the meantime, Avatar promotes reverse racism, because it implants white guilt - humans are the bad guys, they are destroying a beautiful planet and a native civilisation that lives in harmony with nature. "And then there’s his underlying purpose: Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man's need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt." http://www.nypress.com/article-20710-blue-in-the-face.html
Yeah, now we must ban people calling video game avatars avatars, because it violates their religion!Miscellaneous accusations. For instance, some Indian religious organisations have expressed concerns about the way the movie depicts their religion (I am talking about Hinduism).
Those guys could probably find similar things in Scooby-DooAnd then, there are the most fringe lunatics coming out of the woodwork and telling us that the movie is about population control and the director is an eugenicist. http://www.thestoryofagirl.com/2009/12/20/avatar-propaganda/
by Callisdrun » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:35 pm
United Dependencies wrote:Callisdrun wrote:Tauntoga wrote:Humans by nature are violent. We can't hardly live amoungst ourselves happily let alone others. So it wouldn't come as a surprise we'll jump to a war with something else when you nagotiate mining under the Home Tree to get, without blowing it up as they did in the movie. That would have worked as a usefull plan B that wouldn't destroy the land but allow them to get the ore. But, as it's a movie and needs a decent plot with stuff going to hell I don't think it was ever considered.
Humans are Bastards: The Movie
You stole that from TV tropes.
by Cannot think of a name » Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cerula, Ethel mermania, Immoren, Kostane, Spirit of Hope, The Two Jerseys
Advertisement