NATION

PASSWORD

Emily Letts abortion video

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 08, 2014 12:49 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:There's a stigma around women who have abortions and a mistaken belief that abortions are always a traumatic experience for them. A lot of people use this as an excuse for why abortion should be banned. The video was made not only because of that, but because of further misinformation spread that abortions aren't "safe." There are plenty of scare tactics including "if you have an abortion, you an never have kids again." It's to show that the procedure is safe and not the horror show some make it out to be.


Well, you know how it goes: I had to ask an abortion related question to try to steer back on topic to attempt to avoid thread jacking too much. I've edited it to a different question that hopefully hasn't already been answered.

What? Your first question was fine. I'm confused. :blink:
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 08, 2014 12:50 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Korouse wrote:So wait, would it be racist if he dated everyone but white girls?


Well dating is far more discriminatory because we're looking for someone like ourselves.

So this is a poor comparison to draw.

Could we NOT entertain that attempt at a derail?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Thu May 08, 2014 12:50 pm

Monkeykind wrote:Weeds must be killed for other plants to survive.


So you advocate weed genocide because it inconveniences you.

Also; when you eat a tomato, you are eating a living being that is literally starving to death from the moment it was plucked, and is still alive when you eat it. Or if you fry it or slice it, you execute it painfully before eating it.
Last edited by Death Metal on Thu May 08, 2014 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Thu May 08, 2014 12:50 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:
Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:Are those humans inside of the person or otherwise violating the bodily autonomy of the person?
If so, they have a right to remove them, regardless of the outcome.

That's cold. "bodily autonomy" should not trump the life of another. They should just suck it up and carry the baby. Maybe the government should abolish this whole idea of bodily autonomy if it means people die over it.

Then you no longer have the right to defend yourself from rapists or people who are attacking you.
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3440
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Korouse » Thu May 08, 2014 12:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well dating is far more discriminatory because we're looking for someone like ourselves.

So this is a poor comparison to draw.

Could we NOT entertain that attempt at a derail?

"Entertain"? I'm not trolling.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Thu May 08, 2014 12:52 pm

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Empire of Narnia wrote:That's cold. "bodily autonomy" should not trump the life of another. They should just suck it up and carry the baby. Maybe the government should abolish this whole idea of bodily autonomy if it means people die over it.

Then you no longer have the right to defend yourself from rapists or people who are attacking you.

Abolishing bodily autonomy would be horrible.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu May 08, 2014 12:52 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Saiwania wrote:So, why did this woman make an abortion video?

There's a stigma around women who have abortions and a mistaken belief that abortions are always a traumatic experience for them. A lot of people use this as an excuse for why abortion should be banned. The video was made not only because of that, but because of further misinformation spread that abortions aren't "safe." There are plenty of scare tactics including "if you have an abortion, you an never have kids again." It's to show that the procedure is safe and not the horror show some make it out to be.


Well, right now it's a potential risk. Mostly because some people use clandestine or cheapo clinics.

Making abortion more widely available and divert more funds to it would solve the issue though.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Thu May 08, 2014 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Thu May 08, 2014 12:53 pm

Anything that lends any support or credence of any kind to the pro-choice stance ought to be illegal, and utterly shunned by society as hate speech.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 12:53 pm

Empire of Narnia wrote:That's cold. "bodily autonomy" should not trump the life of another.


Really? I have a family relation who is probably going to die, soon, without a transplant. Give him some of your organs.

No?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Thu May 08, 2014 12:53 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:There's a stigma around women who have abortions and a mistaken belief that abortions are always a traumatic experience for them. A lot of people use this as an excuse for why abortion should be banned. The video was made not only because of that, but because of further misinformation spread that abortions aren't "safe." There are plenty of scare tactics including "if you have an abortion, you an never have kids again." It's to show that the procedure is safe and not the horror show some make it out to be.


Well, right now it's a potential risk. Mostly because some people use clandestine clinics.

Making abortion more widely available and divert more funds to it would solve the issue though.

Which is why the pro life movement undermines its own values. If abortion were widely availed and accessible, the rate would remain constant and stable. It would decrease with more sex education. By banning abortion, more women and foetuses would die. This flies in the face of what the movement represents.

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3440
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Korouse » Thu May 08, 2014 12:54 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Empire of Narnia wrote:That's cold. "bodily autonomy" should not trump the life of another.


Really? I have a family relation who is probably going to die, soon, without a transplant. Give him some of your organs.

No?

What organ?
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu May 08, 2014 12:55 pm

The Flood wrote:Anything that lends any support or credence of any kind to the pro-choice stance ought to be illegal, and utterly shunned by society as hate speech.


WAY to sound far off the deep end.

But seriously, do you know what happens in certain countries where abortion is banned?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Thu May 08, 2014 12:55 pm

The Flood wrote:Anything that lends any support or credence of any kind to the pro-choice stance ought to be illegal, and utterly shunned by society as hate speech.


Women's rights is not hate speech.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 12:55 pm

Korouse wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Really? I have a family relation who is probably going to die, soon, without a transplant. Give him some of your organs.

No?

What organ?


I don't see how that matters. Bodily autonomy shouldn't trump his life. Apparently.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3440
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Korouse » Thu May 08, 2014 12:56 pm

Death Metal wrote:
The Flood wrote:Anything that lends any support or credence of any kind to the pro-choice stance ought to be illegal, and utterly shunned by society as hate speech.


Women's rights is not hate speech.

It isn't women's rights. Lel
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3440
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Korouse » Thu May 08, 2014 12:57 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Korouse wrote:What organ?


I don't see how that matters. Bodily autonomy shouldn't trump his life. Apparently.

Well, I would if he was a good person. Of course, I'm not going to ask you his life story.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Thu May 08, 2014 12:57 pm

Korouse wrote:
Death Metal wrote:
Women's rights is not hate speech.

It isn't women's rights. Lel


It absolutely is. Women have the right to remove parasites from their body.
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 12:57 pm

Korouse wrote:
Death Metal wrote:
Women's rights is not hate speech.

It isn't women's rights.


How is letting women make their own reproductive choices not a women's rights issue?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 12:58 pm

Korouse wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
I don't see how that matters. Bodily autonomy shouldn't trump his life. Apparently.

Well, I would if he was a good person. Of course, I'm not going to ask you his life story.


Irrelevant. Perhaps you should read the post I was initially responding to.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 08, 2014 12:58 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Korouse wrote:It isn't women's rights.


How is letting women make their own reproductive choices not a women's rights issue?

I'm pretty sure he's mocking the argument.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu May 08, 2014 12:58 pm

Korouse wrote:
Death Metal wrote:
Women's rights is not hate speech.

It isn't women's rights. Lel


So much enlightenment in this sentence.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 12:59 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
How is letting women make their own reproductive choices not a women's rights issue?

I'm pretty sure he's mocking the argument.


Eh... possibly. Unfortunately, there's no platform ridiculous enough that you can be sure someone isn't serious.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3440
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Korouse » Thu May 08, 2014 12:59 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Korouse wrote:It isn't women's rights.


How is letting women make their own reproductive choices not a women's rights issue?

It's not only the woman's rights when talking about abortion, it's also the fetuses rights.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu May 08, 2014 1:00 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I'm pretty sure he's mocking the argument.


Eh... possibly. Unfortunately, there's no platform ridiculous enough that you can be sure someone isn't serious.

I think I was just trying to convince myself.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu May 08, 2014 1:00 pm

Korouse wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
How is letting women make their own reproductive choices not a women's rights issue?

It's not only the woman's rights when talking about abortion, it's also the fetuses rights.


A foetus doesn't have any rights. Nor should it.
I identify as
a problem

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Best Mexico, Camelone, Cannot think of a name, Equai, Fartsniffage, Greater Miami Shores 3, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Kubra, Lemmingtopias, Necroghastia, Perchan, Phage, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, Superpower Spain, The Jamesian Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads