NATION

PASSWORD

Emily Letts abortion video

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Fri May 09, 2014 7:38 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:In Canada, there is no elective abortion past 24 weeks

Good.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Fri May 09, 2014 7:38 pm

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:This thread embodies everything that is wrong with abortion/right to life/right to choice/whatever debates.

I love it when users decide to just drop into a debate and shit all over it, apparently utterly uninterested in actually participating in it.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:38 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:I find it odd that you do not consider a fully-formed fetus to be "sentient."

And?

How are they any less sentient than a temporarily unconscious person?

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:39 pm

Lamaredia wrote:
Pilotto wrote:What do you mean? You cannot claim in one post that the government has the power to decide what rights you have, and then in the next say the government cannot.

He means that if the government decides that the elderly do not have the right to life, then the elderly don't have the right to life.

Well that's... sick, actually.

User avatar
Citizens of the future
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: May 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Citizens of the future » Fri May 09, 2014 7:39 pm

Go instruct yourself biologicaly dude. If foetus would be parasite then most vertabrae would be considered parasite..

You just answer cold heartly or without logic.

In Canada we have very few prolifers and elective abortions stop at24 weeks

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 7:40 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And?

How are they any less sentient than a temporarily unconscious person?

The temporarily unconscious person can is still sentient.

"Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive, or to experience subjectivity" which they can still do.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:40 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:And?

How are they any less sentient than a temporarily unconscious person?

Sentience is something you don't lose until death.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:41 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:He means that if the government decides that the elderly do not have the right to life, then the elderly don't have the right to life.

Well that's... sick, actually.

Reality is cruel, isn't it?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 7:41 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:Go instruct yourself biologicaly dude. If foetus would be parasite then most vertabrae would be considered parasite..

You just answer cold heartly or without logic.

In Canada we have very few prolifers and elective abortions stop at24 weeks


"An organism that grows, feeds, and is sheltered on or in a different organism while contributing nothing to the survival of its host." is the definition of a parasite.

A fetus grows, feeds, and is sheltered in a woman while contributing nothing to the survival of its host.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Resora
Diplomat
 
Posts: 769
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Resora » Fri May 09, 2014 7:42 pm

Damn, this woman has guts. I'd be too afraid of getting shot by some nutty evangelical that fancies himself the "fetus avenger of the Lord" or whatever to do something this controversial in a public setting. Good on her.
The history of progress is written in the blood of men and women who have dared to espouse an unpopular cause.

Member of the Free Communists (District 108)
Left/Right: -10.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.45
Alternate Test
Political Views

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:43 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:Well that's... sick, actually.

Reality is cruel, isn't it?

If that is the justification that you want to use to justify your position, that the government should have the ability to select who has the right to life and who doesn't, than that's your deal. Please, never ever vote.

User avatar
Citizens of the future
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: May 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Citizens of the future » Fri May 09, 2014 7:43 pm

Lamaredia wrote:
Pilotto wrote:I find it odd that you do not consider a fully-formed fetus to be "sentient."

Considering that it doesn't fill the requirements for being sentient, it isn't that odd.

"Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive, or to experience subjectivity", something that fetuses can't do.



I like the "or"They do perceive. Scientifcaly proven.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:44 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:Go instruct yourself biologicaly dude. If foetus would be parasite then most vertabrae would be considered parasite..

You just answer cold heartly or without logic.

In Canada we have very few prolifers and elective abortions stop at24 weeks

Considering you're the one who made the bullshit claim that parasites can only be between two different species, we're not the ones who need instruction on biology.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:45 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:How are they any less sentient than a temporarily unconscious person?

Sentience is something you don't lose until death.

Really? How can you perceive and react to your surroundings if you're unconscious?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:45 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Reality is cruel, isn't it?

If that is the justification that you want to use to justify your position, that the government should have the ability to select who has the right to life and who doesn't, than that's your deal. Please, never ever vote.

You REALLY can't go a single post without erecting a straw man, huh?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 7:45 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:Considering that it doesn't fill the requirements for being sentient, it isn't that odd.

"Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive, or to experience subjectivity", something that fetuses can't do.



I like the "or"They do perceive. Scientifcaly proven.

If it is so scientifically (you spelt it wrong) proven that fetuses can perceive subjectivity , source it.
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri May 09, 2014 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:47 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:If that is the justification that you want to use to justify your position, that the government should have the ability to select who has the right to life and who doesn't, than that's your deal. Please, never ever vote.

You REALLY can't go a single post without erecting a straw man, huh?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:Why? What rationale for that statement do you have?

There is no "rationale." My government has not granted fetuses the right to live. It therefore doesn't have rights. This isn't complex.
Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:Okay. And what if the government decides that the elderly do not have the right to life?

Then they don't. It's that simple, really.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:47 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:
Lamaredia wrote:Considering that it doesn't fill the requirements for being sentient, it isn't that odd.

"Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive, or to experience subjectivity", something that fetuses can't do.



I like the "or"They do perceive. Scientifcaly proven.

No they don't. Unless you want to argue plants are sentient.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Citizens of the future
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: May 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Citizens of the future » Fri May 09, 2014 7:47 pm

Ok I quit arguing. I am for the choice but seeing how american prochoice are fanatics I understand you have so mny people against abortion

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:48 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You REALLY can't go a single post without erecting a straw man, huh?

Are you fucking kidding me?

Mavorpen wrote:There is no "rationale." My government has not granted fetuses the right to live. It therefore doesn't have rights. This isn't complex.
Mavorpen wrote:Then they don't. It's that simple, really.

Neither of those posts says ANYTHING about that being the justification for my position.

That's something you made up in your head to pretend as though you have a shred of any chance of making a coherent argument against me.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Lamaredia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1546
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lamaredia » Fri May 09, 2014 7:49 pm

Citizens of the future wrote:Ok I quit arguing. I am for the choice but seeing how american prochoice are fanatics I understand you have so mny people against abortion

You never argued in the first place.
Currently representing the SLP/R, Leading to a brighter future, in the NS Parliament RP as Representative Jonas Trägårdh Apelstierna.

Currently a co-admin of the NS Parliament RP

Political compass
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.59

Result


Political test = Social Democrat
Cosmopolitan – 15%
Communistic - 44%
Anarchistic - 28%
Visionary - 50%
Secular - 53%
Pacifist - 12%
Anthropocentric– 16%

Result


Socio-Economic Ideology = Social Democracy
Social Democracy = 100%
Democratic Socialism = 83%
Anarchism 58%


Result
Last edited by Lamaredia on Fri June 07, 2019 1:05 AM, edited 52 times in total.

User avatar
Pilotto
Minister
 
Posts: 2347
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pilotto » Fri May 09, 2014 7:50 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Pilotto wrote:Are you fucking kidding me?


Neither of those posts says ANYTHING about that being the justification for my position.

That's something you made up in your head to pretend as though you have a shred of any chance of making a coherent argument against me.

You do know that anyone who cares too can look back at your quotes and see through the bullshit and the lies in this post, right?

User avatar
Citizens of the future
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: May 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Citizens of the future » Fri May 09, 2014 7:50 pm

Late Foetus perceive sensations and as baby think everything is themselves. Psychology.
Last edited by Citizens of the future on Fri May 09, 2014 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri May 09, 2014 7:50 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Sentience is something you don't lose until death.

Really? How can you perceive and react to your surroundings if you're unconscious?

You do know that "unconsciousness" as you're talking about has nothing to do with the notion of implicit cognition, right?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Resora
Diplomat
 
Posts: 769
Founded: Nov 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Resora » Fri May 09, 2014 7:51 pm

Pilotto wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Neither of those posts says ANYTHING about that being the justification for my position.

That's something you made up in your head to pretend as though you have a shred of any chance of making a coherent argument against me.

You do know that anyone who cares too can look back at your quotes and see through the bullshit and the lies in this post, right?

Dude, he's obviously distinguishing between a fetus and a human being. He believe the government has the right to choose whether a fetus lives or dies. He doesn't believe it has the right to arbitrarily choose whether or not a human being lives or dies.

It's not complicated.
The history of progress is written in the blood of men and women who have dared to espouse an unpopular cause.

Member of the Free Communists (District 108)
Left/Right: -10.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.45
Alternate Test
Political Views

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aerlanica, Cannot think of a name, Cetaros, Eurocom, Forsher, Gun Manufacturers, Hispida, Necroghastia, Reich of the New World Order, Tarsonis, The Acolyte Confederacy, TheKeyToJoy, Thermodolia, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads