Advertisement
by Amor Pulchritudo » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:23 am
by Grandydia » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:26 am
Am I really meant to believe that with all these major advances in science and technology and biology, no-one's managed to make a better wheelchair? Let alone not have advanced surgery enough to repair spinal injuries?
by The Rich Port » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:27 am
by Kiah-Lani-Lew » Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:45 am
The Rich Port wrote:Jeez, have critics already forgotten District 9? For 3D movies, that one was great compared to Smurfs ExTREME!!!11!!!!
by Kiah-Lani-Lew » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:07 am
by North Suran » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:08 am
Risottia wrote:You want originality, there have been plenty of original movies in the last two years.
I can point you to a couple of those:
Il vento fa il suo giro (see the trailer at http://www.ilventofailsuogiro.com/)
Risottia wrote:Persepolis.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
by Gravlen » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:09 am
Amor Pulchritudo wrote:I like Citizen Kane... and I think that in the future Avatar will be studied as a perfect example of a particular genre just as Citizen Kane is now...
by Kiah-Lani-Lew » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:16 am
North Suran wrote:Risottia wrote:You want originality, there have been plenty of original movies in the last two years.
I can point you to a couple of those:
Il vento fa il suo giro (see the trailer at http://www.ilventofailsuogiro.com/)
A film so original that I'd never even heard of it before.
Thus rather firmly planting a bullet into the head of the notion that a film can only be good if its original.
If I recorded 55 minutes of myself running around naked and slavered in red paint, before passing it off as some allegory for the Holocaust, it would not be a good film (although it would be original, and would no doubt get a Palme D'Or from Cannes).Risottia wrote:Persepolis.
Original to the extent that I have never before seen so much fuss being made over a film which looks like it was directed, acted and drawn by a 5-year old.
by North Suran » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:25 am
Kiah-Lani-Lew wrote:North Suran wrote:Risottia wrote:You want originality, there have been plenty of original movies in the last two years.
I can point you to a couple of those:
Il vento fa il suo giro (see the trailer at http://www.ilventofailsuogiro.com/)
A film so original that I'd never even heard of it before.
Thus rather firmly planting a bullet into the head of the notion that a film can only be good if its original.
If I recorded 55 minutes of myself running around naked and slavered in red paint, before passing it off as some allegory for the Holocaust, it would not be a good film (although it would be original, and would no doubt get a Palme D'Or from Cannes).Risottia wrote:Persepolis.
Original to the extent that I have never before seen so much fuss being made over a film which looks like it was directed, acted and drawn by a 5-year old.
ok? i dont get it why is originallity bad?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
by Kiah-Lani-Lew » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:39 am
Slaytesics wrote:Spoiler ALERT!
Dude the best scene, by far, was the praying scene, it looked fucking awesome.
by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:42 am
by The_pantless_hero » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:52 am
Bottle wrote:Equality is a slippery slope, people, and if you give it to the gays you have to give it to the polygamists and if you give it to the polygamists you have to give it to the serial dog molesters and if you give it to the serial dog molesters you have to give it to the machine fetishists and the next thing you know you're being tied up by a trio of polygamist lesbian powerbooks and you can't get out because the safety word is case sensistive!
by Kiah-Lani-Lew » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:56 am
by North Suran » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:57 am
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
by New Ganurath » Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:59 am
by EvilDarkMagicians » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:03 am
New Ganurath wrote:If I may present a moment of fridge logic regarding the plot of the movie:The magnetic field that kept the Hallelujah Mountains afloat was tied to the sacred tree. The fleet was going to move in to bomb the sacred tree. Did none of them consider what would happen to the f***ing mountain range above them once the tree stops holding them up?
by JuNii » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:06 am
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:New Ganurath wrote:If I may present a moment of fridge logic regarding the plot of the movie:The magnetic field that kept the Hallelujah Mountains afloat was tied to the sacred tree. The fleet was going to move in to bomb the sacred tree. Did none of them consider what would happen to the f***ing mountain range above them once the tree stops holding them up?
They didn't know that though. They thought the whole 'connection' thing was all mumbo jumbo, when in fact it could be proved scientifically.
by Augarundus » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:16 am
by JuNii » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:23 am
Augarundus wrote:50%. They got effects and filming right... now where's the best part; story?!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, ImSaLiA, Likhinia, Majestic-12 [Bot], Post War America, Tungstan
Advertisement