NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control - A Political Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Are bills such as the New York SAFE Act effective at stopping gun crime?

The measures are effective.
23
10%
I'm not sure.
44
18%
The measures are not effective.
174
72%
 
Total votes : 241

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:06 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

And that makes sense. Chances are, this AR of mine would only be used for clearing a home (like I mentioned: building this if I have to supply my own rifle... or perhaps I'll build it, anyway), so length is a major concern here. A super-varminter AR would be pretty nice, though, especially out in Texas. I wonder if they make any in .220 Swift.


Not sure, but I think the Swift is too long for the action.



Looks like .243 Win. fits in an AR-10 pretty well.

User avatar
Askerike
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Jun 05, 2010
Corporate Police State

Postby Askerike » Fri Aug 15, 2014 7:57 pm

If money isn't the issue why not just get the sbr stamp? I flat out won't pay the sbr extortion fee. I'd build a pistol with a sig brace before I paid the fee.

I like 6.8 good ballistics and reloads with the same bullet as mymy tried and true .270 sendero. Super convenient. If you buy the expensive PRI mags you can slightly increase the OAL in specII chambers for better accuracy. Depending on manufacturer 6.8 can be found with with large or small primers which can be convenient too during a primer shortage you buy what you can get.

I stopped taking note of how much $$$ was in my 6.8... I couldn't even distinguish ffl discount prices vs full retail... if I have to meet a quota i'll buy what I need mark it up maybe 3%(+2.5% for credit card) and put it on gunbroker if it requires an ffl or ebay if they'll let it sell there. My only selling goal is to make just enough to pay for my renewal.

The way you tell if I like you or not is what I charger for transfers. Lol. Anywhere from free to 50... average $15-20.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:03 pm

Askerike wrote:If money isn't the issue why not just get the sbr stamp? I flat out won't pay the sbr extortion fee. I'd build a pistol with a sig brace before I paid the fee.

I like 6.8 good ballistics and reloads with the same bullet as mymy tried and true .270 sendero. Super convenient. If you buy the expensive PRI mags you can slightly increase the OAL in specII chambers for better accuracy. Depending on manufacturer 6.8 can be found with with large or small primers which can be convenient too during a primer shortage you buy what you can get.

I stopped taking note of how much $$$ was in my 6.8... I couldn't even distinguish ffl discount prices vs full retail... if I have to meet a quota i'll buy what I need mark it up maybe 3%(+2.5% for credit card) and put it on gunbroker if it requires an ffl or ebay if they'll let it sell there. My only selling goal is to make just enough to pay for my renewal.

The way you tell if I like you or not is what I charger for transfers. Lol. Anywhere from free to 50... average $15-20.



Because a pinned 14.5" midlength will have very, very mild recoil without also putting a massive fireball in the face of my fellow blueshirt and blinding both of us. Same reason I've decided on the pinned 'A2 instead of keeping the standard BCM brake. An overall length of ~31.5-32.0" is still quite manageable for CQB.

User avatar
Askerike
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Jun 05, 2010
Corporate Police State

Postby Askerike » Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:42 pm

I'm not saying go shorter... I'm just saying if you had the stamp you might be better off if you needed or wanted to do some change ups. Not having to go through the hassle of having it professionally unpinned.
Last edited by Askerike on Fri Aug 15, 2014 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Fri Aug 15, 2014 9:24 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Not sure, but I think the Swift is too long for the action.



Looks like .243 Win. fits in an AR-10 pretty well.


The AR10 should work with the swift. Not really my area of expertise. If I ever buy a Swift rifle, it will be a bolt action.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:55 am

So Ryan J. Reilly (huffington post justice reporter) thinks these are rubber bullets.
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/ ... 52/photo/1
:rofl:
Just one more reason why reporters and such need to refrain from speaking on such matters in regards to weaponry.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Sun Aug 17, 2014 10:57 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:55 am

Grinning Dragon wrote:So Ryan J. Reilly (huffington post justice reporter) thinks these are rubber bullets.
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/ ... 52/photo/1
:rofl:
Just one more reason why reporters and such need to refrain from speaking on such matters in regards to weaponry.

That is incredibly stupid.

After all, it's common knowledge the Ferguson police are using ray-guns against the protestors, and they don't leave casings or spent bullets.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9953
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:13 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:So Ryan J. Reilly (huffington post justice reporter) thinks these are rubber bullets.
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/ ... 52/photo/1
:rofl:
Just one more reason why reporters and such need to refrain from speaking on such matters in regards to weaponry.


Image

Really, I've read some pretty stupid things in regards to the gun control debate (ghost gun, shoulder thing that goes up, etc), but this is one is near the top of the list.
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:16 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:So Ryan J. Reilly (huffington post justice reporter) thinks these are rubber bullets.
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/ ... 52/photo/1
:rofl:
Just one more reason why reporters and such need to refrain from speaking on such matters in regards to weaponry.

That is incredibly stupid.

After all, it's common knowledge the Ferguson police are using ray-guns against the protestors, and they don't leave casings or spent bullets.

:rofl:
Cool that means my rail mounted light on my AR makes it a ray gun now *grins at the amount of money being saved in ammo costs*

How about a taser or maybe grenades
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Rostogovia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1188
Founded: Nov 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rostogovia » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:21 pm

I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.
NS's Resident PETA Nut
Feminist
Up The IRA! Proud Irish Republican Socialist
☭☭☭Trotskyist.☭☭☭
Bernie Sanders 2016, the worlds only honest statesman.
Real name: Garret
Age: 14
Gender - Male
Location: New York USA
Religious beliefs: On the corner of atheism and agnosticism.

★Comrade of the Commonwealth of Socialist States (CSS)★

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:25 pm

Rostogovia wrote:I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.


I believe citizens should be permitted to own books (with the exclusion of calculus and other scientific books) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with GPA and school attendance checks, enhanced reading and comprehension classes, mental health screenings.

I like how you use the word "permitted" The right enumerated in the 2nd Amendment is an inalienable right not a privilege.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12994
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:28 pm

Rostogovia wrote:I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.


In you're own words, whats the difference between an Assault Rifle and a "Military Grade" weapon?

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
Mallorea and Riva should resign
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:31 pm

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Rostogovia wrote:I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.


In you're own words, whats the difference between an Assault Rifle and a "Military Grade" weapon?


We both know it is a bullshit catch phrase and I get sick and tired of hearing "military grade" it is bullshit and they know it.
Last edited by Grinning Dragon on Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:39 pm

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Rostogovia wrote:I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.


In you're own words, whats the difference between an Assault Rifle and a "Military Grade" weapon?

You know. Military grade weapons are those scary black people guns. Or those guns with the big scopes that can shoot far. Or those guns in those big scary calibers like .223 that can blow holes in elephant's heads and kill cops through concrete and bulletproof vests because they're specially designed cop-killer bullets. Or those ones with the scary military sounding names like 'Colt' or 'Remington'.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:47 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:So Ryan J. Reilly (huffington post justice reporter) thinks these are rubber bullets.
https://twitter.com/ryanjreilly/status/ ... 52/photo/1
:rofl:
Just one more reason why reporters and such need to refrain from speaking on such matters in regards to weaponry.


Image


Really, I've read some pretty stupid things in regards to the gun control debate (ghost gun, shoulder thing that goes up, etc), but this is one is near the top of the list.


Yep, same here. It is idiots like Ryan that spreads misinformation such as this and being too lazy to do some fact checking before releasing his stupidity into the public sphere.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:56 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Image


Really, I've read some pretty stupid things in regards to the gun control debate (ghost gun, shoulder thing that goes up, etc), but this is one is near the top of the list.


Yep, same here. It is idiots like Ryan that spreads misinformation such as this and being too lazy to do some fact checking before releasing his stupidity into the public sphere.


People like this, and we are expected to respect the anti-gun position. How about NOT.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:12 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:
Yep, same here. It is idiots like Ryan that spreads misinformation such as this and being too lazy to do some fact checking before releasing his stupidity into the public sphere.


People like this, and we are expected to respect the anti-gun position. How about NOT.

Not to mention that some of these idiotic ideas get passed as do nothing laws, like weapon bans.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:13 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
People like this, and we are expected to respect the anti-gun position. How about NOT.

Not to mention that some of these idiotic ideas get passed as do nothing laws, like weapon bans.


That is because our system has become a bunch of ignorant idiots electing even bigger ignorant idiots.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10385
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:15 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:Not to mention that some of these idiotic ideas get passed as do nothing laws, like weapon bans.


That is because our system has become a bunch of ignorant idiots electing even bigger ignorant idiots.

Agreed to a point, the other is this notion that safety is a right or some such.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:24 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
That is because our system has become a bunch of ignorant idiots electing even bigger ignorant idiots.

Agreed to a point, the other is this notion that safety is a right or some such.


Even if safety is a right, that supports the private ownership of guns for defense.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:39 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:Not to mention that some of these idiotic ideas get passed as do nothing laws, like weapon bans.


That is because our system has become a bunch of ignorant idiots electing even bigger ignorant idiots.

you say that like it has ever been any other way.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:13 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
That is because our system has become a bunch of ignorant idiots electing even bigger ignorant idiots.

you say that like it has ever been any other way.


Good point. It has always been that way, but the stupidity has gotten really bad over that last few decades.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:06 pm

Rostogovia wrote:I believe that citizens should be permitted to own firearms (With the exclusion of assault rifles and other military grade weapons.) upon completing a rigorous permit process, complete with background checks, safety classes, and mental health screenings. As a native New Yorker I believe that the provisions of the SAFE act to be perfectly reasonable, and in no way limit the capacity of gun owners to hunt or defend themselves.


Every firearm in common use by civilians has been military grade at some point. Including "Hunting sifles" or "Hunting shotguns".

What do you think WW2 soldiers used to kill millions with? Yup, humble bolt-action rifles.

The good old Pump-action shotgun is extremely powerful as well.

The Germans wanted them banned in WW1 because of their efficiency at close quarters.
One shotgun-wielding American soldier, Sergeant Fred Lloyd, captured a village from THIRTY German soldiers.

How does this firepower compare to Assault rifles? They have twice the hit probability at under 30 meters.
Last edited by Tule on Mon Aug 18, 2014 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:03 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
Sociobiology wrote: you say that like it has ever been any other way.


Good point. It has always been that way, but the stupidity has gotten really bad over that last few decades.

two words, President Pierce.
credited with doing more to cause the civil war than any other single person AND so unpopular his own party would not support nomination for a second term. although he was brilliant at international politics, he just sucked at everything domestic.

then you have ones like John Tyler or Warren Harding.

the sad truth is the recent ones always look like the worst, because their always in your mind.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:21 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Good point. It has always been that way, but the stupidity has gotten really bad over that last few decades.

two words, President Pierce.
credited with doing more to cause the civil war than any other single person AND so unpopular his own party would not support nomination for a second term. although he was brilliant at international politics, he just sucked at everything domestic.

then you have ones like John Tyler or Warren Harding.

the sad truth is the recent ones always look like the worst, because their always in your mind.


Ja, but not all of the recent ones were that bad. Reagan and Clinton were good.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lativs, Nantoraka, Rary, Vyahrapura, World Anarchic Union

Advertisement

Remove ads