NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control - A Political Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Are bills such as the New York SAFE Act effective at stopping gun crime?

The measures are effective.
23
10%
I'm not sure.
44
18%
The measures are not effective.
174
72%
 
Total votes : 241

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9975
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:29 pm

Spreewerke wrote:Vz.58s aren't AK-pattern.


The funny thing is, the Vz.58 would have been banned in CT even before Sandy Hook, based on the "looks like a duck" test, and the fact that it's chambered in 7.62x39mm (because of those 2 criteria, they'd consider it an AK47 type). The CT General Assembly is pretty stupid. :(
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:58 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:Vz.58s aren't AK-pattern.


The funny thing is, the Vz.58 would have been banned in CT even before Sandy Hook, based on the "looks like a duck" test, and the fact that it's chambered in 7.62x39mm (because of those 2 criteria, they'd consider it an AK47 type). The CT General Assembly is pretty stupid. :(



Nah, they probably would have banned it because the Vz.58 has more in common with the P.38 than the AK, and everyone knows only Nazis own P.38s.

User avatar
Idaho Conservatives
Minister
 
Posts: 3066
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Idaho Conservatives » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:38 pm

Spreewerke wrote:Vz.58s aren't AK-pattern.


Yeah, they aren't AK's per se - I've heard them best described as the love child of an AK and an SKS. I would call them a cousin of the AK family though.
"Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way" --General George S. Patton

If You're A Fellow Ham, TG me!!!
KF7LCE

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:42 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
The funny thing is, the Vz.58 would have been banned in CT even before Sandy Hook, based on the "looks like a duck" test, and the fact that it's chambered in 7.62x39mm (because of those 2 criteria, they'd consider it an AK47 type). The CT General Assembly is pretty stupid. :(



Nah, they probably would have banned it because the Vz.58 has more in common with the P.38 than the AK, and everyone knows only Nazis own P.38s.

Even worse than that. 'Twas those dastardly commie-nazis in Czechoslovakia which made the thing. Looks like a commie piece of work but functions like a Nazi piece of work. Truly the worst combination there could be.
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:44 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:

Nah, they probably would have banned it because the Vz.58 has more in common with the P.38 than the AK, and everyone knows only Nazis own P.38s.

Even worse than that. 'Twas those dastardly commie-nazis in Czechoslovakia which made the thing. Looks like a commie piece of work but functions like a Nazi piece of work. Truly the worst combination there could be.


Yeah, and those dirty Czechen communazis bombed the marathon!
Last edited by Spreewerke on Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Burleson
Diplomat
 
Posts: 963
Founded: Aug 08, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Burleson » Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:20 pm

Criminals don't tend to follow laws. Why would a law against owning an assault rifle stop them from doing that if the laws against murder don't stop them?
[b]OOC
God Bless America
NSG's resident homophobic, islamophobic, transphobic, redneck
99% - Republican Party
97% - Conservative Party
92% - Constitution Party
62% - Libertarian Party
4% - Democratic Party
1% - Green Party
1% - Socialist Party
http://www.isidewith.com

User avatar
Gaiserin
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1026
Founded: Jun 22, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaiserin » Sun Aug 10, 2014 1:33 am

Searching through the cabinet. We have:
3 Shotguns, two of which are double-barreled.
Revolver + 9mm.
Machete.

Oh and the baseball bat downstairs, also a rifle in the basement.
■■▀■▀■▀■▀▀▀■■■

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Sun Aug 10, 2014 6:46 am

Burleson wrote:Criminals don't tend to follow laws. Why would a law against owning an assault rifle stop them from doing that if the laws against murder don't stop them?

the law doesn't stop them, the background check and the law stop the seller from selling it, because they become liable.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:37 am

Burleson wrote:Criminals don't tend to follow laws. Why would a law against owning an assault rifle stop them from doing that if the laws against murder don't stop them?


62% of homicides in urban America are committed by people with no previous felony conviction. One third have no previous arrest record.

The common belief that gun crime is committed overwhelmingly by career criminals that have the necessary connections to obtain assault rifles is a myth. Most gun murders are crimes of passion, the result of an argument that just happened to take place in close proximity to an easily accessible gun.
The same can be said for gun suicides, many of them are in fact not acts of careful deliberation but impulsive, fleeting sense of panic.

I don't think guns should be banned, I even think that assault rifle ownership can be justified. But I think far too many people do not respect the indiscriminate lethality that guns provide.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sun Aug 10, 2014 10:10 am

Tule wrote:
Burleson wrote:Criminals don't tend to follow laws. Why would a law against owning an assault rifle stop them from doing that if the laws against murder don't stop them?


62% of homicides in urban America are committed by people with no previous felony conviction. One third have no previous arrest record.

The common belief that gun crime is committed overwhelmingly by career criminals that have the necessary connections to obtain assault rifles is a myth. Most gun murders are crimes of passion, the result of an argument that just happened to take place in close proximity to an easily accessible gun.
The same can be said for gun suicides, many of them are in fact not acts of careful deliberation but impulsive, fleeting sense of panic.

I don't think guns should be banned, I even think that assault rifle ownership can be justified. But I think far too many people do not respect the indiscriminate lethality that guns provide.


Both of which are handily out-weighed by the benefits of gun ownership, and heavily outnumbered by the number of guns that are never used in crime and the gun-owners that never commit a gun-crime.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Tule
Senator
 
Posts: 3886
Founded: Jan 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Tule » Sun Aug 10, 2014 10:53 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Tule wrote:
62% of homicides in urban America are committed by people with no previous felony conviction. One third have no previous arrest record.

The common belief that gun crime is committed overwhelmingly by career criminals that have the necessary connections to obtain assault rifles is a myth. Most gun murders are crimes of passion, the result of an argument that just happened to take place in close proximity to an easily accessible gun.
The same can be said for gun suicides, many of them are in fact not acts of careful deliberation but impulsive, fleeting sense of panic.

I don't think guns should be banned, I even think that assault rifle ownership can be justified. But I think far too many people do not respect the indiscriminate lethality that guns provide.


Both of which are handily out-weighed by the benefits of gun ownership, and heavily outnumbered by the number of guns that are never used in crime and the gun-owners that never commit a gun-crime.


The latter, definitely.

The former... arguably.

There are many good reasons to allow civilian gun ownership, but public safety isn't one of them.

Remember, Austria disarmed licensed, law-abiding gun owners, not career criminals, yet the rate of gun suicides and homicides dropped.
Formerly known as Bafuria.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Sun Aug 10, 2014 11:04 am

Tule wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Both of which are handily out-weighed by the benefits of gun ownership, and heavily outnumbered by the number of guns that are never used in crime and the gun-owners that never commit a gun-crime.


The latter, definitely.

The former... arguably.

There are many good reasons to allow civilian gun ownership, but public safety isn't one of them.

Remember, Austria disarmed licensed, law-abiding gun owners, not career criminals, yet the rate of gun suicides and homicides dropped.


Yes, but did the overall homicide and suicide rate decrease?
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Sun Aug 10, 2014 1:46 pm

Tule wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Both of which are handily out-weighed by the benefits of gun ownership, and heavily outnumbered by the number of guns that are never used in crime and the gun-owners that never commit a gun-crime.


The latter, definitely.

The former... arguably.

There are many good reasons to allow civilian gun ownership, but public safety isn't one of them.

Remember, Austria disarmed licensed, law-abiding gun owners, not career criminals, yet the rate of gun suicides and homicides dropped.


I was speaking about American gun-control. Foreign stats do not apply.

Note: I always speak about American gun laws. The gun laws in other countries are none of my business.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:25 pm

Paddy O Fernature wrote:
Gun Manufacturers wrote:
In many states, there's a hunter's safety course in order to legally hunt. For example, in Connecticut the Department of Energy & Environmental Protection runs the course.


They used to teach that course in High School as an elective back in the day even. Wish they still did.


Nowadays if you even bring a Guns & Ammo magazine and start reading it at lunch. You could get suspended like I have during my high school years.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:07 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:I think a good model for gun control would be something resembling Canadian laws as a start: they have a similar culture to us that is very multicultural (so there's no qualms about 'cultural differences' when comparing policies), and have very good outcomes in terms of violent crime, gun crime, and homicides. There's a decent mix of gun ownership and gun control, and I think that using Canadian law as a starting point would be a good decision.


Details gotta put details.

1. If we have Canadian style gun control. My AK rifles would be banned from further sale, manufacture, import, and ownership.

2. My girlfriend's little "pocket pistol" collection would be banned like the AK47/74s and she would need to get a Prohibited Firearms license which I hear is almost impossible to get in Canada. Did I also mention that she wouldn't be allowed to sell or transfer them to anyone. Once she passes away, we would have to turn them in to the police where they will destroy it. The only exception is that she can only transfer a short pistol to another Prohibited Firearms licensee.

3. Full autos would no longer be transferable and would eventually suffer the same as pocket pistols and derringers. And have I were to still have my Full-auto AK, I would've have to get a Restricted Firearms license (also nearly impossible to get in Canada). The only exception is that a full auto can only be transferred or passed down to another Restricted Firearms licensee.

4. No one will be able to apply for neither a restricted or Prohibited Firearms license because in the 90s A law was passed in Canada that closed off future applications. That means no full autos and no "short barreled" pistols for future would-be applicants.

5. Skeletal stocks and folding stocks will be banned.

6. I most likely wouldn't be able to SBR my PS90 no matter what license I have.

So no. We don't want Canada's gun laws.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Thu Aug 14, 2014 5:11 pm

Gaiserin wrote:Searching through the cabinet. We have:
3 Shotguns, two of which are double-barreled.
Revolver + 9mm.
Machete.

Oh and the baseball bat downstairs, also a rifle in the basement.


As in a .38 or .380 revolver?
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Boston and Surrounding Provinces
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1380
Founded: Oct 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Boston and Surrounding Provinces » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:11 pm

Sociobiology wrote:
Burleson wrote:Criminals don't tend to follow laws. Why would a law against owning an assault rifle stop them from doing that if the laws against murder don't stop them?

the law doesn't stop them, the background check and the law stop the seller from selling it, because they become liable.


Black Market, buddy.
"Vita ac Libertas”
Pro: Libertarian, capitalism, gay rights, civil rights, Bill of Rights
Anti: Conservatives, Liberals, communism, gun control
Empire of Narnia wrote:I wish I could sell my body parts for money. I would buy so many toys.

Altraxa wrote:With Cthulu, all things are possible. Remember, impossible is a word for those who haven't sacrificed enough virgins

Eaglleia wrote:Clearly, there needs to be a dinosaur rights act to properly define the acceptable treatment of dinosaurs.
"New England Confederacy"
I am 95% LibertarianDo you like public parks? Well then you're a STAAAAATIST!

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:40 pm

Boston and Surrounding Provinces wrote:
Sociobiology wrote:the law doesn't stop them, the background check and the law stop the seller from selling it, because they become liable.


Black Market, buddy.

Yes the black market exists but currently individuals are not responsiable for checking the backgrounds of those they are selling to. This makes control of the black market a little more difficult. With enforced background checks for all purchase this problem is closed.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Boston and Surrounding Provinces
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1380
Founded: Oct 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Boston and Surrounding Provinces » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:42 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Boston and Surrounding Provinces wrote:
Black Market, buddy.

Yes the black market exists but currently individuals are not responsiable for checking the backgrounds of those they are selling to. This makes control of the black market a little more difficult. With enforced background checks for all purchase this problem is closed.


You don't get the point of the black market, do you? Machine guns are illegal, yet the BM continues to sell that shit.
"Vita ac Libertas”
Pro: Libertarian, capitalism, gay rights, civil rights, Bill of Rights
Anti: Conservatives, Liberals, communism, gun control
Empire of Narnia wrote:I wish I could sell my body parts for money. I would buy so many toys.

Altraxa wrote:With Cthulu, all things are possible. Remember, impossible is a word for those who haven't sacrificed enough virgins

Eaglleia wrote:Clearly, there needs to be a dinosaur rights act to properly define the acceptable treatment of dinosaurs.
"New England Confederacy"
I am 95% LibertarianDo you like public parks? Well then you're a STAAAAATIST!

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10405
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:42 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Boston and Surrounding Provinces wrote:
Black Market, buddy.

Yes the black market exists but currently individuals are not responsible for checking the backgrounds of those they are selling to. This makes control of the black market a little more difficult. With enforced background checks for all purchase this problem is closed.

Please tell me you are being facetious?

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:43 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Boston and Surrounding Provinces wrote:
Black Market, buddy.

Yes the black market exists but currently individuals are not responsiable for checking the backgrounds of those they are selling to. This makes control of the black market a little more difficult. With enforced background checks for all purchase this problem is closed.


That depends what would this "enforced" background check consist of.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Serrian
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1188
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrian » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:43 pm

Just gonna leave a small fact here for you to consider:

Apparently the most common weapon used in American school shootings is the AR-15. That's an automatic, military-grade assault rifle. Freely available to people younger than 25.

Think about that.

Now consider that the NRA stalwartly refuses the very concept of background checks.

Every day, I find a new reason to hate those despicable little sheits.

Can we please have an NRA office shooting soon?
North Arkana wrote:NS's native tech wanker
Now with 45% 47% less wank! (Similar amounts of tech though)
Class D14: Tier 4, Type IV, Superpower

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10405
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:45 pm

Serrian wrote:Just gonna leave a small fact here for you to consider:

1.Apparently the most common weapon used in American school shootings is the AR-15. That's an automatic, military-grade assault rifle. Freely available to people younger than 25.

Think about that.

Now consider that the NRA stalwartly refuses the very concept of background checks.

Every day, I find a new reason to hate those despicable little sheits.

Can we please have an NRA office shooting soon?

1. Wrong, try again

User avatar
Boston and Surrounding Provinces
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1380
Founded: Oct 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Boston and Surrounding Provinces » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:45 pm

Serrian wrote:Just gonna leave a small fact here for you to consider:

Apparently the most common weapon used in American school shootings is the AR-15. That's an automatic, military-grade assault rifle. Freely available to people younger than 25.

Think about that.

Now consider that the NRA stalwartly refuses the very concept of background checks.

Every day, I find a new reason to hate those despicable little sheits.

Can we please have an NRA office shooting soon?


Ahem. AR-15 is NOT automatic. It is a semi auto assault rifle, just like the M1 Garand or the 9MM Pistol. One pull, equals one shot.
"Vita ac Libertas”
Pro: Libertarian, capitalism, gay rights, civil rights, Bill of Rights
Anti: Conservatives, Liberals, communism, gun control
Empire of Narnia wrote:I wish I could sell my body parts for money. I would buy so many toys.

Altraxa wrote:With Cthulu, all things are possible. Remember, impossible is a word for those who haven't sacrificed enough virgins

Eaglleia wrote:Clearly, there needs to be a dinosaur rights act to properly define the acceptable treatment of dinosaurs.
"New England Confederacy"
I am 95% LibertarianDo you like public parks? Well then you're a STAAAAATIST!

User avatar
Serrian
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1188
Founded: Aug 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrian » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:47 pm

Boston and Surrounding Provinces wrote:
Serrian wrote:Just gonna leave a small fact here for you to consider:

Apparently the most common weapon used in American school shootings is the AR-15. That's an automatic, military-grade assault rifle. Freely available to people younger than 25.

Think about that.

Now consider that the NRA stalwartly refuses the very concept of background checks.

Every day, I find a new reason to hate those despicable little sheits.

Can we please have an NRA office shooting soon?


Ahem. AR-15 is NOT automatic. It is a semi auto assault rifle, just like the M1 Garand or the 9MM Pistol. One pull, equals one shot.


Okay, sorry, not much of a gun expert here. Semi-autos are still basically full-autos if you can squeeze the trigger fast enough, plus it gives you more space for recoil stabilization.

Point is, military grade assault rifle. Barely-adult college kids and high-schoolers.
North Arkana wrote:NS's native tech wanker
Now with 45% 47% less wank! (Similar amounts of tech though)
Class D14: Tier 4, Type IV, Superpower

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Democratic Poopland, Google [Bot], Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Necroghastia, Pilipinas and Malaya, Stalvervild, The Black Forrest, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads