no, but is a little joking around going to hurt? is joking around not allo--
oh. I'll go be a mindless robot now and bicker with butthurt anti-feminists, if that's the case.
Advertisement

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:11 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
A little from column a, a little from column b. The internet is a great place for people with radical views as by their nature there's not many of them in a given area. Via the internet you can have a virtual community of functional size for the most obscure things.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Dyakovo » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:11 am
Anubas wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
So it's not actually contributing anything to the thread?
no, but is a little joking around going to hurt? is joking around not allo--Dyakovo wrote:Well, stop it. NSG is super serious business, no humour allowed ever.
*nods*
oh. I'll go be a mindless robot now and bicker with butthurt anti-feminists, if that's the case.

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:14 am
Anubas wrote:no, but is a little joking around going to hurt?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Ashmoria » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:14 am
Sefard wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Indeed. Stay at home dads can sometimes be of help. ESPECIALLY if the woman is the one with the higher income. If both don't need to work to maintain a good standard of living then in my opinion one should relegate more time to the house and what goes on in it, independently of whether this is the man or the woman in the relationship.
And the stigma of stay-at-home dads stem from the fact that it seems effeminate to stay at home and take care of things. I can cook and clean the house same as a woman as well as learn how to take care of a child, so I feel there shouldn't be a huge deal about a male wanting to do a woman's work or a woman doing a man's work. Then again, I also grew up in a family where women do manly things like be aggressive/assertive and can use power tools so
The government should really set up economic policies so that middle class families, and even poor families, can live with one income. We were able to do it 50 to 60 years and even less time ago, there is no reason why we can't do it now, especially with the increase in technology and productivity. Simply put, the money is not going to the people it should be. Additionally, to be frank, women in the workforce makes it easier to lower everyone's salary.

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:15 am
Scomagia wrote:I suppose not. You don't have much room to point fingers at this point, however.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Sefard » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:16 am
Ashmoria wrote:Sefard wrote:
The government should really set up economic policies so that middle class families, and even poor families, can live with one income. We were able to do it 50 to 60 years and even less time ago, there is no reason why we can't do it now, especially with the increase in technology and productivity. Simply put, the money is not going to the people it should be. Additionally, to be frank, women in the workforce makes it easier to lower everyone's salary.
what makes you think that women would prefer to stay home?

by Ashmoria » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:23 am

by Sefard » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:26 am
Ashmoria wrote:Sefard wrote:
I said nothing about them preferring to stay home.
no you did not. and if i assume you didn't mean to suggest that women be forced to stay home i think you need to think this all through some more.
if it is possible for a family to subsist on ONE income it will always do better with 2 incomes thus kinda negating the effect of monkeying with things until it is possible to do well with one income.

by Lunalia » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:28 am

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:39 am
Lunalia wrote:I wish for a day when quotas are no longer needed, but I am not entirely certain that they aren't needed anymore.
There still exists some educational bias, where schools that tend to cater to minorities tend to receive less funding, and so minorities tend to get less good of an education, and so are not able to score as high on standardized tests as others, regardless of whether they're smart enough or not. Quotas allow schools to let students who may be able to excel once given access to a better education in, even though they may not have as impressive test scores as another student.
Additionally, some households still teach that young girls shouldn't be at all interested in learning, and should be content with doing housework for the men of the house. Young girls under this parenting style would probably not receive the time they would need to complete their homework as well as they could. Quotas, again, give those who weren't able to make the most of their pre college/university years, but who have the basic mental abilities to compete with those who were able to make the most of those years, a chance to have the same post high school eduction as others of their basic intelligence level.
If everyone could be guaranteed to get the same education, the same lifestyle at home, quotas wouldn't be needed. But unfortunately, that's not the case.

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:42 am

by Ashmoria » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:45 am
Sefard wrote:Ashmoria wrote:no you did not. and if i assume you didn't mean to suggest that women be forced to stay home i think you need to think this all through some more.
if it is possible for a family to subsist on ONE income it will always do better with 2 incomes thus kinda negating the effect of monkeying with things until it is possible to do well with one income.
Not necessarily. When you are able to live on one income, adding another income will sacrifice a healthy household, which only leads to greater social costs. This is why I proposed the Spousal Stipend.

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:50 am
Ashmoria wrote:supposing that women would prefer to stay home. supposing that the spousal stipend might substitute for the wages of a good job.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Anubas » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:53 am
The Serbian Empire wrote:Dyakovo wrote:And, of course, you can back you that claim...
Welcome to Tumblr and if you search long enough you will find feminists who want to castrate men, fascists who believe My Little Pony promotes white nationalism, and people who are aroused by blood and gore. The problem is how popular some of the castration feminists are. They can get a couple thousand reblogs for some of their posts.

by Krakadarek » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:56 am
Anubas wrote:The Serbian Empire wrote:Welcome to Tumblr and if you search long enough you will find feminists who want to castrate men, fascists who believe My Little Pony promotes white nationalism, and people who are aroused by blood and gore. The problem is how popular some of the castration feminists are. They can get a couple thousand reblogs for some of their posts.
hi, I post on tumblr and can't deny that that does happen. but is tumblr that good of an example? dumb ideologies (or someone like that) pointed out that radicals of any group flock to the Internet. so of course you can pull up examples from social media, but i could also pull up some examples of tumblr posts, with hundreds or thousands of notes, mind you, promoting feminism that isn't misandrist.
do you have any examples that aren't tumblr?

by Ashmoria » Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:57 am
Des-Bal wrote:Ashmoria wrote:supposing that women would prefer to stay home. supposing that the spousal stipend might substitute for the wages of a good job.
Where did he specify that women should stay home? If wages reflect the supposition that a family consists of two working people they'll naturally be lower. Dividing up the work is just good policy, one person working and the other handling the home is just more productive.

by The Serbian Empire » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:00 pm
Anubas wrote:The Serbian Empire wrote:Welcome to Tumblr and if you search long enough you will find feminists who want to castrate men, fascists who believe My Little Pony promotes white nationalism, and people who are aroused by blood and gore. The problem is how popular some of the castration feminists are. They can get a couple thousand reblogs for some of their posts.
hi, I post on tumblr and can't deny that that does happen. but is tumblr that good of an example? dumb ideologies (or someone like that) pointed out that radicals of any group flock to the Internet. so of course you can pull up examples from social media, but i could also pull up some examples of tumblr posts, with hundreds or thousands of notes, mind you, promoting feminism that isn't misandrist.
do you have any examples that aren't tumblr?

by Anubas » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:02 pm
Krakadarek wrote:Anubas wrote:hi, I post on tumblr and can't deny that that does happen. but is tumblr that good of an example? dumb ideologies (or someone like that) pointed out that radicals of any group flock to the Internet. so of course you can pull up examples from social media, but i could also pull up some examples of tumblr posts, with hundreds or thousands of notes, mind you, promoting feminism that isn't misandrist.
do you have any examples that aren't tumblr?
Whats your opinion off men?

by Krakadarek » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:04 pm

by Krakadarek » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:07 pm

by Anubas » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:07 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:Anubas wrote:hi, I post on tumblr and can't deny that that does happen. but is tumblr that good of an example? dumb ideologies (or someone like that) pointed out that radicals of any group flock to the Internet. so of course you can pull up examples from social media, but i could also pull up some examples of tumblr posts, with hundreds or thousands of notes, mind you, promoting feminism that isn't misandrist.
do you have any examples that aren't tumblr?
I fear the volume of reblogs is enough proof, but I have more sources. Of course, I can drag out the countless videos from the likes of Femitheist Divine and footage of Chanty Binx.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Fartsniffage, Holy Marsh, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement