I have the right to use government land (now with slavery!)

[Cannot think of a name]

The only non-Cliven link I can see now is Ted's Wikipedia page.

Well I've checked again, Ted appears to be making a comeback, now I have teh IMDB page as well as teh wiki page for the film and Ted Bundy.

IT is the google Battle of the Bundys!!!!!!

I'm pulling for the clear underdog, Bundy instruments.

[Blakk Metal]

Well I've checked again, Ted appears to be making a comeback, now I have teh IMDB page as well as teh wiki page for the film and Ted Bundy.

IT is the google Battle of the Bundys!!!!!!

I'm pulling for the clear underdog, Bundy instruments.

Bundy beer is definitely dead though.

[Tekania]

I'm pulling for the clear underdog, Bundy instruments.

Bundy beer is definitely dead though.

I'm going to the Bundy Manufacturing Company, the ultimately in underdog in that the company merged with another company and changed names more then 100 years ago.

[StardustLolita]

I am quite certain that there is more than enough land for the turtles and cows to share.

[Dyakovo]

I am quite certain that there is more than enough land for the turtles and cows to share.

You have no clue what this is about, do you?

[Caninope]

What the fuck did the cattle do to the Federal Agents? I honestly hope they're charged for this.

Why? The Federal Government has had the right to impound this fuckwit's cattle since 1998 under a district court order, and that does include killing said cattle.

[United Prefectures of Appia]

If you thought it couldn't get worse with killing cattles, guess again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k63jOjxFpaA

[Tekania]

If you thought it couldn't get worse with killing cattles, guess again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k63jOjxFpaA

Pretty apt description of how I saw it to, use women and children as body shields in the event the fight you're attempting to instigate escalates to gunfire.

[Gauthier]

If you thought it couldn't get worse with killing cattles, guess again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k63jOjxFpaA

Pretty apt description of how I saw it to, use women and children as body shields in the event the fight you're attempting to instigate escalates to gunfire.

If a bunch of brown people used human shields, would FOXNews and the rest of the right wing celebrate them as "patriots"? Of course not.

[Tekania]

Pretty apt description of how I saw it to, use women and children as body shields in the event the fight you're attempting to instigate escalates to gunfire.

If a bunch of brown people used human shields, would FOXNews and the rest of the right wing celebrate them as "patriots"? Of course not.

Yes, I'm certain the Fox headline on that would be calling them "Terrorists".

[L Ron Cupboard]

Cliven Bundy is just a moo-cher.

[Death Metal]

If you thought it couldn't get worse with killing cattles, guess again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k63jOjxFpaA

Like I said, Bundy's backers are cowardly bullies.

[Sociobiology]

Cliven Bundy is just a moo-cher.

i lick becks phrase better, welfare rancher.

[Yumyumsuppertime]

Those ancestral claims may not be as strong as he's claiming.

[Geilinor]

Those ancestral claims may not be as strong as he's claiming.

Why do so many conservative politicians and commentators support this liar?

[Yumyumsuppertime]

Those ancestral claims may not be as strong as he's claiming.

Why do so many conservative politicians and commentators support this liar?

Because if you're not overly concerned with the facts of the matter, the story itself is a Southwestern Libertarian wet dream, with the successful independent rancher being pushed around by an overreaching federal government, and finally taking a stand with the assistance of his fellow patriotic Americans.

[Tekania]

Those ancestral claims may not be as strong as he's claiming.

Not surprising, and lines up with the ranch's first recorded purchase of grazing permits in the 50's and the fact that Bundy's own father was not even born in Nevada.

[Gauthier]

Why do so many conservative politicians and commentators support this liar?

Because if you're not overly concerned with the facts of the matter, the story itself is a Southwestern Libertarian wet dream, with the successful independent rancher being pushed around by an overreaching federal government, and finally taking a stand with the assistance of his fellow patriotic Americans.

Once again, Jon Stewart exposes the inherent right-wing hypocrisy in the Bundy worship.

‘Who the Hell Is on This Guy’s Side?’ Stewart Tears into Hannity for Bundy Hypocrisy

[Fireye]

Why do so many conservative politicians and commentators support this liar?

Because if you're not overly concerned with the facts of the matter, the story itself is a Southwestern Libertarian wet dream, with the successful independent rancher being pushed around by an overreaching federal government, and finally taking a stand with the assistance of his fellow patriotic Americans.

I'm a pretty staunch smaller-government supporter myself, and all I see is an asshole flaunting his crimes.

I don't get how the Libertarians don't see that.

[Distruzio]

I don't really think one should benefit from welfarism without at least acknowledging that is what you need. Buddy is stealing from the taxpayers. If he'd have asked for permission from the established agent of the taxpayers (the government) and received that permission then I'd maybe have a bit of sympathy... maybe.

I am, however, hostile to welfarism.

[Tekania]

Because if you're not overly concerned with the facts of the matter, the story itself is a Southwestern Libertarian wet dream, with the successful independent rancher being pushed around by an overreaching federal government, and finally taking a stand with the assistance of his fellow patriotic Americans.

I'm a pretty staunch smaller-government supporter myself, and all I see is an asshole flaunting his crimes.

I don't get how the Libertarians don't see that.

Indeed, I can understand disagreeing with a particular laws or regulation..... I might even have a slight bit more sympathy towards him if the issue were about his own property. But the simple fact is in this case he is basically arguing for a right to use property he doesn't personally own for whatever purpose he wants and is telling the actual owners to fuck off and holding guns to their heads while he exploits the land for his own personal benefit.

[Gig em Aggies]

I'm a pretty staunch smaller-government supporter myself, and all I see is an asshole flaunting his crimes.

I don't get how the Libertarians don't see that.

Indeed, I can understand disagreeing with a particular laws or regulation..... I might even have a slight bit more sympathy towards him if the issue were about his own property. But the simple fact is in this case he is basically arguing for a right to use property he doesn't personally own for whatever purpose he wants and is telling the actual owners to fuck off and holding guns to their heads while he exploits the land for his own personal benefit.

What if we used his own tactic against him. By which we have stuff owned by the federal government use his land Without paying fees and then when he demand we move we gather armed pro government supporters and have them point guns at his head figuratively and see if he likes being treated that way.

[Shaggai]

Indeed, I can understand disagreeing with a particular laws or regulation..... I might even have a slight bit more sympathy towards him if the issue were about his own property. But the simple fact is in this case he is basically arguing for a right to use property he doesn't personally own for whatever purpose he wants and is telling the actual owners to fuck off and holding guns to their heads while he exploits the land for his own personal benefit.

What if we used his own tactic against him. By which we have stuff owned by the federal government use his land Without paying fees and then when he demand we move we gather armed pro government supporters and have them point guns at his head figuratively and see if he likes being treated that way.

That would be stupid, because it would be illegal. The whole point of the government is not to do illegal things.

[Tekania]

Indeed, I can understand disagreeing with a particular laws or regulation..... I might even have a slight bit more sympathy towards him if the issue were about his own property. But the simple fact is in this case he is basically arguing for a right to use property he doesn't personally own for whatever purpose he wants and is telling the actual owners to fuck off and holding guns to their heads while he exploits the land for his own personal benefit.

What if we used his own tactic against him. By which we have stuff owned by the federal government use his land Without paying fees and then when he demand we move we gather armed pro government supporters and have them point guns at his head figuratively and see if he likes being treated that way.

No, he's allowed to gather military forces to invade others land...... but having that done to him i wrong. Down wit the Feds! USA!USA!USA!

I think I'm doing this right....

[Death Metal]

I don't get how the Libertarians don't see that.

Because the President is a Democrat. Plain and simple.