NATION

PASSWORD

Iran is trolling the US

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:17 am

greed and death wrote:
Cybach wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/wl_afp/iraqiranoilborder_20091218153543

Iranian forces take over Iraq oil well

NASIRIYAH, Iraq (AFP) – Iranian forces took control of a southern Iraqi oil well on a disputed section of the border on Friday, US and Iraqi officials told AFP.

"There has been no violence related to this incident and we trust this will be resolved through peaceful diplomacy between the governments of Iraq and Iran," a US military spokesman told AFP at Contingency Operating Base Adder, just outside the southern Iraqi city of Nasiriyah.

"The oil field is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi border forts," he said, adding that such incidents occur quite frequently.

An official of the state-owned South Oil Co in the southeastern city of Amara, and west of the field, said: "An Iranian force arrived at the field early this morning (Friday).

"It took control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies in Iraqi territory," the official added.



I am very amused at the sheer balls of the Iranians. They're getting all sort of heat and bullying from the US about their alleged uranium enrichment program. They don't mind too much. Instead they just march into Iraq and take over an oilfield, and raise an Iranian flag on it.


they are trying to provoke the US because they have instability at home.
They want US to do soemthing rash so they can say the US is trying to put the shah back in power again or somesuch to get the poeple behind them.
The best thing to do is ignore them.


Indeed, not to feed the troll.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:18 am

Namabia wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Cybach wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/wl_afp/iraqiranoilborder_20091218153543

Iranian forces take over Iraq oil well

NASIRIYAH, Iraq (AFP) – Iranian forces took control of a southern Iraqi oil well on a disputed section of the border on Friday, US and Iraqi officials told AFP.

"There has been no violence related to this incident and we trust this will be resolved through peaceful diplomacy between the governments of Iraq and Iran," a US military spokesman told AFP at Contingency Operating Base Adder, just outside the southern Iraqi city of Nasiriyah.

"The oil field is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi border forts," he said, adding that such incidents occur quite frequently.

An official of the state-owned South Oil Co in the southeastern city of Amara, and west of the field, said: "An Iranian force arrived at the field early this morning (Friday).

"It took control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies in Iraqi territory," the official added.



I am very amused at the sheer balls of the Iranians. They're getting all sort of heat and bullying from the US about their alleged uranium enrichment program. They don't mind too much. Instead they just march into Iraq and take over an oilfield, and raise an Iranian flag on it.


they are trying to provoke the US because they have instability at home.
They want US to do soemthing rash so they can say the US is trying to put the shah back in power again or somesuch to get the poeple behind them.
The best thing to do is ignore them.


What is to say they nuke us? Then we'd turn rash.


They don't want a nuclear war they want us to go drive them out of Iraq.
That way they can tell their citizens see the US is attacking us they are going to bring the long dead shah and put him back in power using their great Satan powers.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:19 am

Namabia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


U.S. is scared.... The U.S. really only has a few Nuclear Weopens ready to fire. Even though 3/4 of Russia's and U.S.'s nuclear missiles from the cold war are locked down in bunkers. 1/4 are still out there! (Some said around 200,000 nuclear weopens were made in the Cold War. If 1/4 is still out there.....)


200 000? Methinks someone exaggerated a bit. More like 10 000 between the five nuclear powers. 25 000 at the most.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Namabia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1814
Founded: Jul 25, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Namabia » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:22 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Namabia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


U.S. is scared.... The U.S. really only has a few Nuclear Weopens ready to fire. Even though 3/4 of Russia's and U.S.'s nuclear missiles from the cold war are locked down in bunkers. 1/4 are still out there! (Some said around 200,000 nuclear weopens were made in the Cold War. If 1/4 is still out there.....)


200 000? Methinks someone exaggerated a bit. More like 10 000 between the five nuclear powers. 25 000 at the most.


I was talking about the cold war arsenal...... Yeah they have exaggerated. But still to have 1/4 of the Cold War Nuclear Arsenal not under high security bunkers. lets say theres 20,000. 1/4 still out there means there are 5,000 nuclear weopens still out there either under light protection or being transported to security bunkers.
I am politically someone who is near the center of the scale.

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:'Hate' is such a strong word. I just want to see him suffer. Is that so awful? :)

Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Big Jim P wrote:I have the right to personal self-defense, whether that necessitates a gun, a knife, my bare hands or a nuclear weapon.

User avatar
Martyrdoom
Diplomat
 
Posts: 504
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Martyrdoom » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:22 am

greed and death wrote:they are trying to provoke the US because they have instability at home.
They want US to do soemthing rash so they can say the US is trying to put the shah back in power again or somesuch to get the poeple behind them.
The best thing to do is ignore them.


Seems that way: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle ... 420453.stm
Smelled a Spring on the Salford wind

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:23 am

greed and death wrote:
Namabia wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Cybach wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/wl_afp/iraqiranoilborder_20091218153543

Iranian forces take over Iraq oil well

NASIRIYAH, Iraq (AFP) – Iranian forces took control of a southern Iraqi oil well on a disputed section of the border on Friday, US and Iraqi officials told AFP.

"There has been no violence related to this incident and we trust this will be resolved through peaceful diplomacy between the governments of Iraq and Iran," a US military spokesman told AFP at Contingency Operating Base Adder, just outside the southern Iraqi city of Nasiriyah.

"The oil field is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi border forts," he said, adding that such incidents occur quite frequently.

An official of the state-owned South Oil Co in the southeastern city of Amara, and west of the field, said: "An Iranian force arrived at the field early this morning (Friday).

"It took control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies in Iraqi territory," the official added.



I am very amused at the sheer balls of the Iranians. They're getting all sort of heat and bullying from the US about their alleged uranium enrichment program. They don't mind too much. Instead they just march into Iraq and take over an oilfield, and raise an Iranian flag on it.


they are trying to provoke the US because they have instability at home.
They want US to do soemthing rash so they can say the US is trying to put the shah back in power again or somesuch to get the poeple behind them.
The best thing to do is ignore them.


What is to say they nuke us? Then we'd turn rash.


They don't want a nuclear war they want us to go drive them out of Iraq.
That way they can tell their citizens see the US is attacking us they are going to bring the long dead shah and put him back in power using their great Satan powers.


Aye, it's like when the Argentine dictatorship attacked the Falklands in a last-ditch attempt to gain somekind of success. The difference being that the Argentine dictatorship counted on military success to win.

...not that a single oil well is anything like the Falklands.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:23 am

EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


Exactly. Its like governments not letting certain people own weapons. Just because someone is a little crazy in the head doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to purchase a shotgun.

Oh wait... ;)
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:24 am

Image

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:25 am

Lelouche wrote:I'm wondering how we report this to a moderator?

either way, this is...unacceptable

Clinton would be bombing something by now
Bush would be Invading something
Obama will be......talking it out?

Not exactly, all three would do little more sanctions that Clinton put in place, and a few words.
The reason being the political advisers of Iranian descent advise against invasion or bombing. Largely because they were students in the late 70's early 80's who helped run out American influence only to be run out themselves.

The political advisers from Iraq however tended to be from Rich families that Saddam ran out. Leading to a different outlook on American interventionism.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
EvilDarkMagicians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13456
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:26 am

United Russian State wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that all the countries that have nuclear bombs think they can tell other countries that do not have nuclear bombs, not to have nuclear bombs when they have they have some. :palm:


Don't forget the UK.


Fixed for clarity.

User avatar
Winland Islands
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Dec 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Winland Islands » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:27 am

With the gulf straits,the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the proxy group Hezbollah in Lebanon the Iranians have options to retaliate against international interests.They are used to sanctions. So they will just keep trolling and trolling and trolling....Unfortunate that this situation could have been prevented with smarter foreign policy in the past. At one point in time Iran and the us were working together against the Taliban and Iran offered at one point to take measures against Hezbollah. Now all sides are doing it wrong, Iran and its hardline regime trying to gain support at home,America and its past foreign policy decisions. So we might soon have war. Or they could be just ignored as if military action is taken the entire population would rally behind the regime.
Last edited by Winland Islands on Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:27 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Namabia wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Cybach wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/wl_afp/iraqiranoilborder_20091218153543

Iranian forces take over Iraq oil well

NASIRIYAH, Iraq (AFP) – Iranian forces took control of a southern Iraqi oil well on a disputed section of the border on Friday, US and Iraqi officials told AFP.

"There has been no violence related to this incident and we trust this will be resolved through peaceful diplomacy between the governments of Iraq and Iran," a US military spokesman told AFP at Contingency Operating Base Adder, just outside the southern Iraqi city of Nasiriyah.

"The oil field is in disputed territory in between Iranian and Iraqi border forts," he said, adding that such incidents occur quite frequently.

An official of the state-owned South Oil Co in the southeastern city of Amara, and west of the field, said: "An Iranian force arrived at the field early this morning (Friday).

"It took control of Well 4 and raised the Iranian flag even though the well lies in Iraqi territory," the official added.



I am very amused at the sheer balls of the Iranians. They're getting all sort of heat and bullying from the US about their alleged uranium enrichment program. They don't mind too much. Instead they just march into Iraq and take over an oilfield, and raise an Iranian flag on it.


they are trying to provoke the US because they have instability at home.
They want US to do soemthing rash so they can say the US is trying to put the shah back in power again or somesuch to get the poeple behind them.
The best thing to do is ignore them.


What is to say they nuke us? Then we'd turn rash.


They don't want a nuclear war they want us to go drive them out of Iraq.
That way they can tell their citizens see the US is attacking us they are going to bring the long dead shah and put him back in power using their great Satan powers.


Aye, it's like when the Argentine dictatorship attacked the Falklands in a last-ditch attempt to gain somekind of success. The difference being that the Argentine dictatorship counted on military success to win.

...not that a single oil well is anything like the Falklands.


Seems that way, funny thing is Argentina thought it would win.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:31 am

Namabia wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Namabia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


U.S. is scared.... The U.S. really only has a few Nuclear Weopens ready to fire. Even though 3/4 of Russia's and U.S.'s nuclear missiles from the cold war are locked down in bunkers. 1/4 are still out there! (Some said around 200,000 nuclear weopens were made in the Cold War. If 1/4 is still out there.....)


200 000? Methinks someone exaggerated a bit. More like 10 000 between the five nuclear powers. 25 000 at the most.


I was talking about the cold war arsenal...... Yeah they have exaggerated. But still to have 1/4 of the Cold War Nuclear Arsenal not under high security bunkers. lets say theres 20,000. 1/4 still out there means there are 5,000 nuclear weopens still out there either under light protection or being transported to security bunkers.


Still enough to kill off most of the human species. When you can do that several times over in reality, exaggerating the number of nukes is ludicrous.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
EvilDarkMagicians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13456
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:35 am

Blackledge wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


Exactly. Its like governments not letting certain people own weapons. Just because someone is a little crazy in the head doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to purchase a shotgun.

Oh wait... ;)


Huh :eyebrow:

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:38 am

Pevisopolis wrote:If Iran is Trolling, then wouldn't that make the US guilty of Flamebait?


I'm the second to sig this. By the way, guess who I am on dA. :lol:

OT: Iran is freaking awesome.
Last edited by Uawc on Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
Namabia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1814
Founded: Jul 25, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Namabia » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:38 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Namabia wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Namabia wrote:
EvilDarkMagicians wrote:What I find even more funny is that USA think they can tell people not have nuclear bombs, when they have they have some. :palm:


U.S. is scared.... The U.S. really only has a few Nuclear Weopens ready to fire. Even though 3/4 of Russia's and U.S.'s nuclear missiles from the cold war are locked down in bunkers. 1/4 are still out there! (Some said around 200,000 nuclear weopens were made in the Cold War. If 1/4 is still out there.....)


200 000? Methinks someone exaggerated a bit. More like 10 000 between the five nuclear powers. 25 000 at the most.


I was talking about the cold war arsenal...... Yeah they have exaggerated. But still to have 1/4 of the Cold War Nuclear Arsenal not under high security bunkers. lets say theres 20,000. 1/4 still out there means there are 5,000 nuclear weopens still out there either under light protection or being transported to security bunkers.


Still enough to kill off most of the human species. When you can do that several times over in reality, exaggerating the number of nukes is ludicrous.


Like I said someone told me that.
I am politically someone who is near the center of the scale.

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:'Hate' is such a strong word. I just want to see him suffer. Is that so awful? :)

Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Big Jim P wrote:I have the right to personal self-defense, whether that necessitates a gun, a knife, my bare hands or a nuclear weapon.

User avatar
Khybero
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Khybero » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:40 am

USA= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
UK= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
France= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Russia= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
China= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Israel= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Iran= Acknowledges MAD and does not give a damn about it

Lets be honest you can't have nuclear weapons when your country is so unstable and lets bw honest anyone who played call of duty 4 will know that the chance of nuke theft is gonna be pretty high in Iran, or they might start giving them to terrorists. :/
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Winland Islands
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Dec 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Winland Islands » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:43 am

The problem with a nuclear armed Iran is that it would take an already effed up region and set off a nuclear arms race. Neighboring India and Pakistan have got the bomb but as a deterrent to each other while Iraq,the traditional enemy of Iran ,has been taken care of. Besides regional influence ,pride, and trolling its neighbors and the world they have no need for such a bomb.

User avatar
Uawc
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5102
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Uawc » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:47 am

Khybero wrote:USA= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
UK= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
France= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Russia= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
China= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Israel= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Iran= Acknowledges MAD and does not give a damn about it

Lets be honest you can't have nuclear weapons when your country is so unstable and lets bw honest anyone who played call of duty 4 will know that the chance of nuke theft is gonna be pretty high in Iran, or they might start giving them to terrorists. :/


Call of Duty. You take your knowledge of how this will work out from Call of motherfreaking Duty. :palm:

I don't think I should have to say much more about this.
Pro-democracy, pro-NATO, anti-authoritarian. Mostly disinterested in the current political climate. Polarization is the cancer of the body politic.

Glory to Ukraine, glory to the heroes!

User avatar
The Nekron Combine
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nekron Combine » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:49 am

Even North Korea isn't as stupid as Iran and recognises MAD. Or it may have something to do with the fact that they have only one nuclear ICBM and would get their arses handed to them in a nuclear war.

User avatar
Kaesekartoffeln
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 117
Founded: Jul 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaesekartoffeln » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:50 am

Here's an interesting article on Iran.
"Whenever I see any one arguing for communism I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally"-Abraham Lincoln, quote updated for 21st century NS.
Great Myths of the Great Depression
UCLA Study on New Deal

User avatar
Khybero
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 48
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Khybero » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:51 am

UAWC wrote:
Call of Duty. You take your knowledge of how this will work out from Call of motherfreaking Duty. :palm:

I don't think I should have to say much more about this.


Your missing the point, what I'm pointing out is Iran's no where near as stable as the present holders of nuclear weapons; the country's security is too volatile, this year we've probably come within a week of a counter revolution that was averted by the Iranian police, if Iran has nuclear weapons and the police fail to stop a counter revolution the weapons could fall into anyone's hands.

I was simply pointing out Call of Duty as the example of a 'what if' scenario.
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Corporate Bordello

Postby Vetalia » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:55 am

Of course, the risk of trolling IRL is that you might actually get your ass kicked.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
EvilDarkMagicians
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13456
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby EvilDarkMagicians » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:56 am

UAWC wrote:
Khybero wrote:USA= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
UK= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
France= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Russia= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
China= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Israel= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Iran= Acknowledges MAD and does not give a damn about it

Lets be honest you can't have nuclear weapons when your country is so unstable and lets bw honest anyone who played call of duty 4 will know that the chance of nuke theft is gonna be pretty high in Iran, or they might start giving them to terrorists. :/


Call of Duty. You take your knowledge of how this will work out from Call of motherfreaking Duty. :palm:


Doesn't everybody. :o

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:58 am

EvilDarkMagicians wrote:
UAWC wrote:
Khybero wrote:USA= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
UK= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
France= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Russia= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
China= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Israel= Acknowledges MAD and does not wish to cause it.
Iran= Acknowledges MAD and does not give a damn about it

Lets be honest you can't have nuclear weapons when your country is so unstable and lets bw honest anyone who played call of duty 4 will know that the chance of nuke theft is gonna be pretty high in Iran, or they might start giving them to terrorists. :/


Call of Duty. You take your knowledge of how this will work out from Call of motherfreaking Duty. :palm:


Doesn't everybody. :o


No. CoD became horribly mainstream after CoD2 :p
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads