Sexuality, Human Expression, and Personhood

[Mini Miehm]

I see people as individuals. Individuals should be judged on their actions, not by your perceptions. If you're not harming other people, you're not doing anything worth being judged negatively for. And even if YOU think someone is harming another, if the person being "harmed" disagrees with you, YOU are in the wrong.

Full definition of A GROUP: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

First, you can't judge someone outside of your perceptions.
Secondly, If I perceive someone as being harmed while they disagree, I am right because my strength is as the strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

You're insane and should seek medical assistance with all due haste. On a related note, you're harming the world by posting. You should stop. For the good of everyone who has to deal with you.

[Llamalandia]

Full definition of A GROUP: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

First, you can't judge someone outside of your perceptions.
Secondly, If I perceive someone as being harmed while they disagree, I am right because my strength is as the strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

You're insane and should seek medical assistance with all due haste. On a related note, you're harming the world by posting. You should stop. For the good of everyone who has to deal with you.

I'm pretty sure that the world will survie just about any nationstates post. (unless some one post plans for how to build a nuke and the location of some weapons grade plutonium here ) Charging someone as harming the world with their posts seems a bit extreme to me. Plus I don't think that "harming the world" is actually against the NS forum rules but then again I'm notamod so...

[Shie]

Full definition of A GROUP: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

First, you can't judge someone outside of your perceptions.
Secondly, If I perceive someone as being harmed while they disagree, I am right because my strength is as the strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

You're insane and should seek medical assistance with all due haste. On a related note, you're harming the world by posting. You should stop. For the good of everyone who has to deal with you.

You know what? You're trying to hurt my feelings and that's not okay.
I've never said a bad word about you and here you are calling me insane, stop being rude to me because you don't like some things I've posted, some of which I've provided evidence for.

[Mini Miehm]

You're insane and should seek medical assistance with all due haste. On a related note, you're harming the world by posting. You should stop. For the good of everyone who has to deal with you.

You know what? You're trying to hurt my feelings and that's not okay.
I've never said a bad word about you and here you are calling me insane, stop being rude to me because you don't like some thing I've posted, some of which I've provided proof for.

Anyone who seriously claims that their strength is as the strength of ten is definitely not well. The ideas you espouse are awful enough, but you're incredibly self righteous about it.

[Shie]

You know what? You're trying to hurt my feelings and that's not okay.
I've never said a bad word about you and here you are calling me insane, stop being rude to me because you don't like some thing I've posted, some of which I've provided proof for.

Anyone who seriously claims that their strength is as the strength of ten is definitely not well. The ideas you espouse are awful enough, but you're incredibly self righteous about it.

You just don't understand me, that's all.

I'm feeling better from when you hurt me though, this is where my strength (emotional) comes in.

[Llamalandia]

You know what? You're trying to hurt my feelings and that's not okay.
I've never said a bad word about you and here you are calling me insane, stop being rude to me because you don't like some thing I've posted, some of which I've provided proof for.

Anyone who seriously claims that their strength is as the strength of ten is definitely not well. The ideas you espouse are awful enough, but you're incredibly self righteous about it.

Hmm while I disagree with Shie, I gotta say accusing someone of harming the world merely with their posts and telling them to shut up seems far worse than anything Shie has actually said thus far. I mean he certainly seems to respect your right to express yourself why can't you respect his?

[Novia Soviet Socialist Republic]

I see people as individuals. Individuals should be judged on their actions, not by your perceptions. If you're not harming other people, you're not doing anything worth being judged negatively for. And even if YOU think someone is harming another, if the person being "harmed" disagrees with you, YOU are in the wrong.

Full definition of A GROUP: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

First, you can't judge someone outside of your perceptions.
Secondly, If I perceive someone as being harmed while they disagree, I am right because my strength is as the strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I am right because my strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I just lost you at that part. Like, I have absolutely no idea what you just said there.

[Bythibus]

You know what? You're trying to hurt my feelings and that's not okay.
I've never said a bad word about you and here you are calling me insane, stop being rude to me because you don't like some thing I've posted, some of which I've provided proof for.

Anyone who seriously claims that their strength is as the strength of ten is definitely not well. The ideas you espouse are awful enough, but you're incredibly self righteous about it.

You don't seem very well versed in hyperbole.

[Des-Bal]

I'm saying that women who enjoy sex exist. How is this hard to get? Just because I don't think that sluts exist doesn't mean that the women society refers to in a judgmental manner as sluts don't exist. That's a pretty fucking moronic way to think.

Then you don't know what words mean. You're saying your upset by the negative use of the word, saying "slut's don't exist" is just fucking innacurate.

[Shie]

Full definition of A GROUP: a number of individuals assembled together or having some unifying relationship.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group

First, you can't judge someone outside of your perceptions.
Secondly, If I perceive someone as being harmed while they disagree, I am right because my strength is as the strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I am right because my strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I just lost you at that part. Like, I have absolutely no idea what you just said there.

We argued for a little while. Regardless of what we were arguing, my point is that there is supposed to be much more than life, death or the fate of the universe at stake here: The outcome of this argument decided that my personal philosophy is correct.

You can always count on the me to win. Why? Strength comes from being good, and that's why I am right.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

I am right because my strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I just lost you at that part. Like, I have absolutely no idea what you just said there.

We argued for a little while. Regardless of what we were arguing, my point is that there is supposed to be much more than life, death or the fate of the universe at stake here: The outcome of this argument decided that my personal philosophy is correct.

You can always count on the me to win. Why? Strength comes from being good, and that's why I am right.

Now, on this? I think you're just fucking with us.

[Shie]

We argued for a little while. Regardless of what we were arguing, my point is that there is supposed to be much more than life, death or the fate of the universe at stake here: The outcome of this argument decided that my personal philosophy is correct.

You can always count on the me to win. Why? Strength comes from being good, and that's why I am right.

Now, on this? I think you're just fucking with us.

I'm not joking when I say that justice always prevails.

[Novia Soviet Socialist Republic]

I am right because my strength of ten, only because my heart is pure.

I just lost you at that part. Like, I have absolutely no idea what you just said there.

We argued for a little while. Regardless of what we were arguing, my point is that there is supposed to be much more than life, death or the fate of the universe at stake here: The outcome of this argument decided that my personal philosophy is correct.

You can always count on the me to win. Why? Strength comes from being good, and that's why I am right.

Being good doesn't make you right. Not by a long shot.

[Llamalandia]

Now, on this? I think you're just fucking with us.

I'm not joking when I say that justice always prevails.

Then explain that period in the US where slavery was legal. That definitely didn't seem to be very just for african-american slaves as far as I can tell.

[Shie]

I'm not joking when I say that justice always prevails.

Then explain that period in the US where slavery was legal. That definitely didn't seem to be very just for african-american slaves as far as I can tell.

Justly, African Americans are no longer slaves in America. Justice did prevail because it always will prevail.

[Bythibus]

I'm not joking when I say that justice always prevails.

Then explain that period in the US where slavery was legal. That definitely didn't seem to be very just for african-american slaves as far as I can tell.

Silly Llama. You see, it was the strength of the white man that meant he was good, and therefore right to enslave the black man.

[Bythibus]

Then explain that period in the US where slavery was legal. That definitely didn't seem to be very just for african-american slaves as far as I can tell.

African Americans are no longer slaves in America so justice did prevail because it always will prevail.

Except for all the times it didn't and won't.

[Shie]

African Americans are no longer slaves in America so justice did prevail because it always will prevail.

Except for all the times it didn't and won't.

It will, it always will and always has. Things can only get better because this is the best of all possible worlds.

[Llamalandia]

Then explain that period in the US where slavery was legal. That definitely didn't seem to be very just for african-american slaves as far as I can tell.

Silly Llama. You see, it was the strength of the white man that meant he was good, and therefore right to enslave the black man.

Right and naturally because the white man was good he had "the strength of ten men"

[Shie]

Silly Llama. You see, it was the strength of the white man that meant he was good, and therefore right to enslave the black man.

Right and naturally because the white man was good he had "the strength of ten men"

Racism isn't good for everyone so that's why it's not okay.

[Bythibus]

Except for all the times it didn't and won't.

It will, it always will and always has. Things can only get better because this is the best world possible.

Did justice prevail when Pol Pot was the leader of Cambodia? How about all those civilians Stalin slaughtered. The Jewish people killed in WWII? Hitler killed himself, justice was not served.

How about the millions of crucified slaves in Rome over the time of the empire? Surely that cannot be justice.

Justice is not always served, and frequently fails. It is not absolute, nor it is blind.

[Shie]

It will, it always will and always has. Things can only get better because this is the best world possible.

Did justice prevail when Pol Pot was the leader of Cambodia? How about all those civilians Stalin slaughtered. The Jewish people killed in WWII? Hitler killed himself, justice was not served.

How about the millions of crucified slaves in Rome over the time of the empire? Surely that cannot be justice.

Justice is not always served, and frequently fails. It is not absolute, nor it is blind.

Let's get down to the nitty gritty of what we've been saying. I don't see what the trouble is here. What is your state of mind when you contemplate the possibility to people dying?

All right, so life is a transitory system. Suppose you just go along with it and dissolve. Why don't we want to give up? I'm not advocating giving up. What I'm interested for you to feel is what it's like to feel inside at the prospect of there being nothing. Death, the reality of approaching death. People get cold and chilly because it's unknown.

The most frightening thing about death is the fact that there might be something and you don't know what it is. Remember facing the world as a child? The world is full of threats, mostly from other people and there are monsters. There's things that scare you. Beyond every monster there is death.

Dissolution is the end of it all, the art of government is to fill that void of death with threats of an unspecified nature so we can move people by saying that if you don't do as I tell you, I'll kill you or you'll kill yourself. Death isn't a bad thing. The most death can come to is nothing, you have to have nothing to have something. You can't fundamentally scare a good person.

What end can it all come to? I don't see what all the trouble is about.

Beyond pain is death.

What will it be like to go to sleep and never wake up?

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Did justice prevail when Pol Pot was the leader of Cambodia? How about all those civilians Stalin slaughtered. The Jewish people killed in WWII? Hitler killed himself, justice was not served.

How about the millions of crucified slaves in Rome over the time of the empire? Surely that cannot be justice.

Justice is not always served, and frequently fails. It is not absolute, nor it is blind.

Let's get down to the nitty gritty of what we've been saying. I don't see what the trouble is here. What is your state of mind when you contemplate the possibility to people dying?

All right, so life is a transitory system. Suppose you just go along with it and dissolve. Why don't we want to give up? I'm not advocating giving up. What I'm interested for you to feel is what it's like to feel inside at the prospect of there being nothing. Death, the reality of approaching death. People get cold and chilly because it's unknown.

The most frightening thing about death is the fact that there might be something and you don't know what it is. Remember facing the world as a child? The world is full of threats, mostly from other people and there are monsters. There's things that scare you. Beyond every monster there is death.

Dissolution is the end of it all, the art of government is to fill that void of death with threats of an unspecified nature so we can move people by saying that if you don't do as I tell you, I'll kill you or you'll kill yourself. Death isn't a bad thing. The most death can come to is nothing, you have to have nothing to have something. You can't fundamentally scare a good person.

What end can it all come to? I don't see what all the trouble is about.

Beyond pain is death.

What will it be like to go to sleep and never wake up?

Governments are social contracts, first of all. The people choose how to govern themselves in modern society and the laws which will be followed hereof.

If you can't scare a good person then that good person is a sociopath.

[Novia Soviet Socialist Republic]

Let's get down to the nitty gritty of what we've been saying. I don't see what the trouble is here. What is your state of mind when you contemplate the possibility to people dying?

All right, so life is a transitory system. Suppose you just go along with it and dissolve. Why don't we want to give up? I'm not advocating giving up. What I'm interested for you to feel is what it's like to feel inside at the prospect of there being nothing. Death, the reality of approaching death. People get cold and chilly because it's unknown.

The most frightening thing about death is the fact that there might be something and you don't know what it is. Remember facing the world as a child? The world is full of threats, mostly from other people and there are monsters. There's things that scare you. Beyond every monster there is death.

Dissolution is the end of it all, the art of government is to fill that void of death with threats of an unspecified nature so we can move people by saying that if you don't do as I tell you, I'll kill you or you'll kill yourself. Death isn't a bad thing. The most death can come to is nothing, you have to have nothing to have something. You can't fundamentally scare a good person.

What end can it all come to? I don't see what all the trouble is about.

Beyond pain is death.

What will it be like to go to sleep and never wake up?

Governments are social contracts, first of all. The people choose how to govern themselves in modern society and the laws which will be followed hereof.

If you can't scare a good person then that good person is a sociopath.

I wouldn't call them a sociopath more along the lines of lacking the ability to feel fear. That would be a terrible evolutionary trait to have.

[Shie]

Governments are social contracts, first of all. The people choose how to govern themselves in modern society and the laws which will be followed hereof.

If you can't scare a good person then that good person is a sociopath.

I wouldn't call them a sociopath more along the lines of lacking the ability to feel fear. That would be a terrible evolutionary trait to have.

Lacking the ability to fear is symptomatic of Antisocial Personality Disorder (Psychopathy, Sociopathy).