NATION

PASSWORD

Sexuality, Human Expression, and Personhood

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should virtue be required for females and males?

Yes, a girl worth true love is a good girl.
118
31%
No, girls can be naughty.
259
69%
 
Total votes : 377

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sun Apr 13, 2014 11:47 am

Shie wrote:
Kiruri wrote:I'm sorry, Mr. Voice-of-the-People. I forgot you're the personification of the people's desires... ¬¬

I'm the personification of what the people must have.

Threlizdun wrote:Someone doesn't have an inflated ego at all.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20360
Founded: Dec 14, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Novia Soviet Socialist Republic » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:39 pm

Shie wrote:
Kiruri wrote:I'm sorry, Mr. Voice-of-the-People. I forgot you're the personification of the people's desires... ¬¬

I'm the personification of what the people must have.


To live in constant fear, to simply exist rather than enjoying life. Got ya. That's what we need.
u wot m8

User avatar
Sefard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sefard » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:42 pm

It is not too much to ask that men keep their word and women not look like sluts in public.

Virtue is the basis on which a society may operate informally, and the means by which more natural means of governance may occur.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:43 pm

Shie wrote:
Novia Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Why should they want that though? How do you know what each human should want?

Personal preference good sir. For instance, I like pineapple and some people don't like pineapple.

Personal preferences can be changed and likely will if a government needed them to, if the preferences of someone can't be altered, they're immature.

Furthest to the left = Ideal male facial template.
Image
The right being the ideal female template.


I prefer 3rd from the left and second from the right.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:46 pm

Ayreonia wrote:
The Flood wrote:Why?
Okay, that's enough of that, I was just making a point about how you can't just say 'why?' to everything the guy said.

Anyway, condoms fail roughly 1% of the time, that means 1 in every 100 people. And when you think about it like that, are you really that unlikely to be that one in a hundred?

I also happen to believe that sex without love is very emotionally damaging. I view it as inherently abusive and selfish. It's not something I could ever do, or something I could ever live with myself if I did do it.

Yes, condoms fail. There's no contraceptive that's guaranteed to work every single time. 99 to 1 are odds that I'm ready to take.

I expect you have some way of backing your argument up, aside from personal feelings?

Still waiting on this, by the way.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:46 pm

Sefard wrote:It is not too much to ask that men PEOPLE keep their word and women not look like sluts in public WE NOT JUDGE PEOPLE BY HOW THE DRESS?

Virtue is the basis on which a society may operate informally, and the means by which more natural means of governance may occur.


Apparently for you, yes it is.

Here's a fun one. What is best in life? Why is your idea of what is best in life more valid than any other? Why shouldn't people who disagree with you use the only proper response to that question as an excuse to beat the tar out of anyone who disagrees?
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

User avatar
Sefard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sefard » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:49 pm

Mini Miehm wrote:
Sefard wrote:It is not too much to ask that men PEOPLE keep their word and women not look like sluts in public WE NOT JUDGE PEOPLE BY HOW THE DRESS?

Virtue is the basis on which a society may operate informally, and the means by which more natural means of governance may occur.


Apparently for you, yes it is.

Here's a fun one. What is best in life? Why is your idea of what is best in life more valid than any other? Why shouldn't people who disagree with you use the only proper response to that question as an excuse to beat the tar out of anyone who disagrees?


I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public.

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:50 pm

Squeeheart wrote:
The Flood wrote:unless aliens threatened to blow up the world if we didnt have these laws

... Aliens? Really? Are you seriously using this to defend your arguments, or are you just joking around right now?
It was obviously a joke...

And what do you mean, 'my arguments'? I never argued anything related to what the OP is advocating.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:53 pm

Sefard wrote:
Mini Miehm wrote:
Apparently for you, yes it is.

Here's a fun one. What is best in life? Why is your idea of what is best in life more valid than any other? Why shouldn't people who disagree with you use the only proper response to that question as an excuse to beat the tar out of anyone who disagrees?


I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men people to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public dress in a way that gets my panties in a wad.


See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:56 pm

Sefard wrote:
Mini Miehm wrote:
Apparently for you, yes it is.

Here's a fun one. What is best in life? Why is your idea of what is best in life more valid than any other? Why shouldn't people who disagree with you use the only proper response to that question as an excuse to beat the tar out of anyone who disagrees?


I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public.

Define "slut."
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:58 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Shie wrote:Personal preferences can be changed and likely will if a government needed them to, if the preferences of someone can't be altered, they're immature.

Furthest to the left = Ideal male facial template.
(Image)
The right being the ideal female template.


I prefer 3rd from the left and second from the right.
The high estrogen women, the one on the right would prefer the high testosterone man all the way to the left.
That's really all that matters.
Last edited by Shie on Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:00 pm

Ayreonia wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Yes, condoms fail. There's no contraceptive that's guaranteed to work every single time. 99 to 1 are odds that I'm ready to take.
I expect you have some way of backing your argument up, aside from personal feelings?

Still waiting on this, by the way.
Treating a person as an object of sexual gratification is inhuman and selfish. I don't know how I can break this down any further, treating people like garbage is bad.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:02 pm

Ayreonia wrote:
Sefard wrote:
I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public.

Define "slut."

A person who commits illegal sexual acts.

User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:02 pm

Shie wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
I prefer 3rd from the left and second from the right.
The high estrogen women, the one on the right would prefer the man all the way to the left. That's really all that matters.


No, what matters is making sure you take your meds. It's a very good thing that people are people, and not a collection of hormonal urges with no higher brain function, or else you might be correct. Thankfully, people manage to make choices that defy what you expect all the time.
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

User avatar
Llamalandia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Llamalandia » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:03 pm

The Flood wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Still waiting on this, by the way.
Treating a person as an object of sexual gratification is inhuman and selfish. I don't know how I can break this down any further, treating people like garbage is bad.


As long as it's consensual I don't really see the problem. I mean heck let's face it there are no doubt some kinky people out there who loved to be treated exactly like garbage so what so wrong about someone for instance fulfilling that desire (provided again that everything is consensual)? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:06 pm

Shie wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Define "slut."

A person who commits illegal sexual acts.


So...a prostitute. Well, that's at least refreshing. Since about the only illegal sexual acts I'm aware of are rape, and selling sex, can you tell me what a rapist and what a person who sells sex look like?

The Flood wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Still waiting on this, by the way.
Treating a person as an object of sexual gratification is inhuman and selfish. I don't know how I can break this down any further, treating people like garbage is bad.


Treating a person like an object is bad. Having sex with another person who wants to have sex with you is not treating them like an object. That's engaging in pretty standard human behavior. Unless you think that wanting to have sex with a person is inherently objectifying, in which case you might need some medication yourself.
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

User avatar
Sefard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sefard » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:09 pm

Mini Miehm wrote:
Sefard wrote:
I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men people to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public dress in a way that gets my panties in a wad.


See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.


Relations with other human beings is best in life.

People do dress immodestly, and while I agree in many settings it is inappropriate to say what I think outloud to people, I may still think it. I'm not offended by attractive women. I simply feel sorry that they disrespectful themselves and others with their immodesty.

User avatar
Sefard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sefard » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:11 pm

Ayreonia wrote:
Sefard wrote:
I have not recommended that anyone who disagrees be beaten or slaughtered or bitched at. I have simply said that I don't find it very difficult for men to keep their word and women not to look like sluts in public.

Define "slut."


Having sex with many persons while not being in a committed relationship (not necessarily marriage) with them, and wearing provocative clothing to achieve the aforementioned.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32096
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:11 pm

Mini Miehm wrote:
See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.


Yes they do. Many women go out dressed like sluts, it's not up to anybody to tell them what they look like but being upset that people have formed that opinion is a different kettle of fish.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:12 pm

Sefard wrote:
Mini Miehm wrote:
See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.


Relations with other human beings is best in life.


This is what people like you don't understand:


Everyone is different. It may be the best for you, but not best for everyone, maybe not even best for the majority.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:14 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Shie wrote:Personal preferences can be changed and likely will if a government needed them to, if the preferences of someone can't be altered, they're immature.

Furthest to the left = Ideal male facial template.
Image
The right being the ideal female template.


I prefer 3rd from the left and second from the right.

The guy all the way on the left looks like a serial killer.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:14 pm

Sefard wrote:
Mini Miehm wrote:
See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.


Relations with other human beings is best in life.

People do dress immodestly, and while I agree in many settings it is inappropriate to say what I think outloud to people, I may still think it. I'm not offended by attractive women. I simply feel sorry that they disrespectful themselves and others with their immodesty.


Incorrect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PQ6335puOc

People dress. Period. There is no such thing as modest or immodest dress. No one disrespects themselves by how they dress. They dress however suits them. I like jeans, band shirts, and leather. If you feel disrespected by how other people dress, you need to reassess your life priorities, and maybe take a long hard look at that limb in your eye.
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

User avatar
Shie
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1909
Founded: Dec 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shie » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:15 pm

Mini Miehm wrote:
Shie wrote: The high estrogen women, the one on the right would prefer the man all the way to the left. That's really all that matters.


No, what matters is making sure you take your meds. It's a very good thing that people are people, and not a collection of hormonal urges with no higher brain function, or else you might be correct. Thankfully, people manage to make choices that defy what you expect all the time.
The exception may happen for males only due to the higher sex drive in males, especially those exposed to androgens at critical development points. However for highly feminine females, the preference for dominant masculine males will be a constant because females are already selective because they've got more to invest in reproduction, the best top-tier women are the most selective but can trade health for status and wealth. She carries the child for nine months while the male can walk off. Females with the best health initially want the healthiest males
but are willing to make a trade-off provided that he can provide her stability for their offspring.
Last edited by Shie on Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sefard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: Jan 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sefard » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:16 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Sefard wrote:
Relations with other human beings is best in life.


This is what people like you don't understand:


Everyone is different. It may be the best for you, but not best for everyone, maybe not even best for the majority.


And this is what people like you don't understand:

People are different, and that's fine. People can still hold each other to reasonable standards of decency while still continuing to be different. Being different doesn't mean you have to conduct yourself in a gross or disrespectful manner.
Last edited by Sefard on Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mini Miehm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 785
Founded: Apr 15, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Mini Miehm » Sun Apr 13, 2014 1:18 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Mini Miehm wrote:
See, here's the problem. No one goes out dressed like a slut. And even if they DID go out dressed like a slut, it's not up to you to tell them, or even think it to yourself. Just because you're easily offended by attractive women, does not make women being attractive a moral problem.

And you still haven't answered what is best in life.


Yes they do. Many women go out dressed like sluts, it's not up to anybody to tell them what they look like but being upset that people have formed that opinion is a different kettle of fish.


What does a slut look like exactly? What IS a slut? Because the issue with using words like "Slut" is that it's a loaded term. It carries connotations of shaming, judgement, and derision. You're passing judgment on a person based on nothing more than how they dress. That's a shitty damn way to run a railroad.
Mallorea and Riva should resign

Don't reward the trolls.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Based Illinois, Buhers Mk II, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Des-Bal, Dhemixia, Fractalnavel, Maineiacs, Mearisse, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Sauros, Shrillland, Xind

Advertisement

Remove ads