NATION

PASSWORD

Is the feminist movement useless in developed countries?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:00 pm

Alyakia wrote:1. no it fucking doesn't. when people say minority it's understood they are referring to social structures, independent of actual numbers. please see my post again for more examples of minorities that somehow managed to be numerically larger??? or invent a new word.
2. yep


No it fucking isn't. When someone says minority it means they are numerically inferior in relation to another group or less than half of the total population. You are using the word incorrectly, being a minority group says nothing about social standing or political influence. The point you should be taking from your examples is that you're using the word minority incorrectly.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
United Nationals
Envoy
 
Posts: 202
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Nationals » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:01 pm

oh jesus christ.
there are more women than men in the united states.
and worldwide i believe(might be wrong)
women arent a minority.
Sometimes I like to stand in a hole and pretend im a carrot.
I Like Video Games.
I like Potatoes. lots and lots of potatoes.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:01 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote: My ancestry traces from multiple continents. The ones that came to the US came legally. And instead of begging for welfare, they lifted themselves from poverty they faced back home and became successful. And today, it is up to me to do the same and not fall because of stupidity and laziness.


I'm not entirely sure I buy that at all. I'm not sure you understand how AWFUL minorities have had it in this country. How far back are we talking?

Early 1900's is when someone I was related to came to the US. But anyways, I'm sick and tired how minorities like me need to feel like their such a victim of the system when it's all on them. And you question if I do not understand how awful minorities have had it in this country? I am one.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57847
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:01 pm

Essentially, the problem with Feminism is that the feminist narrative is being used to oppress working class males.
It has become a second patriarchy in that respect, though more benign than the first incarnation.

The overreach caused by some of the more insane feminists occasionally crosses into trying to oppress middle class males too. When that happens, we see a shitstorm of backlash.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3406
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:01 pm

United Nationals wrote:Feminism is going no where.
They argue about wage inequality. which is because men go into more high paying jobs or careers than women do. not because the majority of employers are male sexist pigs but because as i said men choose to go into higher paying fields

then there's the rape argument
if i had to guess i would have to say that less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone.
so going after all males for something that one percent of the entire male population does is completely idiotic.

and last but not least, the political standpoint.

feminists say that america is sexist because we haven't had an female president. well lets look at the numbers here
70.4 million -- The number of women who cast ballots in the 2008 presidential election, versus 60.7 million men.

almost 10 million more females voted in the 2008 election than males. if females wanted a female candidate to run the numbers here alone would guarantee the victory of a female. assuming that the majority of females vote for the female candidate.


That's quite an easy straw man (or straw woman in this case to pull down though).

Firstly however I would ask you if you could kindly back up the following claims with evidence however:

"men choose to go into higher paying fields"
"less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone"

Then comes the statement: "if i had to guess i would have to say that less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone.
so going after all males for something that one percent of the entire male population does is completely idiotic"

Who is going after all males and how are they doing this?

I eagerly await your response.
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:02 pm

Mkuki wrote:
European Socialist Republic wrote:Really? I'd like a source for that, please.

The Young Turks
Outside the Beltway

Please don't source TYT.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:02 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Alyakia wrote:1. no it fucking doesn't. when people say minority it's understood they are referring to social structures, independent of actual numbers. please see my post again for more examples of minorities that somehow managed to be numerically larger??? or invent a new word.
2. yep


No it fucking isn't. When someone says minority it means they are numerically inferior in relation to another group or less than half of the total population. You are using the word incorrectly, being a minority group says nothing about social standing or political influence. The point you should be taking from your examples is that you're using the word minority incorrectly.


actually, yes it does. in fact, that is exactly what it means. i am going to google "minority group" for you.

A minority group is a sociological category within a demographic. Rather than a relational "social group", as the term would indicate, the term refers to a category that is differentiated and defined by the social majority, that is, those who hold the majority of positions of social power in a society. The differentiation can be based on one or more observable human characteristics, including, for example, ethnicity, race, gender, wealth, health or sexual orientation. Usage of the term is applied to various situations and civilizations within history, despite its popular mis-association with a numerical, statistical minority. In the social sciences, the term "minority" is used to refer to categories of persons who hold few positions of social power.

in fact i have bolded a special part, just for you.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Magna Libero
Minister
 
Posts: 2864
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Magna Libero » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:02 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
1. When you're calling one group a minority? Yes it fucking does.
2. Gender Apartheid is the most absurdly stupid things I've heard all day.


1. no it fucking doesn't. when people say minority it's understood they are referring to social structures, independent of actual numbers. please see my post again for more examples of minorities that somehow managed to be numerically larger??? or invent a new word.
2. yep

Ostroeuropa wrote:I've been clear in the past that I think the sane feminists should just drop the title and move on.
You aren't going to convince the insane ones to stop, and they ARE damaging the cause.


i thought the proper response to words was just to keep using them no matter what?

Logically, wouldn't majority be a more proper word than minority? Gee, why hasn't anyone thought about this before?
hi

User avatar
Quackquackhonk
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 469
Founded: Jul 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Quackquackhonk » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:02 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:Essentially, the problem with Feminism is that the feminist narrative is being used to oppress working class males...


is something someone completely disconnected from reality would argue.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:03 pm

United Nationals wrote:oh jesus christ.
there are more women than men in the united states.
and worldwide i believe(might be wrong)
women arent a minority.


Worldwide it's about 51-49 in favor of men but there are almost always more women than men in developed countries. Haven't done much research but if I had to guess I'd say it has to do with the age and mortality rate associated with pregnancy.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:03 pm

Quackquackhonk wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Essentially, the problem with Feminism is that the feminist narrative is being used to oppress working class males...


is something someone completely disconnected from reality would argue.

Not really. It's reverse discrimination. One of these days, the tables will turn.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:04 pm

Terra Sector Union wrote:

Please don't source TYT.

Why not? They specifically cite a study by the DoJ.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
United Nationals
Envoy
 
Posts: 202
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Nationals » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:05 pm

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
United Nationals wrote:Feminism is going no where.
They argue about wage inequality. which is because men go into more high paying jobs or careers than women do. not because the majority of employers are male sexist pigs but because as i said men choose to go into higher paying fields

then there's the rape argument
if i had to guess i would have to say that less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone.
so going after all males for something that one percent of the entire male population does is completely idiotic.

and last but not least, the political standpoint.

feminists say that america is sexist because we haven't had an female president. well lets look at the numbers here
70.4 million -- The number of women who cast ballots in the 2008 presidential election, versus 60.7 million men.

almost 10 million more females voted in the 2008 election than males. if females wanted a female candidate to run the numbers here alone would guarantee the victory of a female. assuming that the majority of females vote for the female candidate.


That's quite an easy straw man (or straw woman in this case to pull down though).

Firstly however I would ask you if you could kindly back up the following claims with evidence however:

"men choose to go into higher paying fields"
"less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone"

Then comes the statement: "if i had to guess i would have to say that less than one percent of the male population in america has raped anyone.
so going after all males for something that one percent of the entire male population does is completely idiotic"

Who is going after all males and how are they doing this?

I eagerly await your response.

Feminists. and this is half my guess and half researched. if you want me to go and prove it to you i gladly will.
Sometimes I like to stand in a hole and pretend im a carrot.
I Like Video Games.
I like Potatoes. lots and lots of potatoes.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57847
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:05 pm

Quackquackhonk wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:Essentially, the problem with Feminism is that the feminist narrative is being used to oppress working class males...


is something someone completely disconnected from reality would argue.


Nice counter argument. Don't you usually argue that you should check your privilege?
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:05 pm

Mkuki wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote:Please don't source TYT.

Why not? They specifically cite a study by the DoJ.

Then source the study. TYT are too biased to use them a credible source. Sorry.
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:05 pm

Magna Libero wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
1. no it fucking doesn't. when people say minority it's understood they are referring to social structures, independent of actual numbers. please see my post again for more examples of minorities that somehow managed to be numerically larger??? or invent a new word.
2. yep



i thought the proper response to words was just to keep using them no matter what?

Logically, wouldn't majority be a more proper word than minority? Gee, why hasn't anyone thought about this before?


"Not limited to mathematical minority: example, Blacks in South Africa, Blacks in Mississippi and South Carolina in the 1920's "

i dunno. i am glad that some posters are taking it upon themselves to ask these hard hitting questions that political correctness hates.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Quackquackhonk
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 469
Founded: Jul 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Quackquackhonk » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:06 pm

Terra Sector Union wrote:
Quackquackhonk wrote:
is something someone completely disconnected from reality would argue.

It's reverse discrimination.


nonsensical term.

User avatar
United Nationals
Envoy
 
Posts: 202
Founded: Jul 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Nationals » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:06 pm

Sometimes I like to stand in a hole and pretend im a carrot.
I Like Video Games.
I like Potatoes. lots and lots of potatoes.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57847
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:06 pm

Alyakia wrote:
Magna Libero wrote:Logically, wouldn't majority be a more proper word than minority? Gee, why hasn't anyone thought about this before?


"Not limited to mathematical minority: example, Blacks in South Africa, Blacks in Mississippi and South Carolina in the 1920's "

i dunno. i am glad that some posters are taking it upon themselves to ask these hard hitting questions that political correctness hates.


Would you count working class males as a minority, and if so, why have their been no legislative efforts toward making them better off.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:07 pm

Terra Sector Union wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
I'm not entirely sure I buy that at all. I'm not sure you understand how AWFUL minorities have had it in this country. How far back are we talking?

Early 1900's is when someone I was related to came to the US. But anyways, I'm sick and tired how minorities like me need to feel like their such a victim of the system when it's all on them. And you question if I do not understand how awful minorities have had it in this country? I am one.


You have said many times all of this discrimination hasn't affected you, and that the only reasons it didn't work for others is because they're lazy and stupid.

I seriously, seriously doubt you're telling the truth... For more reasons than one... But that is beside the point.

Yes, all those lazy idiotic minorities who couldn't start a business after the Civil War, right in the middle of the Yellow Scare. All those women too lazy to huff it to the polls after they'd just legalized them voting...

Read a history book, please.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:07 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Vicious Debaters wrote:Male feminist here, and you seem misinformed.

One in four college women report surviving rape
(15 percent) or attempted rape (12 percent) since their fourteenth birthday.

In a study by the U.S. Centers for Disease control of 5,000 college students at over 100 colleges, 20% of women answered "yes" to the question "In your lifetime have you been forced to submit to sexual intercourse against your will?" Thus, one in five college women has been raped at some point in her lifetime... 4% of men answered "yes" (1)

http://www.oneinfourusa.org/statistics.php

It's a problem, bro.


The issue with that is that Males are continuously informed that they cannot be raped by society, and dissuaded from reporting, while Women are encouraged to report by many parts of society (though also dissuaded by some parts.)
In addition, the question is poorly phrased, as perceptions of the nature of "force" change radically based on the understanding of the person asked.
It's entirely possible that many males simply do not consider coercion as a type of force (Coercion being the most frequent type of rape.), and/or do not consider being taken advantage of while drunk as a type of rape, and they havn't been regularly told otherwise by campaigning.
That is a part of rape culture. Absolutely. They need to be informed otherwise.

But what bugs the shit out of me about your type of feminism is that you never consider the whole picture.
A lot of men don't know what constitutes rape. This is your entire goddamn argument. This is your explanation for why women are raped more.
But when someone points out "If they don't know what constitutes rape, why the fuck do you believe their self-reporting figures?" you go immediately silent.

Maybe we would be better served by dropping the gendered nonsense and focusing on rape as a social issue instead of a gender one. By continuously reinforcing the notion that women do not rape, and only men rape, we completely undermine our efforts to get people to understand what rape actually is.
The problem is basically a wing of feminism that is out to demonize men at all costs, even if it results in worse lives for women.
In short, i'm betting the male report is far, far underrepresented.
:clap:
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:08 pm

Quackquackhonk wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote:It's reverse discrimination.


nonsensical term.

You don't think it's possible a group can be discriminated because of the wrongdoings of the past?
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:08 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Alyakia wrote:
"Not limited to mathematical minority: example, Blacks in South Africa, Blacks in Mississippi and South Carolina in the 1920's "

i dunno. i am glad that some posters are taking it upon themselves to ask these hard hitting questions that political correctness hates.


Would you count working class males as a minority, and if so, why have their been no legislative efforts toward making them better off.


hmm. perhaps we should form some sort of political party to represent these workings class males. the only question is, what shall we name it?
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Cilestis
Envoy
 
Posts: 233
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Cilestis » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:08 pm

Considering how unequipped it is to deal with any real problems in developed countries, I can't imagine feminism in the sense I've encountered would be useful in countries where honor rapes and killings are still a thing. Just my two cents.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:09 pm

Alyakia wrote:actually, yes it does. in fact, that is exactly what it means. i am going to google "minority group" for you.

A minority group is a sociological category within a demographic. Rather than a relational "social group", as the term would indicate, the term refers to a category that is differentiated and defined by the social majority, that is, those who hold the majority of positions of social power in a society. The differentiation can be based on one or more observable human characteristics, including, for example, ethnicity, race, gender, wealth, health or sexual orientation. Usage of the term is applied to various situations and civilizations within history, despite its popular mis-association with a numerical, statistical minority. In the social sciences, the term "minority" is used to refer to categories of persons who hold few positions of social power.

in fact i have bolded a special part, just for you.


What you are describing is the misappropriation of a word. It's pretty fucking problematic because it ignores the problems real minority groups face.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Beringin Raya, Bienenhalde, Buryatia and Zabaykalsky, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Mearisse, Neo-American States, Ostroeuropa, Philjia, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Sklavopoli, Uminaku, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads