Often times the employer speaks Spanish.
Advertisement

by The Scientific States » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:30 pm

by Viritica » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:30 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Viritica wrote:![]()
Oh here we go again with the "you ebil natuonalizt you h8 mooslemans"
They deal with issues pertaining to Sharia law.
It's a failure on the part of the Britain to integrate people. If they have their own separate communities with their own separate courts I don't really think they're embracing Britain or its culture.
I'm not saying that, I'm referring to extremist UKIPers.
Again, there aren't separate courts, they're guidelines etc etc.

by Pilotto » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:30 pm
Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:Pilotto wrote:Like I said, when deciding who does and does not get to become a citizen, we can afford to be picky. There is not shortage of people who want to immigrate here, so why would we want to accept those who will be unable to adequately communicate with the vast, vast majority of their fellow countrymen? For every immigrant you accept who does not know English, you are turning one down who does.
There isn't a shortage of people wanting to come here, most of them don't speak English, the vast majority does not speak English. In fact, I would go so far as to say that one can take in all English speaking Immigrants, and still take in lots of non-English speaking immigrants. There is no loss if we do accept an immigrant who does not speak English, but who has a better record than some English speaking criminal.
...Free...
.Ukraine.
I Side With
Republicans - 92%
Libertarians - 73%
Democrats - 16%
Green Party - 8%
Socialist - 1%
Minister of Defense of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM ALLIANCE!
Minister of Defense of the Christian Liberty Alliance
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL MERCANTILE ASSEMBLAGE!
Proud Member of the Western Coalition
Proud Member of the Central Powers

by Viritica » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:30 pm

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:31 pm

by Norstal » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:31 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Libertarian California » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:31 pm

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:31 pm
Pilotto wrote:Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:
There isn't a shortage of people wanting to come here, most of them don't speak English, the vast majority does not speak English. In fact, I would go so far as to say that one can take in all English speaking Immigrants, and still take in lots of non-English speaking immigrants. There is no loss if we do accept an immigrant who does not speak English, but who has a better record than some English speaking criminal.
If we have found ourselves already accepting every single qualified, English-speaking potential immigrant, and still have room for more, then we can move on to the qualified, non-English speaking potential immigrants.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:32 pm
The EEOC has stated that rules requiring employees to speak only English in the workplace violate the law unless they are reasonable necessary to the operation of the business.
A rule requiring employees to speak only English in the workplace at all times, including breaks and lunch time, will rarely be justified.
An English-only rule should be limited to the circumstances in which it is needed for the employer to operate safely or efficiently.
Circumstances in which an English-only rule may be justified include: communications with customers or coworkers who only speak English; emergencies or other situations in which workers must speak a common language to promote safety; cooperative work assignments in which the English-only rule is needed to promote efficiency.
Even if there is a need for an English-only rule, an employer may not take disciplinary action against an employee for violating the rule unless the employer has notified workers about the rule and the consequences of violating it.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Appalacia (Ancient) » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:32 pm

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:33 pm

by Viritica » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:33 pm


by Norstal » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:34 pm
The Enclave Government wrote:Gallup wrote:Another simple question. Should Immigrants to the USA learn English? Should they be forced to take English classes? And who would pay for them?
I think that, yes, immigrants to the US should learn to speak English. That doesn't mean they can't speak their native language. Rather, it means they can better participate in the USA's economy. If you know a county's language, you have a leg up on those who don't. I would also make the classes optional, and paid for by the government.
Yes.
Or better yet, immigrants should GET TEH FUCK OUT! To pass highschool i need to learn a goddamn foreign language. THIS IS AMERICA, NOT SPAIN OR CUBA, OR FRANCE OR ANY GODDAMN NATION.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:34 pm
Talanzaar wrote:No, but they should[Strike]no[/Strike]know the very basics of English at least
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by The Scientific States » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:35 pm
Viritica wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
I'm not saying that, I'm referring to extremist UKIPers.
Again, there aren't separate courts, they're guidelines etc etc.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9975937/Inside-Britains-Sharia-courts.html

by Libertarian California » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:35 pm

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:35 pm

by The Scientific States » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:35 pm

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:36 pm

by Viritica » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:37 pm
The Scientific States wrote:
I'm also assuming you have a problem with Jewish courts, Christian courts?
I read the article, they're nothing like you said.

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:37 pm
Viritica wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
I'm not saying that, I'm referring to extremist UKIPers.
Again, there aren't separate courts, they're guidelines etc etc.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9975937/Inside-Britains-Sharia-courts.html

by Estormo » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:37 pm

by Pilotto » Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:37 pm
Nationes Pii Redivivi wrote:Pilotto wrote:If we have found ourselves already accepting every single qualified, English-speaking potential immigrant, and still have room for more, then we can move on to the qualified, non-English speaking potential immigrants.
Then, why limit ourselves to English speakers, when English has nothing to do with their ability to function in society?
...Free...
.Ukraine.
I Side With
Republicans - 92%
Libertarians - 73%
Democrats - 16%
Green Party - 8%
Socialist - 1%
Minister of Defense of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM ALLIANCE!
Minister of Defense of the Christian Liberty Alliance
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL MERCANTILE ASSEMBLAGE!
Proud Member of the Western Coalition
Proud Member of the Central Powers
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Forsher, Habsburg Mexico, Hurdergaryp, Hurtful Thoughts, Lativs, Paddy O Fernature, Port Caverton, The Pirateariat, Valyxias, Vertillia, Violetist Britannia, Washington Resistance Army, World Anarchic Union
Advertisement