Advertisement

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:15 am

by Alien Space Bats » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:19 am
Baltenstein wrote:This whole "unidentified local self-defense forces" spectacle makes me wonder if the PR China is taking any notes in regards to Taiwan. Or at least some disputed Japanese/Philippino islands.

by The blood ravens » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:20 am
Ethel mermania wrote:all i know if i were estonian i would be worried
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSB ... 9?irpc=932

by Volnotova » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:24 am
Baltenstein wrote:This whole "unidentified local self-defense forces" spectacle makes me wonder if the PR China is taking any notes in regards to Taiwan. Or at least some disputed Japanese/Philippino islands.

by Volnotova » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:25 am
The blood ravens wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:all i know if i were estonian i would be worried
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSB ... 9?irpc=932
Unless Putin has a death wish he won't mess with Estonia.

by Ethel mermania » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:25 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:Baltenstein wrote:This whole "unidentified local self-defense forces" spectacle makes me wonder if the PR China is taking any notes in regards to Taiwan. Or at least some disputed Japanese/Philippino islands.
That might be halfway useful... if anyone actually LIVED on any of those disputed landmasses.
More seriously, though, I doubt that the Chinese possess Russia's taste for brazen violations of international law.

by Kouralia » Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:19 am
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

by Greed and Death » Mon Mar 24, 2014 8:39 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:Baltenstein wrote:This whole "unidentified local self-defense forces" spectacle makes me wonder if the PR China is taking any notes in regards to Taiwan. Or at least some disputed Japanese/Philippino islands.
That might be halfway useful... if anyone actually LIVED on any of those disputed landmasses.
More seriously, though, I doubt that the Chinese possess Russia's taste for brazen violations of international law.

by OMGeverynameistaken » Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:08 am
Dictatorship Of Serdaristan wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Once the first wave lands, the airspace is going to be swarming with NATO forces. Putin's not going to risk the embarrassment of a Russian force stranded in Moldova. Even if they don't get cut off, they're still left with the problem of supplying forces in the region.
A quick look at the Moldovan airport pages on Wikipedia (there are only 5 operational airports in the country, and two of those are listed as 'unclear' status...I'm not sure what that means,) indicates that there are 4 airports capable of landing an Il-76. Two of those have rather short runways and are probably unmaintained (hence their 'unclear' status,) a third is a military airbase (landing there would probably be a bad idea,) and the third is Moldova's international airport. Chisinau International has ONE runway. I hope the mighty Russian war machine is familiar with holding patterns, because all those VDV troops and airborne APCs people are envisioning are going to be waiting for a while.
Chisinau International isn't located in a particularly convenient area for access to the disputed region and, quite frankly, I don't think that Putin, however blatant his seizure of part of Ukraine might have been, is going to try outright annexing a landlocked, avowedly neutral, country of minimal strategic value which is surrounded by states that don't like Russia, one of which is a NATO member. And really, Moldova's top export is sunflower seeds. Most of which they already sell to Russia anyway.
So yeah, accepting that Putin is a megalomaniac with plans for world domination, I don't think he's going to lubricate the conquering Russian steambearroller with sunflower oil.
I guess I want clear enough, VDV is Russia's paratroopers, and BMD's are air-droppable with crew inside, so basically the Il-76 simply has to fly over Moldova. but you have a point, Putin is a smart man, he wouldn't risk conflict over sunflower seeds.

by Greed and Death » Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:26 am
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Dictatorship Of Serdaristan wrote:I guess I want clear enough, VDV is Russia's paratroopers, and BMD's are air-droppable with crew inside, so basically the Il-76 simply has to fly over Moldova. but you have a point, Putin is a smart man, he wouldn't risk conflict over sunflower seeds.
You still need to supply paratroopers, and BMDs are thirsty.
And there's a very good reason the last big paradrops were in WWII.

by Breadknife » Mon Mar 24, 2014 9:31 am
Not sure how you'd classify "big paradrops", but I recall the Suez Crisis featuring paratroop deployment by at least two of the nations involved...OMGeverynameistaken wrote:And there's a very good reason the last big paradrops were in WWII.

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:19 am

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:48 am
Scholmeria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RxSzSWbcxo
I though all the time that she was a corrupt gas princess who had good relations with Putin.

by Natalia Poklonskaya » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:56 am
Scholmeria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RxSzSWbcxo
I though all the time that she was a corrupt gas princess who had good relations with Putin.

by Occupied Deutschland » Mon Mar 24, 2014 10:57 am
Scholmeria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RxSzSWbcxo
I though all the time that she was a corrupt gas princess who had good relations with Putin.

by Alien Space Bats » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:02 am
Baltenstein wrote:Seriously, where do the Russians get all those leaks from?
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Russia Today.
Ehnope. Conversation either didn't happen, or didn't happen as that 'leak' sounds.

by Occupied Deutschland » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:26 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:Russia Today.
Ehnope. Conversation either didn't happen, or didn't happen as that 'leak' sounds.
This is one case where I have no doubt the data is genuine: Two Ukrainians talking about how angry they are that their country has been ass-raped by Russia.
But the amazing thing here is what's to come: Russia and all of its apologists will express outrage over the Ukrainians' outrage and cite this as further evidence of their need to bring the Ukraine to heel. That's the thing about brutes: It's not enough to brutalize their victims; they have to then have their victims express their fawning gratitude over having been brutalized in turn.

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:29 am
Baltenstein wrote:Scholmeria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RxSzSWbcxo
I though all the time that she was a corrupt gas princess who had good relations with Putin.
You would think that politicians would have learned to watch their words when they are talking about Ukraine-related topics over the phone by now.
Seriously, where do the Russians get all those leaks from?

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:32 am

by Priory Academy USSR » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:33 am
Occupied Deutschland wrote:If anti-Russia sentiment takes off to a greater extent in Ukraine than it already had, Russia has no one to blame but themselves.

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:46 am
Priory Academy USSR wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:If anti-Russia sentiment takes off to a greater extent in Ukraine than it already had, Russia has no one to blame but themselves.
You're saying that as if it would be a problem for the Russian government. Having fervently anti-Russian fascists in power would only weaken the position of Ukraine in Crimea (and if Putin pushes it, Eastern Ukraine as a whole).

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:48 am

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:54 am
Scholmeria wrote:Another anti-Ukrainian rand comes from Gregory Gysi, parliamentarian in the German Bundestag of the party Die Linke (successor of the former SED party that ruled East Germany for about 40 years; literary the party is translate as "the Left") who said that Ukraine is ruled by fascist and saying lies about the suppose progroms of Russians which is bullshit. Given that he and his party are a Cold War relic it is not wondering.
Thanks God Merkel beated the Left in most former East German Federal states and made the party even more weaker.

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:06 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:
But yes, I don't exactly see how it isn't understandable. She's been a large proponent of friendly ties with Russia/Putin in the past, having part of the country conquered by them/him must be a rather brutal wakeup call. Not exactly prone to inspire a fawning attitude for the Russian Federation.
If anti-Russia sentiment takes off to a greater extent in Ukraine than it already had, Russia has no one to blame but themselves.

by Gravlen » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:09 pm
Baltenstein wrote:Scholmeria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RxSzSWbcxo
I though all the time that she was a corrupt gas princess who had good relations with Putin.
You would think that politicians would have learned to watch their words when they are talking about Ukraine-related topics over the phone by now.
Seriously, where do the Russians get all those leaks from?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bawkie
Advertisement