It's nice to have the option of losing without hanging.
Advertisement

by Alien Space Bats » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:07 pm

by Estruia » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:22 pm

by Greed and Death » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:31 pm

by Estruia » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:32 pm

by OMGeverynameistaken » Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:49 pm
Estruia wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Are you really suggesting that the Russians are going to fly an invasion force over Ukraine and parachute them into Moldova?
Are you even aware of the region's geography?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ionMap.png
Do you see that small strip of land between the Black Sea and Moldova? It wouldn't take much to launch helicopters from a vessel in the Black Sea, and fly them into Moldova.

by Estruia » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:46 pm
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Brilliant!Estruia wrote:
Are you even aware of the region's geography?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ionMap.png
Do you see that small strip of land between the Black Sea and Moldova? It wouldn't take much to launch helicopters from a vessel in the Black Sea, and fly them into Moldova.
Are you even aware of basic strategy and logistics?
The Mi-17, which I believe is still the main Russian transport helicopter, has a range of about 500km. Assuming they took off from the westernmost city in Crimea (unlikely,) they would have a 250km trip to the very edge of Moldova. So it's either a one way trip or those helicopters are dropping the Russian troops right on the border with Ukraine. Assuming nobody in Ukraine or NATO starts WWIII at any point in this exchange, what do the Russian troops do? They've just been dumped in a landlocked, neutral country with whatever supplies they can carry (supplies would have to be light, after all, since the helicopters are operating at their maximum round-trip range.)
Of course, NATO and Ukraine are both on high alert and are probably watching the Black Sea like some kind of metaphorical predatory birdlike animal, meaning that Moldova will have at least a couple hours of warning when those Russian birds take off. So any Russian landing party will no doubt have a welcome prepared for them.
So no, it's not impossible. Just stupid.

by Dictatorship Of Serdaristan » Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:16 pm
Estruia wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Brilliant!
Are you even aware of basic strategy and logistics?
The Mi-17, which I believe is still the main Russian transport helicopter, has a range of about 500km. Assuming they took off from the westernmost city in Crimea (unlikely,) they would have a 250km trip to the very edge of Moldova. So it's either a one way trip or those helicopters are dropping the Russian troops right on the border with Ukraine. Assuming nobody in Ukraine or NATO starts WWIII at any point in this exchange, what do the Russian troops do? They've just been dumped in a landlocked, neutral country with whatever supplies they can carry (supplies would have to be light, after all, since the helicopters are operating at their maximum round-trip range.)
Of course, NATO and Ukraine are both on high alert and are probably watching the Black Sea like some kind of metaphorical predatory birdlike animal, meaning that Moldova will have at least a couple hours of warning when those Russian birds take off. So any Russian landing party will no doubt have a welcome prepared for them.
So no, it's not impossible. Just stupid.
If Helicopters are a no-go, why could they just not do what they did in Crimea, and use military transport planes to fly troops into the region? I'm sure Transnistria has civilian airports with airstrips large enough for some Il-76's to land.

by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:19 pm
Dictatorship Of Serdaristan wrote:Estruia wrote:
If Helicopters are a no-go, why could they just not do what they did in Crimea, and use military transport planes to fly troops into the region? I'm sure Transnistria has civilian airports with airstrips large enough for some Il-76's to land.
Theyd likely use fixed wing aircraft, VDV soldiers and BMD Airdroppable IFV's.

by Alien Space Bats » Sun Mar 23, 2014 11:35 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:All of which would, of course, be "local Transnistria self-defense forces with equipment from the corner store".

by OMGeverynameistaken » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:06 am
Estruia wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:
Brilliant!
Are you even aware of basic strategy and logistics?
The Mi-17, which I believe is still the main Russian transport helicopter, has a range of about 500km. Assuming they took off from the westernmost city in Crimea (unlikely,) they would have a 250km trip to the very edge of Moldova. So it's either a one way trip or those helicopters are dropping the Russian troops right on the border with Ukraine. Assuming nobody in Ukraine or NATO starts WWIII at any point in this exchange, what do the Russian troops do? They've just been dumped in a landlocked, neutral country with whatever supplies they can carry (supplies would have to be light, after all, since the helicopters are operating at their maximum round-trip range.)
Of course, NATO and Ukraine are both on high alert and are probably watching the Black Sea like some kind of metaphorical predatory birdlike animal, meaning that Moldova will have at least a couple hours of warning when those Russian birds take off. So any Russian landing party will no doubt have a welcome prepared for them.
So no, it's not impossible. Just stupid.
If Helicopters are a no-go, why could they just not do what they did in Crimea, and use military transport planes to fly troops into the region? I'm sure Transnistria has civilian airports with airstrips large enough for some Il-76's to land.

by Dictatorship Of Serdaristan » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:23 am
OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Estruia wrote:
If Helicopters are a no-go, why could they just not do what they did in Crimea, and use military transport planes to fly troops into the region? I'm sure Transnistria has civilian airports with airstrips large enough for some Il-76's to land.
Once the first wave lands, the airspace is going to be swarming with NATO forces. Putin's not going to risk the embarrassment of a Russian force stranded in Moldova. Even if they don't get cut off, they're still left with the problem of supplying forces in the region.
A quick look at the Moldovan airport pages on Wikipedia (there are only 5 operational airports in the country, and two of those are listed as 'unclear' status...I'm not sure what that means,) indicates that there are 4 airports capable of landing an Il-76. Two of those have rather short runways and are probably unmaintained (hence their 'unclear' status,) a third is a military airbase (landing there would probably be a bad idea,) and the third is Moldova's international airport. Chisinau International has ONE runway. I hope the mighty Russian war machine is familiar with holding patterns, because all those VDV troops and airborne APCs people are envisioning are going to be waiting for a while.
Chisinau International isn't located in a particularly convenient area for access to the disputed region and, quite frankly, I don't think that Putin, however blatant his seizure of part of Ukraine might have been, is going to try outright annexing a landlocked, avowedly neutral, country of minimal strategic value which is surrounded by states that don't like Russia, one of which is a NATO member. And really, Moldova's top export is sunflower seeds. Most of which they already sell to Russia anyway.
So yeah, accepting that Putin is a megalomaniac with plans for world domination, I don't think he's going to lubricate the conquering Russian steambearroller with sunflower oil.

by Beta Test » Mon Mar 24, 2014 1:34 am

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 3:19 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:greed and death wrote:Russia would argue this self defense forces spontaneously took up arms.
Yeah, well, wait until some of them are captured and interrogated, and thus forced to divulge their names, ranks, and service ID numbers. Then it will be fucking obvious that they're not just locals who took up arms.

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:37 am
Volnotova wrote:Russian state duma to the polish foreign ministry: Lets divide Ukraine.
What the actual fuck?

by Kvatchdom » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:41 am
Baltenstein wrote:Volnotova wrote:Russian state duma to the polish foreign ministry: Lets divide Ukraine.
What the actual fuck?
Arch-troll Vladimir "Let's flood Great Britain with nukes" Zhirinovsky strikes again.

by Tiesabre » Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:45 am
Volnotova wrote:Russian state duma to the polish foreign ministry: Lets divide Ukraine.
What the actual fuck?

by Respawn » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:03 am
Volnotova wrote:Russian state duma to the polish foreign ministry: Lets divide Ukraine.
What the actual fuck?

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:03 am
Baltenstein wrote:Volnotova wrote:Russian state duma to the polish foreign ministry: Lets divide Ukraine.
What the actual fuck?
Arch-troll Vladimir "Let's flood Great Britain with nukes" Zhirinovsky strikes again.

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:10 am

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:19 am
Baltenstein wrote:Scholmeria wrote:You should respect him more. He is the opposition to Putin in the Duma.
He's a clown whose role is to rally nationalist crazies behind him and make Putin look like a reasonable, liberal guy. When it comes to parliamentary votes, he always backs Putin's decisions. I doubt he takes himself very seriously.

by Scholmeria » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:20 am

by Baltenstein » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:08 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bawkie, Google [Bot]
Advertisement