The Republican Path To Victory II

by **Hakio** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:34 am

"Minorities only vote for those of their own ethnicity"
Racist much? I mean you're generalizing entire ethnicities into a stereotype. Also, maybe they vote inside their own ethnicity because you right wingers couldn't give a damn about the civil liberties. Random pat-downs of African Americans in public for looking suspicious is now legal in some parts of the country.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:34 am

Divair wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:uhhuh

Abandon ship yet?

Nope. Not even close.

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:34 am

Divair wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:uhhuh

Abandon ship yet?

there is no sense debating foxnews in a thread that isn't about foxnews.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:34 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Viritica wrote:They don't actually lie, contrary to popular belief.

uhhuh

Provide me with proof.

by **European Socialist Republic** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am

Viritica wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:its the lies.

foxnews is the only channel that I have seen cause people to break into spontaneous rants in public.

They don't actually lie, contrary to popular belief.

Nope, they just distort the truth. That or they live in an alternate universe.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Divair wrote:Abandon ship yet?

there is no sense debating foxnews in a thread that isn't about foxnews.

Yet somehow it manages to get brought up.

by **Hakio** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am

Pilotto wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:its the lies.

foxnews is the only channel that I have seen cause people to break into spontaneous rants in public.

I'm not sure what you mean by that. All news is biased to a certain degree, and Fox News is the only cable news channel with a conservative slant. So I find it amusing when die-hard MSNBC fans attack Fox News, and blind themselves to their own hypocrisy.

MSNBC is a bunch of blithering idiots. They are weak sauce liberals who are over concerned with political correctness and apologize for everything.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:35 am

European Socialist Republic wrote:
Viritica wrote:They don't actually lie, contrary to popular belief.

Nope, they just distort the truth. That or they live in an alternate universe.

>coming from someone who most likely hasn't even seen Fox News before and thus can provide no instances

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:36 am

Hakio wrote:"Minorities only vote for those of their own ethnicity"
Racist much? I mean you're generalizing entire ethnicities into a stereotype. Also, maybe they vote inside their own ethnicity because you right wingers couldn't give a damn about the civil liberties. Random pat-downs of African Americans in public for looking suspicious is now legal in some parts of the country.

oddly enough minorities vote for candidates that support policies that please minority voters. being of the same group is icing on the cake not the cake itself.

by **Divair** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:36 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Divair wrote:Abandon ship yet?

there is no sense debating foxnews in a thread that isn't about foxnews.

There is no sense in debating kids who will regurgitate nonsense they picked up on InfoWars and blogs. And yet..

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:38 am

Divair wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:there is no sense debating foxnews in a thread that isn't about foxnews.

There is no sense in debating kids who will regurgitate nonsense they picked up on InfoWars and blogs. And yet..

I am immune to be annoyed at "debaters" who change the subject until the find one that they can win on then claim to have won the original point.

by **Divair** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:38 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Divair wrote:There is no sense in debating kids who will regurgitate nonsense they picked up on InfoWars and blogs. And yet..

I am immune to be annoyed at "debaters" who change the subject until the find one that they can win on then claim to have won the original point.

That's impressive. I want some of what you've got.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:39 am

Divair wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:there is no sense debating foxnews in a thread that isn't about foxnews.

There is no sense in debating kids who will regurgitate nonsense they picked up on InfoWars and blogs. And yet..

Which is not what's happening.

So... why are you bitching?

by **Estormo** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:40 am

[nation][/nation]

Divair wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:uhhuh

Abandon ship yet?

Well, they don't lie. But they put the truth on a biased perspective.

by **McNernia** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:40 am

Viritica wrote:
Mcnernia wrote:The way forward is Rand Paul and Chris Christie, both of those men are electable. The Republicans are heading further to the right and well. Me, I support Rand, Christie wont get past the primaries I dont think.

Some fear that Christie might have a heart attack if he was in office

So well Rand Paul?

by **European Socialist Republic** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:40 am

Viritica wrote:
European Socialist Republic wrote:Nope, they just distort the truth. That or they live in an alternate universe.

>coming from someone who most likely hasn't even seen Fox News before and thus can provide no instances

This proves enough:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/1 ... rts/190225

by **Pilotto** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:41 am

This was kinda from earlier in the thread.

Ashmoria wrote:
Pilotto wrote:How do Republicans discriminate against Latinos? If they took the time to come here legally then more power to them. Now, illegal immigrants should be deported, Latino or otherwise.

they pass laws like that one in Arizona where if you look illegal you can be forced to produce papers to prove you are a legal resident.

And how do they determine who "looks" illegal? The law specifically prohibits law enforcement from racially profiling. They can use other evidence, such as maybe the person they suspect of being an illegal immigrant doesn't speak English, or they look really dusty and dirty (like maybe they had been walking through the desert), or they have no form of identification on them whatsoever.

by **Viritica** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:43 am

European Socialist Republic wrote:
Viritica wrote:>coming from someone who most likely hasn't even seen Fox News before and thus can provide no instances

This proves enough:
http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/1 ... rts/190225

And your source found this all out from where exactly?

by **Pilotto** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:44 am

Estormo wrote:[nation][/nation]
Divair wrote:Abandon ship yet?

Well, they don't lie. But they put the truth on a biased perspective.

Kinda like all news sources. Liberals hate Fox because it is the only channel with a bias that they don't agree with.

Mcnernia wrote:
Viritica wrote:Some fear that Christie might have a heart attack if he was in office

So well Rand Paul?

I really like Rand Paul... except that I'm worried that he's secretly an isolationist like his father.

by **Hakio** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:52 am

The only republican nominee I even respect just a little right now is Ron Paul. Because at least he does something different than the rest. I'll tell you in a Republican debate, that idiot Ron Paul totally sounds like the smartest guy in the room.

by **Belmaria** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:53 am

Pilotto wrote:
Estormo wrote:[nation][/nation]
Well, they don't lie. But they put the truth on a biased perspective.

Kinda like all news sources. Liberals hate Fox because it is the only channel with a bias that they don't agree with.

Mcnernia wrote:So well Rand Paul?

I really like Rand Paul... except that I'm worried that he's secretly an isolationist like his father.

Ron Paul is not an isolationist. He's a non-interventionist. There's a difference.

by **Estormo** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:53 am

Hakio wrote:The only republican nominee I even respect just a little right now is Ron Paul. Because at least he does something different than the rest. I'll tell you in a Republican debate, that idiot Ron Paul totally sounds like the smartest guy in the room.

That "Rubio" bloke sounds promising.

by **Saiwania** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:54 am

Myrensis wrote:It's Saiwania, he's all ready acknowledged that he's so terrified of brown people that he plans to flee the country the minute whites are no longer an absolute majority.

What I want is no different from an ethnic Jew wishing to migrate to Israel to be among their own kind. It is less about fear of non-Whites as it is my desire to be with my people. But please, do go on about how much of a despicable person I am for wanting to bask in my ancestral heritage and continue it.

There isn't any point in the GOP trying to appeal to non-Whites if they largely aren't conservative and never will be. I think the root issue at hand is that the platform that the GOP is based on- conservatism, might not be viable anymore. The only winning move would be to move to the left on all of the issues.

by **McNernia** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:55 am

Libertarians are non-interventionist meaning that they want USA to be like Switzerland. And well if Rand is elected then if he is an isolationist...mehh.

by **Spartan Philidelphia** » Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:55 am

Estormo wrote:
Hakio wrote:The only republican nominee I even respect just a little right now is Ron Paul. Because at least he does something different than the rest. I'll tell you in a Republican debate, that idiot Ron Paul totally sounds like the smartest guy in the room.

That "Rubio" bloke sounds promising.

So do you believe that Marco Rubio is part of a Republican Path to Victory? If you do, why?

The Republican Path To Victory II

Who is online