NATION

PASSWORD

Masculinity. What does it mean to be a man?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7636
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:09 am

Eh, bored and will apply MTBI signs to each
Masc-fem
Introvert-extrovert
Intuition-Sensing
Thinking-feeling
Judging-perceiving

User avatar
Unitaristic Regions
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5019
Founded: Apr 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Unitaristic Regions » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:10 am

Hakio wrote:1. Identify themselves as a man.
That's it. If you want to be called a woman or a man, I'll call you whatever you want. Gender doesn't matter to me much anyways.


I'll agree there.
Used to be a straight-edge orthodox communist, now I'm de facto a state-capitalist who dislikes migration and hopes automation will bring socialism under proper conditions.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:10 am

Pragia wrote:Eh, bored and will apply MTBI signs to each
Masc-fem
Introvert-extrovert
Intuition-Sensing
Thinking-feeling
Judging-perceiving

ENTP-ISTP here.

Seems legit.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:11 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Or genetic manipulation? Science has progressed you know....

You said a la Spartana, not a revision of it.

Throwing babies down the abyss is wasteful and stupid when science gives us a even better solution.

I am very certain the spartans would agree.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
New Edom
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23241
Founded: Mar 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Edom » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:12 am

Any of the guys here want to be a house husband? How do women feel about that?
"The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's far more expensive to do things cheaply, and it's more democratic to do things in secret." - Jim Hacker "Yes Minister"

User avatar
Nervium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6513
Founded: Jan 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nervium » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:13 am

New Edom wrote:Any of the guys here want to be a house husband? How do women feel about that?


I'm open to the idea. Being a man.
I've retired from the forums.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:14 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ifreann wrote:So, a person with a penis who doesn't identify as a man is nonetheless a man, according to you?



Nope.

I do not know if that makes me really creepy or deranged.


Neither, it makes you someone who really, really wants to be seen as one or both of those.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:15 am

Nervium wrote:
Valica wrote:I like how Nick Offerman explained how to be a man.

1) Take a bite of steak.
2) Wash it down with some whiskey, preferably single malt scotch.
3) Find a Socialist and punch him or her in the face.
4) Hand-craft a small wooden boot out of cedar.
5) Make love to a partner of your choice, preferably someone who is accepting of your advances.
6) Upon climax, withdraw your firearm and unload some rounds laced with double entendre into the night sky.

Source


Sounds pretty effiminate if you aske me.

Indeed. The first steps should be about killing and butchering an animal, not eating it. *nods*
On topic, I tend to view it as being gentlemanly.
Last edited by Diopolis on Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
United Christian States of America
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Mar 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby United Christian States of America » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:16 am

To be unquestionably expendable and never speak out against the injustice toward them from a cruel, uncaring, gynocentric society.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:19 am

Ovisterra wrote:
CTALNH wrote:I do not know if that makes me really creepy or deranged.


Neither, it makes you someone who really, really wants to be seen as one or both of those.

That argument is rendered null because nobody wants to seem creepy or deranged...
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
New Edom
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23241
Founded: Mar 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Edom » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:19 am

United Christian States of America wrote:To be unquestionably expendable and never speak out against the injustice toward them from a cruel, uncaring, gynocentric society.


Unfortunately. But people need to have a sense of integrity to flourish, and generally our society doesn't teach it to either men or women.
"The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's far more expensive to do things cheaply, and it's more democratic to do things in secret." - Jim Hacker "Yes Minister"

User avatar
Nervium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6513
Founded: Jan 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nervium » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:20 am

New Edom wrote:
United Christian States of America wrote:To be unquestionably expendable and never speak out against the injustice toward them from a cruel, uncaring, gynocentric society.


Unfortunately. But people need to have a sense of integrity to flourish, and generally our society doesn't teach it to either men or women.


And it's also not gynocentric... But that's just a major detail.
I've retired from the forums.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:21 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Neither, it makes you someone who really, really wants to be seen as one or both of those.

That argument is rendered null because nobody wants to seem creepy or deranged...


Evidently at least one person does. *shrug* I'm not gonna pretend I understand the mindset that much.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Magna Libero
Minister
 
Posts: 2864
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Magna Libero » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:21 am

Constaniana wrote:
Magna Libero wrote:That one is able to change a lamp. Obviously. Although, I can't change one and I'm a man, so...

But you can still open jars, right?

No. I would starve if I hadn't women stronger than me to do that. According to the evolution theory I deserve to die, right? :(
Last edited by Magna Libero on Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
hi

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:26 am

I think the most important thing about masculinity is that it's voluntary. Acting like a "real man" out of a wish to conform or due to peer pressure is not manly, it's forcing a role you don't want upon yourself because you're afraid of what other people would think of you. No.

Another thing is tolerance. I've met an unfortunately high amount of Manly Mentm who thought they could assert their manliness by looking down on women, gays, transfolk and other groups who are socially weaker than they are. No. Besides being abhorrent, doing so shows that you are insecure. There's nothing more badass than treating someone with the respect they deserve. It's not manly to punch a queer. It's not manly to tell a woman to get back in the kitchen. It's not manly to mock a fellow man for not liking "manly" things and having no interest in cars, guns and steak (before you ask, I like cars, guns and steak myself).

Hatred and violence don't make a man.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Nervium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6513
Founded: Jan 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nervium » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:27 am

Ayreonia wrote:I think the most important thing about masculinity is that it's voluntary. Acting like a "real man" out of a wish to conform or due to peer pressure is not manly, it's forcing a role you don't want upon yourself because you're afraid of what other people would think of you. No.

Another thing is tolerance. I've met an unfortunately high amount of Manly Mentm who thought they could assert their manliness by looking down on women, gays, transfolk and other groups who are socially weaker than they are. No. Besides being abhorrent, doing so shows that you are insecure. There's nothing more badass than treating someone with the respect they deserve. It's not manly to punch a queer. It's not manly to tell a woman to get back in the kitchen. It's not manly to mock a fellow man for not liking "manly" things and having no interest in cars, guns and steak (before you ask, I like cars, guns and steak myself).

Hatred and violence don't make a man.


Dear God... What are you, a hippie? :lol:

I agree, though.
I've retired from the forums.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:28 am

Ovisterra wrote:
CTALNH wrote:That argument is rendered null because nobody wants to seem creepy or deranged...


Evidently at least one person does. *shrug* I'm not gonna pretend I understand the mindset that much.

You want to seem creepy and deranged?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:29 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Evidently at least one person does. *shrug* I'm not gonna pretend I understand the mindset that much.

You want to seem creepy and deranged?


Am I the one claiming to be at least one of the two? No. That was you.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:30 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Neither, it makes you someone who really, really wants to be seen as one or both of those.

That argument is rendered null because nobody wants to seem creepy or deranged...


Ahem....
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:30 am

Ovisterra wrote:
CTALNH wrote:You want to seem creepy and deranged?


Am I the one claiming to be at least one of the two? No. That was you.

I never claimed I am either neither would I wanna be either I just said I must seem either one or the other.
Last edited by CTALNH on Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:31 am

Ayreonia wrote:I think the most important thing about masculinity is that it's voluntary. Acting like a "real man" out of a wish to conform or due to peer pressure is not manly, it's forcing a role you don't want upon yourself because you're afraid of what other people would think of you. No.

Another thing is tolerance. I've met an unfortunately high amount of Manly Mentm who thought they could assert their manliness by looking down on women, gays, transfolk and other groups who are socially weaker than they are. No. Besides being abhorrent, doing so shows that you are insecure. There's nothing more badass than treating someone with the respect they deserve. It's not manly to punch a queer. It's not manly to tell a woman to get back in the kitchen. It's not manly to mock a fellow man for not liking "manly" things and having no interest in cars, guns and steak (before you ask, I like cars, guns and steak myself).

Hatred and violence don't make a man.

I think this deserves an AQ'd.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Kromar
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 474
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kromar » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:31 am

Part of your confusion about this Rio is that you oppose any given strandard of manhood with manchildishness, and femininity, when each individual item in the standard differentiates between manly men and at least one other group (otherwise the standard would be pointless). So in the example that someone posted above that men must be honorable, you replied asking if a dishonorable person was effeminate or man childish. He is not. Such a man would be immoral, by the moral standards of maleness. I do not know if there is a label for males who occupy that demographic, other than "men who are not real men." but that's kindof a silly name.

Here is a list of what I believe the requirements of "being a man" are, with the groups it differentiates men from being listed with each element.

does not Identify as gender other than male - non cisgendered males
is biologically male - women

And now what follows is a list of manly traits. Not all need be possesed by a man, but certain ones may be essential in order for a man to be a "real man." non males could hold a number of these properties and would then be said to be "manly." Also note that I've tried to eliminate from the list things that an accurate list of womanliness would include, because they would be redundant.

Is largely self reliant - manchildren, boys
Expresses few negative emotions/ holds few negative feelings. Rage is an exception; a real man may on occasion become enraged at no cost to his manliness. - effeminates/manchildren, boys
Socially aggressive: postures himself socially to appear dominant over others, especially when challenged (in the form of insults, shit-testing, and provokation) - effeminates/manchildren, shy guys (depending on how severe the lack of social power)
Strong: Physical strength is valued, as is psychological strength (resistance to depression, lonliness, and other psychological issues that show weakness of some kind.) - boys, effeminates, manchildren
Willing to get dirty: both literally and morally, a man should be willing to do what is necessary. - effeminates, manchildren
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Round and round, and up and down, and back and forth again; Nobody ever loses, 'cause nobody ever wins.

User avatar
Pragia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7636
Founded: May 08, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Pragia » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:32 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Pragia wrote:Eh, bored and will apply MTBI signs to each
Masc-fem
Introvert-extrovert
Intuition-Sensing
Thinking-feeling
Judging-perceiving

ENTP-ISTP here.

Seems legit.

In general the way I see it, not nessecarily correct

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:34 am

CTALNH wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Am I the one claiming to be at least one of the two? No. That was you.

I never claimed I am either


Well that's just not true.

neither would I wanna be either


That's probably true, but I never denied it.

I just said I must seem either one or the other.


Indeed, coming across as edgy and cool and apparently slightly psychopathic seems to be your aim.

But I'm not here to debate this with you. I have nothing to prove and certainly nothing to gain from such a discussion. I'm just pointing it out.
Last edited by Ovisterra on Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:34 am

Ovisterra wrote:
CTALNH wrote:I never claimed I am either


Well that's just not true.

neither would I wanna be either


That's probably true, but I never denied it.

I just said I must seem either one or the other.


Indeed, coming across as edgy and cool and apparently slightly psychopathic seems to be your aim.

But I'm not here to debate this with you. I have nothing to prove and certainly nothing to gain from such a discussion. I'm just pointing it out.

Indeed lets not derail the thread.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cerula, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Floofybit, Hidrandia, HISPIDA, Hurdergaryp, Ifreann, Kerwa, Myrensis, Niolia, Solstice Isle, Stratonesia, UMi-NazKapp Group, Wallachinstein, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads