NATION

PASSWORD

Would you ever want to not feel?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:28 pm

There are people in the world like this.

They're cripplingly indecisive.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:28 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:You can't? How?

People make discourses about how I will not be worthy of society's support and that my future is doomed and I can fap to that.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Euloria wrote:How does that not make sense? When use logic alone, there are only two conclusions. The first is that life has no purpose, as there is no enjoyment, and thus everyone should. The second states life also has no purpose, therefore we must invent one that brings us enjoyment.

Using only logic gets us nowhere.

But logically, one needs to survive and reproduce. If this is fulfilling in and of itself, then logic has accomplished everything it needs.

It all depends on how you define fulfillment, and I'm of the belief that that's cultural, not inherent.

Except without feeling, it is not fulfilling. You do not feel the desire to do it, nor does pure logic lead you to the conclusion that reproduction and survival is necessary.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:From what I've cobbled together from personal experience with family members and myself with depression, the part that's life-destroying is just feeling shitty and apathetic all the time. I don't think I'd mind leaving that behind.

Shitty and apathetic is really general. I was too immature to really comprehend what the hell was happening. Much of it was confused with normal things of puberty, and having to adapt, and the general shittiness of having puppy love and extreme allergic rhinitis does to your humor.

I've had relatives with really severe depression, and they couldn't describe it beyond just feeling terrible all the time and that making them not care about anything else, and it just crushing and crushing.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm

Sometimes, especially in winter months. SAD and all.
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:You can't? How?

People make discourses about how I will not be worthy of society's support and that my future is doomed and I can fap to that.

Meh. So long as you fell satisfied, I suppose you're doing ok.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Utceforp
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Utceforp » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm

Euloria wrote:
Utceforp wrote:I admit that the purpose of life is inherently an emotional concept. However, I would not want to feel, because emotions would be a hindrance to achieving that goal. Letting old people live makes them more happy than killing them would make other people happy, so there's a net gain of happiness.

Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?

Nobody's happiness does. The "value" of a human being is incredibly hard to define, so except in certain circumstances (A young biologist would be worth more than an old musician) you have to assume that people are equal.
Signatures are so 2014.

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Euloria wrote:How does that not make sense? When use logic alone, there are only two conclusions. The first is that life has no purpose, as there is no enjoyment, and thus everyone should. The second states life also has no purpose, therefore we must invent one that brings us enjoyment.

Using only logic gets us nowhere.

The second one works. Logic is the means, emotion is the end. Including emotion in the decisions that are part of the means to the end is what is a problem.

Without emotion though, there is no reason to reach? You do not feel the desire to reach it, nor will you feel the enjoyment at the end. Logic is needed in making decisions certainly, but it is ironically a leap in logic to claim that enjoyment is desirable.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Basking Turtles
Envoy
 
Posts: 336
Founded: Sep 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Basking Turtles » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm

Utceforp wrote:Emotions are the end, but they cannot be the means. If you feel your way through life I doubt you'll be satisfied when you die. In any case, the goal of life is for everyone to be satisfied when they die. Why is your satisfaction more important?

If you have empathy, (part of) your purpose will be to help others.

I understand your idea of rational, logical machines being more efficient. But we are not built like that. We need motivation to function. Emotions motivate you every step of the way. They motivate you to get up in the morning, to get dressed, to get in the car, to turn the key and start driving, and so on.

If you feel nothing, you will wake up in the morning and think: I could get up. Or not. Whatever. So you don't get up, because not moving is easy. I have spent entire days in bed like this, until eventually I had to get up to pee. And I didn't even feel bad about wasting an entire day like that, because I felt nothing. See what I mean? If you don't feel, you don't get anything done.

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Euloria wrote:Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?

Nobody's happiness does. The "value" of a human being is incredibly hard to define, so except in certain circumstances (A young biologist would be worth more than an old musician) you have to assume that people are equal.

Except logically, no one has any value, as without a purpose there is no value to define.
Last edited by Euloria on Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Utceforp
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Utceforp » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm

Euloria wrote:
Utceforp wrote:The second one works. Logic is the means, emotion is the end. Including emotion in the decisions that are part of the means to the end is what is a problem.

Without emotion though, there is no reason to reach? You do not feel the desire to reach it, nor will you feel the enjoyment at the end. Logic is needed in making decisions certainly, but it is ironically a leap in logic to claim that enjoyment is desirable.

If enjoyment isn't desirable, why are you promoting emotions?
Signatures are so 2014.

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:32 pm

Frisivisia wrote:I've had relatives with really severe depression, and they couldn't describe it beyond just feeling terrible all the time and that making them not care about anything else, and it just crushing and crushing.

Emo as it might sound, I felt like a rhinoceros was sit on me and I passed out, then someone made a hole in the ground and to make the rhinoceros go away, also penetrated my trunk with a blade, and now I am slowly healing the broken bones and the wound.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:32 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Euloria wrote:Without emotion though, there is no reason to reach? You do not feel the desire to reach it, nor will you feel the enjoyment at the end. Logic is needed in making decisions certainly, but it is ironically a leap in logic to claim that enjoyment is desirable.

If enjoyment isn't desirable, why are you promoting emotions?

Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:33 pm

Euloria wrote:
Frisivisia wrote:But logically, one needs to survive and reproduce. If this is fulfilling in and of itself, then logic has accomplished everything it needs.

It all depends on how you define fulfillment, and I'm of the belief that that's cultural, not inherent.

Except without feeling, it is not fulfilling. You do not feel the desire to do it, nor does pure logic lead you to the conclusion that reproduction and survival is necessary.

Bullshit. You can look at something and say, "I have done all I need to", thus being fulfilled, without feeling fulfilled, and I think it's really ridiculous that you're saying that logic alone cannot go with feelings because "feeling" is too generic of a term and can describe either a thought or an emotion.

Pure logic says "survive and reproduce", this is the basis of life.

Either way, logic is only a means, logic isn't a place you go to, it's a tool you use, and you're really doling out a pointless philosophical problem as you've defined it so thin that you can't help but be right. That's no good for thought and only stifles the discussion.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Utceforp
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10326
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Utceforp » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:33 pm

Euloria wrote:
Utceforp wrote:If enjoyment isn't desirable, why are you promoting emotions?

Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.

So you're saying that the only way to decide that emotions are valuable is from an emotional standpoint?
Signatures are so 2014.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm

Stovokor wrote:Also i'm a sociopath.

omg me too. let's be friends!
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm

Euloria wrote:
Utceforp wrote:If enjoyment isn't desirable, why are you promoting emotions?

Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.

That's not really explained, is it?
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:Meh. So long as you fell satisfied, I suppose you're doing ok.

2012, 2013 and 2014 have been the best years of my life so far. I couldn't hate my body and my lack of will with my real life more, but I don't feel bad about myself not even a fraction of what it was.

I know this lifestyle isn't and can't be eternal but so can be said of life as a whole, amirite?
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:35 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Euloria wrote:Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.

So you're saying that the only way to decide that emotions are valuable is from an emotional standpoint?

Well, assuming we're not wired to feel them at all, then yes. It would be a waste of bodily resources to make the proper hormones which would go unused.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:36 pm

Frisivisia wrote:Bullshit. You can look at something and say, "I have done all I need to", thus being fulfilled, without feeling fulfilled, and I think it's really ridiculous that you're saying that logic alone cannot go with feelings because "feeling" is too generic of a term and can describe either a thought or an emotion.

Except that fulfillment, as we are both defining it, is a feeling. You can literally fulfill something, as in complete a task, but you do not feel fulfillment, as in the feeling that you achieved something you needed to, as you do not desire to achieve anything.

Frisivisia wrote:Pure logic says "survive and reproduce", this is the basis of life.

There is no reason to do that, on purely logical standpoint, as there is no purpose to continuing it. Were the Earth alive, it would not logically be necessary for it to keep having asteroids slam into it.

Frisivisia wrote:Either way, logic is only a means, logic isn't a place you go to, it's a tool you use, and you're really doling out a pointless philosophical problem as you've defined it so thin that you can't help but be right. That's no good for thought and only stifles the discussion.

I never said logic doesn't have its uses, its immensely important for day-to-day life along with the bigger questions. Emotions and logic are both massively important and neither should be eliminated.
Last edited by Euloria on Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:43 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:37 pm

Frisivisia wrote:
Euloria wrote:Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.

That's not really explained, is it?

Why would it be desirable? There is no reason to feel it.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Euloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 475
Founded: Feb 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:37 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Euloria wrote:Enjoyment is not desirable when you look at it from a purely logical standpoint.

So you're saying that the only way to decide that emotions are valuable is from an emotional standpoint?

To a degree, yes.
Obligatory Signature.'

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:38 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Shnercropolis wrote:Meh. So long as you fell satisfied, I suppose you're doing ok.

2012, 2013 and 2014 have been the best years of my life so far. I couldn't hate my body and my lack of will with my real life more, but I don't feel bad about myself not even a fraction of what it was.

I know this lifestyle isn't and can't be eternal but so can be said of life as a whole, amirite?

Yeh. Future me is totally going to cash in from my work, though.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:44 pm

Euloria wrote:
Utceforp wrote:I admit that the purpose of life is inherently an emotional concept. However, I would not want to feel, because emotions would be a hindrance to achieving that goal. Letting old people live makes them more happy than killing them would make other people happy, so there's a net gain of happiness.

Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?


You made the point more complicated than it already was.

The point me and Utce were discussing was why were emotions and character valuation important. Without emotions you cannot make the logical decisions accurately since you would believe that the most efficient choice to keep the species alive is what needs to happen (in this case murder all the old people and give the young people more resources).

What Utce has said, if I understand correctly, is that even while using logic one can apply emotional net gains and losses and hence his own argument admits that emotions need to be valued when making decisions.

Of course, he is also saying that having emotions is a hindrance to achieve our purpose in life, which I do not agree with since the satisfaction of achieving our purposes in life is also an emotion regardless of how much you sacrifice emotionally down the road.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Katyuscha
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23116
Founded: Sep 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Katyuscha » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:44 pm

Tried it, once. Only made things worse, for me.

Plus, never being able to love sounds like a nightmarish fate.
Very soft
Song

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Rusticus I Damianus, Sovereign Island of Pimland, The Astral Mandate, Tillania, Unoccupied New York

Advertisement

Remove ads