Advertisement

by Sun Wukong » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:28 pm

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:28 pm
Shnercropolis wrote:You can't? How?

by Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Euloria wrote:How does that not make sense? When use logic alone, there are only two conclusions. The first is that life has no purpose, as there is no enjoyment, and thus everyone should. The second states life also has no purpose, therefore we must invent one that brings us enjoyment.
Using only logic gets us nowhere.
But logically, one needs to survive and reproduce. If this is fulfilling in and of itself, then logic has accomplished everything it needs.
It all depends on how you define fulfillment, and I'm of the belief that that's cultural, not inherent.

by Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Frisivisia wrote:From what I've cobbled together from personal experience with family members and myself with depression, the part that's life-destroying is just feeling shitty and apathetic all the time. I don't think I'd mind leaving that behind.
Shitty and apathetic is really general. I was too immature to really comprehend what the hell was happening. Much of it was confused with normal things of puberty, and having to adapt, and the general shittiness of having puppy love and extreme allergic rhinitis does to your humor.

by Gaelic Celtia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:29 pm
Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.

by Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm

by Utceforp » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm
Euloria wrote:Utceforp wrote:I admit that the purpose of life is inherently an emotional concept. However, I would not want to feel, because emotions would be a hindrance to achieving that goal. Letting old people live makes them more happy than killing them would make other people happy, so there's a net gain of happiness.
Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?

by Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:30 pm
Utceforp wrote:Euloria wrote:How does that not make sense? When use logic alone, there are only two conclusions. The first is that life has no purpose, as there is no enjoyment, and thus everyone should. The second states life also has no purpose, therefore we must invent one that brings us enjoyment.
Using only logic gets us nowhere.
The second one works. Logic is the means, emotion is the end. Including emotion in the decisions that are part of the means to the end is what is a problem.

by Basking Turtles » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm
Utceforp wrote:Emotions are the end, but they cannot be the means. If you feel your way through life I doubt you'll be satisfied when you die. In any case, the goal of life is for everyone to be satisfied when they die. Why is your satisfaction more important?

by Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm
Utceforp wrote:Euloria wrote:Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?
Nobody's happiness does. The "value" of a human being is incredibly hard to define, so except in certain circumstances (A young biologist would be worth more than an old musician) you have to assume that people are equal.

by Utceforp » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:31 pm
Euloria wrote:Utceforp wrote:The second one works. Logic is the means, emotion is the end. Including emotion in the decisions that are part of the means to the end is what is a problem.
Without emotion though, there is no reason to reach? You do not feel the desire to reach it, nor will you feel the enjoyment at the end. Logic is needed in making decisions certainly, but it is ironically a leap in logic to claim that enjoyment is desirable.

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:32 pm
Frisivisia wrote:I've had relatives with really severe depression, and they couldn't describe it beyond just feeling terrible all the time and that making them not care about anything else, and it just crushing and crushing.

by Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:32 pm
Utceforp wrote:Euloria wrote:Without emotion though, there is no reason to reach? You do not feel the desire to reach it, nor will you feel the enjoyment at the end. Logic is needed in making decisions certainly, but it is ironically a leap in logic to claim that enjoyment is desirable.
If enjoyment isn't desirable, why are you promoting emotions?

by Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:33 pm
Euloria wrote:Frisivisia wrote:But logically, one needs to survive and reproduce. If this is fulfilling in and of itself, then logic has accomplished everything it needs.
It all depends on how you define fulfillment, and I'm of the belief that that's cultural, not inherent.
Except without feeling, it is not fulfilling. You do not feel the desire to do it, nor does pure logic lead you to the conclusion that reproduction and survival is necessary.

by The Joseon Dynasty » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm
Stovokor wrote:Also i'm a sociopath.

by Frisivisia » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:34 pm
Shnercropolis wrote:Meh. So long as you fell satisfied, I suppose you're doing ok.

by Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:35 pm

by Euloria » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:36 pm
Frisivisia wrote:Bullshit. You can look at something and say, "I have done all I need to", thus being fulfilled, without feeling fulfilled, and I think it's really ridiculous that you're saying that logic alone cannot go with feelings because "feeling" is too generic of a term and can describe either a thought or an emotion.
Frisivisia wrote:Pure logic says "survive and reproduce", this is the basis of life.
Frisivisia wrote:Either way, logic is only a means, logic isn't a place you go to, it's a tool you use, and you're really doling out a pointless philosophical problem as you've defined it so thin that you can't help but be right. That's no good for thought and only stifles the discussion.

by Shnercropolis » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:38 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Shnercropolis wrote:Meh. So long as you fell satisfied, I suppose you're doing ok.
2012, 2013 and 2014 have been the best years of my life so far. I couldn't hate my body and my lack of will with my real life more, but I don't feel bad about myself not even a fraction of what it was.
I know this lifestyle isn't and can't be eternal but so can be said of life as a whole, amirite?

by Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:44 pm
Euloria wrote:Utceforp wrote:I admit that the purpose of life is inherently an emotional concept. However, I would not want to feel, because emotions would be a hindrance to achieving that goal. Letting old people live makes them more happy than killing them would make other people happy, so there's a net gain of happiness.
Except that happiness doesn't exist, because you cannot feel it. And there is the question, why is happiness desirable? If it is, whose takes priority, if anyone's does?
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Google [Bot], Rusticus I Damianus, Sovereign Island of Pimland, The Astral Mandate, Tillania, Unoccupied New York
Advertisement